EVENT>Monday Night Bridge |SESSION>Monday Eve |SECTION> A N-S
------------------------,------ ------------,-------- --------------------------
DATE>January 9, 2017 |CLUB NO.>185264 | 01/09/2017 22:12
---------------------,-- ------------------- -------------,---------------------
DIR> Mike Lipp |RATING>Junior Fund |MOVEMENT>MITCHELL
------------,-------- ,-------------------------,--------- ---------------------
AVE> 84.0 |TOP> 7 |MP LIMITS>None/500/200 |CLUB>Mike's Games At The CBC
------------ --------- ------------------------- -------------------------------
PAIRS IN STRAT A=12/B=9/C=3 ,---,-----------------,-------------------------,------,---------,
-------------------------------------------------| | Overall | Section | |Final |
No Name Name |Flt|Rnk-A|Rnk-B|Rnk-C|Rnk-A|Rnk-B|Rnk-C| Score | Pct |Awards |
------------------------------------------------- --- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------- ------ ---------
1 Susan Stacy Vanstone Robert Roark B 5 4 . | 2 2 . 100.53 59.84 1.12(SA)
2 Susan De Roos Terri Mackey C . . . | . . . 65.32 38.88
3 Charlie Kobida Mike Burns B . . . | . . . 76.93 45.79
4 Joy Singerman John Williams B 1 1 . | 1 1 . 105.02 62.51 3.21(OA)
5 Liz Lin Elmer Hubka A . . . | . . . 70.43 41.92
6 Patrick Lammers Judy Barron B . . . | . . . 76.02 45.25
7 Annette Kereiakes Tom Kereiakes C . . 2 | . . 1 77.78 46.30 0.70(OC)
8 Richard Magnus Julian Magnus, Jr B . . . | 5 4 . 80.93 48.17 0.32(SA)
9 Betty Murdock Louise Wolf C . . . | . . . 73.44 43.71
10 Joyce Tedrick Linda Pretz B 6 5 . | 3 3 . 99.15 59.02 0.80(SA)
11 Dean Congbalay William Cook A . . . | 4 . . 98.46 58.61 0.56(SA)
Totals 924.01
Thanks to Bob Fisk for the expert analysis.
Look at board 32 Fun Auction
**PAIRS**
BOARD 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
/
1> 5.79 0.07 1.21 3- 2.36 4.64 6.93
130 ---- ---- ---- ---- -670 -500 -140 -300 100 300 ----
2> 3- 3- 3- 0.07 6.93 3- 3-
650 ---- ---- ---- ---- 650 650 50 1370 650 650 ----
3> 4.07 6.93 0.07 5.79 4.07 1.21 2.36
90 ---- ---- ---- ---- 110 -110 100 90 -50 70 ----
4> 0.64 4.64 6.36 2.93 0.64 6.36 2.93
-660 -140 ---- ---- ---- ---- 100 -630 -660 100 -630 ----
5> 5.79 2.93 6.93 2.93 0.07 2.93 2.93
80 -110 ---- ---- ---- ---- 110 -110 -140 -110 -110 ----
6> 1.79 5.79 6.93 1.79 1.79 1.79 4.64
-620 -170 ---- ---- ---- ---- 100 -620 -620 -620 -200 ----
7> 2.36 2.36 6.36 2.36 6.36 4.64 0.07
-170 -170 100 ---- ---- ---- ---- -170 100 -140 -650 ----
8> 4.64 1.21 4.64 0.07 2.36 6.93 4.64
200 140 200 ---- ---- ---- ---- -50 170 450 200 ----
9> 6.93 1.21 1.21 1.21 4.64 4.64 4.64
130 -650 -650 ---- ---- ---- ---- -650 -170 -170 -170 ----
10> 1.21 1.21 4.64 1.21 3- 6.93 5.79
-630 -630 -130 -630 ---- ---- ---- ---- -600 100 -100 ----
11> 6.93 1.21 0.07 5.79 2.36 3- 4.64
460 120 -50 450 ---- ---- ---- ---- 150 170 400 ----
12> 6.93 2.93 5.79 2.93 2.93 0.07 2.93
100 -420 50 -420 ---- ---- ---- ---- -420 -490 -420 ----
13> 4.64 5.79 0.07 3- 1.21 2.36 6.93
150 600 -200 130 -100 ---- ---- ---- ---- 110 630 ----
14> 2.36 2.36 2.36 6.93 5.79 2.36 2.36
-50 -50 -50 140 110 ---- ---- ---- ---- -50 -50 ----
15> 4.64 4.64 0.64 4.64 0.64 6.93 2.36
630 630 600 630 600 ---- ---- ---- ---- 660 620 ----
16> 4.64 1.21 6.93 4.64 0.07 2.36 4.64
420 -50 590 420 -100 170 ---- ---- ---- ---- 420 ----
17> 4.64 4.64 4.64 4.64 0.07 1.21 4.64
420 420 420 420 170 200 ---- ---- ---- ---- 420 ----
18> 4.17 2.83 1- 0.17 3- 6.17 6.17
620 200 130 110 AVE 650 ---- ---- ---- ---- 650 ----
19> 0.07 2.93 5.79 5.79 2.93 1.21 5.79
-100 150 400 400 150 110 400 ---- ---- ---- ---- ----
20> 6.93 4.64 1.79 4.64 1.79 0.07 4.64
-110 -140 -170 -140 -170 -200 -140 ---- ---- ---- ---- ----
21> 6.36 1.79 3- 4.64 1.79 6.36 0.07
630 130 240 250 130 630 -80 ---- ---- ---- ---- ----
22> 6 1 4- 4- 3 0 2 7
110 -130 100 100 -50 -300 -90 200 ---- ---- ---- ----
23> 5 2- 0 7 5 5 2- 1
-100 -110 -200 100 -100 -100 -110 -140 ---- ---- ---- ----
24> - - 5- 4 7 5- 2- 2-
-150 -150 110 -50 130 110 -100 -100 ---- ---- ---- ----
25> 0 3 7 3 3 6 3 3
---- 100 130 300 130 130 150 130 130 ---- ---- ----
26> 5 3- 6 7 1 0 2 3-
---- -100 -130 90 130 -170 -200 -140 -130 ---- ---- ----
27> 2 5 5 5 - - 7 3
---- 140 200 200 200 -50 -50 420 170 ---- ---- ----
28> 1- 6- 3 1- 0 4- 4- 6-
---- ---- 680 1430 690 680 650 710 710 1430 ---- ----
29> 2- 2- 5 7 5 5 0 1
---- ---- -100 -100 PASS 300 PASS PASS -200 -120 ---- ----
30> 1- 4- 0 4- 4- 7 1- 4-
---- ---- 450 480 150 480 480 500 450 480 ---- ----
31> 2 6 - 3 4 - 6 6
---- ---- ---- 50 140 -110 100 110 -110 140 140 ----
32> 1 1 7 4- 3 4- 6 1
---- ---- ---- -650 -650 300 100 -630 100 200 -650 ----
33> 5- 4 1 3 5- 1 7 1
---- ---- ---- 90 50 -90 -50 90 -90 120 -90 ----
34> 1.21 1.21 1.21 4.64 6.36 6.36 3-
---- ---- ---- ---- -100 -100 -100 80 110 110 PASS ----
35> 0.07 5.79 2.93 2.93 2.93 2.93 6.93
---- ---- ---- ---- -650 -130 -620 -620 -620 -620 100 ----
36> 2.36 4.64 4.64 1.21 4.64 0.07 6.93
---- ---- ---- ---- 140 170 170 110 170 -100 200 ----
EVENT>Monday Night Bridge |SESSION>Monday Eve |SECTION> A E-W
------------------------,------ ------------,-------- --------------------------
DATE>January 9, 2017 |CLUB NO.>185264 | 01/09/2017 22:12
---------------------,-- ------------------- -------------,---------------------
DIR> Mike Lipp |RATING>Junior Fund |MOVEMENT>MITCHELL
------------,-------- ,-------------------------,--------- ---------------------
AVE> 84.0 |TOP> 7 |MP LIMITS>None/500/200 |CLUB>Mike's Games At The CBC
------------ --------- ------------------------- -------------------------------
PAIRS IN STRAT A=12/B=9/C=6 ,---,-----------------,-------------------------,------,---------,
-------------------------------------------------| | Overall | Section | |Final |
No Name Name |Flt|Rnk-A|Rnk-B|Rnk-C|Rnk-A|Rnk-B|Rnk-C| Score | Pct |Awards |
------------------------------------------------- --- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------- ------ ---------
1 Stephen Felson Robert Brown A . . . | 4 . . 91.78 54.63 0.56(SA)
2 Dona Koch Sara Brown C . . . | . . . 72.90 43.39
3 Ralph Terbrueggen Stephen Moese A . . . | . . . 83.90 49.94
4 Kevin Henry Pam Campbell B 2 2 . | 1 1 . 103.43 61.57 2.41(OA)
5 Joseph Kammer Gail Zimmer B . . . | . 4 . 81.89 48.74 0.24(SB)
6 Lewis Temples Richard Koch C . . 4 | . . . 76.03 45.26 0.39(OC)
7 Judith Lubow Joanne Earls B 3 3 . | 2 2 . 103.20 61.43 1.81(OA)
8 Joan Diers Evelyn McCarthy C . . 1 | 5 3 1 88.22 52.51 0.93(OC)
9 Cheryl Endres Pamela Kennedy C . . 3 | . . 2 77.22 45.96 0.52(OC)
10 Peggy Jervis Pat Lindeman C . . . | . . . 71.30 42.44
11 Pam Heckel Margaret Decker C . . . | . . . 58.67 34.92
12 Larry Newman Dennis Schultz A 4 . . | 3 . . 101.07 60.16 1.35(OA)
Totals 1009.61
Thanks to Bob Fisk for the expert analysis.
