EVENT>Monday Night Bridge |SESSION>Monday Eve |SECTION> A N-S
------------------------,------ ------------,-------- --------------------------
DATE>July 31, 2017 |CLUB NO.>185264 | 07/31/2017 22:15
---------------------,-- ------------------- -------------,---------------------
DIR> Mike Lipp |RATING>Club Masterpoint (100%, 80%, 70% Open)|MOVEMENT>MITCHELL
------------,-------- ,-------------------------,--------- ---------------------
AVE> 84.0 |TOP> 7 |MP LIMITS>None/500/200 |CLUB>Mike's Games At The CBC
------------ --------- ------------------------- -------------------------------
PAIRS IN STRAT A=9/B=6/C=2 ,---,-------------------------,------,---------,
-------------------------------------------------| | Section | |Section |
No Name Name |Flt|Rnk-A|Rnk-B|Rnk-C| Score | Pct |Awards |
------------------------------------------------- --- ----- ----- ----- ------- ------ ---------
1 Debbie Wiest Pamela Kennedy B . . . 79.36 47.24
2 Donald Pollack Bernice Pollack C . . 1 71.14 42.35 0.14(C)
3 Joyce Tedrick Joy Singerman B . . . 80.80 48.10
4 Nalin Mehta Ila Mehta B 3 2 . 92.17 54.86 0.45(A)
5 Liz Lin Elmer Hubka A 4 . . 88.03 52.40 0.32(A)
6 Judith Lubow Patrick Lammers B 2 1 . 92.34 54.96 0.63(A)
7 Cecilia Kloecker Kathy Rice C . . . 68.65 40.86
8 Doris Kehoe Lilam Stanley A 1 . . 99.51 59.23 0.90(A)
Totals 672.00
**PAIRS**
BOARD 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
/
1> 1.79 1.79 6.36 4.64 1.79 6.36 1.79
-50 ---- -50 420 140 -50 420 -50 ----
2> 2.93 6.36 4.64 0.64 2.93 6.36 0.64
-100 ---- 100 50 -130 -100 100 -130 ----
3> 1.79 5.79 5.79 1.79 3- 5.79 0.07
-1370 ---- -620 -620 -1370 -690 -620 -1440 ----
4> 1.21 3- 2.36 6.36 4.64 0.07 6.36
-630 -600 ---- -620 100 -140 -650 100 ----
5> 2.36 3- 0.64 6.93 5.21 0.64 5.21
-150 -130 ---- -400 50 -110 -400 -110 ----
6> 0.07 1.79 3- 5.79 6.93 4.64 1.79
-300 -130 ---- -110 110 140 -100 -130 ----
7> 5.21 2.93 0.64 5.21 0.64 2.93 6.93
200 100 -140 ---- 200 -140 100 400 ----
8> 4.64 0.64 4.64 2.36 4.64 0.64 6.93
980 490 980 ---- 940 980 490 990 ----
9> 5.21 0.64 0.64 5.21 2.36 6.93 3-
100 -110 -110 ---- 100 -90 300 -50 ----
10> 4.07 1.21 4.07 1.21 5.79 1.21 6.93
-600 -630 -600 -630 ---- -170 -630 200 ----
11> 6.93 2.36 4.64 0.64 0.64 4.64 4.64
450 -50 420 -100 ---- -100 420 420 ----
12> 3- 1.21 0.07 2.36 5.79 4.64 6.93
140 110 -100 130 ---- 180 150 600 ----
13> 2.93 2.93 2.93 6.36 2.93 0.07 6.36
130 130 130 400 130 ---- 100 400 ----
14> 4.64 2.93 0.64 5.79 0.64 2.93 6.93
150 140 110 170 110 ---- 140 200 ----
15> 3- 3- 6.17 3- 6.17 0.17 1-
AVE 620 650 620 650 ---- 500 600 ----
16> 5.79 5.79 2.36 2.36 5.79 2.36 0.07
430 430 400 400 430 400 ---- -50 ----
17> 4.07 1.79 0.07 5.79 1.79 4.07 6.93
120 90 -50 170 90 120 ---- 400 ----
18> 5.79 6.93 3- 3- 3- 1.21 0.07
50 110 -90 -90 -90 -120 ---- -160 ----
19> 0.07 5.21 5.21 1.79 1.79 5.21 5.21
-1370 -600 -600 -630 -630 -600 -600 ---- ----
20> 0.07 5.21 5.21 2.36 5.21 5.21 1.21
-110 100 100 -80 100 100 -90 ---- ----
21> 5.79 1.21 6.93 2.36 3- 4.64 0.07
100 -500 140 -150 -100 50 -800 ---- ----
22> 4- - 2 4- 4- 7 - 4-
-130 -690 -600 -130 -130 100 -690 -130 ----
23> 0 1- 3 6- 1- 6- 4 5
-790 -620 -170 100 -620 100 -110 -100 ----
24> 2- 2- 2- 2- 7 2- 6 2-
-450 -450 -450 -450 -100 -450 -420 -450 ----
25> 6.36 4.64 6.36 1.21 1.21 1.21 3-
---- 400 150 400 -150 -150 -150 -50 ----
26> 4.64 0.07 5.79 2.36 2.36 2.36 6.93
---- -110 -200 100 -170 -170 -170 200 ----
27> 2.36 6.93 5.21 1.21 5.21 0.07 3-
---- 170 480 420 140 420 -100 200 ----
EVENT>Monday Night Bridge |SESSION>Monday Eve |SECTION> A E-W
------------------------,------ ------------,-------- --------------------------
DATE>July 31, 2017 |CLUB NO.>185264 | 07/31/2017 22:15
---------------------,-- ------------------- -------------,---------------------
DIR> Mike Lipp |RATING>Club Masterpoint (100%, 80%, 70% Open)|MOVEMENT>MITCHELL
------------,-------- ,-------------------------,--------- ---------------------
AVE> 84.0 |TOP> 7 |MP LIMITS>None/500/200 |CLUB>Mike's Games At The CBC
------------ --------- ------------------------- -------------------------------
PAIRS IN STRAT A=9/B=6/C=4 ,---,-------------------------,------,---------,
-------------------------------------------------| | Section | |Section |
No Name Name |Flt|Rnk-A|Rnk-B|Rnk-C| Score | Pct |Awards |
------------------------------------------------- --- ----- ----- ----- ------- ------ ---------
1 Joseph Kammer Gail Zimmer B 2 1 . 101.91 60.66 0.63(A)
2 Pete Williams Matt Williams C . . 2 81.45 48.48 0.20(C)
3 Lewis Temples Richard Koch C 4 2 1 86.06 51.23 0.34(B)
4 Myrna Waak Ralph Terbrueggen B . . . 69.20 41.19
5 Patrick Hoffman William Cook A . . . 81.27 48.38
6 Pam Campbell Robert Roark A 3 . . 97.74 58.18 0.45(A)
7 Joan Diers Evelyn McCarthy C . . . 69.14 41.15
8 Amy Connett Pat Lindeman C . . . 50.94 30.32
9 Stephen Felson Robert Brown A 1 . . 115.74 68.89 0.90(A)
Totals 753.45
**PAIRS**
BOARD 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
/
1> 5.21 5.21 0.64 5.21 5.21 0.64 2.36
50 50 ---- -420 50 50 -420 ---- -140
2> 4.07 4.07 0.64 0.64 6.36 2.36 6.36
100 100 ---- -100 -100 130 -50 ---- 130
3> 5.21 3- 1.21 1.21 6.93 1.21 5.21
1370 690 ---- 620 620 1440 620 ---- 1370
4> 2.36 3- 6.93 0.64 4.64 0.64 5.79
140 600 650 ---- -100 620 ---- -100 630
5> 1.79 3- 6.36 1.79 6.36 0.07 4.64
110 130 400 ---- 110 400 ---- -50 150
6> 0.07 5.21 2.36 5.21 3- 1.21 6.93
-140 130 100 ---- 130 110 ---- -110 300
7> 4.07 4.07 6.36 0.07 1.79 1.79 6.36
-100 -100 140 -400 ---- ---- -200 -200 140
8> 6.36 6.36 2.36 0.07 4.64 2.36 2.36
-490 -490 -980 -990 ---- ---- -940 -980 -980
9> 6.36 0.07 6.36 3- 1.79 1.79 4.64
110 -300 110 50 ---- ---- -100 -100 90
10> 5.79 2.93 0.07 5.79 2.93 1.21 5.79
630 600 -200 630 ---- ---- 600 170 630
11> 2.36 2.36 2.36 6.36 0.07 6.36 4.64
-420 -420 -420 100 ---- ---- -450 100 50
12> 2.36 6.93 0.07 4.64 3- 1.21 5.79
-150 100 -600 -130 ---- ---- -140 -180 -110
13> 4.07 0.64 0.64 4.07 4.07 4.07 6.93
-130 -400 -400 ---- -130 -130 ---- -130 -100
14> 6.36 0.07 1.21 6.36 2.36 4.07 4.07
-110 -200 -170 ---- -110 -150 ---- -140 -140
15> 0.83 5- 3- 0.83 3- 3- 6.83
-650 -600 -620 ---- -650 AVE ---- -620 -500
16> 6.93 4.64 1.21 1.21 4.64 1.21 4.64
50 -400 ---- -430 -430 -400 -430 ---- -400
17> 0.07 1.21 5.21 2.93 2.93 5.21 6.93
-400 -170 ---- -90 -120 -120 -90 ---- 50
18> 6.93 3- 3- 1.21 5.79 0.07 3-
160 90 ---- 90 -50 120 -110 ---- 90
19> 5.21 5.21 6.93 1.79 1.79 1.79 1.79
630 ---- 630 1370 600 600 600 600 ----
20> 4.64 1.79 6.93 1.79 1.79 5.79 1.79
80 ---- -100 110 -100 -100 90 -100 ----
21> 4.64 3- 1.21 2.36 5.79 6.93 0.07
150 ---- 100 -100 -50 500 800 -140 ----
22> 2- 2- 0 6- 6- 5 2- 2-
---- 130 130 -100 690 690 600 130 130
23> 5- 7 - 5- 3 4 2 -
---- 620 790 -100 620 110 170 100 -100
24> 0 4- 4- 4- 1 4- 4- 4-
---- 100 450 450 450 420 450 450 450
25> 5.79 5.79 0.64 5.79 2.36 3- 0.64
150 ---- 150 -400 150 -150 50 -400 ----
26> 4.64 4.64 2.36 4.64 6.93 0.07 1.21
170 ---- 170 110 170 200 -200 -100 ----
27> 5.79 1.79 4.64 6.93 0.07 3- 1.79
-140 ---- -420 -170 100 -480 -200 -420 ----
Monday Night Bridge, Monday Eve, July 31, 2017
Board 1 North Deals None Vul |
♠ | 5 3 2 | ♥ | A 8 7 4 | ♦ | J 9 6 5 4 | ♣ | 10 |
|
♠ | Q 9 8 | ♥ | J 10 6 | ♦ | Q 2 | ♣ | A J 8 5 3 |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | A 10 7 6 4 | ♥ | 5 | ♦ | K 10 8 7 | ♣ | 7 6 2 |
|
|
|
♠ | K J | ♥ | K Q 9 3 2 | ♦ | A 3 | ♣ | K Q 9 4 |
|
NS 4♥; NS 2N; EW 2♠; NS 2♦; EW 1♣; Par +300: EW 4♠×−2
West | North | East | South |
| Pass | Pass | 1 ♥ |
Pass | 3 ♥1 | Pass | 4 ♥ |
Pass | Pass | Pass | |
Contract | Lead | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
4 ♥ | S | 4 | ♣ A | 420 | | 6.36 | 0.64 | 4-Mehta-Mehta | 7-Diers-McCarthy |
4 ♥ | S | 4 | ♠ 9 | 420 | | 6.36 | 0.64 | 7-Kloecker-Rice | 4-Waak-Terbrueggen |
3 ♥ | S | 3 | ♠ 8 | 140 | | 4.64 | 2.36 | 5-Lin-Hubka | 9-Felson-Brown |
4 ♥ | S | −1 | ♠ Q | | 50 | 1.79 | 5.21 | 1-Wiest-Kennedy | 1-Kammer-Zimmer |
3 ♥ | S | −1 | ♦ Q | | 50 | 1.79 | 5.21 | 3-Tedrick-Singerman | 5-Hoffman-Cook |
4 ♥ | N | −1 | ♠ 8 | | 50 | 1.79 | 5.21 | 6-Lubow-Lammers | 2-Williams-Williams |
4 ♥ | S | −1 | ♦ Q | | 50 | 1.79 | 5.21 | 8-Kehoe-Stanley | 6-Campbell-Roark |
N/S lose one Spade trick, one Diamond, and one Club, making four. If West
leads a trump (as they should on the auction), many declarers will get the hand
wrong. After a trump lead, declarer doesn't have the timing to ruff two Clubs,
so they should switch tactics. South should win trick one in their hand and
play a small Club towards the ♣T in dummy. West will hop with the ♣ J and
play another round of trumps, but declarer is now in control. The ♣ K is
covered by the ♣ A and ruffed in dummy. The ♥ A pulls the last trump, and a
small Spade is led towards the closed hand. As long as declarer guesses
correctly in Spades, the only other loser they'll have is a Diamond, making
four. Nicely played!
