EVENT>Monday Night Bridge |SESSION>Monday Eve |SECTION> A N-S
------------------------,------ ------------,-------- --------------------------
DATE>October 31, 2016 |CLUB NO.>185264 | 10/31/2016 22:29
---------------------,-- ------------------- -------------,---------------------
DIR> Mike Lipp |RATING>Club Masterpoint (100%, 80%, 60% Open)|MOVEMENT>MITCHELL
------------,-------- ,-------------------------,--------- ---------------------
AVE> 84.0 |TOP> 7 |MP LIMITS>None/500/100 |CLUB>Monday Night Bridge
------------ --------- ------------------------- -------------------------------
PAIRS IN STRAT A=10/B=8/C=3 ,---,-------------------------,------,---------,
-------------------------------------------------| | Section | |Section |
No Name Name |Flt|Rnk-A|Rnk-B|Rnk-C| Score | Pct |Awards |
------------------------------------------------- --- ----- ----- ----- ------- ------ ---------
2 Millard Lakes Ying Peng C 2 2 1 94.93 56.51 0.70(A)
3 Donald Pollack Bernice Pollack C . . . 72.15 42.95
4 Joy Singerman Adrianne Freiberg B 3 3 . 87.08 51.83 0.50(A)
5 Liz Lin Elmer Hubka A . . . 79.71 47.45
6 Patricia Burnam Leonard Kanterman C . . . 70.43 41.92
7 Patrick Lammers Judy Barron B . . . 82.12 48.88
8 Judy Crotty Hall Carla Runda B . . . 79.79 47.49
9 Susan Stacy Vanstone Martin Gibler B 1 1 . 103.64 61.69 1.00(A)
10 Annette Kereiakes Tom Kereiakes B 4 . . 86.13 51.27 0.35(A)
Totals 755.98
Thanks to Bob Fisk for the Hand Analysis
**PAIRS**
BOARD 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
/
1> 3- 4.64 6.36 1.21 1.21 6.36 1.21
---- ---- ---- 140 170 420 -50 -50 420 -50
2> 4.64 5.79 0.07 1.21 2.36 6.93 3-
---- ---- ---- 110 120 -200 -100 50 150 90
3> 2.36 0.07 1.21 5.79 6.93 4.64 3-
---- ---- ---- -50 -110 -100 300 600 140 100
4> 2.36 4.07 0.64 6.36 0.64 6.36 4.07
---- 620 ---- ---- 630 600 660 600 660 630
5> 6.36 2.36 2.36 6.36 2.36 2.36 2.36
---- -420 ---- ---- -450 -450 -420 -450 -450 -450
6> 5.21 6.93 0.07 1.21 2.36 3- 5.21
---- 400 ---- ---- 1100 100 130 200 300 400
7> 5.79 6.93 0.07 4.64 2.36 2.36 2.36
---- 100 300 ---- ---- -650 -600 -620 -620 -620
8> 4.64 0.64 2.36 0.64 4.64 6.93 4.64
---- 490 -50 ---- ---- 400 -50 490 990 490
9> 4.64 1.79 1.79 5.79 1.79 6.93 1.79
---- -680 -710 ---- ---- -710 -650 -710 200 -710
10> 4.64 2.36 4.64 0.64 6.93 4.64 0.64
---- -90 -120 -90 ---- ---- -630 100 -90 -630
11> 5.79 2.36 5.79 5.79 3- 1.21 0.07
---- 110 -50 110 ---- ---- 110 50 -110 -140
12> 1.21 1.21 6.93 1.21 3- 5.21 5.21
---- -100 -100 90 ---- ---- -100 -90 50 50
13> 0.64 6.93 0.64 4.07 4.07 4.07 4.07
---- -100 120 -100 90 ---- ---- 90 90 90
14> 5.79 2.93 2.93 5.79 1.21 0.07 5.79
---- 50 -150 -150 50 ---- ---- -170 -420 50
15> 2.36 2.36 2.36 2.36 6.36 2.36 6.36
---- 680 680 680 680 ---- ---- 1430 680 1430
16> 0.64 0.64 6.93 2.93 2.93 5.21 5.21
---- -50 -50 490 450 450 ---- ---- 460 460
17> 3- 5.79 0.07 3- 1.21 3- 6.93
---- -150 -100 -610 -150 -550 ---- ---- -150 -50
18> 6.93 0.07 5.21 5.21 1.79 3- 1.79
---- 90 -260 50 50 -200 ---- ---- -140 -200
19> 1.21 4.64 6.93 1.21 4.64 1.21 4.64