Look at board 32 Fun Auction
**PAIRS**
BOARD 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
/
1> 1.21 3- 4.64 2.36 0.07 6.93 5.79
-130 ---- 140 ---- 300 ---- -100 ---- -300 670 ---- 500
2> 3- 6.93 0.07 3- 3- 3- 3-
-650 ---- -50 -----1370 ---- -650 ---- -650 -650 ---- -650
3> 2.93 1.21 2.93 5.79 4.64 0.07 6.93
-90 ---- -100 ---- -90 ---- 50 ---- -70 -110 ---- 110
4> 4.07 2.36 6.36 0.64 4.07 0.64 6.36
630 140 ---- 660 ---- -100 ---- 630 ---- ---- -100 660
5> 4.07 4.07 6.93 4.07 4.07 0.07 1.21
110 110 ---- 140 ---- 110 ---- 110 ---- ---- -110 -80
6> 5.21 1.21 5.21 5.21 2.36 0.07 5.21
620 170 ---- 620 ---- 620 ---- 200 ---- ---- -100 620
7> 4.64 0.64 0.64 2.36 6.93 4.64 4.64
170 -100 -100 ---- 140 ---- 650 ---- ---- ---- 170 170
8> 5.79 4.64 2.36 0.07 2.36 2.36 6.93
-140 -170 -200 ---- -450 ---- -200 ---- ---- ---- -200 50
9> 5.79 2.36 5.79 2.36 2.36 0.07 5.79
650 170 650 ---- 170 ---- 170 ---- ---- ---- -130 650
10> 3- 2.36 0.07 5.79 1.21 5.79 5.79
600 130 -100 630 ---- 100 ---- ---- ---- 630 ---- 630
11> 4.64 6.93 3- 1.21 2.36 0.07 5.79
-150 50 -170 -450 ---- -400 ---- ---- ---- -460 ---- -120
12> 4.07 1.21 6.93 4.07 4.07 0.07 4.07
420 -50 490 420 ---- 420 ---- ---- ---- -100 ---- 420
13> 6.93 4.64 3- 0.07 5.79 2.36 1.21
200 -110 -130 -630 100 ---- ---- ---- -150 ---- -600 ----
14> 4.64 4.64 0.07 4.64 1.21 4.64 4.64
50 50 -140 50 -110 ---- ---- ---- 50 ---- 50 ----
15> 6.36 0.07 2.36 4.64 6.36 2.36 2.36
-600 -660 -630 -620 -600 ---- ---- ---- -630 ---- -630 ----
16> 2.36 2.36 6.93 4.64 2.36 5.79 0.07
---- -420 -420 100 ---- -170 ---- -420 ---- 50 ---- -590
17> 2.36 2.36 6.93 5.79 2.36 2.36 2.36
---- -420 -420 -170 ---- -200 ---- -420 ---- -420 ---- -420
18> 6.83 0.83 3- 0.83 2.83 4.17 5-
---- -110 -650 AVE ---- -650 ---- -620 ---- -200 ---- -130
19> 1.21 4.07 5.79 6.93 1.21 4.07 1.21
-400 ---- -150 ---- -110 100 -400 ---- -150 ---- -400 ----
20> 2.36 5.21 6.93 0.07 2.36 2.36 5.21
140 ---- 170 ---- 200 110 140 ---- 140 ---- 170 ----
21> 2.36 5.21 0.64 0.64 6.93 5.21 3-
-250 ---- -130 ---- -630 -630 80 ---- -130 ---- -240 ----
22> 4 7 1 5 6 0 2- 2-
---- 50 ---- 300 -110 90 130 -200 ---- -100 ---- -100
23> 2 2 2 4- 4- 6 7 0
---- 100 ---- 100 100 110 110 140 ---- 200 ---- -100
24> 0 1- 6- 4- 6- 4- 1- 3
---- -130 ---- -110 150 100 150 100 ---- -110 ---- 50
25> 4 4 1 7 4 4 4 0
-130 ---- -130 ---- -150 -100 -130 -130 -130 ---- -300 ----
26> 0 6 7 2 5 3- 3- 1
-130 ---- 170 ---- 200 100 140 130 130 ---- -90 ----
27> 2 6- 6- 5 0 2 4 2
-200 ---- 50 ---- 50 -140 -420 -200 -170 ---- -200 ----
28> 5- 7 2- 5- 2- - - 4
---- -680 ---- -650 ---- -710 -680 -710 -1430 -1430 ---- -690
29> 0 2 2 4- 7 4- 6 2
---- -300 ---- PASS ---- PASS 100 200 100 120 ---- PASS
30> 2- 2- 0 5- 5- 2- 2- 7
---- -480 ---- -480 ---- -500 -450 -450 -480 -480 ---- -150
31> 6- 4 3 6- 5 1 1 1
110 ---- -100 ---- -110 ---- 110 -50 -140 -140 -140 ----
32> 0 2- 4 2- 6 1 6 6
-300 ---- -100 ---- 630 ---- -100 650 -200 650 650 ----
33> 6 4 1- 6 1- 0 3 6
90 ---- 50 ---- -90 ---- 90 -90 -120 -50 90 ----
34> 5.79 2.36 0.64 0.64 5.79 3- 5.79
---- 100 ---- -80 ---- -110 ---- -110 100 PASS 100 ----
35> 4.07 4.07 4.07 4.07 6.93 0.07 1.21
---- 620 ---- 620 ---- 620 ---- 620 650 -100 130 ----
36> 2.36 5.79 2.36 6.93 4.64 0.07 2.36
---- -170 ---- -110 ---- -170 ---- 100 -140 -200 -170 ----
Monday Night Bridge, Monday Eve, January 9, 2017
Board 1 North Deals None Vul |
♠ | 10 7 3 | ♥ | A Q 9 2 | ♦ | J 10 | ♣ | 9 8 7 6 |
|
♠ | J 5 2 | ♥ | 10 8 5 4 | ♦ | A 6 3 2 | ♣ | 4 2 |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | Q 9 8 6 | ♥ | K J 7 6 3 | ♦ | K 5 | ♣ | A Q |
|
|
|
♠ | A K 4 | ♥ | — | ♦ | Q 9 8 7 4 | ♣ | K J 10 5 3 |
|
EW 2♥; NS 1N; NS 2♦; NS 2♣; E 1♠; Par −100: NS 2N×−1; NS 3♣×−1; NS 3♦×−1
West | North | East | South |
| Pass | 1 ♥1 | 2 NT2 |
3 ♥3 | Pass | Pass | Dbl4 |
Pass | Pass | Pass | |
- Don't open 1 NT with 5-4 shape in the majors
- Unusual 2 NT
- Weak to constructive Heart raise
- Do something smart, partner
|
Contract | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
4 ♥× | E | −2 | 300 | | 6.93 | 0.07 | 11-Congbalay-Cook | 9-Endres-Kennedy |
2 ♣ | S | 4 | 130 | | 5.79 | 1.21 | 1-Vanstone-Roark | 1-Felson-Brown |
3 ♥ | E | −2 | 100 | | 4.64 | 2.36 | 10-Tedrick-Pretz | 7-Lubow-Earls |
3 ♥ | E | 3 | | 140 | 3.50 | 3.50 | 8-Magnus-Magnus, Jr | 3-Terbrueggen-Moese |
4 ♠ | S | −6 | | 300 | 2.36 | 4.64 | 9-Murdock-Wolf | 5-Kammer-Zimmer |
5 ♣× | S | −3 | | 500 | 1.21 | 5.79 | 7-Kereiakes-Kereiakes | 12-Newman-Schultz |
2 ♥× | E | 4 | | 670 | 0.07 | 6.93 | 6-Lammers-Barron | 10-Jervis-Lindeman |
Although East has a semi-balanced hand and 15 HCP, they shouldn't open 1 NT.
Why is that? If you play Puppet (or 5-card Stayman), you won't be able to find
a major-suit fit with 5-4 shape. If partner asks if you have a 5-card major,
you'll show your Hearts, and they'll bid 3 NT. You won't know whether they have
a 3- or 4-card Spade suit.
South, while not quite holding the maximum Unusual 2 NT hand, has enough extra
to double to get partner to do something. North, with all of their strength in
the opponent's suit, is happy to pass. E/W lose two Spade tricks, two Hearts,
and one Club, down one. If South makes the obvious lead of a high Spade, 3 ♥
might make with declarer throwing the ♣ 2 under the ♠ Q. North can ruff, but
it will be at the cost of a natural trump trick. Oops.
Board 2 East Deals N-S Vul |
♠ | A K 9 7 6 3 2 | ♥ | A | ♦ | 3 2 | ♣ | A K Q |
|
♠ | 4 | ♥ | J 10 5 4 3 2 | ♦ | A Q J 8 7 | ♣ | 4 |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | J 8 5 | ♥ | K Q 9 7 | ♦ | 10 9 | ♣ | 10 9 5 3 |
|
|
|
♠ | Q 10 | ♥ | 8 6 | ♦ | K 6 5 4 | ♣ | J 8 7 6 2 |
|
S 6N; S 6♠; S 6♣; N 5♠; N 4N; EW 4♥; N 4♣; S 2♦; Par +500: EW 7♥×−3
West | North | East | South |
| | Pass | Pass |
1 ♥1 | Dbl2 | 3 ♥3 | Pass |
4 ♥ | 4 ♠ | Pass | Pass |
5 ♥ | Dbl | Pass | 5 ♠ |
Pass | Pass | Pass | |
- Too much playing strength to preempt
- Too big to simply bid 4 ♠
- Alert, showing 0-6 HCP and four Hearts (BROMAD)
|
Contract | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
6 ♣ | S | 6 | 1370 | | 6.93 | 0.07 | 9-Murdock-Wolf | 5-Kammer-Zimmer |
5 ♠ | N | 5 | 650 | | 3.50 | 3.50 | 1-Vanstone-Roark | 1-Felson-Brown |
4 ♠ | N | 5 | 650 | | 3.50 | 3.50 | 6-Lammers-Barron | 10-Jervis-Lindeman |
4 ♠ | N | 5 | 650 | | 3.50 | 3.50 | 7-Kereiakes-Kereiakes | 12-Newman-Schultz |
4 ♠ | N | 5 | 650 | | 3.50 | 3.50 | 10-Tedrick-Pretz | 7-Lubow-Earls |
4 ♠ | N | 5 | 650 | | 3.50 | 3.50 | 11-Congbalay-Cook | 9-Endres-Kennedy |
5 ♥ | W | −1 | 50 | | 0.07 | 6.93 | 8-Magnus-Magnus, Jr | 3-Terbrueggen-Moese |
It's unfortunate that North can't get their partner to bid notrump (or either
black suit for that matter) during the auction. The hand plays one trick
better from the South side, since the ♦ K would be protected on opening lead.
That said, East is more than likely to lead the ♥ K, and N/S can make 12 tricks
on double-dummy lines. That said, North isn't that smart, so we're back to 11
tricks.
Declarer will win the opening Heart lead with the ♥ A and most likely pull
trump in three rounds. With no way to reach dummy's Clubs, they'll resort to a
Diamond finesse. Dang. The double-dummy line would be to pull one round of
trump with the ♠ A, ♣ AKQ (West unable to ruff), Spade to the ♠ Q, and ♣ J8
pitching both Diamonds from the North hand. East is welcome to ruff the fifth
Club, but that's the only trick for the defense.
Board 3 South Deals E-W Vul |
♠ | 10 9 5 | ♥ | Q 9 2 | ♦ | K Q 9 | ♣ | A 10 7 4 |
|
♠ | Q 7 3 | ♥ | A J 10 6 | ♦ | 7 4 3 | ♣ | 5 3 2 |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | A J 8 6 | ♥ | K 5 | ♦ | 10 6 | ♣ | K J 9 8 6 |
|
|
|
♠ | K 4 2 | ♥ | 8 7 4 3 | ♦ | A J 8 5 2 | ♣ | Q |
|
NS 1N; NS 2♦; EW 2♣; EW 1♠; NS 1♥; Par +90
West | North | East | South |
| | | Pass |
Pass | 1 ♣1 | Pass | 1 ♥ |
Pass | Pass | 2 ♣2 | 2 ♦ |
Pass | Pass | Pass | |
- Light opener in third seat
- Natural
|
Contract | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
2 ♥ | S | 2 | 110 | | 6.93 | 0.07 | 6-Lammers-Barron | 10-Jervis-Lindeman |
2 ♠ | E | −1 | 100 | | 5.79 | 1.21 | 8-Magnus-Magnus, Jr | 3-Terbrueggen-Moese |
2 ♦ | S | 2 | 90 | | 4.07 | 2.93 | 1-Vanstone-Roark | 1-Felson-Brown |
1 NT | N | 1 | 90 | | 4.07 | 2.93 | 9-Murdock-Wolf | 5-Kammer-Zimmer |
1 ♦ | S | 1 | 70 | | 2.36 | 4.64 | 11-Congbalay-Cook | 9-Endres-Kennedy |
2 ♥ | S | −1 | | 50 | 1.21 | 5.79 | 10-Tedrick-Pretz | 7-Lubow-Earls |
2 ♣ | E | 3 | | 110 | 0.07 | 6.93 | 7-Kereiakes-Kereiakes | 12-Newman-Schultz |
If North doesn't open light in third seat, the auction will go
P-P-P-1 ♣-1 ♦-1 ♥-2 ♦-P-P-P. All roads lead to Rome (huh?).
N/S lose two Spade tricks and three Hearts, making two. E/W don't have a
reasonable sacrifice in 3 ♣ on the vulnerability. West will lead the ♣ 3 (MUD)
on opening lead, although a trump is also possible.
Board 4 West Deals Both Vul |
♠ | 10 9 7 5 | ♥ | 10 6 4 2 | ♦ | 5 4 | ♣ | 10 8 7 |
|
♠ | Q 8 4 | ♥ | A Q 8 | ♦ | K 8 7 6 | ♣ | K Q 2 |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | A K J 3 | ♥ | J 9 3 | ♦ | 10 9 | ♣ | J 9 6 4 |
|
|
|
♠ | 6 2 | ♥ | K 7 5 | ♦ | A Q J 3 2 | ♣ | A 5 3 |
|
EW 4N; EW 4♠; EW 5♣; EW 3♥; EW 3♦; Par −630
West | North | East | South |
1 NT1 | Pass | 3 ♣2 | Pass |
3 ♦3 | Pass | 3 ♥4 | Pass |
3 NT | Pass | Pass | Pass |
- 15 to 17
- Alert, artificial asking for a 5-card major
- Alert, artificial denying a 5-card major
- Alert, showing three Hearts and four Spades
|
Contract | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
3 ♠ | E | −1 | 100 | | 6.36 | 0.64 | 7-Kereiakes-Kereiakes | 11-Heckel-Decker |
3 NT | W | −1 | 100 | | 6.36 | 0.64 | 10-Tedrick-Pretz | 6-Temples-Koch |
2 ♠ | E | 3 | | 140 | 4.64 | 2.36 | 2-De Roos-Mackey | 2-Koch-Brown |
3 NT | W | 4 | | 630 | 2.93 | 4.07 | 8-Magnus-Magnus, Jr | 1-Felson-Brown |
3 NT | E | 4 | | 630 | 2.93 | 4.07 | 11-Congbalay-Cook | 8-Diers-McCarthy |
3 NT | W | 5 | | 660 | 0.64 | 6.36 | 1-Vanstone-Roark | 12-Newman-Schultz |
3 NT | W | 5 | | 660 | 0.64 | 6.36 | 9-Murdock-Wolf | 4-Henry-Campbell |
East uses Five-Card Stayman, and E/W end up in 3 NT when no major-suit fit is
found. Five-Card Stayman is preferable to Puppet Stayman over 1 NT, since
opener's major-suit shape can remain hidden longer if responder isn't
interested in finding a 4-4 fit. Not the case here.
E/W take four Spade tricks, two Hearts, one Diamond, and three Clubs, making
four. Looking at it another way, N/S take two Diamond tricks and one Club.
E/W's spot cards in Diamonds (♦T9876) prove to be invaluable. The ♦ 5 isn't
an unreasonable lead, since North knows their partner has all of the defensive
strength.