Board 2 East Deals N-S Vul |
♠ | Q 5 2 | ♥ | K Q 8 4 3 | ♦ | Q 10 3 | ♣ | Q 2 |
|
♠ | 9 4 | ♥ | A 10 6 | ♦ | A 9 6 4 | ♣ | A J 9 5 |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | K J 8 6 3 | ♥ | 2 | ♦ | K J 7 | ♣ | 10 7 6 3 |
|
|
|
♠ | A 10 7 | ♥ | J 9 7 5 | ♦ | 8 5 2 | ♣ | K 8 4 |
|
EW 5♣; EW 3♠; EW 4♦; EW 1N; Par −400
West | North | East | South |
| | Pass | Pass |
1 ♦ | 1 ♥ | 1 ♠1 | 2 ♥ |
Pass | Pass | Dbl2 | Pass |
3 ♣ | Pass | Pass | Pass |
- Showing 5+ Spades
- Do something smart, partner
|
Contract | Lead | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
3 ♣ | W | −2 | ♥ K | 100 | | 6.36 | 0.64 | 3-Tedrick-Singerman | 5-Hoffman-Cook |
4 ♠ | E | −2 | ♥ 5 | 100 | | 6.36 | 0.64 | 7-Kloecker-Rice | 4-Waak-Terbrueggen |
3 ♠ | E | −1 | ♥ J | 50 | | 4.64 | 2.36 | 4-Mehta-Mehta | 7-Diers-McCarthy |
3 ♥ | N | −1 | ♦ 7 | | 100 | 2.93 | 4.07 | 1-Wiest-Kennedy | 1-Kammer-Zimmer |
3 ♥ | N | −1 | ♠ 3 | | 100 | 2.93 | 4.07 | 6-Lubow-Lammers | 2-Williams-Williams |
3 ♦ | W | 4 | ♥ 4 | | 130 | 0.64 | 6.36 | 5-Lin-Hubka | 9-Felson-Brown |
3 ♣ | W | 4 | ♥ K | | 130 | 0.64 | 6.36 | 8-Kehoe-Stanley | 6-Campbell-Roark |
It's surprising that 2 ♥ by N/S goes down two, but it does. If West can find
the pass of East's balancing double, they'll get a top board. As it is....
E/W lose one Club trick and one Spade, making five. North will lead the ♥ K.
Board 3 South Deals E-W Vul |
♠ | 5 | ♥ | 8 6 3 | ♦ | J 10 3 | ♣ | Q 9 6 5 4 3 |
|
♠ | K J 9 7 | ♥ | Q 9 7 5 | ♦ | 7 | ♣ | K J 10 7 |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | A 8 6 | ♥ | A K | ♦ | A K Q 9 8 5 2 | ♣ | 8 |
|
|
|
♠ | Q 10 4 3 2 | ♥ | J 10 4 2 | ♦ | 6 4 | ♣ | A 2 |
|
EW 6N; EW 6♠; EW 6♦; EW 5♥; EW 3♣; Par −1440
West | North | East | South |
| | | Pass |
Pass | Pass | 2 ♣ | Pass |
2 ♦1 | Pass | 4 ♦2 | Pass |
4 ♠3 | Pass | 6 ♦ | Pass |
Pass | Pass | | |
- Showing an Ace, King, or QQ
- RKC Blackwood (Minorwood) for Diamonds
- 1430 response showing 0 or 3 keycards
|
Contract | Lead | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
5 ♦ | E | 6 | ♦ 4 | | 620 | 5.79 | 1.21 | 3-Tedrick-Singerman | 5-Hoffman-Cook |
5 ♦ | E | 6 | ♣ A | | 620 | 5.79 | 1.21 | 4-Mehta-Mehta | 7-Diers-McCarthy |
5 ♦ | E | 6 | ♣ A | | 620 | 5.79 | 1.21 | 7-Kloecker-Rice | 4-Waak-Terbrueggen |
3 NT | E | 6 | ♠ 3 | | 690 | 3.50 | 3.50 | 6-Lubow-Lammers | 2-Williams-Williams |
6 ♦ | W | 6 | ♠ 5 | | 1370 | 1.79 | 5.21 | 1-Wiest-Kennedy | 1-Kammer-Zimmer |
6 ♦ | E | 6 | ♣ A | | 1370 | 1.79 | 5.21 | 5-Lin-Hubka | 9-Felson-Brown |
6 NT | W | 6 | ♣ 6 | | 1440 | 0.07 | 6.93 | 8-Kehoe-Stanley | 6-Campbell-Roark |
East was pretty sure they were going to be in 6 ♦ when they picked up their
hand. They were right. E/W lose one Club trick, making six. If North leads
anything other than a Club, E/W will make seven when dummy's ♣ 8 goes away on
the ♥ Q. It's more likely that North will lead their stiff Spade (or a trump).
Both are disastrous.
Board 4 West Deals Both Vul |
♠ | 4 | ♥ | K 9 7 4 | ♦ | A K 9 5 4 | ♣ | 9 6 3 |
|
♠ | K J 10 9 6 | ♥ | 10 5 3 | ♦ | Q 10 2 | ♣ | A J |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | A 8 3 | ♥ | A J 8 | ♦ | J 7 3 | ♣ | K Q 10 8 |
|
|
|
♠ | Q 7 5 2 | ♥ | Q 6 2 | ♦ | 8 6 | ♣ | 7 5 4 2 |
|
EW 4N; EW 4♠; EW 4♣; EW 2♥; EW 2♦; Par −630
West | North | East | South |
Pass | Pass | 1 NT1 | Pass |
2 ♥2 | Pass | 2 ♠ | Pass |
3 NT | Pass | 4 ♠ | Pass |
Pass | Pass | | |
Contract | Lead | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
3 NT | E | −1 | ♠ 2 | 100 | | 6.36 | 0.64 | 5-Lin-Hubka | 8-Connett-Lindeman |
4 ♠ | E | −1 | ♦ 6 | 100 | | 6.36 | 0.64 | 8-Kehoe-Stanley | 5-Hoffman-Cook |
1 ♠ | W | 3 | ♦ A | | 140 | 4.64 | 2.36 | 6-Lubow-Lammers | 1-Kammer-Zimmer |
3 NT | E | 3 | ♣ 7 | | 600 | 3.50 | 3.50 | 2-Pollack-Pollack | 2-Williams-Williams |
4 ♠ | E | 4 | ♦ 8 | | 620 | 2.36 | 4.64 | 4-Mehta-Mehta | 6-Campbell-Roark |
3 NT | E | 4 | ♣ 5 | | 630 | 1.21 | 5.79 | 1-Wiest-Kennedy | 9-Felson-Brown |
4 ♠ | E | 5 | ♦ 8 | | 650 | 0.07 | 6.93 | 7-Kloecker-Rice | 3-Temples-Koch |
E/W lose two Diamond tricks and one Diamond ruff, making four. 3 NT would
score better, since there are 10 tricks off the top (five Spades, one Heart,
and four Clubs), but it's hard to fault E/W for being in Spades. If South
leads anything other than a Diamond, E/W will make five.
Board 5 North Deals N-S Vul |
♠ | Q 8 | ♥ | 3 | ♦ | A 9 7 6 4 3 | ♣ | A 8 4 2 |
|
♠ | K 7 2 | ♥ | 10 | ♦ | Q 10 8 2 | ♣ | K Q 10 6 5 |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | A J 4 | ♥ | A K 8 7 4 2 | ♦ | 5 | ♣ | J 7 3 |
|
|
|
♠ | 10 9 6 5 3 | ♥ | Q J 9 6 5 | ♦ | K J | ♣ | 9 |
|
EW 4N; EW 4♣; EW 2♥; EW 1♠; Par −430
West | North | East | South |
| 1 ♦1 | 1 ♥ | 1 ♠2 |
Pass | 2 ♣ | Dbl3 | Pass |
3 NT4 | Pass | Pass | Pass |
- Rule of 20 opener
- Showing 5+ Spades
- Do something smart, partner
- Enough of this foolishness
|
Contract | Lead | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
4 ♣ | W | −1 | ♥ 3 | 50 | | 6.93 | 0.07 | 5-Lin-Hubka | 8-Connett-Lindeman |
2 ♥ | E | 2 | ♦ K | | 110 | 5.21 | 1.79 | 6-Lubow-Lammers | 1-Kammer-Zimmer |
2 ♥ | E | 2 | ♣ 9 | | 110 | 5.21 | 1.79 | 8-Kehoe-Stanley | 5-Hoffman-Cook |
3 ♣ | W | 4 | ♥ 3 | | 130 | 3.50 | 3.50 | 2-Pollack-Pollack | 2-Williams-Williams |
2 NT | W | 3 | ♦ 6 | | 150 | 2.36 | 4.64 | 1-Wiest-Kennedy | 9-Felson-Brown |
3 NT | W | 3 | ♦ 6 | | 400 | 0.64 | 6.36 | 4-Mehta-Mehta | 6-Campbell-Roark |
3 NT | W | 3 | ♦ 6 | | 400 | 0.64 | 6.36 | 7-Kloecker-Rice | 3-Temples-Koch |
By the time the bidding reaches West, they're pretty sure the deck has 60 HCP
in it. They're positive of that when it gets back to them again, but they bid
3 NT fully expecting to make it.
E/W take three Spade tricks, two Hearts, one Diamond, and four Clubs, making
four (N/S get two Diamonds and the ♣ A). North has no good lead, but they'll
probably lead a small Diamond. South will win with the ♦ K and return the ♦ J,
but declarer will cover with the ♦ Q and the hand is essentially over.