---- -120 -90 100 -120 -90 -120 ---- ---- -90
20> 3- 6.93 5.79 1.21 4.64 1.21 1.21
---- -300 -90 -140 -620 -200 -620 ---- ---- -620
21> 3- 6.93 3- 5.79 3- 1.21 0.07
---- 650 1460 650 680 650 620 ---- ---- -100
22> 5.79 2.93 2.93 0.07 6.93 1.21 4.64
---- -170 -200 -200 -650 -140 -230 -180 ---- ----
23> 2.36 0.07 2.36 4.64 6.93 5.79 2.36
---- -150 -600 -150 -130 -90 -120 -150 ---- ----
24> 4.07 0.64 4.07 4.07 6.93 0.64 4.07
---- -110 -140 -110 -110 110 -140 -110 ---- ----
25> 6 1 4 1 4 7 1 4
---- 140 -90 110 -90 110 200 -90 110 ----
26> 1 3 6 6 4 1 1 6
---- -200 130 630 630 600 -200 -200 630 ----
27> 7 3 1- 1- 0 5 4 6
---- 670 130 50 50 -140 400 150 500 ----
28> 2 - - 5 5 7 3 5
---- ---- 170 -100 -100 620 620 650 200 620
29> 0 1 6 2 6 3 4 6
---- ---- -300 -200 720 110 720 150 620 720
30> 7 2- 0 1 6 2- 4- 4-
---- ---- 110 -100 -200 -150 90 -100 -50 -50
EVENT>Monday Night Bridge |SESSION>Monday Eve |SECTION> A E-W
------------------------,------ ------------,-------- --------------------------
DATE>October 31, 2016 |CLUB NO.>185264 | 10/31/2016 22:29
---------------------,-- ------------------- -------------,---------------------
DIR> Mike Lipp |RATING>Club Masterpoint (100%, 80%, 60% Open)|MOVEMENT>MITCHELL
------------,-------- ,-------------------------,--------- ---------------------
AVE> 84.0 |TOP> 7 |MP LIMITS>None/500/100 |CLUB>Monday Night Bridge
------------ --------- ------------------------- -------------------------------
PAIRS IN STRAT A=10/B=8/C=3 ,---,-------------------------,------,---------,
-------------------------------------------------| | Section | |Section |
No Name Name |Flt|Rnk-A|Rnk-B|Rnk-C| Score | Pct |Awards |
------------------------------------------------- --- ----- ----- ----- ------- ------ ---------
1 Richard Koch Lewis Temples B . . . 62.77 37.36
2 Jane Duncan Joanne Earls B 3 1 . 97.94 58.30 0.64(B)
3 Mike Burns Elva Jung B 4 2 . 94.06 55.99 0.45(B)
4 Sara Brown Dona Koch C . . . 51.01 30.36
5 Peter Dehaan Nancy Garriott B . . . 69.78 41.54
6 Herb Behr Richard Freiberg A 2 . . 98.08 58.38 0.70(A)
7 Herb Schapera Ralph Terbrueggen A 1 . . 102.46 60.99 1.00(A)
8 Joseph Kammer Gail Zimmer B . . . 86.29 51.36
9 Joan Diers Evelyn McCarthy C . 3 1 89.47 53.26 0.32(B)
10 Carol Markham J Thomas Markham C . . . 84.17 50.10
Totals 836.03
Thanks to Bob Fisk for the Hand Analysis
**PAIRS**
BOARD 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
/
1> 5.79 5.79 3- 0.64 2.36 5.79 0.64
---- ---- 50 ---- 50 -140 -420 -170 50 -420
2> 5.79 4.64 2.36 0.07 1.21 3- 6.93
---- ---- 100 ---- -50 -110 -150 -120 -90 200
3> 1.21 0.07 4.64 2.36 6.93 3- 5.79
---- ---- -300 ---- -600 50 -140 110 -100 100
4> 0.64 4.64 6.36 0.64 2.93 2.93 6.36
-660 -620 ---- -600 ---- -660 -630 -630 -600 ----
5> 0.64 0.64 4.64 4.64 4.64 4.64 4.64
420 420 ---- 450 ---- 450 450 450 450 ----
6> 5.79 1.79 4.64 3- 0.07 1.79 6.93
-130 -400 ---- -200 ---- -300 -1100 -400 -100 ----
7> 1.21 4.64 0.07 4.64 4.64 6.93 2.36
-100 620 -300 ---- 620 ---- 620 650 ---- 600
8> 2.36 2.36 6.36 0.07 2.36 4.64 6.36
-490 -490 50 ---- -990 ---- -490 -400 ---- 50