Board 5 North Deals N-S Vul |
♠ | 8 5 4 | ♥ | J 6 5 | ♦ | K 8 4 3 2 | ♣ | Q 9 |
|
♠ | 7 | ♥ | A Q 8 7 4 3 | ♦ | A J 7 | ♣ | 5 4 2 |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | J 10 6 3 2 | ♥ | K 2 | ♦ | Q 10 5 | ♣ | 10 7 3 |
|
|
|
♠ | A K Q 9 | ♥ | 10 9 | ♦ | 9 6 | ♣ | A K J 8 6 |
|
EW 2♥; NS 3♣; NS 1♠; NS 1♦; Par +100: EW 3♥×−1
West | North | East | South |
| Pass | Pass | 1 ♣1 |
1 ♥ | Pass | Pass | 1 ♠2 |
2 ♥ | Pass | Pass | 3 ♣ |
Pass | Pass | 3 ♥ | Pass |
Pass | Pass | | |
- Planning to reverse
- Same strength hand as a reverse when partner is quiet
|
Contract | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
1 ♠ | S | 2 | 110 | | 6.93 | 0.07 | 7-Kereiakes-Kereiakes | 11-Heckel-Decker |
1 ♠ | S | 1 | 80 | | 5.79 | 1.21 | 1-Vanstone-Roark | 12-Newman-Schultz |
2 ♥ | W | 2 | | 110 | 2.93 | 4.07 | 2-De Roos-Mackey | 2-Koch-Brown |
2 ♥ | W | 2 | | 110 | 2.93 | 4.07 | 8-Magnus-Magnus, Jr | 1-Felson-Brown |
2 ♥ | W | 2 | | 110 | 2.93 | 4.07 | 10-Tedrick-Pretz | 6-Temples-Koch |
2 ♥ | W | 2 | | 110 | 2.93 | 4.07 | 11-Congbalay-Cook | 8-Diers-McCarthy |
3 ♥ | W | 3 | | 140 | 0.07 | 6.93 | 9-Murdock-Wolf | 4-Henry-Campbell |
North doesn't have the worst hand in the world, but at the end of the auction,
there will be five pass cards in front of them. Stupid pass cards. They'll
briefly think about doubling the final contract, but they're terrified that
their partner will bid a black suit again. Stupid partner.
E/W lose one Spade trick, one Diamond, and three Clubs, down one. North will
lead the ♣ Q on opening lead. South should overtake with the ♣ K, cash the ♠ K
to get partner's count (partner will show three), and play off two more rounds
of Clubs.
If South held ♥T9x, it would now make sense to play a fourth round of Clubs.
If partner was able to ruff high enough to dislodge the ♥ K, it would promote a
trump trick for the defense. Holding only two Hearts, South knows that plan is
futile and will play the ♦ 9 at trick five.
Board 6 East Deals E-W Vul |
♠ | 9 8 | ♥ | J 9 5 4 | ♦ | 10 9 | ♣ | 10 8 5 4 2 |
|
♠ | A K 10 6 4 3 | ♥ | A K 7 2 | ♦ | 2 | ♣ | Q J |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | Q 5 2 | ♥ | Q 10 | ♦ | K J 8 7 6 5 | ♣ | 6 3 |
|
|
|
♠ | J 7 | ♥ | 8 6 3 | ♦ | A Q 4 3 | ♣ | A K 9 7 |
|
EW 4♠; E 3♥; W 2♥; EW 3♦; NS 2♣; Par −500: NS 5♣×−3
West | North | East | South |
| | Pass | 1 ♦ |
Dbl1 | Pass | 1 NT2 | Pass |
3 ♠3 | Pass | 4 ♠ | Pass |
Pass | Pass | | |
- Too strong to simply overcall 1 ♠
- Showing 7-10 HCP and strength in Diamonds
- Jump in Spades needing a trick and a fit from partner
|
Contract | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
4 ♠ | W | −1 | 100 | | 6.93 | 0.07 | 7-Kereiakes-Kereiakes | 11-Heckel-Decker |
2 ♠ | W | 4 | | 170 | 5.79 | 1.21 | 2-De Roos-Mackey | 2-Koch-Brown |
3 ♠ | W | 5 | | 200 | 4.64 | 2.36 | 11-Congbalay-Cook | 8-Diers-McCarthy |
4 ♠ | W | 4 | | 620 | 1.79 | 5.21 | 1-Vanstone-Roark | 12-Newman-Schultz |
4 ♠ | W | 4 | | 620 | 1.79 | 5.21 | 8-Magnus-Magnus, Jr | 1-Felson-Brown |
4 ♠ | W | 4 | | 620 | 1.79 | 5.21 | 9-Murdock-Wolf | 4-Henry-Campbell |
4 ♠ | W | 4 | | 620 | 1.79 | 5.21 | 10-Tedrick-Pretz | 6-Temples-Koch |
With equal (or favorable) vulnerability, East might have passed the double of
1 ♦. If they had, South would have redoubled for rescue (SOS redouble), and
North would bid 2 ♣.
E/W lose one Diamond trick and two Clubs, making four. North will lead the ♦T
on opening lead, and South will cash out.
Board 7 South Deals Both Vul |
♠ | 8 7 | ♥ | Q 9 3 | ♦ | A Q 8 | ♣ | Q 9 7 4 3 |
|
♠ | Q 4 | ♥ | A J 10 6 2 | ♦ | K 6 5 3 2 | ♣ | 6 |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | A J 10 9 6 5 2 | ♥ | K 7 | ♦ | 4 | ♣ | J 10 2 |
|
|
|
♠ | K 3 | ♥ | 8 5 4 | ♦ | J 10 9 7 | ♣ | A K 8 5 |
|
NS 3N; EW 2♠; NS 3♣; EW 1♥; NS 1♦; Par +500: EW 4♠×−2
West | North | East | South |
| | | Pass |
1 ♥1 | Pass | 1 ♠ | 1 NT2 |
Pass3 | 2 ♣ | 2 ♠ | Pass |
Pass | 3 ♣ | Pass | Pass |
Pass | | | |
- Rule of 20 opener
- Sandwich NT for the minors
- Denies 3-card Spade support (no support double)
|
Contract | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
3 ♠ | E | −1 | 100 | | 6.36 | 0.64 | 3-Kobida-Burns | 3-Terbrueggen-Moese |
3 ♠ | E | −1 | 100 | | 6.36 | 0.64 | 9-Murdock-Wolf | 2-Koch-Brown |
2 ♠ | E | 3 | | 140 | 4.64 | 2.36 | 10-Tedrick-Pretz | 5-Kammer-Zimmer |
3 ♠ | E | 4 | | 170 | 2.36 | 4.64 | 1-Vanstone-Roark | 11-Heckel-Decker |
3 ♠ | E | 4 | | 170 | 2.36 | 4.64 | 2-De Roos-Mackey | 1-Felson-Brown |
3 ♠ | E | 4 | | 170 | 2.36 | 4.64 | 8-Magnus-Magnus, Jr | 12-Newman-Schultz |
4 ♠ | E | 5 | | 650 | 0.07 | 6.93 | 11-Congbalay-Cook | 7-Lubow-Earls |
If any N/S pairs get to 3 NT, well, my hats off to them (not literally). 3 ♣
will be a popular contract, although some East's will take one bid too many and
will likely be doubled (not really, I like to pretend).
N/S lose one Spade trick, two Hearts, and a Heart ruff, making three. East
will lead the ♥ K on opening lead and ruff the third round of Hearts.
Board 8 West Deals None Vul |
♠ | Q 10 6 | ♥ | A 10 9 8 7 6 2 | ♦ | A Q 4 | ♣ | — |
|
♠ | K J 9 4 | ♥ | Q J 3 | ♦ | 8 3 2 | ♣ | 8 5 3 |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | A 5 2 | ♥ | 5 4 | ♦ | J 6 | ♣ | A K J 9 6 4 |
|
|
|
♠ | 8 7 3 | ♥ | K | ♦ | K 10 9 7 5 | ♣ | Q 10 7 2 |
|
NS 4♥; NS 4♦; NS 2N; NS 1♠; Par +420
West | North | East | South |
Pass | 1 ♥ | 2 ♣1 | Pass |
Pass | Dbl2 | Pass | 2 ♦ |
Pass | 2 ♥ | Pass | Pass |
Pass | | | |
- Showing a full opener
- Not loving the idea of partner passing
|
Contract | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
4 ♥ | N | 5 | 450 | | 6.93 | 0.07 | 10-Tedrick-Pretz | 5-Kammer-Zimmer |
2 ♥ | N | 5 | 200 | | 4.64 | 2.36 | 1-Vanstone-Roark | 11-Heckel-Decker |
3 ♥ | N | 5 | 200 | | 4.64 | 2.36 | 3-Kobida-Burns | 3-Terbrueggen-Moese |
3 ♥ | N | 5 | 200 | | 4.64 | 2.36 | 11-Congbalay-Cook | 7-Lubow-Earls |
2 ♥ | N | 4 | 170 | | 2.36 | 4.64 | 9-Murdock-Wolf | 2-Koch-Brown |
2 ♥ | N | 3 | 140 | | 1.21 | 5.79 | 2-De Roos-Mackey | 1-Felson-Brown |
4 ♥ | N | −1 | | 50 | 0.07 | 6.93 | 8-Magnus-Magnus, Jr | 12-Newman-Schultz |
North will be a bit hesitant about reopening with a double. With a singleton
Club, a double is automatic. With a void, it becomes problematic defending a
low-level contract, since North will never be able to lead a trump towards
partner.
North's Heart spot cards are good enough that they can play opposite a small
singleton, so North corrects back to 2 ♥ (it's Matchpoints after all). N/S
lose two Spade tricks and one Heart, making four. If South finds a 3 ♥ bit
over 2 ♥, North will gladly bid game. I have sympathy for South though, since
North would make a reopening double with a slightly worse hand. East will
probably lead the ♣ K on opening lead.
Declarer will ruff in their hand, play a small trump to the ♥ K, Diamond back
to the ♦ A, and cash the ♥ A. Leaving the master trump outstanding, they'll
now cash the ♦ Q, play the ♦ 4 to the ♦ K, and pitch a Spade as West ruffs.
While this doesn't lower the number of Spade losers, it ensures making four
even if East holds ♠ AJ9.
Board 9 North Deals E-W Vul |
♠ | Q 9 6 2 | ♥ | 10 9 5 | ♦ | Q 8 4 2 | ♣ | A 5 |
|
♠ | K J 10 8 4 3 | ♥ | Q | ♦ | — | ♣ | K Q J 10 7 3 |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | A 5 | ♥ | K 6 4 3 | ♦ | A 7 5 3 | ♣ | 8 6 2 |
|
|
|
♠ | 7 | ♥ | A J 8 7 2 | ♦ | K J 10 9 6 | ♣ | 9 4 |
|
EW 4♠; NS 3♥; EW 4♣; NS 3♦; EW 1N; Par −300: NS 5♦×−2; NS 5♥×−2
West | North | East | South |
| Pass | Pass | 1 ♥1 |
2 ♥2 | 3 ♥3 | Pass4 | Pass |
4 ♥5 | Pass | 4 ♠ | Pass |
Pass | Pass | | |
- Light opener in third seat
- Michaels, showing either a minimum or maximum hand with Spades and a minor
- Weak to constructive Heart raise
- On the vulnerability
- Showing a maximum hand
|
Contract | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
3 ♦ | S | 4 | 130 | | 6.93 | 0.07 | 1-Vanstone-Roark | 11-Heckel-Decker |
3 ♠ | W | 4 | | 170 | 4.64 | 2.36 | 9-Murdock-Wolf | 2-Koch-Brown |
3 ♠ | W | 4 | | 170 | 4.64 | 2.36 | 10-Tedrick-Pretz | 5-Kammer-Zimmer |
3 ♠ | W | 4 | | 170 | 4.64 | 2.36 | 11-Congbalay-Cook | 7-Lubow-Earls |
4 ♠ | W | 5 | | 650 | 1.21 | 5.79 | 2-De Roos-Mackey | 1-Felson-Brown |
4 ♠ | W | 5 | | 650 | 1.21 | 5.79 | 3-Kobida-Burns | 3-Terbrueggen-Moese |
4 ♠ | W | 5 | | 650 | 1.21 | 5.79 | 8-Magnus-Magnus, Jr | 12-Newman-Schultz |
With two small Spades, East might have bid 4 NT to ask for partner's minor.
Holding ♠ Ax, East has an easy 4 ♠ bid.
E/W lose one Spade trick, one Heart, and one Club, making four. There will be
more than one N/S pair that bid on to 5 ♥ on the vulnerability, although it's
risky, since neither is sure that 4 ♠ is making. North will lead the ♥T.
Board 10 East Deals Both Vul |
♠ | K 9 | ♥ | J 10 7 6 3 2 | ♦ | 7 3 2 | ♣ | 7 4 |
|
♠ | A 7 3 2 | ♥ | K 4 | ♦ | K Q 10 8 5 | ♣ | J 8 |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | Q J 5 | ♥ | A Q 9 | ♦ | J 9 4 | ♣ | Q 10 6 5 |
|
|
|
♠ | 10 8 6 4 | ♥ | 8 5 | ♦ | A 6 | ♣ | A K 9 3 2 |
|
EW 3N; EW 2♦; EW 1♠; NS 1♥; EW 1♣; Par −600
West | North | East | South |
| | 1 ♣ | Pass |
1 ♦1 | Pass | 1 NT | Pass |
2 ♠2 | Pass | 2 NT | Pass |
3 NT | Pass | Pass | Pass |
- Walsh style
- Alert, partner is showing an opening hand with four Spades and longer Diamonds
|
Contract | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
3 NT | E | −1 | 100 | | 6.93 | 0.07 | 10-Tedrick-Pretz | 3-Terbrueggen-Moese |
2 ♥ | N | −1 | | 100 | 5.79 | 1.21 | 11-Congbalay-Cook | 6-Temples-Koch |
2 ♦ | W | 4 | | 130 | 4.64 | 2.36 | 3-Kobida-Burns | 2-Koch-Brown |
3 NT | E | 3 | | 600 | 3.50 | 3.50 | 9-Murdock-Wolf | 1-Felson-Brown |
3 NT | E | 4 | | 630 | 1.21 | 5.79 | 1-Vanstone-Roark | 10-Jervis-Lindeman |
3 NT | E | 4 | | 630 | 1.21 | 5.79 | 2-De Roos-Mackey | 12-Newman-Schultz |
3 NT | E | 4 | | 630 | 1.21 | 5.79 | 4-Singerman-Williams | 4-Henry-Campbell |
When West responds with 1 ♦ over partner's 1 ♣ opener, they're either (1)
denying a four-card major, or (2) showing an opening hand with longer Diamonds.