Board 6 East Deals E-W Vul |
♠ | A Q 10 4 3 | ♥ | Q 9 5 | ♦ | J 6 2 | ♣ | K 8 |
|
♠ | J | ♥ | K J 6 3 | ♦ | 10 9 5 3 | ♣ | A Q 10 2 |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | 9 6 5 | ♥ | A 10 2 | ♦ | A K 8 7 | ♣ | J 7 3 |
|
|
|
♠ | K 8 7 2 | ♥ | 8 7 4 | ♦ | Q 4 | ♣ | 9 6 5 4 |
|
EW 4♥; EW 4♦; EW 2N; EW 3♣; NS 1♠; Par −500: NS 4♠×−3
West | North | East | South |
| | 1 ♦ | Pass |
1 ♥ | 1 ♠ | Dbl1 | 3 ♠2 |
4 ♥3 | Pass | Pass | Pass |
- Alert, support double showing exactly three Hearts
- Weak jump raise
- Not afraid to play in a Moysian fit
|
Contract | Lead | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
3 ♠ | N | 3 | ♦ A | 140 | | 6.93 | 0.07 | 6-Lubow-Lammers | 1-Kammer-Zimmer |
2 ♠ | N | 2 | ♥ 2 | 110 | | 5.79 | 1.21 | 5-Lin-Hubka | 8-Connett-Lindeman |
4 ♠× | N | −1 | ♦ K | | 100 | 4.64 | 2.36 | 7-Kloecker-Rice | 3-Temples-Koch |
3 ♦ | E | 3 | ♠ K | | 110 | 3.50 | 3.50 | 4-Mehta-Mehta | 6-Campbell-Roark |
4 ♦ | E | 4 | ♠ 8 | | 130 | 1.79 | 5.21 | 2-Pollack-Pollack | 2-Williams-Williams |
4 ♦ | E | 4 | ♠ 2 | | 130 | 1.79 | 5.21 | 8-Kehoe-Stanley | 5-Hoffman-Cook |
3 ♠× | N | −2 | ♦ A | | 300 | 0.07 | 6.93 | 1-Wiest-Kennedy | 9-Felson-Brown |
West's 4 ♥ bid, while risky, has a lot going for it. Sometimes trump split
3-3 (36%). Sometimes the defender with the fourth trump will end up ruffing a
loser anyway (105%). That last percentage might have been made up.
E/W lose one Spade trick, one Club, and one Diamond, making four. North will
lead the ♠ A and continue with a low Spade at trick two, ruffed by declarer
with the ♥ 3. If declarer knew that the Club finesse was losing, they wouldn't
bother taking it, but they'll probably play a Diamond to the ♦ A and lead the
♣ J losing to North's ♣ K. North will probably continue with ♠ Q, but declarer
will ruff with the ♥ 6, cash the ♥ K, and finesse against North's ♥ Q. When
that works, declarer will cash out and concede a Diamond at the end.
Why not pull trump before setting up the Clubs. Well, if you like it when the
opponents cash a bazillion Spades, then by all means pull trump first. I'm
allergic to that.
Board 7 South Deals Both Vul |
♠ | A J 4 2 | ♥ | 4 3 | ♦ | A K J 9 7 | ♣ | 7 6 |
|
♠ | Q 9 7 6 3 | ♥ | 9 | ♦ | 8 5 | ♣ | A K J 5 3 |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | 8 | ♥ | A Q J 7 6 2 | ♦ | Q 4 3 | ♣ | 10 9 2 |
|
|
|
♠ | K 10 5 | ♥ | K 10 8 5 | ♦ | 10 6 2 | ♣ | Q 8 4 |
|
EW 2♥; EW 3♣; S 1N; NS 2♦; Par −110
West | North | East | South |
| | | Pass |
1 ♠1 | 2 ♦ | 2 ♥2 | 3 ♦ |
Pass | Pass | 3 ♥ | Dbl |
Pass | Pass | Pass | |
- Rule of 20 opener
- Showing 5+ Hearts and 10+ HCP
|
Contract | Lead | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
4 ♠ | W | −4 | ♦ A | 400 | | 6.93 | 0.07 | 8-Kehoe-Stanley | 4-Waak-Terbrueggen |
3 ♥ | E | −2 | ♦ 6 | 200 | | 5.21 | 1.79 | 1-Wiest-Kennedy | 8-Connett-Lindeman |
3 ♥ | E | −2 | ♠ 5 | 200 | | 5.21 | 1.79 | 5-Lin-Hubka | 7-Diers-McCarthy |
3 ♣ | W | −1 | ♦ A | 100 | | 2.93 | 4.07 | 2-Pollack-Pollack | 1-Kammer-Zimmer |
2 ♠ | W | −1 | ♦ K | 100 | | 2.93 | 4.07 | 7-Kloecker-Rice | 2-Williams-Williams |
3 ♥ | E | 3 | ♦ 6 | | 140 | 0.64 | 6.36 | 3-Tedrick-Singerman | 3-Temples-Koch |
2 ♥ | E | 3 | ♦ 2 | | 140 | 0.64 | 6.36 | 6-Lubow-Lammers | 9-Felson-Brown |
When you're responder and you make a pseudo 2/1 response after an overcall,
you're promising partner that you'll take another bid. That sort of backfires
here as E/W get one level too high. Oops.
E/W lose one Spade trick, two Hearts, and two Clubs, down one. South will
probably lead the ♦ 2 (small from an honor).
Board 8 West Deals None Vul |
♠ | K Q 3 | ♥ | A K 10 5 | ♦ | Q 8 | ♣ | A K Q 9 |
|
♠ | 8 6 | ♥ | 8 6 4 3 | ♦ | A 10 9 2 | ♣ | 7 4 2 |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | 10 9 4 | ♥ | Q 9 7 2 | ♦ | 7 5 4 3 | ♣ | J 5 |
|
|
|
♠ | A J 7 5 2 | ♥ | J | ♦ | K J 6 | ♣ | 10 8 6 3 |
|
NS 6N; NS 6♠; NS 6♣; NS 5♥; NS 3♦; Par +990
West | North | East | South |
Pass | 2 ♣ | Pass | 2 ♦1 |
Pass | 2 NT | Pass | 3 ♥2 |
Pass | 3 ♠ | Pass | 4 ♦3 |
Pass | 4 NT4 | Pass | 5 ♣5 |
Pass | 6 NT | Pass | Pass |
Pass | | | |
- Showing an Ace, King, or QQ
- Transfer
- Showing 1st or 2nd round control in Diamonds and indicating a problem in Clubs
- RKC Blackwood (Kickback) for Spades
- 1430 response showing 1 or 4 keycards
|
Contract | Lead | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
6 NT | N | 6 | ♥ 2 | 990 | | 6.93 | 0.07 | 8-Kehoe-Stanley | 4-Waak-Terbrueggen |
6 ♠ | N | 6 | ♠ 4 | 980 | | 4.64 | 2.36 | 1-Wiest-Kennedy | 8-Connett-Lindeman |
6 ♠ | S | 6 | ♦ A | 980 | | 4.64 | 2.36 | 3-Tedrick-Singerman | 3-Temples-Koch |
6 ♠ | N | 6 | ♦ 7 | 980 | | 4.64 | 2.36 | 6-Lubow-Lammers | 9-Felson-Brown |
6 ♣ | N | 7 | ♥ 9 | 940 | | 2.36 | 4.64 | 5-Lin-Hubka | 7-Diers-McCarthy |
3 NT | S | 6 | ♥ 8 | 490 | | 0.64 | 6.36 | 2-Pollack-Pollack | 1-Kammer-Zimmer |
3 NT | N | 6 | ♥ 2 | 490 | | 0.64 | 6.36 | 7-Kloecker-Rice | 2-Williams-Williams |
North figures that there are just as many tricks in notrump as there are in
Spades, so they bid the notrump slam (i.e., it's matchpoints). N/S take five
Spade tricks, two Hearts, one Diamond, and four Clubs, making six. There's no
way for N/S to steal 13 tricks without knocking out the ♦ A, so East's choice
of leads is irrelevant. The ♠T looks safe.
Board 9 North Deals E-W Vul |
♠ | A 5 2 | ♥ | 10 8 5 | ♦ | Q J 9 2 | ♣ | Q 10 6 |
|
♠ | J 10 8 | ♥ | Q 7 4 2 | ♦ | A 3 | ♣ | 9 7 5 3 |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | Q 9 6 4 | ♥ | A J | ♦ | 10 6 5 | ♣ | A K 4 2 |
|
|
|
♠ | K 7 3 | ♥ | K 9 6 3 | ♦ | K 8 7 4 | ♣ | J 8 |
|
EW 2♠; NS 1N; EW 2♣; NS 1♦; Par −100: NS 2N×−1
West | North | East | South |
| Pass | 1 ♣ | Pass |
1 ♥ | Pass | 1 ♠ | Pass |
1 NT | Pass | Pass | Pass |
Contract | Lead | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
3 NT | W | −3 | ♦ Q | 300 | | 6.93 | 0.07 | 7-Kloecker-Rice | 2-Williams-Williams |
2 ♥ | W | −1 | ♦ Q | 100 | | 5.21 | 1.79 | 1-Wiest-Kennedy | 8-Connett-Lindeman |
1 NT | W | −1 | ♦ 2 | 100 | | 5.21 | 1.79 | 5-Lin-Hubka | 7-Diers-McCarthy |
2 ♦ | N | −1 | ♥ A | | 50 | 3.50 | 3.50 | 8-Kehoe-Stanley | 4-Waak-Terbrueggen |
1 NT | W | 1 | ♦ K | | 90 | 2.36 | 4.64 | 6-Lubow-Lammers | 9-Felson-Brown |
1 ♠ | E | 2 | ♦ 8 | | 110 | 0.64 | 6.36 | 2-Pollack-Pollack | 1-Kammer-Zimmer |
1 ♠ | E | 2 | ♥ 3 | | 110 | 0.64 | 6.36 | 3-Tedrick-Singerman | 3-Temples-Koch |
N/S take two Spade tricks, one Heart, one Club, and three Diamonds, making
one. Problem is, N/S aren't declaring. E/W, on the other hand, take one
Diamond trick, one Heart, two Spades, and two Clubs, down one. Or E/W will
take one Diamond trick, one Heart, one Spade, and three Clubs, down one as
well. Sigh.
South may lead the ♦ 4 on the auction, and declarer will likely hold up the ♦ A
one round. When in with the ♦ A, declarer has a choice of ways to start
getting additional tricks. If they play a Spade, North will hop with the ♠ A
and play a Heart. Declarer will win with the ♥ A (if they duck this trick, the
Heart suit will remain blocked) and play a second Spade. South will duck once
to restrict entries to dummy and declarer will switch their attention to Clubs.
Unfortunately, N/S have already established three Diamond tricks, one Heart,
two Spades, plus the Club trick they're about to get.
1 NT contracts are often a race to seven tricks. If you're not vulnerable, you
don't mind declaring the hand and losing the race, since defeating 1 NT a single
trick is worth +50 to the opponents versus the +90 they would have gotten
declaring the hand. If you're vulnerable, +100 to the opponents is an
unfortunate score.