9> 2.36 5.21 5.21 0.07 5.21 5.21 1.21
680 710 710 ---- -200 ---- 710 710 ---- 650
10> 0.07 4.64 2.36 2.36 6.36 6.36 2.36
-100 120 90 90 ---- 630 ---- ---- 630 90
11> 3- 4.64 5.79 1.21 6.93 1.21 1.21
-50 50 110 -110 ---- 140 ---- ---- -110 -110
12> 3- 5.79 1.79 0.07 1.79 5.79 5.79
90 100 -50 -90 ---- -50 ---- ---- 100 100
13> 0.07 2.93 6.36 2.93 2.93 6.36 2.93
-120 -90 100 -90 -90 ---- ---- ---- 100 -90
14> 4.07 6.93 4.07 1.21 1.21 1.21 5.79
150 420 150 -50 -50 ---- ---- ---- -50 170
15> 4.64 4.64 4.64 0.64 4.64 4.64 0.64
-680 -680 -680 -1430 -680 ---- ---- ---- -680 -1430
16> 1.79 0.07 1.79 4.07 4.07 6.36 6.36
-460 -490 -460 -450 ---- -450 ---- 50 ---- 50
17> 3- 6.93 0.07 3- 5.79 3- 1.21
150 610 50 150 ---- 550 ---- 150 ---- 100
18> 3- 1.79 5.21 1.79 5.21 0.07 6.93
140 -50 200 -50 ---- 200 ---- -90 ---- 260
19> 0.07 2.36 5.79 2.36 5.79 5.79 2.36
-100 90 120 ---- 90 120 120 ---- 90 ----
20> 1.21 5.79 5.79 2.36 3- 5.79 0.07
140 620 620 ---- 200 300 620 ---- 90 ----
21> 3- 6.93 1.21 3- 3- 5.79 0.07
-650 100 -680 ---- -650 -650 -620 -----1460 ----
22> 6.93 0.07 1.21 5.79 4.07 2.36 4.07
---- 650 ---- 140 170 230 200 180 ---- 200
23> 2.36 0.07 4.64 1.21 6.93 4.64 4.64
---- 130 ---- 90 150 120 600 150 ---- 150
24> 2.93 0.07 2.93 6.36 6.36 2.93 2.93
---- 110 ---- -110 110 140 140 110 ---- 110
25> 6 3 1 0 6 6 3 3
90 ---- -110 -140 -200 90 90 -110 -110 ----
26> 1 3 6 6 4 6 1 1
-630 ---- -600 200 200 -130 200 -630 -630 ----
27> 5- 7 0 2 4 3 5- 1
-50 ---- 140 -670 -400 -130 -150 -50 -500 ----
28> 2 2 5 0 6- 4 6- 2
---- -620 ---- -620 -170 -650 100 -200 100 -620
29> 5 1 7 4 6 3 1 1
---- -110 ---- -720 300 -150 200 -620 -720 -720
30> 6 1 0 4- 4- 2- 7 2-
---- 150 ---- -90 -110 100 100 50 200 50
Monday Night Bridge, Monday Eve, October 31, 2016
Board 1 North Deals None Vul |
♠ | K 9 6 | ♥ | K 6 5 | ♦ | Q 6 4 | ♣ | K 7 6 5 |
|
♠ | Q 2 | ♥ | J 3 | ♦ | J 10 7 5 3 2 | ♣ | Q 10 3 |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | 10 4 | ♥ | Q 10 9 8 7 4 | ♦ | K 9 | ♣ | A 8 2 |
|
|
|
♠ | A J 8 7 5 3 | ♥ | A 2 | ♦ | A 8 | ♣ | J 9 4 |
|
N 5N; NS 5♠; S 4N; NS 4♣; EW 1♥; NS 1♦; Par +460
West | North | East | South |
| Pass | 2 ♥ | 2 ♠ |
Pass | 3 ♥1 | Pass2 | 4 ♠ |
Pass | Pass | Pass | |
- Cuebid to show a limit+ raise in Spades
- Don't lead a Heart
|
Contract | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
4 ♠ | S | 4 | 420 | | 6.36 | 0.64 | 6-Burnam-Kanterman | 10-Markham-Markham |
4 ♠ | S | 4 | 420 | | 6.36 | 0.64 | 9-Vanstone-Gibler | 7-Schapera-Terbrueggen |
2 ♠ | S | 4 | 170 | | 4.64 | 2.36 | 5-Lin-Hubka | 8-Kammer-Zimmer |
2 ♠ | S | 3 | 140 | | 3.50 | 3.50 | 4-Singerman-Freiberg | 6-Behr-Freiberg |
4 ♠ | S | −1 | | 50 | 1.21 | 5.79 | 7-Lammers-Barron | 3-Burns-Jung |
4 ♠ | S | −1 | | 50 | 1.21 | 5.79 | 8-Hall-Runda | 5-Dehaan-Garriott |
4 ♠ | S | −1 | | 50 | 1.21 | 5.79 | 10-Kereiakes-Kereiakes | 9-Diers-McCarthy |
While East's 2 ♥ opener would be suspect if vulnerable, it's perfectly fine
when not vulnerable. N/S should easily get to game on a similar auction,
losing a trick in each minor suit.