In this case, it's the second one. When you mark Frequently bypass 4+♦ on
your convention card, you're playing what's called Walsh Style.
E/W take four Diamond tricks, three Hearts, and two Spades, making three.
North will probably lead a Heart, but nothing really matters as declarer has
time to knock out the stoppers in both pointy suits (♠ and ♦).
Board 11 South Deals None Vul |
♠ | 8 | ♥ | Q 8 7 3 | ♦ | A Q 4 | ♣ | K Q J 10 2 |
|
♠ | K 6 4 | ♥ | J 5 4 | ♦ | K J 8 7 2 | ♣ | 7 6 |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | 9 7 5 2 | ♥ | A K 6 2 | ♦ | 6 3 | ♣ | 9 5 4 |
|
|
|
♠ | A Q J 10 3 | ♥ | 10 9 | ♦ | 10 9 5 | ♣ | A 8 3 |
|
NS 4N; NS 4♠; NS 5♣; NS 3♥; NS 2♦; Par +430
West | North | East | South |
| | | Pass |
Pass | 1 ♣ | Pass | 1 ♠ |
Pass | 2 ♣1 | Pass | 2 NT2 |
Pass | 3 NT | Pass | Pass |
Pass | | | |
- Not strong enough to reverse
- Showing around 11 HCP
|
Contract | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
3 NT | N | 5 | 460 | | 6.93 | 0.07 | 1-Vanstone-Roark | 10-Jervis-Lindeman |
4 ♠ | S | 5 | 450 | | 5.79 | 1.21 | 4-Singerman-Williams | 4-Henry-Campbell |
3 NT | S | 3 | 400 | | 4.64 | 2.36 | 11-Congbalay-Cook | 6-Temples-Koch |
2 ♠ | S | 4 | 170 | | 3.50 | 3.50 | 10-Tedrick-Pretz | 3-Terbrueggen-Moese |
2 NT | N | 3 | 150 | | 2.36 | 4.64 | 9-Murdock-Wolf | 1-Felson-Brown |
2 NT | N | 2 | 120 | | 1.21 | 5.79 | 2-De Roos-Mackey | 12-Newman-Schultz |
3 NT | N | −1 | | 50 | 0.07 | 6.93 | 3-Kobida-Burns | 2-Koch-Brown |
Some will open the South hand, and that's certainly not wrong with 2-1/2 quick
tricks and lovely spot cards. South's 2 NT bid is simply showing their
shape--it doesn't promise values in the unbid suits (nobody's bidding those
anyway). If North had three Spades, they'd sneak in a 3 ♠ bid over 2 NT.
E/W take two Heart tricks and a Spade. If they don't grab their tricks before
Spades are established, N/S will make five (five Club tricks, two Diamonds, and
four Spades). That's unlikely, since West will probably lead the ♥ 4 (or the
♥ J).
The proper way to play the Spades is ♠ A first followed by more gigantic
Spades. A finesse won't get you an extra Spade trick, since you'd need East to
hold precisely ♠ Kx for the finesse to work. With ♠ Kx, West would then have
five Spades, and a fifth Spade trick would still be impossible.
Board 12 West Deals N-S Vul |
♠ | Q J 10 7 | ♥ | J 10 6 4 3 | ♦ | 4 | ♣ | K 8 7 |
|
♠ | A K 9 3 | ♥ | K 8 | ♦ | A J 9 3 2 | ♣ | A 3 |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | 6 5 4 2 | ♥ | A 9 | ♦ | Q 10 7 6 | ♣ | J 10 4 |
|
|
|
♠ | 8 | ♥ | Q 7 5 2 | ♦ | K 8 5 | ♣ | Q 9 6 5 2 |
|
EW 4N; EW 4♠; EW 4♦; NS 2♥; NS 1♣; Par −430
West | North | East | South |
2 NT1 | Pass | 3 ♣2 | Pass |
3 ♦3 | Pass | 3 ♥4 | Pass |
3 ♠ | Pass | 3 NT5 | Pass |
4 ♠ | Pass | Pass | Pass |
- 20 to 21
- Puppet Stayman asking for a 4- or 5-card major
- Alert, artificial denying a 5-card major but showing one or more 4-card majors
- Alert, artificial showing four Spades
- Suggesting a notrump contract
|
Contract | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
4 ♠ | E | −2 | 100 | | 6.93 | 0.07 | 1-Vanstone-Roark | 10-Jervis-Lindeman |
4 ♦ | W | −1 | 50 | | 5.79 | 1.21 | 3-Kobida-Burns | 2-Koch-Brown |
4 ♠ | W | 4 | | 420 | 2.93 | 4.07 | 2-De Roos-Mackey | 12-Newman-Schultz |
4 ♠ | E | 4 | | 420 | 2.93 | 4.07 | 4-Singerman-Williams | 4-Henry-Campbell |
4 ♠ | E | 4 | | 420 | 2.93 | 4.07 | 9-Murdock-Wolf | 1-Felson-Brown |
4 ♠ | W | 4 | | 420 | 2.93 | 4.07 | 11-Congbalay-Cook | 6-Temples-Koch |
3 NT | W | 6 | | 490 | 0.07 | 6.93 | 10-Tedrick-Pretz | 3-Terbrueggen-Moese |
West's hand is easily worth an upgrade due to the fifth Diamond and the primes
(Aces and Kings). East, with a semi-balanced hand, suggests possibly playing
in notrump once the Spade fit has been found. West, with two doubletons, is
reluctant and bids the major-suit game.
E/W lose two Spade tricks and one Club, making four. North should probably not
lead their singleton Diamond on opening lead, since they definitely don't want
to ruff anything (i.e., they have natural trump tricks). Better would be the
♥ J. Playing along double-dummy lines, declarer should win in dummy with the
♥ A and immediately run the ♦ Q. When it wins, declarer should finesse a
second Diamond. North can ruff in, but it will be at the expense of one of
their trump tricks. Declarer can win any return, pull two rounds of trump
(noting the bad break), and continue Diamonds.
Board 13 North Deals Both Vul |
♠ | K Q 6 5 | ♥ | 10 | ♦ | A K Q 10 8 3 | ♣ | 7 4 |
|
♠ | 8 7 3 | ♥ | 8 5 3 2 | ♦ | J | ♣ | K J 10 9 5 |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | A J 10 9 2 | ♥ | A Q 9 | ♦ | 6 5 4 2 | ♣ | 6 |
|
|
|
♠ | 4 | ♥ | K J 7 6 4 | ♦ | 9 7 | ♣ | A Q 8 3 2 |
|
N 3N; S 2N; NS 3♦; NS 1♥; NS 1♣; Par +600
West | North | East | South |
| 1 ♦ | 1 ♠ | 2 ♥1 |
Pass | 3 NT2 | Pass | Pass |
Pass | | | |
- Showing 5+ Hearts and 10+ HCP (5-and-Dime)
- What else?
|
Contract | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
3 NT | S | 4 | 630 | | 6.93 | 0.07 | 11-Congbalay-Cook | 4-Henry-Campbell |
3 NT | S | 3 | 600 | | 5.79 | 1.21 | 2-De Roos-Mackey | 11-Heckel-Decker |
3 ♦ | N | 5 | 150 | | 4.64 | 2.36 | 1-Vanstone-Roark | 9-Endres-Kennedy |
3 ♦ | N | 4 | 130 | | 3.50 | 3.50 | 4-Singerman-Williams | 3-Terbrueggen-Moese |
3 ♦ | N | 3 | 110 | | 2.36 | 4.64 | 10-Tedrick-Pretz | 2-Koch-Brown |
3 ♦ | N | −1 | | 100 | 1.21 | 5.79 | 5-Lin-Hubka | 5-Kammer-Zimmer |
4 ♦ | N | −2 | | 200 | 0.07 | 6.93 | 3-Kobida-Burns | 1-Felson-Brown |
North has no reason not to bid 3 NT after South shows values and Hearts.
East's best lead is the ♠ J (interior honor sequence). North can win and lead
the ♥T towards dummy. It doesn't matter what East does at this point--N/W are
going to end up with one Spade trick, one Heart, six Diamonds, and one Club,
making three.
Board 14 East Deals None Vul |
♠ | K J 6 4 3 | ♥ | K 7 6 | ♦ | 8 | ♣ | A J 10 3 |
|
♠ | 7 | ♥ | A J 8 4 | ♦ | 6 5 3 | ♣ | K Q 9 6 4 |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | A 10 9 2 | ♥ | 10 9 5 3 | ♦ | Q 10 7 2 | ♣ | 5 |
|
|
|
♠ | Q 8 5 | ♥ | Q 2 | ♦ | A K J 9 4 | ♣ | 8 7 2 |
|
NS 3♠; NS 2N; NS 3♦; NS 2♣; Par +140
West | North | East | South |
| | Pass | 1 ♦ |
Pass | 1 ♠ | Pass | 1 NT |
Pass | 2 ♦1 | Pass | 2 ♠2 |
Pass | 4 ♠ | Pass | Pass |
Pass | | | |
- Alert, artificial game-forcing XYZ bid
- Showing 3-card Spade support and denying four Hearts
|
Contract | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
2 ♠ | N | 3 | 140 | | 6.93 | 0.07 | 4-Singerman-Williams | 3-Terbrueggen-Moese |
2 ♠ | N | 2 | 110 | | 5.79 | 1.21 | 5-Lin-Hubka | 5-Kammer-Zimmer |
4 ♠ | N | −1 | | 50 | 2.36 | 4.64 | 1-Vanstone-Roark | 9-Endres-Kennedy |
4 ♠ | N | −1 | | 50 | 2.36 | 4.64 | 2-De Roos-Mackey | 11-Heckel-Decker |
3 NT | N | −1 | | 50 | 2.36 | 4.64 | 3-Kobida-Burns | 1-Felson-Brown |
4 ♠ | N | −1 | | 50 | 2.36 | 4.64 | 10-Tedrick-Pretz | 2-Koch-Brown |
4 ♠ | N | −1 | | 50 | 2.36 | 4.64 | 11-Congbalay-Cook | 4-Henry-Campbell |
N/S lose two Spade tricks, one Heart, and one Club, down one on the bad trump
split. Bad? When you're missing five trumps, you can expect them to split 3-2
68% of the time, 4-1 28% of the time, and 5-0 4% of the time. Basically, that
says that somewhere around a third of the time, you're going to get a "bad"
split. Deal with it. East will lead the ♣ 5.
Board 15 South Deals N-S Vul |
♠ | K J 7 6 | ♥ | 9 7 4 | ♦ | A 5 | ♣ | K 9 8 3 |
|
♠ | 9 5 | ♥ | 8 | ♦ | Q 10 9 7 6 4 | ♣ | 10 7 6 5 |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | A 10 4 3 2 | ♥ | Q 10 3 2 | ♦ | 8 2 | ♣ | A J |
|
|
|
♠ | Q 8 | ♥ | A K J 6 5 | ♦ | K J 3 | ♣ | Q 4 2 |
|
NS 5N; NS 5♥; NS 3♠; NS 3♣; NS 1♦; Par +660
West | North | East | South |
| | | 1 NT1 |
Pass2 | 3 ♣3 | Pass | 3 ♥4 |
Pass | 4 ♥ | Pass | Pass |
Pass | | | |
- 15 to 17
- Too weak to interfere with the opponent's notrump auction
- Alert, artificial asking for a 5-card major
- Alert, showing five Hearts
|
Contract | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
3 NT | S | 5 | 660 | | 6.93 | 0.07 | 10-Tedrick-Pretz | 2-Koch-Brown |
3 NT | S | 4 | 630 | | 4.64 | 2.36 | 1-Vanstone-Roark | 9-Endres-Kennedy |
3 NT | S | 4 | 630 | | 4.64 | 2.36 | 2-De Roos-Mackey | 11-Heckel-Decker |
3 NT | S | 4 | 630 | | 4.64 | 2.36 | 4-Singerman-Williams | 3-Terbrueggen-Moese |
4 ♥ | S | 4 | 620 | | 2.36 | 4.64 | 11-Congbalay-Cook | 4-Henry-Campbell |
3 NT | S | 3 | 600 | | 0.64 | 6.36 | 3-Kobida-Burns | 1-Felson-Brown |
3 NT | S | 3 | 600 | | 0.64 | 6.36 | 5-Lin-Hubka | 5-Kammer-Zimmer |
N/S lose one Spade trick, one Heart, and one Club, making four. On the likely
Spade lead, declarer will win in hand with the ♠ Q (East ducking), and play the
♥ A. Now a small Diamond to the ♦ A, Diamond back to the ♦ K, and a Diamond
ruff with East overruffing with the ♥T. East can cash their black-suit Aces,
but that's it for the defense when the ♥ Q is finessable.