Board 10 East Deals Both Vul |
♠ | A 10 | ♥ | Q 9 4 3 | ♦ | 10 7 6 | ♣ | Q J 7 6 |
|
♠ | Q J 9 7 2 | ♥ | A 2 | ♦ | K Q 5 2 | ♣ | K 9 |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | K 3 | ♥ | J 10 8 7 6 | ♦ | A 8 | ♣ | A 5 3 2 |
|
|
|
♠ | 8 6 5 4 | ♥ | K 5 | ♦ | J 9 4 3 | ♣ | 10 8 4 |
|
EW 5♠; EW 4N; EW 4♥; EW 4♦; EW 3♣; Par −650
West | North | East | South |
| | 1 ♥ | Pass |
1 ♠ | Pass | 2 ♣ | Pass |
2 ♦1 | Pass | 2 NT2 | Pass |
3 NT | Pass | Pass | Pass |
- Alert, artificial Fourth-Suit bid forcing to game
- Denying a third Spade and a fourth Diamond, but showing a Diamond stopper for notrump
|
Contract | Lead | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
6 NT | E | −2 | ♣ 8 | 200 | | 6.93 | 0.07 | 8-Kehoe-Stanley | 3-Temples-Koch |
1 ♠ | W | 4 | ♣ Q | | 170 | 5.79 | 1.21 | 6-Lubow-Lammers | 8-Connett-Lindeman |
3 NT | E | 3 | ♣ 8 | | 600 | 4.07 | 2.93 | 1-Wiest-Kennedy | 7-Diers-McCarthy |
3 NT | E | 3 | ♠ 8 | | 600 | 4.07 | 2.93 | 3-Tedrick-Singerman | 2-Williams-Williams |
3 NT | E | 4 | ♦ 3 | | 630 | 1.21 | 5.79 | 2-Pollack-Pollack | 9-Felson-Brown |
3 NT | W | 4 | ♣ 6 | | 630 | 1.21 | 5.79 | 4-Mehta-Mehta | 4-Waak-Terbrueggen |
3 NT | E | 4 | ♦ 3 | | 630 | 1.21 | 5.79 | 7-Kloecker-Rice | 1-Kammer-Zimmer |
E/W take four Spade tricks (the ♠T drops doubleton), three Diamonds, one
Heart, and two Clubs, making four. South won't enjoy being on lead, but a
small Club looks as good as anything.
Board 11 South Deals None Vul |
♠ | A J 3 2 | ♥ | Q 3 2 | ♦ | Q J 10 8 4 | ♣ | 9 |
|
♠ | 8 | ♥ | 8 7 6 5 | ♦ | A 9 7 3 | ♣ | Q J 10 7 |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | K 10 5 4 | ♥ | 4 | ♦ | K 5 2 | ♣ | K 6 4 3 2 |
|
|
|
♠ | Q 9 7 6 | ♥ | A K J 10 9 | ♦ | 6 | ♣ | A 8 5 |
|
NS 4♠; NS 4♥; NS 1N; EW 2♣; NS 1♦; Par +420
West | North | East | South |
| | | 2 ♦1 |
Pass | 2 NT2 | Pass | 3 ♣3 |
Pass | 3 ♠4 | Pass | 4 ♠5 |
Pass | Pass | Pass | |
- Alert, artificial Flannery bid showing exactly four Spades, five Hearts, and 11-15 HCP
- Alert, artificial bid asking for more information about partner's hand
- Alert, artificial bid showing exactly three Clubs
- Willing to play in 3 ♠ opposite a minimum opener
- Not a minimum opener
|
Contract | Lead | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
5 ♥ | S | 5 | ♦ A | 450 | | 6.93 | 0.07 | 1-Wiest-Kennedy | 7-Diers-McCarthy |
4 ♥ | S | 4 | ♠ 8 | 420 | | 4.64 | 2.36 | 3-Tedrick-Singerman | 2-Williams-Williams |
4 ♥ | S | 4 | ♠ 8 | 420 | | 4.64 | 2.36 | 7-Kloecker-Rice | 1-Kammer-Zimmer |
4 ♥ | S | 4 | ♠ 8 | 420 | | 4.64 | 2.36 | 8-Kehoe-Stanley | 3-Temples-Koch |
4 ♠ | N | −1 | ♥ 4 | | 50 | 2.36 | 4.64 | 2-Pollack-Pollack | 9-Felson-Brown |
4 ♥ | S | −2 | ♠ 8 | | 100 | 0.64 | 6.36 | 4-Mehta-Mehta | 4-Waak-Terbrueggen |
4 ♠ | N | −2 | ♥ 4 | | 100 | 0.64 | 6.36 | 6-Lubow-Lammers | 8-Connett-Lindeman |
N/S play a 2 ♦ opening as Flannery showing four Spades, five Hearts, and 11-15
HCP. That's a hand that's traditionally difficult to bid, often resulting in
opener being forced to rebid 2 ♣ with a two-card suit after 1 ♥ - 1 NT - ??.
N/S lose two Spade tricks and one Diamond, making four. East may lead their
stiff ♥ 4. Suspicious of the lead, declarer may win in hand with the ♥ Q and
play the ♠ A and another Spade. If East hops with the ♠ K and plays another
Spade, they'll lose one of their trump tricks, but N/S will gain a Club loser
when declarer is unable to ruff both of dummy's Clubs.
Board 12 West Deals N-S Vul |
♠ | Q 7 6 4 | ♥ | 10 6 | ♦ | 3 2 | ♣ | A K J 6 4 |
|
♠ | J 9 3 2 | ♥ | J 2 | ♦ | J 10 9 4 | ♣ | Q 9 2 |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | K 10 8 | ♥ | K Q 8 7 | ♦ | Q 8 7 6 5 | ♣ | 3 |
|
|
|
♠ | A 5 | ♥ | A 9 5 4 3 | ♦ | A K | ♣ | 10 8 7 5 |
|
NS 3N; NS 5♣; NS 3♥; NS 2♠; EW 2♦; Par +500: EW 5♦×−3
West | North | East | South |
Pass | Pass | Pass | 1 ♥ |
Pass | 1 ♠ | Pass | 2 ♣ |
Pass | 3 ♣1 | Pass | 3 NT |
Pass | Pass | Pass | |
- Showing an invitational hand with length in Clubs
|
Contract | Lead | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
3 NT | S | 3 | ♦ 4 | 600 | | 6.93 | 0.07 | 8-Kehoe-Stanley | 3-Temples-Koch |
1 NT | S | 4 | ♦ 4 | 180 | | 5.79 | 1.21 | 6-Lubow-Lammers | 8-Connett-Lindeman |
1 NT | S | 3 | ♦ J | 150 | | 4.64 | 2.36 | 7-Kloecker-Rice | 1-Kammer-Zimmer |
1 ♥ | S | 3 | ♦ J | 140 | | 3.50 | 3.50 | 1-Wiest-Kennedy | 7-Diers-McCarthy |
4 ♣ | N | 4 | ♦ 6 | 130 | | 2.36 | 4.64 | 4-Mehta-Mehta | 4-Waak-Terbrueggen |
3 ♣ | N | 3 | ♥ K | 110 | | 1.21 | 5.79 | 2-Pollack-Pollack | 9-Felson-Brown |
3 NT | S | −1 | ♠ 2 | | 100 | 0.07 | 6.93 | 3-Tedrick-Singerman | 2-Williams-Williams |
South is all too happy to accept North's game invitation. N/S take one Spade
trick, one Heart, two Diamonds, and five Clubs, making three if they guess the
Clubs correctly. That may not happen, since most declarers will play for 2-2
Clubs and go down one. Oh well. West will lead the ♦ J.
Board 13 North Deals Both Vul |
♠ | A K J 9 2 | ♥ | 9 | ♦ | A Q 7 6 | ♣ | K 10 5 |
|
♠ | 10 8 5 3 | ♥ | A K 5 | ♦ | K 10 | ♣ | A Q 9 8 |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | Q 7 6 | ♥ | 8 6 3 2 | ♦ | 8 4 3 | ♣ | 7 3 2 |
|
|
|
♠ | 4 | ♥ | Q J 10 7 4 | ♦ | J 9 5 2 | ♣ | J 6 4 |
|
NS 3♠; NS 3♥; NS 4♦; NS 2N; NS 3♣; Par +140
West | North | East | South |
| 1 ♠ | Pass | 1 NT1 |
Pass | 2 ♦ | Pass | Pass |
Pass | | | |
Contract | Lead | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
2 ♥ | E | −4 | ♠ 4 | 400 | | 6.36 | 0.64 | 4-Mehta-Mehta | 3-Temples-Koch |
2 ♥ | E | −4 | ♠ 4 | 400 | | 6.36 | 0.64 | 8-Kehoe-Stanley | 2-Williams-Williams |
2 ♦ | N | 4 | ♥ 6 | 130 | | 2.93 | 4.07 | 1-Wiest-Kennedy | 6-Campbell-Roark |
3 ♦ | N | 4 | ♣ 7 | 130 | | 2.93 | 4.07 | 2-Pollack-Pollack | 8-Connett-Lindeman |
3 ♦ | N | 4 | ♥ 6 | 130 | | 2.93 | 4.07 | 3-Tedrick-Singerman | 1-Kammer-Zimmer |
2 ♦ | N | 4 | ♥ 6 | 130 | | 2.93 | 4.07 | 5-Lin-Hubka | 5-Hoffman-Cook |
2 NT | W | −1 | ♠ K | 100 | | 0.07 | 6.93 | 7-Kloecker-Rice | 9-Felson-Brown |
North's hand isn't quite worth a jump-shift rebid of 3 ♦, so they'll bid a
"heavy" 2 ♦. What does "heavy" mean in this context? A two-level rebid in a
new suit by opener shows a hand that ranges from 11 HCP to a really bad 18 HCP.
That's a huge range, and responder is wise to try like heck to take another
bid. In this case, South is thrilled to be able to pass given that they
already stretched a bit to bid once. Also, notice that West, holding 16 HCP,
never took a bid. Why was that? Shouldn't they have bid like crazy with a
hand that good? They should if they like going down three doubled when partner
shows up with nothing. The more points you have in an auction such as this,
the fewer points your partner has. Remember that.
N/S lose one Club trick, one Heart, and one Spade, making four. The proper way
to play the Diamond suit is small to the ♦ Q and then the ♦ A trying to drop a
doubleton ♦ K. East may lead the ♥ 6 (MUD).