Why does it show that N/S make five? They do on double-dummy lines. Here's
how:
(1) Win trick one with the ♠ Q
(2) Play a small Diamond to dummy's ♦ A
(3) Play the ♥ 9 from dummy, East covering with the ♥T (smothering the ♥ 8 in
the West hand)
(4) Play the ♦ K (removing an exit card from the East hand)
(5) Play the ♠ 8 to dummy's ♠ J (East winning)
(6) Win the small Heart return in dummy with the ♥ 7
(7) Play the ♠ K throwing the ♦ J
(8) Play a small Club to the ♣ Q (East playing the ♣ J)
(9) ♥ A
(10) ♥ K pulling East's last trump
(11) ♣ 4 to dummy's ♣ 8 (East forced to win the ♣ A)
(12) Ruff East's Spade return with the ♥ 6
(13) Small Club to the ♣ K
Board 16 West Deals E-W Vul |
♠ | K Q 10 8 5 2 | ♥ | 3 2 | ♦ | 4 | ♣ | A 8 4 2 |
|
♠ | 7 6 | ♥ | A Q 10 6 5 | ♦ | K Q 10 6 2 | ♣ | 6 |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | J 3 | ♥ | J 9 4 | ♦ | J 7 5 3 | ♣ | Q 10 7 3 |
|
|
|
♠ | A 9 4 | ♥ | K 8 7 | ♦ | A 9 8 | ♣ | K J 9 5 |
|
S 6♣; S 5N; NS 5♠; N 5♣; N 2N; EW 2♦; Par +920
West | North | East | South |
1 ♥ | 2 ♠1 | Pass | 3 ♥2 |
Dbl3 | 4 ♠ | Pass | Pass |
Pass | | | |
- Preemptive jump-shift overcall
- Forcing, showing a limit-raise or better in Spades
- Lead a Heart
|
Contract | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
4 ♠× | N | 4 | 590 | | 6.93 | 0.07 | 3-Kobida-Burns | 12-Newman-Schultz |
4 ♠ | N | 4 | 420 | | 4.64 | 2.36 | 1-Vanstone-Roark | 8-Diers-McCarthy |
4 ♠ | N | 4 | 420 | | 4.64 | 2.36 | 4-Singerman-Williams | 2-Koch-Brown |
4 ♠ | N | 4 | 420 | | 4.64 | 2.36 | 11-Congbalay-Cook | 3-Terbrueggen-Moese |
2 ♠ | N | 4 | 170 | | 2.36 | 4.64 | 6-Lammers-Barron | 6-Temples-Koch |
4 ♠ | N | −1 | | 50 | 1.21 | 5.79 | 2-De Roos-Mackey | 10-Jervis-Lindeman |
3 NT | S | −2 | | 100 | 0.07 | 6.93 | 5-Lin-Hubka | 4-Henry-Campbell |
North has a maximum for their 2 ♠ overcall, so they're delighted to go on to
game when South shows a strong hand with Spade support. N/S lose two Heart
tricks, making five. Declarer will probably end up losing a Club trick as well
by playing the ♣ A and leading another Club to the ♣ J. That's not a bad
line--just an unfortunate one. East will lead the ♥ 4.
Board 17 North Deals None Vul |
♠ | Q 5 4 | ♥ | A J 10 6 2 | ♦ | A J | ♣ | K 9 4 |
|
♠ | J 2 | ♥ | Q 9 7 3 | ♦ | 7 6 | ♣ | A J 10 6 2 |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | K 10 | ♥ | K 8 | ♦ | 10 9 8 5 4 3 | ♣ | 7 5 3 |
|
|
|
♠ | A 9 8 7 6 3 | ♥ | 5 4 | ♦ | K Q 2 | ♣ | Q 8 |
|
NS 4♠; NS 3N; NS 3♥; S 1♣; Par +420
West | North | East | South |
| 1 NT1 | Pass | 4 ♥2 |
Pass | 4 ♠ | Pass | Pass |
Pass | | | |
Contract | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
4 ♠ | N | 4 | 420 | | 4.64 | 2.36 | 1-Vanstone-Roark | 8-Diers-McCarthy |
4 ♠ | N | 4 | 420 | | 4.64 | 2.36 | 2-De Roos-Mackey | 10-Jervis-Lindeman |
4 ♠ | S | 4 | 420 | | 4.64 | 2.36 | 3-Kobida-Burns | 12-Newman-Schultz |
4 ♠ | S | 4 | 420 | | 4.64 | 2.36 | 4-Singerman-Williams | 2-Koch-Brown |
4 ♠ | N | 4 | 420 | | 4.64 | 2.36 | 11-Congbalay-Cook | 3-Terbrueggen-Moese |
2 ♠ | S | 5 | 200 | | 1.21 | 5.79 | 6-Lammers-Barron | 6-Temples-Koch |
3 ♠ | S | 4 | 170 | | 0.07 | 6.93 | 5-Lin-Hubka | 4-Henry-Campbell |
South is about a card shy of making a slam try. N/S lose one Spade trick, one
Heart, and one Club, making four. The proper way to play the Spade suit is low
to the ♠ A and back towards the ♠ Q. East will probably lead the ♦T.
Board 18 East Deals N-S Vul |
♠ | A 10 7 6 2 | ♥ | A K 2 | ♦ | 9 | ♣ | K J 7 4 |
|
♠ | 5 4 | ♥ | 8 5 4 | ♦ | A K J 8 5 2 | ♣ | Q 2 |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | Q 8 3 | ♥ | Q J 10 9 3 | ♦ | 10 3 | ♣ | 8 6 5 |
|
|
|
♠ | K J 9 | ♥ | 7 6 | ♦ | Q 7 6 4 | ♣ | A 10 9 3 |
|
NS 6♠; NS 6♣; S 5N; S 2♥; N 1N; S 2♦; N 1♥; Par +1430
West | North | East | South |
| | Pass | Pass |
2 ♦1 | 2 ♠ | Pass | 3 ♦2 |
Pass | 4 ♠ | Pass | Pass |
Pass | | | |
- Weak two opener
- Cuebid showing a limit raise in Spades
|
Contract | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
4 ♠ | N | 5 | 650 | | 6.17 | 0.83 | 6-Lammers-Barron | 6-Temples-Koch |
4 ♠ | N | 5 | 650 | | 6.17 | 0.83 | 11-Congbalay-Cook | 3-Terbrueggen-Moese |
4 ♠ | N | 4 | 620 | | 4.17 | 2.83 | 1-Vanstone-Roark | 8-Diers-McCarthy |
4 ♠ | S | 5 | Ave | Ave | 3.50 | 3.50 | 5-Lin-Hubka | 4-Henry-Campbell |
3 ♠ | N | 5 | 200 | | 2.83 | 4.17 | 2-De Roos-Mackey | 10-Jervis-Lindeman |
4 ♣ | S | 4 | 130 | | 1.50 | 5.50 | 3-Kobida-Burns | 12-Newman-Schultz |
2 ♠ | N | 2 | 110 | | 0.17 | 6.83 | 4-Singerman-Williams | 2-Koch-Brown |
N/S won't get to the slam, nor should they. To take 12 tricks, Spades have to
split 3-2 and declarer has to find both the ♠ Q and ♣ Q while negotiating a
Heart ruff with dummy's ♠ 9. Let's see....that's somewhere around a 9% slam.
Don't be in it.
East will lead the ♦T on opening lead, and West will allow it to hold.
Declarer will ruff the Diamond continuation, and lead a Spade to dummy's ♠ J
(East is more likely to hold Spade length on the auction). When the ♠ J wins,
declarer will continue with the ♠ K, the ♥ AK, and a Heart ruff. Now a small
Club to the ♣ J and the ♠ A to end the drama.
Board 19 South Deals E-W Vul |
♠ | A 9 5 | ♥ | K 9 6 | ♦ | K J | ♣ | Q J 9 6 3 |
|
♠ | J 8 4 | ♥ | A 3 | ♦ | 8 5 4 3 2 | ♣ | 10 5 4 |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | K Q 7 | ♥ | Q J 10 5 | ♦ | 10 9 7 6 | ♣ | 8 2 |
|
|
|
♠ | 10 6 3 2 | ♥ | 8 7 4 2 | ♦ | A Q | ♣ | A K 7 |
|
NS 3N; NS 2♠; NS 2♥; NS 3♣; EW 1♦; Par +400
West | North | East | South |
| | | 1 ♣ |
Pass | 2 ♣1 | Pass | 2 ♦2 |
Pass | 2 NT3 | Pass | 3 NT |
Pass | Pass | Pass | |
- Alert, game-forcing Club raise
- Showing a Diamond stopper for notrump and denying a stopper in both majors
- Stoppers in the majors
|
Contract | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
3 NT | S | 3 | 400 | | 5.79 | 1.21 | 3-Kobida-Burns | 11-Heckel-Decker |
3 NT | N | 3 | 400 | | 5.79 | 1.21 | 4-Singerman-Williams | 1-Felson-Brown |
3 NT | N | 3 | 400 | | 5.79 | 1.21 | 7-Kereiakes-Kereiakes | 7-Lubow-Earls |
2 NT | N | 3 | 150 | | 2.93 | 4.07 | 2-De Roos-Mackey | 9-Endres-Kennedy |
2 NT | S | 3 | 150 | | 2.93 | 4.07 | 5-Lin-Hubka | 3-Terbrueggen-Moese |
2 ♣ | S | 3 | 110 | | 1.21 | 5.79 | 6-Lammers-Barron | 5-Kammer-Zimmer |
4 ♥ | S | −2 | | 100 | 0.07 | 6.93 | 1-Vanstone-Roark | 6-Temples-Koch |
South's 2 ♦ rebid doesn't deny stoppers in either major--it simply denies both
a Heart stopper and a Spade stopper. N/S take five Club tricks, two Diamonds,
one Heart, and one Spade, making three. East will lead the ♥ Q, West will
overtake with the ♥ A, return a Heart, and declarer will cash out.
Board 20 West Deals Both Vul |
♠ | 8 7 | ♥ | Q 5 2 | ♦ | K Q J 7 | ♣ | K Q 8 2 |
|
♠ | Q 6 4 2 | ♥ | K 9 8 6 4 | ♦ | 10 5 4 | ♣ | 4 |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | A K 5 3 | ♥ | A 3 | ♦ | A 3 2 | ♣ | 10 9 5 3 |
|
|
|
♠ | J 10 9 | ♥ | J 10 7 | ♦ | 9 8 6 | ♣ | A J 7 6 |
|
EW 4♠; EW 3♥; EW 1N; NS 1♣; Par −620
West | North | East | South |
Pass | 1 ♦ | 1 NT1 | Pass |
2 ♣2 | Pass | 2 ♠ | Pass |
Pass | Pass | | |
Contract | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
2 ♥ | E | 2 | | 110 | 6.93 | 0.07 | 1-Vanstone-Roark | 6-Temples-Koch |
2 ♥ | E | 3 | | 140 | 4.64 | 2.36 | 2-De Roos-Mackey | 9-Endres-Kennedy |
2 ♥ | E | 3 | | 140 | 4.64 | 2.36 | 4-Singerman-Williams | 1-Felson-Brown |
2 ♥ | E | 3 | | 140 | 4.64 | 2.36 | 7-Kereiakes-Kereiakes | 7-Lubow-Earls |
2 ♠ | E | 4 | | 170 | 1.79 | 5.21 | 3-Kobida-Burns | 11-Heckel-Decker |
2 ♠ | W | 4 | | 170 | 1.79 | 5.21 | 5-Lin-Hubka | 3-Terbrueggen-Moese |
1 NT | S | −2 | | 200 | 0.07 | 6.93 | 6-Lammers-Barron | 5-Kammer-Zimmer |
West knows that a major-suit contract will play better than a notrump
contract, so they trot out Garbage (Crawling) Stayman over partner's 1 NT
overcall. If East had bid 2 ♦, denying a 4-card major, West would have
continued with 2 ♥ (to play). If East held only two Hearts, they would "crawl"
up to 2 ♠. Not the case here, as East holds four Spades.
South will lead the ♦ 8 (MUD) on opening lead, and E/W will lose only three
minor-suit tricks when Hearts split 3-3. Best line is to win with the ♦ A,
♥ A, ♥ 3 to the ♥ K, and ruff a Heart with the ♠ 3. Now, ♠ AK and a small
Spade to dummy's ♠ Q finish off the trumps, and declarer can discard their two
losing Diamonds on dummy's Heart winners.
Alternatively, declarer can win the ♦ A and play a small Club from both hands.
The defenders can win cheaply and cash two more Diamonds before exiting with a
trump, but declarer will still have 10 tricks even if Hearts fail to split.
Board 21 North Deals N-S Vul |
♠ | K 10 4 | ♥ | 10 7 | ♦ | 9 3 | ♣ | K J 9 7 6 3 |
|
♠ | 8 7 6 3 2 | ♥ | 8 4 2 | ♦ | 5 4 | ♣ | Q 10 5 |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | J 5 | ♥ | A Q 9 5 3 | ♦ | Q 10 8 7 6 | ♣ | A |
|
|
|
♠ | A Q 9 | ♥ | K J 6 | ♦ | A K J 2 | ♣ | 8 4 2 |
|
NS 5N; NS 4♠; NS 5♣; NS 3♦; NS 1♥; Par +660
West | North | East | South |
| Pass | 1 ♥ | 1 NT1 |
Pass | 2 ♣2 | Pass | 2 ♦ |
Pass | 2 NT3 | Pass | 3 NT |
Pass | Pass | Pass | |
- 15 to 18
- Stayman, intending to invite in notrump
- Alert, partner may or may not have a 4-card major
|
Contract | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
3 NT | S | 4 | 630 | | 6.36 | 0.64 | 1-Vanstone-Roark | 6-Temples-Koch |
3 NT | S | 4 | 630 | | 6.36 | 0.64 | 6-Lammers-Barron | 5-Kammer-Zimmer |
3 ♥ | E | −5 | 250 | | 4.64 | 2.36 | 4-Singerman-Williams | 1-Felson-Brown |
2 NT | S | 6 | 240 | | 3.50 | 3.50 | 3-Kobida-Burns | 11-Heckel-Decker |
3 ♣ | S | 4 | 130 | | 1.79 | 5.21 | 2-De Roos-Mackey | 9-Endres-Kennedy |
3 ♣ | N | 4 | 130 | | 1.79 | 5.21 | 5-Lin-Hubka | 3-Terbrueggen-Moese |
1 ♥ | E | 1 | | 80 | 0.07 | 6.93 | 7-Kereiakes-Kereiakes | 7-Lubow-Earls |
While North might have called their hand weak if partner had opened 1 NT, it's
certainly worth inviting when South overcalls 1 NT (15-18 HCP). North has a
six-card minor, two Tens, and two 9's--none of which are accounted for by
simply adding up high-card points.
N/S take three Spade tricks, two Hearts, three Diamonds, and two Clubs. It's
unlikely that declarer will guess that East has a stiff ♣ A and will likely
lead a small Club to dummy's ♣ J--oops. West will lead the ♥ 4 (MUD) on
opening lead.
Board 22 East Deals E-W Vul |
♠ | A 9 5 4 3 | ♥ | J 3 2 | ♦ | J 7 2 | ♣ | A 6 |
|
♠ | J 7 6 | ♥ | 7 | ♦ | Q 8 6 5 | ♣ | K Q J 8 7 |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | K 2 | ♥ | A Q 6 5 4 | ♦ | K 10 9 3 | ♣ | 9 3 |
|
|
|
♠ | Q 10 8 | ♥ | K 10 9 8 | ♦ | A 4 | ♣ | 10 5 4 2 |
|
EW 4♦; NS 2♠; EW 2♣; EW 1♥; Par −130
West | North | East | South |
| | 1 ♥ | Pass |
1 NT1 | Pass | 2 ♦ | Pass |
3 ♦ | Pass | Pass | Pass |
Contract | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
3 NT | E | −2 | 200 | | 7.00 | 0.00 | 8-Magnus-Magnus, Jr | 8-Diers-McCarthy |
2 ♠ | N | 2 | 110 | | 6.00 | 1.00 | 1-Vanstone-Roark | 5-Kammer-Zimmer |
3 ♦ | E | −1 | 100 | | 4.50 | 2.50 | 3-Kobida-Burns | 10-Jervis-Lindeman |
3 ♦ | E | −1 | 100 | | 4.50 | 2.50 | 4-Singerman-Williams | 12-Newman-Schultz |
2 ♠ | N | −1 | | 50 | 3.00 | 4.00 | 5-Lin-Hubka | 2-Koch-Brown |
1 NT | W | 1 | | 90 | 2.00 | 5.00 | 7-Kereiakes-Kereiakes | 6-Temples-Koch |
2 ♦ | E | 4 | | 130 | 1.00 | 6.00 | 2-De Roos-Mackey | 7-Lubow-Earls |
2 ♠× | N | −2 | | 300 | 0.00 | 7.00 | 6-Lammers-Barron | 4-Henry-Campbell |
If West had passed their partner's 2 ♦ bid, North would have balanced with
2 ♠. That's not going to happen at the three level. E/W lose one Spade trick,
one Diamond, and one Club, making four. If declarer misguesses the Diamonds,
they'll make three, although it's extremely likely that South will lead the ♦ A
and another Diamond. So much for misguessing....
Board 23 South Deals Both Vul |
♠ | A Q 4 3 | ♥ | K J 7 | ♦ | J 8 4 | ♣ | A Q 8 |
|
♠ | 10 7 | ♥ | A 8 4 2 | ♦ | 9 6 2 | ♣ | J 9 5 2 |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | K 9 8 5 | ♥ | Q 10 9 6 3 | ♦ | A K 3 | ♣ | 10 |
|
|
|
♠ | J 6 2 | ♥ | 5 | ♦ | Q 10 7 5 | ♣ | K 7 6 4 3 |
|
NS 2♠; EW 2♥; N 2♦; NS 2♣; S 1♦; Par +110
West | North | East | South |
| | | Pass |
Pass | 1 NT1 | 2 ♥2 | Pass |
Pass | Pass | | |
- 15 to 17
- Alert, showing both majors
|
Contract | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
2 ♥ | E | −1 | 100 | | 7.00 | 0.00 | 4-Singerman-Williams | 12-Newman-Schultz |
3 ♣ | S | −1 | | 100 | 5.00 | 2.00 | 1-Vanstone-Roark | 5-Kammer-Zimmer |
1 NT | N | −1 | | 100 | 5.00 | 2.00 | 5-Lin-Hubka | 2-Koch-Brown |
1 NT | N | −1 | | 100 | 5.00 | 2.00 | 6-Lammers-Barron | 4-Henry-Campbell |
2 ♥ | W | 2 | | 110 | 2.50 | 4.50 | 2-De Roos-Mackey | 7-Lubow-Earls |
2 ♥ | E | 2 | | 110 | 2.50 | 4.50 | 7-Kereiakes-Kereiakes | 6-Temples-Koch |
2 ♥ | E | 3 | | 140 | 1.00 | 6.00 | 8-Magnus-Magnus, Jr | 8-Diers-McCarthy |
1 NT | N | −2 | | 200 | 0.00 | 7.00 | 3-Kobida-Burns | 10-Jervis-Lindeman |
E/W lose one Club trick, one Diamond, one Heart, and two Spades, making two.
South might lead the ♦ 5.
Board 24 West Deals None Vul |
♠ | 10 5 | ♥ | 5 4 | ♦ | Q J 10 9 8 6 5 | ♣ | Q 5 |
|
♠ | K 9 2 | ♥ | Q J 8 7 | ♦ | 4 3 2 | ♣ | J 9 2 |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | J 8 7 4 3 | ♥ | 9 2 | ♦ | A K 7 | ♣ | K 10 8 |
|
|
|
♠ | A Q 6 | ♥ | A K 10 6 3 | ♦ | — | ♣ | A 7 6 4 3 |
|
N 4♦; S 3♦; EW 1N; E 1♠; NS 1♥; NS 1♣; Par +130
West | North | East | South |
Pass | 3 ♦ | Pass | 3 ♥1 |
Pass | 3 NT2 | Pass | 4 ♣3 |
Pass | 4 ♦4 | Pass | Pass |
Pass | | | |
- Forcing
- Alert, showing 2-card Heart support
- No desire to play in notrump, bidding out their hand
- Um....I like Diamonds
|
Contract | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
3 ♦ | N | 4 | 130 | | 7.00 | 0.00 | 5-Lin-Hubka | 2-Koch-Brown |
3 ♦ | N | 3 | 110 | | 5.50 | 1.50 | 3-Kobida-Burns | 10-Jervis-Lindeman |
3 ♦ | N | 3 | 110 | | 5.50 | 1.50 | 6-Lammers-Barron | 4-Henry-Campbell |
4 ♥ | S | −1 | | 50 | 4.00 | 3.00 | 4-Singerman-Williams | 12-Newman-Schultz |
3 NT | S | −2 | | 100 | 2.50 | 4.50 | 7-Kereiakes-Kereiakes | 6-Temples-Koch |
3 NT | S | −2 | | 100 | 2.50 | 4.50 | 8-Magnus-Magnus, Jr | 8-Diers-McCarthy |
3 NT | S | −3 | | 150 | 0.50 | 6.50 | 1-Vanstone-Roark | 5-Kammer-Zimmer |
3 ♣ | S | −3 | | 150 | 0.50 | 6.50 | 2-De Roos-Mackey | 7-Lubow-Earls |
Some South players might bid 4 ♥ over North's 4 ♦ bid, and that might be a
reasonable bid in IMPs (team game), but not in Matchpoints. It's too important
in Matchpoints to go plus, and 4 ♦ looks to be the last makeable contract. N/S
lose two Diamond tricks and one trick in a black suit--not sure which one.
East can't afford to lead a Spade or a Club on opening lead, so they'll lead a
Heart. Declarer will win in dummy with the ♥ K, play the ♥ A, and ruff a Heart
with the ♦ 8. East is welcome to overruff, but it doesn't gain them anything,
since it's with a natural trump trick. If they discard, declarer will continue
with a high trump. Still unable to play a Spade or Club, East will take their
two high Diamonds and exit with another Diamond, declarer winning in their
hand. Now a Spade to the ♠ Q loses to West. So much for making 11 tricks, but
declarer can't be stopped from returning to dummy with either black-suit Ace to
ruff another Heart, return to dummy with the other Ace, and pitch their Club
loser on the good Heart, making four. Nicely played!
Board 25 North Deals E-W Vul |
♠ | 8 | ♥ | K Q 10 | ♦ | A 10 9 | ♣ | K Q 9 7 4 3 |
|
♠ | Q J 9 6 | ♥ | A J 7 4 | ♦ | K 8 7 | ♣ | A 5 |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | 10 3 2 | ♥ | 9 8 6 3 2 | ♦ | Q 6 5 | ♣ | J 8 |
|
|
|
♠ | A K 7 5 4 | ♥ | 5 | ♦ | J 4 3 2 | ♣ | 10 6 2 |
|
NS 3N; NS 4♣; NS 2♠; NS 2♦; W 1♥; Par +400
West | North | East | South |
| 1 ♣ | Pass | 1 ♠ |
Pass | 3 ♣ | Pass | 3 ♦ |
Pass | 3 ♥ | Pass | 3 NT |
Pass | Pass | Pass | |
Contract | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
1 NT | W | −3 | 300 | | 7.00 | 0.00 | 4-Singerman-Williams | 11-Heckel-Decker |
3 ♣ | N | 5 | 150 | | 6.00 | 1.00 | 7-Kereiakes-Kereiakes | 5-Kammer-Zimmer |
2 ♣ | N | 4 | 130 | | 3.00 | 4.00 | 3-Kobida-Burns | 8-Diers-McCarthy |
2 ♣ | N | 4 | 130 | | 3.00 | 4.00 | 5-Lin-Hubka | 1-Felson-Brown |
3 ♣ | N | 4 | 130 | | 3.00 | 4.00 | 6-Lammers-Barron | 3-Terbrueggen-Moese |
2 ♣ | N | 4 | 130 | | 3.00 | 4.00 | 8-Magnus-Magnus, Jr | 7-Lubow-Earls |
3 ♣ | N | 4 | 130 | | 3.00 | 4.00 | 9-Murdock-Wolf | 9-Endres-Kennedy |
3 ♥ | E | −1 | 100 | | 0.00 | 7.00 | 2-De Roos-Mackey | 6-Temples-Koch |
North's 3 ♣ rebid shows a five-loser hand. South's 3 ♦ bid is forcing, and
North shows their Heart values (it can't be a 4-card suit, since they would
have reversed into 2 ♥). When North denies a 3rd Spade, South parks in 3 NT.
N/S take five Club tricks, one Diamond, two Spades, and one Heart, making
three. Declarer has to be careful to unblock the ♣T under one of dummy's high
honors. West will probably lead the ♠ Q.
Board 26 East Deals Both Vul |
♠ | Q J 6 4 | ♥ | Q 7 6 | ♦ | 8 7 | ♣ | J 10 9 6 |
|
♠ | K 7 3 | ♥ | J 8 5 3 2 | ♦ | K Q 9 6 | ♣ | K |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | 10 5 2 | ♥ | A 10 9 | ♦ | A 10 5 3 2 | ♣ | Q 8 |
|
|
|
♠ | A 9 8 | ♥ | K 4 | ♦ | J 4 | ♣ | A 7 5 4 3 2 |
|
EW 3♥; EW 3♦; EW 1N; NS 2♣; NS 1♠; Par −140
West | North | East | South |
| | Pass | 1 ♣ |
1 ♥1 | Dbl2 | 2 ♥ | 2 ♣ |
2 ♦3 | Pass4 | 3 ♥ | Pass |
Pass | Pass | | |
- Slightly better than doubling
- Negative showing exactly four Spades
- Showing a full opener
- On the vulnerability
|
Contract | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
4 ♣ | S | 4 | 130 | | 7.00 | 0.00 | 5-Lin-Hubka | 1-Felson-Brown |
2 ♣ | S | 2 | 90 | | 6.00 | 1.00 | 4-Singerman-Williams | 11-Heckel-Decker |
2 ♠ | N | −1 | | 100 | 5.00 | 2.00 | 2-De Roos-Mackey | 6-Temples-Koch |
2 ♦ | E | 4 | | 130 | 3.50 | 3.50 | 3-Kobida-Burns | 8-Diers-McCarthy |
2 ♦ | E | 4 | | 130 | 3.50 | 3.50 | 9-Murdock-Wolf | 9-Endres-Kennedy |
3 ♥ | W | 3 | | 140 | 2.00 | 5.00 | 8-Magnus-Magnus, Jr | 7-Lubow-Earls |
2 ♥ | W | 4 | | 170 | 1.00 | 6.00 | 6-Lammers-Barron | 3-Terbrueggen-Moese |
2 ♠ | N | −2 | | 200 | 0.00 | 7.00 | 7-Kereiakes-Kereiakes | 5-Kammer-Zimmer |
North's values are too soft (filled with Queens and Jacks) to compete to the
three level even with the known 10-card fit. E/W lose one Heart trick, two
Spades, and one Club, making three. North will lead the ♣ J.