Board 14 East Deals None Vul |
♠ | A K Q 4 | ♥ | K Q J | ♦ | Q J 9 4 2 | ♣ | 8 |
|
♠ | 8 6 2 | ♥ | 9 6 3 | ♦ | 10 | ♣ | Q 9 7 4 3 2 |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | J 7 3 | ♥ | A 7 5 | ♦ | A K 8 7 | ♣ | J 10 5 |
|
|
|
♠ | 10 9 5 | ♥ | 10 8 4 2 | ♦ | 6 5 3 | ♣ | A K 6 |
|
NS 3♠; NS 3♥; NS 2N; NS 3♦; EW 1♣; Par +140
West | North | East | South |
| | 1 ♦ | Pass |
Pass | 2 NT1 | Pass | 3 ♣2 |
Pass | 3 ♦3 | Pass | 3 NT |
Pass | Pass | Pass | |
- Showing 18-19 HCP and a balanced or semi-balanced hand
- Puppet Stayman asking for a 5- or 4-card major
- Alert, artificial Puppet Stayman response denying a 5-card major but showing one or more four-card majors
|
Contract | Lead | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
1 ♦ | E | −4 | ♣ A | 200 | | 6.93 | 0.07 | 8-Kehoe-Stanley | 2-Williams-Williams |
1 ♠ | N | 4 | ♦ K | 170 | | 5.79 | 1.21 | 4-Mehta-Mehta | 3-Temples-Koch |
1 ♦ | E | −3 | ♥ 8 | 150 | | 4.64 | 2.36 | 1-Wiest-Kennedy | 6-Campbell-Roark |
3 ♥ | S | 3 | ♦ 10 | 140 | | 2.93 | 4.07 | 2-Pollack-Pollack | 8-Connett-Lindeman |
3 ♥ | S | 3 | ♦ 10 | 140 | | 2.93 | 4.07 | 7-Kloecker-Rice | 9-Felson-Brown |
1 ♥ | S | 2 | ♦ 10 | 110 | | 0.64 | 6.36 | 3-Tedrick-Singerman | 1-Kammer-Zimmer |
2 ♥ | S | 2 | ♦ 10 | 110 | | 0.64 | 6.36 | 5-Lin-Hubka | 5-Hoffman-Cook |
South checks to see if North has a five-card Heart suit, but with 4333 shape,
they don't want to continue to look for a 4-4 major. If East finds a Club lead
or switches to Clubs after grabbing the ♥ A, N/S will take only eight tricks.
Anything else will result in N/S making three, since declarer will be able to
get to dummy with the ♣ A and cash the long Heart.
Board 15 South Deals N-S Vul |
♠ | K 10 7 6 | ♥ | K 4 | ♦ | K 7 | ♣ | J 9 8 6 5 |
|
♠ | 5 | ♥ | J 10 9 5 2 | ♦ | A 9 8 3 2 | ♣ | K 7 |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | 9 8 4 2 | ♥ | Q 7 6 3 | ♦ | J 10 6 | ♣ | Q 3 |
|
|
|
♠ | A Q J 3 | ♥ | A 8 | ♦ | Q 5 4 | ♣ | A 10 4 2 |
|
NS 5♠; NS 4N; NS 5♣; EW 1♥; EW 1♦; Par +650
West | North | East | South |
| | | 1 NT1 |
2 ♦2 | 2 NT3 | Pass | 3 ♣4 |
Pass | 3 ♦5 | Pass | 3 ♠ |
Pass | 4 ♠ | Pass | Pass |
Pass | | | |
- 15 to 17
- Alert, artificial DONT bid showing Diamonds and a higher-ranking suit
- Alert, Lebensohl bid asking partner to bid 3 ♣
- Alert, Lebensohl forced bid
- Alert, cuebid as Stayman with a stopper in Diamonds
|
Contract | Lead | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
4 ♠ | S | 5 | ♥ J | 650 | | 6.17 | 0.83 | 3-Tedrick-Singerman | 1-Kammer-Zimmer |
4 ♠ | S | 5 | ♥ J | 650 | | 6.17 | 0.83 | 5-Lin-Hubka | 5-Hoffman-Cook |
4 ♠ | N | 5 | ♦ J | Ave | Ave | 3.50 | 3.50 | 1-Wiest-Kennedy | 6-Campbell-Roark |
4 ♠ | N | 4 | ♥ 3 | 620 | | 3.50 | 3.50 | 2-Pollack-Pollack | 8-Connett-Lindeman |
4 ♠ | S | 4 | ♦ 3 | 620 | | 3.50 | 3.50 | 4-Mehta-Mehta | 3-Temples-Koch |
3 NT | S | 3 | ♦ 3 | 600 | | 1.50 | 5.50 | 8-Kehoe-Stanley | 2-Williams-Williams |
5 ♥× | E | −3 | ♠ A | 500 | | 0.17 | 6.83 | 7-Kloecker-Rice | 9-Felson-Brown |
N/S lose one Diamond trick and one Club, making five. West may lead the ♥ J.
Board 16 West Deals E-W Vul |
♠ | K Q 8 | ♥ | A Q 9 4 | ♦ | A 2 | ♣ | Q J 8 7 |
|
♠ | 3 | ♥ | J 8 7 6 3 2 | ♦ | J 8 | ♣ | A K 6 4 |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | 10 9 7 6 5 | ♥ | K | ♦ | Q 9 6 4 | ♣ | 9 3 2 |
|
|
|
♠ | A J 4 2 | ♥ | 10 5 | ♦ | K 10 7 5 3 | ♣ | 10 5 |
|
NS 5N; NS 4♠; NS 2♥; NS 3♦; NS 3♣; Par +460
West | North | East | South |
Pass1 | 1 ♣ | Pass | 1 ♠ |
Pass | 2 NT2 | Pass | 3 NT |
Pass | Pass | Pass | |
- Not quite a vulnerable weak two bid
- Showing 18-19 HCP
|
Contract | Lead | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
3 NT | N | 4 | ♦ 4 | 430 | | 5.79 | 1.21 | 1-Wiest-Kennedy | 5-Hoffman-Cook |
3 NT | N | 4 | ♥ K | 430 | | 5.79 | 1.21 | 2-Pollack-Pollack | 7-Diers-McCarthy |
3 NT | S | 4 | ♥ 6 | 430 | | 5.79 | 1.21 | 5-Lin-Hubka | 4-Waak-Terbrueggen |
3 NT | N | 3 | ♥ K | 400 | | 2.36 | 4.64 | 3-Tedrick-Singerman | 9-Felson-Brown |
3 NT | N | 3 | ♦ 4 | 400 | | 2.36 | 4.64 | 4-Mehta-Mehta | 2-Williams-Williams |
3 NT | N | 3 | ♣ 9 | 400 | | 2.36 | 4.64 | 6-Lubow-Lammers | 6-Campbell-Roark |
3 NT | N | −1 | ♥ K | | 50 | 0.07 | 6.93 | 8-Kehoe-Stanley | 1-Kammer-Zimmer |
N/S take four Spade tricks, two Clubs, two Diamonds, and three Hearts, making
five. More likely, declarer will finesse into East's stiff ♥ K and end up
making four. It's also possible that West will lead a small Heart on the go,
and East will win trick one.
Board 17 North Deals None Vul |
♠ | Q 8 7 5 | ♥ | K J | ♦ | 8 7 6 | ♣ | A K 6 5 |
|
♠ | K 9 | ♥ | Q 10 2 | ♦ | J 10 9 5 4 | ♣ | Q J 3 |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | J 4 3 2 | ♥ | 9 8 6 5 4 | ♦ | A Q | ♣ | 10 9 |
|
|
|
♠ | A 10 6 | ♥ | A 7 3 | ♦ | K 3 2 | ♣ | 8 7 4 2 |
|
NS 3N; NS 3♠; NS 4♣; NS 1♥; NS 1♦; Par +400
West | North | East | South |
| 1 ♣ | Pass | 2 NT1 |
Pass | 3 NT | Pass | Pass |
Pass | | | |
- Showing 11-12 HCP and denying a four-card major
|
Contract | Lead | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
3 NT | S | 3 | ♦ J | 400 | | 6.93 | 0.07 | 8-Kehoe-Stanley | 1-Kammer-Zimmer |
2 ♠ | N | 4 | ♥ 9 | 170 | | 5.79 | 1.21 | 4-Mehta-Mehta | 2-Williams-Williams |
2 NT | S | 2 | ♦ J | 120 | | 4.07 | 2.93 | 1-Wiest-Kennedy | 5-Hoffman-Cook |
2 NT | S | 2 | ♦ J | 120 | | 4.07 | 2.93 | 6-Lubow-Lammers | 6-Campbell-Roark |
1 NT | S | 1 | ♦ 5 | 90 | | 1.79 | 5.21 | 2-Pollack-Pollack | 7-Diers-McCarthy |
1 NT | S | 1 | ♦ 4 | 90 | | 1.79 | 5.21 | 5-Lin-Hubka | 4-Waak-Terbrueggen |
4 ♣ | N | −1 | ♦ A | | 50 | 0.07 | 6.93 | 3-Tedrick-Singerman | 9-Felson-Brown |
N/S take two Spade tricks, three Hearts, one Diamond, and three Clubs, making
three. If West leads the ♦ J to East's ♦ A and East returns the ♦ Q, South
should duck. When East has no more Diamonds to play, E/W will be limited to
the two Diamonds they've already won, the ♠ K, and a Club (declarer can lead a
Club from hand and duck it to East's ♣ 9). If South makes the mistake of
overtaking the ♦ Q, West will cash three Diamonds when in with the ♠ K. Oops.
Board 18 East Deals N-S Vul |
♠ | 10 8 5 | ♥ | A 10 8 7 6 | ♦ | J 8 | ♣ | J 9 6 |
|
♠ | 7 4 3 | ♥ | 5 4 3 2 | ♦ | A 9 5 | ♣ | Q 10 3 |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | A K 9 2 | ♥ | J | ♦ | K 7 6 4 3 | ♣ | K 5 4 |
|
|
|
♠ | Q J 6 | ♥ | K Q 9 | ♦ | Q 10 2 | ♣ | A 8 7 2 |
|
EW 2♠; NS 2♥; EW 3♦; NS 1N; Par −110
West | North | East | South |
| | 1 ♦ | Pass1 |
1 ♥ | Pass | 1 ♠ | Pass |
1 NT | Pass | Pass | Dbl2 |
Pass | 2 ♥ | Pass | Pass |
Pass | | | |
- Don't make minimum offshape takeout doubles
- Do something smart, partner
|
Contract | Lead | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
2 ♥ | N | 2 | ♠ A | 110 | | 6.93 | 0.07 | 2-Pollack-Pollack | 7-Diers-McCarthy |
1 NT | W | −1 | ♥ 7 | 50 | | 5.79 | 1.21 | 1-Wiest-Kennedy | 5-Hoffman-Cook |
1 NT | W | 1 | ♥ 7 | | 90 | 3.50 | 3.50 | 3-Tedrick-Singerman | 9-Felson-Brown |
1 ♦ | E | 2 | ♣ 8 | | 90 | 3.50 | 3.50 | 4-Mehta-Mehta | 2-Williams-Williams |
2 ♦ | E | 2 | ♥ K | | 90 | 3.50 | 3.50 | 5-Lin-Hubka | 4-Waak-Terbrueggen |
1 NT | W | 2 | ♣ 6 | | 120 | 1.21 | 5.79 | 6-Lubow-Lammers | 6-Campbell-Roark |
1 ♠× | E | 1 | ♥ K | | 160 | 0.07 | 6.93 | 8-Kehoe-Stanley | 1-Kammer-Zimmer |
If your hand looks like a 1 NT overcall, but you don't have enough points
(15-18), it's a pass. That said, you'll sometimes come back in the auction
when the opponents try to park in a part score. N/S lose two Spade tricks, two
Diamonds, and one Club, making two. West may lead a trump.