Board 27 South Deals None Vul |
♠ | A Q 6 | ♥ | 5 | ♦ | Q 10 8 4 3 | ♣ | A 10 9 3 |
|
♠ | 9 | ♥ | A Q 8 6 | ♦ | 9 6 5 | ♣ | Q J 8 7 6 |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | 10 5 2 | ♥ | K J 10 4 | ♦ | A 7 2 | ♣ | K 5 2 |
|
|
|
♠ | K J 8 7 4 3 | ♥ | 9 7 3 2 | ♦ | K J | ♣ | 4 |
|
NS 5♠; NS 1N; EW 2♣; EW 1♥; NS 1♦; Par +450
West | North | East | South |
| | | Pass1 |
Pass | 1 ♦ | Pass | 1 ♠ |
1 NT2 | Dbl3 | 2 ♥ | 3 ♠ |
Pass | 4 ♠ | Pass | Pass |
Pass | | | |
- Don't make a weak two bid with four cards in the other major
- Alert, artificial showing the unbid suits with emphasis on the lower-ranking suit (Sandwich NT)
- Alert, support double showing 3-card Spade support
|
Contract | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
4 ♠ | S | 4 | 420 | | 7.00 | 0.00 | 8-Magnus-Magnus, Jr | 7-Lubow-Earls |
3 NT | E | −4 | 200 | | 5.00 | 2.00 | 3-Kobida-Burns | 8-Diers-McCarthy |
2 ♠ | S | 5 | 200 | | 5.00 | 2.00 | 4-Singerman-Williams | 11-Heckel-Decker |
2 ♠ | S | 5 | 200 | | 5.00 | 2.00 | 5-Lin-Hubka | 1-Felson-Brown |
3 ♠ | S | 4 | 170 | | 3.00 | 4.00 | 9-Murdock-Wolf | 9-Endres-Kennedy |
2 ♠ | S | 3 | 140 | | 2.00 | 5.00 | 2-De Roos-Mackey | 6-Temples-Koch |
4 ♠ | S | −1 | | 50 | 0.50 | 6.50 | 6-Lammers-Barron | 3-Terbrueggen-Moese |
3 ♠ | S | −1 | | 50 | 0.50 | 6.50 | 7-Kereiakes-Kereiakes | 5-Kammer-Zimmer |
When you're already a passed hand, your Sandwich NT bid should deny five cards
in the higher-ranking unbid suit (i.e., emphasis on the lower-ranking suit).
N/S lose one Heart trick and one Diamond, making five. Declarer shouldn't
worry about ruffing their Heart losers, as they can be discarded on dummy's
Diamonds. Assume that West starts off with the ♥ A and another Heart.
Declarer can ruff low in dummy, and immediately play a low Diamond to their
♦ K. East will duck and most likely win the continuation. A Club is now best,
declarer winning in dummy with the ♣ A. Declarer can afford to play off one
round of trumps, but then they need to switch to Diamonds throwing Hearts from
their hand. East is free to ruff in on the fourth round, but declarer can
overruff, play another Spade to dummy's ♠ Q (pulling East's last trump), and
continue with winning Diamonds.
How did declarer know that West would be short in Spades? Remember their
Sandwich NT bid? Combine that with the fact that East didn't continue with a
third round of Diamonds after winning their ♦ A (West signaled showing an odd
number of Diamonds), and you have a complete picture of West's hand. With five
Clubs, three Diamonds, and four Hearts, how many Spades does West have? Isn't
Bridge easy?
Board 28 West Deals N-S Vul |
♠ | A K J 10 7 5 2 | ♥ | 7 4 | ♦ | — | ♣ | K Q 10 7 |
|
♠ | 9 8 | ♥ | 10 6 5 | ♦ | K Q J 9 4 | ♣ | 8 6 4 |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | 6 4 3 | ♥ | A Q 8 3 | ♦ | 8 7 6 3 2 | ♣ | J |
|
|
|
♠ | Q | ♥ | K J 9 2 | ♦ | A 10 5 | ♣ | A 9 5 3 2 |
|
NS 6N; NS 6♠; NS 6♣; NS 2♥; EW 1♦; Par +1400: EW 7♦×−6
West | North | East | South |
Pass1 | 1 ♠2 | Pass | 2 ♣ |
Pass | 3 ♠3 | Pass | 4 NT4 |
Pass | 5 NT5 | Pass | 6 NT6 |
Pass | Pass | Pass | |
- A 2 ♦ opener wouldn't be wrong
- Gorgeous hand, but 1 ♠ doesn't deny this holding
- A jump in opener's major in a 2/1 auction sets trump and asks for control bids
- RKC Blackwood (Kickback) for Spades
- 1430 response showing an even number of keycards and a useful void
- No reason to play in Spades
|
Contract | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
6 ♠ | N | 6 | 1430 | | 6.50 | 0.50 | 4-Singerman-Williams | 9-Endres-Kennedy |
6 ♠ | N | 6 | 1430 | | 6.50 | 0.50 | 10-Tedrick-Pretz | 10-Jervis-Lindeman |
4 ♠ | N | 7 | 710 | | 4.50 | 2.50 | 8-Magnus-Magnus, Jr | 6-Temples-Koch |
4 ♠ | N | 7 | 710 | | 4.50 | 2.50 | 9-Murdock-Wolf | 8-Diers-McCarthy |
3 NT | S | 6 | 690 | | 3.00 | 4.00 | 5-Lin-Hubka | 12-Newman-Schultz |
4 ♠ | N | 6 | 680 | | 1.50 | 5.50 | 3-Kobida-Burns | 7-Lubow-Earls |
4 ♠ | N | 6 | 680 | | 1.50 | 5.50 | 6-Lammers-Barron | 2-Koch-Brown |
4 ♠ | N | 5 | 650 | | 0.00 | 7.00 | 7-Kereiakes-Kereiakes | 4-Henry-Campbell |
North was intending to jump shift into 3 ♣ if South had responded 1 NT, but
chooses to rebid 3 ♠ to set trump and ask for control bids. South, with first
or second-round control in all side suits, has no reason not to ask for
keycards. North shows an even number (two or four) keycards and a useful void,
and South, with no reason to expect there to be additional tricks in a Spade
contract, bids the notrump slam.
N/S take seven Spade tricks, five Club tricks, and one Diamond, making seven
when West leads the ♦ K. If West grabs the wrong card and accidentally leads a
Heart, they'll hold N/S to 12 tricks. Stupid accidental Heart lead.
Board 29 North Deals Both Vul |
♠ | K 8 3 2 | ♥ | — | ♦ | Q 9 8 5 2 | ♣ | K Q J 3 |
|
♠ | Q 10 4 | ♥ | K 10 5 4 2 | ♦ | K J 10 6 3 | ♣ | — |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | J 9 7 5 | ♥ | A J 9 8 | ♦ | 4 | ♣ | A 10 9 2 |
|
|
|
♠ | A 6 | ♥ | Q 7 6 3 | ♦ | A 7 | ♣ | 8 7 6 5 4 |
|
EW 3♥; W 2♠; S 3♣; EW 1N; N 2♣; E 1♠; NS 1♦; Par −140
West | North | East | South |
| 1 ♦1 | Pass2 | 1 ♥ |
Pass | 1 ♠ | Pass | 1 NT |
2 ♥3 | Pass | 2 ♠4 | Pass |
3 ♥5 | Pass | Pass | Pass |
- Rule of 20 opener
- Not quite a takeout double
- Natural
- Limit raise in Hearts
- No thank you
|
Contract | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
3 ♦ | W | −3 | 300 | | 7.00 | 0.00 | 6-Lammers-Barron | 2-Koch-Brown |
Pass | | | Pass | | 5.00 | 2.00 | 5-Lin-Hubka | 12-Newman-Schultz |
Pass | | | Pass | | 5.00 | 2.00 | 7-Kereiakes-Kereiakes | 4-Henry-Campbell |
Pass | | | Pass | | 5.00 | 2.00 | 8-Magnus-Magnus, Jr | 6-Temples-Koch |
3 NT | S | −1 | | 100 | 2.50 | 4.50 | 3-Kobida-Burns | 7-Lubow-Earls |
3 ♣ | N | −1 | | 100 | 2.50 | 4.50 | 4-Singerman-Williams | 9-Endres-Kennedy |
2 NT | E | 2 | | 120 | 1.00 | 6.00 | 10-Tedrick-Pretz | 10-Jervis-Lindeman |
1 NT | S | −2 | | 200 | 0.00 | 7.00 | 9-Murdock-Wolf | 8-Diers-McCarthy |
West can't quite overcall 2 ♥ the first time through but is happy to do so
after South's 1 NT bid limits their hand.
E/W lose two Spade tricks, a Spade ruff, and a Diamond, making three. Declarer
will be able to discard one Diamond on dummy's ♠ J, one on dummy's ♣ A, and
ruff one with dummy's fourth Heart after pulling trump. For the declarers who
aren't sure how to play the trump suit, did you forget that South bid Hearts?
Don't forget.
Board 30 East Deals None Vul |
♠ | K Q J 10 8 3 | ♥ | A K | ♦ | Q 9 7 3 2 | ♣ | — |
|
♠ | 9 6 5 | ♥ | 9 5 | ♦ | 10 8 6 | ♣ | J 9 6 5 2 |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | A | ♥ | 10 8 6 3 2 | ♦ | K | ♣ | A Q 10 7 4 3 |
|
|
|
♠ | 7 4 2 | ♥ | Q J 7 4 | ♦ | A J 5 4 | ♣ | K 8 |
|
NS 6♠; NS 6♦; NS 4N; N 3♥; S 2♥; EW 3♣; Par +800: EW 7♣×−4
West | North | East | South |
| | 1 ♣1 | Dbl2 |
3 ♣3 | 6 ♠4 | Pass | Pass |
Pass | | | |
- Planning to reverse
- A bit light but what the heck
- Weak and preemptive
- Sometimes you have to bid what you think you'll make
|
Contract | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
6 ♣× | E | −3 | 500 | | 7.00 | 0.00 | 8-Magnus-Magnus, Jr | 6-Temples-Koch |
4 ♠ | N | 6 | 480 | | 4.50 | 2.50 | 4-Singerman-Williams | 9-Endres-Kennedy |
4 ♠ | N | 6 | 480 | | 4.50 | 2.50 | 6-Lammers-Barron | 2-Koch-Brown |
4 ♠ | N | 6 | 480 | | 4.50 | 2.50 | 7-Kereiakes-Kereiakes | 4-Henry-Campbell |
5 ♠ | N | 6 | 480 | | 4.50 | 2.50 | 10-Tedrick-Pretz | 10-Jervis-Lindeman |
4 ♠ | N | 5 | 450 | | 1.50 | 5.50 | 3-Kobida-Burns | 7-Lubow-Earls |
4 ♠ | N | 5 | 450 | | 1.50 | 5.50 | 9-Murdock-Wolf | 8-Diers-McCarthy |
3 ♦ | S | 5 | 150 | | 0.00 | 7.00 | 5-Lin-Hubka | 12-Newman-Schultz |
Holding both the ♠ A and ♣ A will discourage East from sacrificing in 7 ♣.
Stupid Aces. Some Easts will double for penalty much to North's delight.
Stupid doubles.
N/S lose one Spade, making six. The proper way to play the Diamond suit is low
towards the ♦ J. When the ♦ K shows up, the rest is easy. It's likely that
East will lead the ♠ A to get a look at dummy. If dummy had a singleton Club,
East would have tried cashing the ♣ A. With two Clubs in dummy (combined with
partner's known five Clubs), East knows the ♣ A is not cashing.
Board 31 South Deals N-S Vul |
♠ | K 6 | ♥ | 9 6 5 | ♦ | A 9 6 4 3 2 | ♣ | 8 4 |
|
♠ | 7 4 3 | ♥ | J 3 | ♦ | K Q 8 7 5 | ♣ | 10 9 3 |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | A Q 8 | ♥ | K 10 2 | ♦ | 10 | ♣ | K Q J 6 5 2 |
|
|
|
♠ | J 10 9 5 2 | ♥ | A Q 8 7 4 | ♦ | J | ♣ | A 7 |
|
NS 3♥; NS 2♠; EW 1N; EW 2♣; Par +140
West | North | East | South |
| | | 1 ♠ |
Pass | 1 NT1 | 2 ♣ | 2 ♥ |
3 ♣ | 3 ♥ | Pass | Pass |
Pass | | | |
Contract | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
3 ♥ | S | 3 | 140 | | 6.00 | 1.00 | 5-Lin-Hubka | 10-Jervis-Lindeman |
2 ♠ | S | 3 | 140 | | 6.00 | 1.00 | 10-Tedrick-Pretz | 9-Endres-Kennedy |
2 ♥ | S | 3 | 140 | | 6.00 | 1.00 | 11-Congbalay-Cook | 11-Heckel-Decker |
2 ♥ | S | 2 | 110 | | 4.00 | 3.00 | 8-Magnus-Magnus, Jr | 5-Kammer-Zimmer |
4 ♣ | E | −2 | 100 | | 3.00 | 4.00 | 7-Kereiakes-Kereiakes | 3-Terbrueggen-Moese |
3 NT | E | −1 | 50 | | 2.00 | 5.00 | 4-Singerman-Williams | 8-Diers-McCarthy |
3 ♣ | E | 3 | | 110 | 0.50 | 6.50 | 6-Lammers-Barron | 1-Felson-Brown |
3 ♣ | E | 3 | | 110 | 0.50 | 6.50 | 9-Murdock-Wolf | 7-Lubow-Earls |
With some values and shortness in the opponent's suit, North doesn't want to
pass after West's 3 ♣ bid, so they raise partner's Hearts to the three level.