Board 19 South Deals E-W Vul |
♠ | 10 9 8 | ♥ | J 5 2 | ♦ | A J 7 6 5 2 | ♣ | J |
|
♠ | A 3 | ♥ | K Q 9 7 3 | ♦ | 10 | ♣ | K 10 7 6 5 |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | K 6 2 | ♥ | 10 6 | ♦ | K Q 3 | ♣ | A 8 4 3 2 |
|
|
|
♠ | Q J 7 5 4 | ♥ | A 8 4 | ♦ | 9 8 4 | ♣ | Q 9 |
|
EW 5N; EW 4♥; EW 5♣; EW 1♠; EW 1♦; Par −660
West | North | East | South |
| | | Pass |
1 ♥ | Pass | 2 ♣ | Pass |
3 ♣ | Pass | 3 NT | Pass |
Pass | Pass | | |
Contract | Lead | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
3 NT | W | 3 | ♠ 4 | | 600 | 5.21 | 1.79 | 2-Pollack-Pollack | 6-Campbell-Roark |
5 ♣ | E | 5 | ♠ Q | | 600 | 5.21 | 1.79 | 3-Tedrick-Singerman | 8-Connett-Lindeman |
5 ♣ | E | 5 | ♦ 4 | | 600 | 5.21 | 1.79 | 6-Lubow-Lammers | 5-Hoffman-Cook |
3 NT | E | 3 | ♠ 5 | | 600 | 5.21 | 1.79 | 7-Kloecker-Rice | 7-Diers-McCarthy |
3 NT | E | 4 | ♦ 9 | | 630 | 1.79 | 5.21 | 4-Mehta-Mehta | 1-Kammer-Zimmer |
3 NT | E | 4 | ♠ 4 | | 630 | 1.79 | 5.21 | 5-Lin-Hubka | 3-Temples-Koch |
6 ♣ | E | 6 | ♥ A | | 1370 | 0.07 | 6.93 | 1-Wiest-Kennedy | 4-Waak-Terbrueggen |
West's 3 ♣ raise shows 4+ Clubs. E/W lose to both red Aces, but that's it.
South will probably lead a small Spade. Declarer will win with dummy's ♠ A,
play a Club to the ♣ A, and lead the ♥T towards their hand. When the ♥ A is
favorably placed, they can essentially claim 11 tricks.
Board 20 West Deals Both Vul |
♠ | 10 8 5 3 | ♥ | K Q J 7 | ♦ | Q | ♣ | Q 6 5 2 |
|
♠ | 6 4 2 | ♥ | 9 8 6 4 2 | ♦ | 8 2 | ♣ | A K 3 |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | K Q J 7 | ♥ | A 5 | ♦ | A K 9 7 5 | ♣ | J 4 |
|
|
|
♠ | A 9 | ♥ | 10 3 | ♦ | J 10 6 4 3 | ♣ | 10 9 8 7 |
|
EW 2♠; EW 2♥; EW 1N; EW 2♦; NS 1♣; Par −110
West | North | East | South |
Pass | Pass | 1 ♦ | Pass |
1 ♥ | Pass | 2 ♠1 | Pass |
2 NT2 | Pass | 3 ♣3 | Pass |
3 ♠ | Pass | Pass | Pass |
- Reverse
- Alert, artificial Lebensohl bid asking partner to bid 3 ♣
- Alert, artificial Lebensohl forced bid
|
Contract | Lead | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
3 ♠ | E | −1 | ♣ 10 | 100 | | 5.21 | 1.79 | 2-Pollack-Pollack | 6-Campbell-Roark |
2 NT | E | −1 | ♦ J | 100 | | 5.21 | 1.79 | 3-Tedrick-Singerman | 8-Connett-Lindeman |
3 ♦ | E | −1 | ♣ 10 | 100 | | 5.21 | 1.79 | 5-Lin-Hubka | 3-Temples-Koch |
3 NT | W | −1 | ♥ K | 100 | | 5.21 | 1.79 | 6-Lubow-Lammers | 5-Hoffman-Cook |
1 ♠ | E | 1 | ♣ 10 | | 80 | 2.36 | 4.64 | 4-Mehta-Mehta | 1-Kammer-Zimmer |
2 ♦ | E | 2 | ♠ A | | 90 | 1.21 | 5.79 | 7-Kloecker-Rice | 7-Diers-McCarthy |
2 ♠ | E | 2 | ♣ 9 | | 110 | 0.07 | 6.93 | 1-Wiest-Kennedy | 4-Waak-Terbrueggen |
West has an easy 1 ♥ response, but after partner reverses into Spades, they
become a bit cautious. Luckily they play Lebensohl as a method to slow down
the auction. A 2 NT bid at this point requires (most of the time) that partner
bid 3 ♣. West's 3 ♠ bid is a suggestion for a final contract, and East, with a
minimum reverse, decides to park there.
E/W lose three Spade tricks, one Heart, and one Club, down one. Declarer's
best course of action is to avoid playing trumps at all and try and cross-ruff
the whole hand. South may lead the ♥T, and declarer will win with the ♥ A and
play a second Heart. North will win cheaply and lead their stiff ♦ Q.
Declarer will grab the ♦ K, play a Club to the ♣ K, and lead a Diamond towards
their hand. North has nothing better to do than ruff and continue with another
high Heart. Declarer will ruff high, South will overruff, and lead back the
♠ 9. Declarer will win, cash the ♠ K (getting news of the bad break), and play
the ♦ A. North can ruff, but declarer still has the ♣ A and a trump in each
hand for eight tricks.
Board 21 North Deals N-S Vul |
♠ | K 6 5 3 | ♥ | A J 8 6 3 | ♦ | 10 2 | ♣ | A J |
|
♠ | Q 7 4 | ♥ | 7 5 2 | ♦ | 7 5 | ♣ | K 8 6 5 4 |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | A 9 | ♥ | K Q 10 9 4 | ♦ | A K 9 6 | ♣ | Q 2 |
|
|
|
♠ | J 10 8 2 | ♥ | — | ♦ | Q J 8 4 3 | ♣ | 10 9 7 3 |
|
W 3♥; N 2♠; E 2♥; EW 1N; N 2♦; S 1♠; S 1♦; EW 1♣; Par −140
West | North | East | South |
| 2 ♦1 | Dbl2 | 2 ♠3 |
Pass | Pass | Dbl4 | Pass |
Pass | Pass | | |
- Alert, artificial Flannery bid showing exactly four Spades, five Hearts, and 11-15 HCP
- Alert, showing values and a desire to defend
- Alert, non-forcing and natural
- For penalty (or cooperative)
|
Contract | Lead | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
2 ♠ | S | 3 | ♣ 4 | 140 | | 6.93 | 0.07 | 3-Tedrick-Singerman | 8-Connett-Lindeman |
2 NT | E | −2 | ♦ 4 | 100 | | 5.79 | 1.21 | 1-Wiest-Kennedy | 4-Waak-Terbrueggen |
3 NT | E | −1 | ♦ 4 | 50 | | 4.64 | 2.36 | 6-Lubow-Lammers | 5-Hoffman-Cook |
2 ♠ | N | −1 | ♦ K | | 100 | 3.50 | 3.50 | 5-Lin-Hubka | 3-Temples-Koch |
2 NT | E | 3 | ♦ 4 | | 150 | 2.36 | 4.64 | 4-Mehta-Mehta | 1-Kammer-Zimmer |
2 ♠× | S | −2 | ♣ 5 | | 500 | 1.21 | 5.79 | 2-Pollack-Pollack | 6-Campbell-Roark |
2 ♥× | N | −3 | ♦ A | | 800 | 0.07 | 6.93 | 7-Kloecker-Rice | 7-Diers-McCarthy |
I have sympathy for the N/S pairs who don't play Flannery, since North is
going to open 1 ♥ and end up playing there, most likely down three. Playing in
2 ♠ doubled isn't much better, since N/S lose one Spade trick, two Diamonds,
one Club, and one Heart.
If West leads anything other than a Heart on opening lead, N/S will make two.
If they lead the ♥ 5 (MUD), declarer will win with the ♥ A and pitch a small
Diamond from their hand. The ♦T is next, and East will hop with the ♦ K and
lead the ♥ K. Declarer will ruff low and lead the ♦ Q to East's ♦ A. East
will continue with another Diamond to the ♦ 8, ruffed by West with the ♠ 7, and
declarer will overruff with the ♠ K. Another Heart ruff is followed by the
♦ J, ruffed by West with the ♠ Q while declarer pitches the ♣ J. The ♠ 4 is
led to East's ♠ A, and East will exit with their last Spade. Declarer can win
two more Spade tricks and the ♣ A, but they'll have to play away from the ♥ J8
to East's ♥ QT at trick 12. Nice defense!
Board 22 East Deals E-W Vul |
♠ | J 8 6 | ♥ | Q 9 7 6 | ♦ | 6 | ♣ | A K J 9 8 |
|
♠ | A 2 | ♥ | 10 3 | ♦ | K Q J 9 8 7 | ♣ | Q 10 4 |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | K Q 10 7 | ♥ | A J 4 | ♦ | A 10 3 | ♣ | 7 5 3 |
|
|
|
♠ | 9 5 4 3 | ♥ | K 8 5 2 | ♦ | 5 4 2 | ♣ | 6 2 |
|
W 5N; EW 4♠; EW 4♦; E 2N; NS 1♥; W 1♣; Par −660
West | North | East | South |
| | 1 ♣ | Pass |
1 ♦ | Pass | 1 NT | Pass |
3 NT | Pass | Pass | Pass |
Contract | Lead | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
5 ♦ | W | −1 | ♣ A | 100 | | 7.00 | 0.00 | 6-Lubow-Lammers | 4-Waak-Terbrueggen |
3 ♦ | W | 4 | ♣ A | | 130 | 4.50 | 2.50 | 1-Wiest-Kennedy | 3-Temples-Koch |
2 ♦ | W | 4 | ♣ K | | 130 | 4.50 | 2.50 | 4-Mehta-Mehta | 9-Felson-Brown |
3 ♦ | W | 4 | ♣ A | | 130 | 4.50 | 2.50 | 5-Lin-Hubka | 2-Williams-Williams |
4 ♦ | W | 4 | ♣ A | | 130 | 4.50 | 2.50 | 8-Kehoe-Stanley | 8-Connett-Lindeman |
5 ♦ | E | 5 | ♦ 5 | | 600 | 2.00 | 5.00 | 3-Tedrick-Singerman | 7-Diers-McCarthy |
3 NT | E | 6 | ♥ 2 | | 690 | 0.50 | 6.50 | 2-Pollack-Pollack | 5-Hoffman-Cook |
3 NT | E | 6 | ♥ 2 | | 690 | 0.50 | 6.50 | 7-Kloecker-Rice | 6-Campbell-Roark |
If South finds the lead of the ♣ 6, E/W will be down one when North scarfs up
the first five tricks. It's much more likely that they'll lead the ♥ 2, and
E/W will take 11 tricks. Oops. E/W will take six Diamond tricks, four Spades,
and one Heart.