Even if South turns up with only four Hearts, this bid isn't horrible.
N/S lose two Spade tricks, one Heart, and one Club, making three. West will
lead the ♣T.
Board 32 West Deals E-W Vul |
♠ | 7 6 5 | ♥ | Q 9 7 5 | ♦ | K 10 7 4 | ♣ | 4 3 |
|
♠ | A K Q 10 | ♥ | A K J 6 3 2 | ♦ | A 8 | ♣ | A |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | J 9 8 | ♥ | — | ♦ | Q 9 6 5 3 | ♣ | K J 7 5 2 |
|
|
|
♠ | 4 3 2 | ♥ | 10 8 4 | ♦ | J 2 | ♣ | Q 10 9 8 6 |
|
EW 7♠; EW 5N; EW 5♥; EW 5♦; EW 4♣; Par −2210
West | North | East | South |
2 ♣ | Pass | 2 ♦1 | Pass |
2 ♥2 | Pass | 2 ♠3 | Pass |
3 ♠4 | Pass | 4 ♠5 | Pass |
4 NT6 | Pass | 5 ♦7 | Pass |
5 NT8 | Pass | 6 ♣9 | Pass |
7 ♠ | Pass | Pass | Pass |
- Game forcing, showing an A, K, or QQ
- Alert, Kokish Relay asking partner to bid 2 ♠
- Alert, forced bid
- Alert, showing a two-suited hand with 5+ Hearts and exactly four Spades
- Agreeing on Spades
- RKC Blackwood (Kickback) for Spades
- 1430 response showing 0 or 3 keycards
- Confirming possession of all of the keycards and the ♠ Q and asking for specific Kings
- Showing the ♣ K
|
Contract | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
7 NT | E | −3 | 300 | | 7.00 | 0.00 | 6-Lammers-Barron | 1-Felson-Brown |
7 NT | W | −2 | 200 | | 6.00 | 1.00 | 10-Tedrick-Pretz | 9-Endres-Kennedy |
6 ♣ | W | −1 | 100 | | 4.50 | 2.50 | 7-Kereiakes-Kereiakes | 3-Terbrueggen-Moese |
6 ♥ | W | −1 | 100 | | 4.50 | 2.50 | 9-Murdock-Wolf | 7-Lubow-Earls |
3 NT | E | 4 | | 630 | 3.00 | 4.00 | 8-Magnus-Magnus, Jr | 5-Kammer-Zimmer |
5 ♥ | W | 5 | | 650 | 1.00 | 6.00 | 4-Singerman-Williams | 8-Diers-McCarthy |
4 ♥ | W | 5 | | 650 | 1.00 | 6.00 | 5-Lin-Hubka | 10-Jervis-Lindeman |
4 ♥ | W | 5 | | 650 | 1.00 | 6.00 | 11-Congbalay-Cook | 11-Heckel-Decker |
Gorgeous auction. When East is able to show the ♣ K, West can count 13
tricks--four Spade tricks in hand, two Clubs, one Diamond, two Heart ruffs in
dummy, and four Heart tricks. How do they know they don't have a Heart loser?
Well, with three Hearts, East might have bid 4 ♥ rather than 4 ♠. If East does
have three Hearts, then (1) they might have the ♥ Q, or (2) the ♥ Q might fall
in two rounds.
North will probably lead a trump (typically the best lead against a grand
slam). Declarer will win in hand with the ♠ A, ruff a small Heart with dummy's
♠ J, Club to the ♣ A, ruff another Heart with the ♠ 9, cash the ♣ K pitching
their small Diamond, ♠ 8 to the ♠ K, ♠ Q pulling the last trump, and ♥ A. When
both opponents follow to the third Heart, declarer can claim. Nicely done!
Board 33 North Deals None Vul |
♠ | K Q 8 7 5 | ♥ | 9 7 | ♦ | A 9 5 3 | ♣ | 8 7 |
|
♠ | 10 | ♥ | Q 10 8 5 2 | ♦ | 10 6 | ♣ | A Q J 6 2 |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | A J 9 4 3 | ♥ | J 4 | ♦ | J 8 4 2 | ♣ | K 4 |
|
|
|
♠ | 6 2 | ♥ | A K 6 3 | ♦ | K Q 7 | ♣ | 10 9 5 3 |
|
NS 2♠; EW 2♥; EW 1N; EW 2♣; NS 1♦; Par +100: EW 2N×−1; EW 3♣×−1; EW 3♥×−1
West | North | East | South |
| Pass | Pass | 1 ♣ |
1 ♥ | 1 ♠1 | Pass | 1 NT |
2 ♣2 | 2 ♠ | Pass | Pass |
Pass | | | |
- Showing 5+ Spades
- Natural and lead directing
|
Contract | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
1 NT | S | 2 | 120 | | 7.00 | 0.00 | 10-Tedrick-Pretz | 9-Endres-Kennedy |
1 NT | S | 1 | 90 | | 5.50 | 1.50 | 4-Singerman-Williams | 8-Diers-McCarthy |
1 NT | S | 1 | 90 | | 5.50 | 1.50 | 8-Magnus-Magnus, Jr | 5-Kammer-Zimmer |
2 NT | E | −1 | 50 | | 4.00 | 3.00 | 5-Lin-Hubka | 10-Jervis-Lindeman |
2 ♠ | N | −1 | | 50 | 3.00 | 4.00 | 7-Kereiakes-Kereiakes | 3-Terbrueggen-Moese |
2 ♣ | W | 2 | | 90 | 1.00 | 6.00 | 6-Lammers-Barron | 1-Felson-Brown |
1 NT | E | 1 | | 90 | 1.00 | 6.00 | 9-Murdock-Wolf | 7-Lubow-Earls |
1 NT | E | 1 | | 90 | 1.00 | 6.00 | 11-Congbalay-Cook | 11-Heckel-Decker |
If East doubles the final contract, they're going to have to defend
frighteningly well. Either that or they'll have to hope declarer plays the
hand frighteningly badly (more likely).
N/S will lose two Clubs and three Spades (♠ AJ9), making two. East should lead
the ♣ K on the auction, although it's just as likely they'll lead the ♥ J.
Board 34 East Deals N-S Vul |
♠ | 10 9 8 4 | ♥ | A J 4 2 | ♦ | A J 2 | ♣ | 9 4 |
|
♠ | A K J 2 | ♥ | 9 | ♦ | Q 10 9 7 4 | ♣ | 6 5 3 |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | 7 5 | ♥ | 10 8 5 3 | ♦ | 8 5 3 | ♣ | A K J 10 |
|
|
|
♠ | Q 6 3 | ♥ | K Q 7 6 | ♦ | K 6 | ♣ | Q 8 7 2 |
|
NS 2N; NS 2♥; EW 2♦; NS 1♠; EW 1♣; Par +100: EW 3♦×−1
West | North | East | South |
| | Pass | 1 ♣ |
2 NT1 | Dbl2 | Pass | Pass |
3 ♦ | Dbl3 | Pass | Pass |
Pass | | | |
- Alert, Unmichaels bid showing Diamonds and an unknown major
- Alert, a desire to penalize one or more of the opponent's suits
- For penalty with a touch of do-something-smart-partner in the mix
|
Contract | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
2 ♥ | N | 2 | 110 | | 6.36 | 0.64 | 9-Murdock-Wolf | 6-Temples-Koch |
2 ♥ | N | 2 | 110 | | 6.36 | 0.64 | 10-Tedrick-Pretz | 8-Diers-McCarthy |
1 ♥ | S | 1 | 80 | | 4.64 | 2.36 | 8-Magnus-Magnus, Jr | 4-Henry-Campbell |
Pass | | | Pass | | 3.50 | 3.50 | 11-Congbalay-Cook | 10-Jervis-Lindeman |
2 ♥ | N | −1 | | 100 | 1.21 | 5.79 | 5-Lin-Hubka | 9-Endres-Kennedy |
3 ♥ | N | −1 | | 100 | 1.21 | 5.79 | 6-Lammers-Barron | 11-Heckel-Decker |
2 ♥ | S | −1 | | 100 | 1.21 | 5.79 | 7-Kereiakes-Kereiakes | 2-Koch-Brown |
West's 2 NT bid over South's 1 ♣ opener shows Diamonds and a major, typically
5-5 (4-5 is possible when not vulnerable) and either a minimum (5-11 HCP) or
maximum (16+ HCP) hand.
Some N/S pairs will venture on to 3 NT with little success. E/W lose one Heart
trick, three Diamonds, and one Club, down one doubled for –100. That will lose
out to the E/W pairs who are pitted against overly optimistic N/S pairs. Oh
well...
Board 35 South Deals E-W Vul |
♠ | A 8 6 5 4 | ♥ | 8 6 | ♦ | 7 3 | ♣ | Q 9 6 4 |
|
♠ | 7 | ♥ | A 10 7 3 | ♦ | Q J 10 8 5 2 | ♣ | A 2 |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | K Q 3 | ♥ | K Q 9 4 2 | ♦ | 9 6 4 | ♣ | K J |
|
|
|
♠ | J 10 9 2 | ♥ | J 5 | ♦ | A K | ♣ | 10 8 7 5 3 |
|
EW 4♥; EW 4♦; EW 2N; NS 1♠; Par −500: NS 4♠×−3
West | North | East | South |
| | | Pass |
1 ♦ | Pass | 1 ♥ | Pass |
2 ♥ | Pass | 2 NT1 | Pass |
4 ♥2 | Pass | Pass | Pass |
- Alert, artificial asking for the quality of partner's Heart raise (Wold 2 NT)
- Showing a 6-loser hand with a singleton in the other major
|
Contract | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
5 ♥ | E | −1 | 100 | | 6.93 | 0.07 | 11-Congbalay-Cook | 10-Jervis-Lindeman |
3 ♦ | W | 4 | | 130 | 5.79 | 1.21 | 6-Lammers-Barron | 11-Heckel-Decker |
4 ♥ | E | 4 | | 620 | 2.93 | 4.07 | 7-Kereiakes-Kereiakes | 2-Koch-Brown |
4 ♥ | E | 4 | | 620 | 2.93 | 4.07 | 8-Magnus-Magnus, Jr | 4-Henry-Campbell |
4 ♥ | E | 4 | | 620 | 2.93 | 4.07 | 9-Murdock-Wolf | 6-Temples-Koch |
4 ♥ | E | 4 | | 620 | 2.93 | 4.07 | 10-Tedrick-Pretz | 8-Diers-McCarthy |
4 ♥ | E | 5 | | 650 | 0.07 | 6.93 | 5-Lin-Hubka | 9-Endres-Kennedy |
If West had shown a singleton Diamond, East would be off to the races. As it
is....
E/W lose one Spade trick and two Diamonds, making four. South will lead the
♦ K on opening lead and switch to the ♠ J when they see dummy's Diamonds.
North will win the ♠ A and return a second Diamond.
Board 36 West Deals Both Vul |
♠ | A J 6 2 | ♥ | Q 3 | ♦ | J 10 7 3 | ♣ | 6 5 2 |
|
♠ | 10 8 5 3 | ♥ | K J 2 | ♦ | K Q 9 6 5 4 | ♣ | — |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | K Q 9 4 | ♥ | 7 5 | ♦ | 2 | ♣ | Q J 10 9 4 3 |
|
|
|
♠ | 7 | ♥ | A 10 9 8 6 4 | ♦ | A 8 | ♣ | A K 8 7 |
|
NS 3N; NS 3♥; EW 2♠; EW 1♦; NS 1♣; Par +500: EW 4♠×−2
West | North | East | South |
Pass1 | Pass | Pass | 1 ♥ |
2 ♦ | Dbl2 | Pass | 2 ♥ |
Pass | 2 NT | Pass | 3 NT |
Pass | Pass | Pass | |
- Don't make a weak two bid with four cards in the other major
- Negative showing 4+ Spades
|
Contract | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
3 ♠× | E | −1 | 200 | | 6.93 | 0.07 | 11-Congbalay-Cook | 10-Jervis-Lindeman |
3 ♥ | S | 4 | 170 | | 4.64 | 2.36 | 6-Lammers-Barron | 11-Heckel-Decker |
2 ♥ | S | 4 | 170 | | 4.64 | 2.36 | 7-Kereiakes-Kereiakes | 2-Koch-Brown |
2 ♥ | S | 4 | 170 | | 4.64 | 2.36 | 9-Murdock-Wolf | 6-Temples-Koch |
2 ♥ | S | 3 | 140 | | 2.36 | 4.64 | 5-Lin-Hubka | 9-Endres-Kennedy |
2 ♥ | S | 2 | 110 | | 1.21 | 5.79 | 8-Magnus-Magnus, Jr | 4-Henry-Campbell |
3 ♥ | S | −1 | | 100 | 0.07 | 6.93 | 10-Tedrick-Pretz | 8-Diers-McCarthy |
Passing 2 ♥ wouldn't be wrong, but North likes their hand and stretches to bid
2 NT. South is happy to go on to game with extras of their own.
N/S take one Spade trick, five Hearts, one Diamond, and two Clubs, making
three. The proper way to play the Heart suit is to start with a small Heart
towards the ♥ Q. If East leads the ♦ 2, declarer should win with dummy's ♦ A
and immediately lead a Heart. If East starts with the ♣ Q (more likely),
declarer should grab it, since nine tricks are there for the taking.