Board 23 South Deals Both Vul |
♠ | Q 8 5 | ♥ | A 7 | ♦ | K Q 9 5 2 | ♣ | K 8 6 |
|
♠ | A K 9 7 3 | ♥ | 9 3 2 | ♦ | 6 | ♣ | A 10 7 2 |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | J 2 | ♥ | K Q J 10 6 5 | ♦ | J 7 4 | ♣ | J 4 |
|
|
|
♠ | 10 6 4 | ♥ | 8 4 | ♦ | A 10 8 3 | ♣ | Q 9 5 3 |
|
EW 4♥; EW 3♠; NS 2♦; Par −620
West | North | East | South |
| | | Pass |
1 ♠1 | 2 ♦ | 2 ♥2 | 4 ♦3 |
4 ♥ | Pass | Pass | Pass |
- Rule of 20 opener
- Showing 5+ Hearts and 10+ HCP
- Weak jump raise
|
Contract | Lead | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
4 ♥ | E | −1 | ♦ A | 100 | | 6.50 | 0.50 | 4-Mehta-Mehta | 9-Felson-Brown |
4 ♥ | E | −1 | ♦ A | 100 | | 6.50 | 0.50 | 6-Lubow-Lammers | 4-Waak-Terbrueggen |
3 ♦ | N | −1 | ♠ 2 | | 100 | 5.00 | 2.00 | 8-Kehoe-Stanley | 8-Connett-Lindeman |
2 ♠ | W | 2 | ♦ K | | 110 | 4.00 | 3.00 | 7-Kloecker-Rice | 6-Campbell-Roark |
3 ♥ | E | 4 | ♦ A | | 170 | 3.00 | 4.00 | 3-Tedrick-Singerman | 7-Diers-McCarthy |
4 ♥ | E | 4 | ♦ 8 | | 620 | 1.50 | 5.50 | 2-Pollack-Pollack | 5-Hoffman-Cook |
4 ♥ | E | 4 | ♦ A | | 620 | 1.50 | 5.50 | 5-Lin-Hubka | 2-Williams-Williams |
4 ♥× | E | 4 | ♦ A | | 790 | 0.00 | 7.00 | 1-Wiest-Kennedy | 3-Temples-Koch |
If N/S weren't vulnerable, they'd have a good sacrifice in 5 ♦, down three
doubled for –500. That's better than –620 for E/W making 4 ♥.
E/W lose one Heart trick, one Diamond, and one Club. South will probably lead
the ♦ A and switch to a Club when North plays the ♦ 2--suit preference for
Clubs on the "obvious shift." If South switches to a trump, or leads a trump
at trick one, declarer won't be able to ruff their Diamond losers, but they
will be able to set up dummy's Spades.
Board 24 West Deals None Vul |
♠ | 6 | ♥ | 10 2 | ♦ | K 7 6 5 2 | ♣ | K Q 10 8 4 |
|
♠ | K J 9 7 4 3 2 | ♥ | — | ♦ | Q 8 4 | ♣ | A J 5 |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | A 8 5 | ♥ | K 8 3 | ♦ | A J 3 | ♣ | 9 6 3 2 |
|
|
|
♠ | Q 10 | ♥ | A Q J 9 7 6 5 4 | ♦ | 10 9 | ♣ | 7 |
|
EW 6♠; E 5N; NS 2♥; EW 2♣; EW 1♦; Par −980
West | North | East | South |
1 ♠ | 2 NT1 | 3 ♦2 | 3 ♥3 |
4 ♠ | Pass | Pass | Pass |
- Unusual 2 NT showing 5-5 in the minors and either a minimum or maximum hand
- Alert, Unusual vs. Unusual cuebid of North's higher ranking suit to show a limit raise or better in Spades
- Shut up about your stupid minor suits
|
Contract | Lead | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
5 ♥× | S | −1 | ♠ 7 | | 100 | 7.00 | 0.00 | 5-Lin-Hubka | 2-Williams-Williams |
4 ♠ | W | 4 | ♥ 10 | | 420 | 6.00 | 1.00 | 7-Kloecker-Rice | 6-Campbell-Roark |
5 ♠ | W | 5 | ♥ 10 | | 450 | 2.50 | 4.50 | 1-Wiest-Kennedy | 3-Temples-Koch |
4 ♠ | W | 5 | ♥ 10 | | 450 | 2.50 | 4.50 | 2-Pollack-Pollack | 5-Hoffman-Cook |
4 ♠ | W | 5 | ♣ K | | 450 | 2.50 | 4.50 | 3-Tedrick-Singerman | 7-Diers-McCarthy |
5 ♠ | W | 5 | ♥ 10 | | 450 | 2.50 | 4.50 | 4-Mehta-Mehta | 9-Felson-Brown |
4 ♠ | W | 5 | ♥ 10 | | 450 | 2.50 | 4.50 | 6-Lubow-Lammers | 4-Waak-Terbrueggen |
4 ♠ | W | 5 | ♥ 10 | | 450 | 2.50 | 4.50 | 8-Kehoe-Stanley | 8-Connett-Lindeman |
The auction is interesting. North has shown 5-5 in the minors and will show
up with one Spade during the play. That leaves them with only two Hearts
leaving eight for South. With eight Hearts and two Spades (again, showing up
on the play of the hand), South has room for only three minor-suit cards.
Watch how that information will be put to good use.
The opening lead will probably be the ♥T. Declarer will play low from dummy,
and ruff in the closed hand. The ♦ Q is next, and West should not cover (it
only aids with declarer's communication). When the ♦ Q holds, declarer should
lead the ♠ 2 to the ♠ A, and play a Spade back to the ♠ K to pull the enemy
trump. The ♣ A is cashed (South following), a Diamond to the ♦ J (South
following with their last minor-suit card), ♥ K covered by South with the ♥ A
and ruffed in the closed hand, and a Diamond to the ♦ A (South pitching a
Spade). These are the hands after eight tricks:
North: ♦ K7 ♣ KQ4
Dummy: ♠ 8 ♥ 8 ♣ 963
South: ♥ QJ954
Declarer: ♠ J94 ♣ J5
The ♥ 8 is led from dummy, South will cover, and declarer will pitch a losing
Club leaving South on lead. With nothing left but Hearts, South's forced
Heart return will allow declarer to ruff in dummy and pitch their last Club,
making six. Nicely played!
Board 25 North Deals E-W Vul |
♠ | 6 3 | ♥ | K Q 4 | ♦ | A K 8 5 4 | ♣ | A 5 2 |
|
♠ | 10 8 7 2 | ♥ | A J | ♦ | 9 7 | ♣ | K Q 7 6 3 |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | A 5 | ♥ | 10 8 7 5 2 | ♦ | Q 10 6 3 | ♣ | 8 4 |
|
|
|
♠ | K Q J 9 4 | ♥ | 9 6 3 | ♦ | J 2 | ♣ | J 10 9 |
|
NS 3♠; NS 2N; NS 2♦; NS 1♥; NS 1♣; Par +140
West | North | East | South |
| 1 NT1 | Pass | 2 ♥2 |
Pass | 2 ♠ | Pass | 2 NT |
Pass | 3 NT | Pass | Pass |
Pass | | | |
Contract | Lead | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
3 NT | N | 3 | ♥ 5 | 400 | | 6.36 | 0.64 | 2-Pollack-Pollack | 4-Waak-Terbrueggen |
3 NT | N | 3 | ♥ 5 | 400 | | 6.36 | 0.64 | 4-Mehta-Mehta | 8-Connett-Lindeman |
2 NT | N | 3 | ♣ 8 | 150 | | 4.64 | 2.36 | 3-Tedrick-Singerman | 6-Campbell-Roark |
3 NT | N | −1 | ♥ 7 | | 50 | 3.50 | 3.50 | 8-Kehoe-Stanley | 7-Diers-McCarthy |
3 NT | N | −3 | ♥ 5 | | 150 | 1.21 | 5.79 | 5-Lin-Hubka | 1-Kammer-Zimmer |
3 NT | N | −3 | ♥ 5 | | 150 | 1.21 | 5.79 | 6-Lubow-Lammers | 3-Temples-Koch |
3 NT | N | −3 | ♥ 5 | | 150 | 1.21 | 5.79 | 7-Kloecker-Rice | 5-Hoffman-Cook |
N/S take two Spade tricks, two Hearts, three Diamonds, and one Club, down one.
If East leads anything other than the ♣ 8, declarer will make 9 (or 10)
tricks. Even if East does lead the ♣ 8, their partner has to duck at trick
one! Declarer will be surprised when their ♣ 9 holds the trick, but they'll
continue on their merry way oblivious to the fact that their contract is now
doomed. The ♠ K goes to East's ♠ A, and East plays the ♣ 4 to dummy's ♣T and
their partner's ♣ Q. It does declarer no good to duck, so they'll win the ♣ A.
When West turns up with the ♥ A, they'll be able to cash three good Clubs for
the setting tricks. Nice defense!
Note: If East does split their honors on the lead of the ♣ 8, declarer has to
duck to guarantee their contract. This is a hand with many ducks (quack).
Board 26 East Deals Both Vul |
♠ | A 9 | ♥ | K 10 5 | ♦ | 9 8 7 4 | ♣ | J 7 6 3 |
|
♠ | K Q J 7 2 | ♥ | 8 6 3 | ♦ | Q J 6 | ♣ | 5 4 |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | 6 5 3 | ♥ | A Q J 9 2 | ♦ | 10 5 | ♣ | A Q 9 |
|
|
|
♠ | 10 8 4 | ♥ | 7 4 | ♦ | A K 3 2 | ♣ | K 10 8 2 |
|
E 4♠; E 3N; W 3♠; W 2N; EW 2♥; NS 2♦; N 2♣; S 1♣; Par −620
West | North | East | South |
| | 1 ♥ | Pass |
1 ♠ | Pass | 1 NT | Pass |
2 ♠ | Pass | Pass | Pass |
Contract | Lead | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
4 ♠ | W | −2 | ♣ 7 | 200 | | 6.93 | 0.07 | 8-Kehoe-Stanley | 7-Diers-McCarthy |
3 ♥ | E | −1 | ♦ A | 100 | | 5.79 | 1.21 | 4-Mehta-Mehta | 8-Connett-Lindeman |
2 ♥ | E | 2 | ♦ A | | 110 | 4.64 | 2.36 | 2-Pollack-Pollack | 4-Waak-Terbrueggen |
2 ♥ | E | 4 | ♣ 2 | | 170 | 2.36 | 4.64 | 5-Lin-Hubka | 1-Kammer-Zimmer |
2 ♥ | E | 4 | ♦ A | | 170 | 2.36 | 4.64 | 6-Lubow-Lammers | 3-Temples-Koch |
2 ♥ | E | 4 | ♦ A | | 170 | 2.36 | 4.64 | 7-Kloecker-Rice | 5-Hoffman-Cook |
3 ♣ | N | −2 | ♦ 10 | | 200 | 0.07 | 6.93 | 3-Tedrick-Singerman | 6-Campbell-Roark |
West's hand isn't quite good enough to invite when their partner shows 12-14
HCP, so they sign off in Spades. E/W lose one Spade trick, two Diamonds, and
one Club, making three if North finds a Club lead. On any other lead, E/W will
make four. North will lead either the ♦ 8 (MUD) or the ♠ A and a trump. Oops.
Board 27 South Deals None Vul |
♠ | K 10 9 8 5 2 | ♥ | 10 | ♦ | A K 7 5 3 | ♣ | 2 |
|
♠ | Q 6 4 3 | ♥ | K 8 6 2 | ♦ | J | ♣ | 8 5 4 3 |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | — | ♥ | J 9 7 4 | ♦ | Q 8 6 4 2 | ♣ | A K 10 6 |
|
|
|
♠ | A J 7 | ♥ | A Q 5 3 | ♦ | 10 9 | ♣ | Q J 9 7 |
|
NS 4♠; NS 3N; NS 3♦; EW 1♥; EW 1♣; Par +420
West | North | East | South |
| | | 1 ♣ |
Pass | 1 ♠ | Pass | 1 NT |
Pass | 4 ♠ | Pass | Pass |
Pass | | | |
Contract | Lead | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
4 ♠ | N | 6 | ♣ K | 480 | | 6.93 | 0.07 | 3-Tedrick-Singerman | 6-Campbell-Roark |
4 ♠ | N | 4 | ♣ K | 420 | | 5.21 | 1.79 | 4-Mehta-Mehta | 8-Connett-Lindeman |
4 ♠ | N | 4 | ♣ K | 420 | | 5.21 | 1.79 | 6-Lubow-Lammers | 3-Temples-Koch |
3 ♥ | W | −4 | ♣ 2 | 200 | | 3.50 | 3.50 | 8-Kehoe-Stanley | 7-Diers-McCarthy |
3 ♠ | N | 4 | ♣ K | 170 | | 2.36 | 4.64 | 2-Pollack-Pollack | 4-Waak-Terbrueggen |
2 ♠ | N | 3 | ♣ A | 140 | | 1.21 | 5.79 | 5-Lin-Hubka | 1-Kammer-Zimmer |
2 ♠ | N | −2 | ♣ A | | 100 | 0.07 | 6.93 | 7-Kloecker-Rice | 5-Hoffman-Cook |
For those of you who play XYZ, don't overuse the 2 ♦ rebid to create a game
force. If you know where you're going to play the hand, as North does here
with a known 8+ card fit, simply bid game at your second turn after a 1 NT
response.
N/S lose two Club tricks and one Diamond ruff, making four. Two Club tricks?
Yep. East's best lead is a Heart. Declarer will win with the ♥ A and lead the
♦T towards their hand, covered by West, and taken with the ♦ A. The ♣ 2 is
next, and East will hop with the ♣ K and play another Heart. Declarer will
ruff in hand and lead the ♦ K, ruffed by West with the ♠ 3. West can't lead
away from the ♥ K or the ♠ Q, so they'll lead a Club. Rather than ruff,
declarer should pitch the ♦ 3! East will win with the ♣ K and exit with a
Heart, ruffed with the ♠ 5. A small Diamond is ruffed with dummy's ♠ A (West
pitching a Club), and this is the hand position after eight tricks:
Declarer: ♠ KT98 ♦ 7
East: ♥ 9 ♦ Q6 ♣T6
Dummy: ♠ J7 ♥ Q ♣ QJ
West: ♠ Q64 ♥ K ♣ 8
The ♣ Q lets declarer pitch their losing Diamond, and the ♠ J through West's
Spade holding ends the drama. Nicely played!
West | North | East | South |
Pass | 1 ♠ | Pass | 1 NT1 |
2 ♣ | Pass | Pass | Dbl2 |
Pass | 2 ♦ | Pass | Pass |
Pass | | | |
- Forcing
- Do something smart, partner
|
Look for opportunities to sneak in lead-directing bids. There's very little
risk bidding 2 ♣ with the West hand when you're not vulnerable--what's the
worst that can happen with a suit that meaty?
N/S lose three Club tricks, one Heart, and one Diamond, making two. East will
lead the ♣ A on the auction and continue Clubs at trick two. West wins the ♣ J
and continues with the ♣ K. Rather than ruffing in dummy, declarer should
probably pitch a small Heart. When West continues with the ♣ Q, declarer
should ruff with the ♦ A (East pitching a second Spade). ♠ A and ♠ K are next,
pitching a small Heart from dummy on the second Spade, and the ♥ 8 is led
towards the ♥ K. If East hops with the ♥ A, declarer will play low and
eventually conceded a trump trick to West's ♦ J. If East plays low, declarer
can win the ♥ K and exit with a small Heart. At this point, E/W can't do
anything to get additional tricks, since declarer can cross-ruff Hearts and
Spades or pull trump with equal effect.
West | North | East | South |
| Pass1 | Pass | 1 ♥ |
2 ♥2 | Pass | 2 NT3 | Pass |
3 ♠4 | Pass | 4 ♣5 | Pass |
4 ♦6 | Pass | 4 ♠7 | Pass |
Pass | Pass | | |
- If you open this one 3 ♣ vulnerable, please come to my table next
- Michaels cuebid showing a min/max hand with Spades and a minor
- Alert, asking for partner's minor
- Alert, showing the strong hand
- Raise to game or correct
- Showing a Diamond suit
- Showing a doubleton Spade
|
E/W don't want to be in slam missing two keycards, so stopping in 4 ♠ is quite
reasonable. East won't have three Spades on this auction, since they checked
twice for a minor-suit fit. If West doesn't want to play in 4 ♠ opposite a
doubleton, they're free to correct to 5 ♦.
E/W lose one Heart trick, making six. Dummy has two entries to take the Spade
finesse twice. North will lead the ♦ 4.
West | North | East | South |
| | Pass | 1 NT1 |
Pass | 2 ♣ | Pass | 2 ♥ |
Pass | 2 ♠2 | Pass | 3 ♠3 |
Pass | 4 ♣4 | Pass | 4 ♦5 |
Pass | 4 NT6 | Pass | 5 ♦7 |
Pass | 5 ♥8 | Pass | 5 NT9 |
Pass | 6 ♣10 | Pass | 6 ♠11 |
Pass | Pass | Pass | |
- 15 to 17
- Forcing bid showing a 4-card Spade suit
- Minimum 1 NT opener with four Spades
- Slam interest with 1st or 2nd round control in Clubs
- 1st or 2nd round control in Diamonds
- RKC Blackwood (Kickback) for Spades
- 1430 response showing 0 or 3 keycards
- Do you have the ♠ Q?
- Yes, but I'm sorely lacking in side-suit Kings
- Do you have 3rd round control in Clubs?
- No, I'm the worst partner ever
|
N/S have a nice auction to reach the slam. N/S take 13 tricks when Spades
behave, and the restricted-choice logic in Clubs proves correct (i.e., when an
honor falls from one opponent, play their partner for the touching honor).
East may make that easier if they lead their stiff ♣ J (thanks East!).
West | North | East | South |
| | | 1 ♦ |
Pass | 1 ♠ | Pass | 3 ♣1 |
Pass | 3 ♥2 | Pass | 3 ♠3 |
Pass | 4 NT4 | Pass | 5 ♦5 |
Pass | 5 NT6 | Pass | 6 ♣7 |
Pass | 6 ♦8 | Pass | 7 ♠9 |
Pass | 7 NT10 | Pass | Pass |
Pass | | | |
- Jump shift, natural and forcing to game
- Showing four Hearts
- Showing a 3rd Spade
- RKC Blackwood (Kickback) for Spades
- 1430 response showing 0 or 3 keycards
- Asking for specific Kings and guaranteeing all the keycards
- Showing the King of Clubs
- Do you have the King of Diamonds as well?
- I do
- Let's play here
|
Nice auction! We usually don't like to have two fast losers in a side suit
when we ask for keycards, but it's hard to imagine a hand that would have jump
shifted into 3 ♣ with ♣ QJT9 of Clubs. That said, if anyone is going to do
that, it's your partner (hey, you chose them).
N/S lose no tricks. The correct way to play the Spade suit is to start with
the ♠ A. If either opponent has ♠ Jxxx you can still pick up the suit. East
will lead a "safe" ♠ 7.
West | North | East | South |
2 ♥1 | Pass | Pass | 2 ♠2 |
Pass | 3 NT3 | Pass4 | Pass |
Pass | | | |
- Weak two bid
- Ready to apologize if it's wrong
- Ready to apologize if it's wrong
- WTF?
|
We don't usually bid with a preemptive-type hand when the opponents preempt.
We never do if we're in the direct seat (immediately after the preempter). In
this case....
N/S are going to collect five Spade tricks, two Hearts, and two Diamonds,
making three. If E/W make "attitude leads" against notrump contracts (i.e.,
leading the smallest card from a suit they like with any length), then the
singleton ♣ 6 might very well win trick one. Heh.
West | North | East | South |
| Pass | Pass | 1 ♦ |
1 ♠ | 1 NT1 | 2 ♠2 | Pass |
Pass | Dbl3 | Pass | 2 NT |
Pass | Pass | Pass | |
- Showing 7-10 HCP and a stopper or two in Spades
- Showing a third Spade
- Do something smart, partner
|
South doesn't want to defend Spades, since they know that E/W have an
eight-card fit. East, with such a nice Club suit, will refuse to lead their
partner's suit and put the ♣ Q on the table. Declarer should duck twice trying
to block the suit (i.e., keep the opponents from taking four tricks). That
works when West wins trick three with the ♣ A. The proper way to play the
Heart suit is small to the ♥ J, return to the North hand with a Spade or
Diamond, and lead the ♥ Q smothering the ♥T. That's more likely on the
auction than trying to find ♥ Kx in the East hand (i.e., East should have
longer Hearts). N/S end up losing three Club tricks and both pointy-suit Aces,
making two.
West | North | East | South |
| | 1 NT1 | 2 ♣2 |
Dbl3 | Rdbl4 | 2 ♥ | Pass |
4 ♥ | Pass | Pass | Pass |
- 15 to 17
- Alert, artificial DONT bid showing Clubs and a higher suit
- Alert, Stayman
- I like Clubs
|
E/W lose one Heart trick, one Diamond, and one Club, making four....maybe. If
South decides to lead their stiff ♦ 5, North will win with the ♦ A and give
South their ruff. In reality, that was South's natural trump trick, but is
declarer going to sniff that out? After ruffing with their ♥ 2, South will
play the ♣ Q to declarer's ♣ A. Declarer, trying to get rid of their Club
loser, may cash the ♥ A before playing the ♠ A, small to the ♠ Q, and ♠ K
pitching the ♣T. When the ♥ K falls, declarer will take the rest of the
tricks (yay declarer!). If declarer doesn't play the ♥ A before cashing the
Spades, North will ruff the third Spade, declarer will overruff with the ♥ J,
and with no entry to the board will now play the ♥ A dropping the ♥ K (yay
declarer again!). To hold declarer to 10 tricks, South should lead the ♣ Q.
West | North | East | South |
| | | 1 ♠ |
Pass | 2 ♥ | Pass | 2 ♠ |
Pass | 3 ♦ | Pass | 3 NT |
Pass | Pass | Dbl1 | 4 ♠2 |
Dbl3 | Pass | Pass | Pass |
- You're not making 3 NT
- I agree with you
- You're not making 4 ♠ either
|
The misfit on this hand costs N/S dearly. N/S lose one Heart trick, one
Diamond, and two Clubs, down one doubled for –100. West will lead the ♣ Q.
Declarer may duck trick one, grab trick two with the ♣ A, and ruff their third
Club with dummy's ♠ K. That works splendidly until West turns up with five
trump. Rats.
West | North | East | South |
Pass | 1 ♠ | Pass | 1 NT1 |
Pass | 2 ♣ | Pass | 3 ♦2 |
Pass | Pass | Pass | |
- Forcing
- Showing an invitational hand with long Diamonds
|
N/S lose one Spade trick, one Heart, and two Clubs, making three. Clubs is a
frozen suit, meaning that whoever leads the suit loses a trick (try it!). West
will lead the ♣ A.