West will likely lead the ♦ J when East doesn't double for a Heart lead, and
declarer should not cover at trick one. East plays low, declarer wins with the
♦ A, pulls trump in two rounds, and plays ♥ A, ♥ K, and and another Heart,
ruffing in their hand. Now a small Diamond from each hand endplays East. A
Club return allows dummy's ♣ K to win, and declarer pitches a Club on the good
♦ Q. A Heart return allows declarer to discard a Club from hand while ruffing
on the board, and once again pitches a Club on the ♦ Q. Nicely played!
Board 2 East Deals N-S Vul |
♠ | K J 6 2 | ♥ | 8 7 6 2 | ♦ | Q J 8 | ♣ | 7 2 |
|
♠ | 10 8 7 4 | ♥ | J 5 4 | ♦ | 9 6 5 4 | ♣ | 10 3 |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | A Q 9 | ♥ | K 9 3 | ♦ | 3 | ♣ | A K 8 6 5 4 |
|
|
|
♠ | 5 3 | ♥ | A Q 10 | ♦ | A K 10 7 2 | ♣ | Q J 9 |
|
NS 2N; NS 2♦; NS 1♥; EW 1♣; Par +120
West | North | East | South |
| | 1 ♣ | 1 ♦ |
Pass | Pass | 2 ♣ | Dbl1 |
Pass | 2 ♦ | Pass | Pass |
Pass | | | |
- Do something intelligent for once, partner
|
Contract | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
4 ♣ | E | −3 | 150 | | 6.93 | 0.07 | 9-Vanstone-Gibler | 7-Schapera-Terbrueggen |
2 NT | S | 2 | 120 | | 5.79 | 1.21 | 5-Lin-Hubka | 8-Kammer-Zimmer |
3 ♦ | S | 3 | 110 | | 4.64 | 2.36 | 4-Singerman-Freiberg | 6-Behr-Freiberg |
2 ♦ | S | 2 | 90 | | 3.50 | 3.50 | 10-Kereiakes-Kereiakes | 9-Diers-McCarthy |
2 ♣ | E | −1 | 50 | | 2.36 | 4.64 | 8-Hall-Runda | 5-Dehaan-Garriott |
3 ♦ | S | −1 | | 100 | 1.21 | 5.79 | 7-Lammers-Barron | 3-Burns-Jung |
4 ♦ | S | −2 | | 200 | 0.07 | 6.93 | 6-Burnam-Kanterman | 10-Markham-Markham |
It's tough for N/S to find the decent 2 NT contract--more likely they'd get to
3 NT if they press on which doesn't play very well on a Spade lead (or on any
lead for that matter as eight tricks are the maximum N/S can collect.
In 2 ♦, N/S lose two Spades, one Heart, and two Clubs. West will lead the ♣T
on opening lead.
Board 3 South Deals E-W Vul |
♠ | A 9 7 4 2 | ♥ | A 9 5 2 | ♦ | 10 8 | ♣ | K 8 |
|
♠ | 5 | ♥ | Q J 10 7 3 | ♦ | Q 7 | ♣ | A Q J 10 3 |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | K J 3 | ♥ | 8 | ♦ | K J 9 6 4 3 | ♣ | 9 7 2 |
|
|
|
♠ | Q 10 8 6 | ♥ | K 6 4 | ♦ | A 5 2 | ♣ | 6 5 4 |
|
NS 3♠; W 3♣; EW 2♦; E 2♣; NS 1♥; Par +140
West | North | East | South |
| | | Pass |
1 ♥ | 1 ♠ | 1 NT | 2 ♠ |
3 ♣ | 3 ♠ | Pass | Pass |
Pass | | | |
Contract | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
3 NT | E | −6 | 600 | | 6.93 | 0.07 | 8-Hall-Runda | 5-Dehaan-Garriott |
2 NT | E | −3 | 300 | | 5.79 | 1.21 | 7-Lammers-Barron | 3-Burns-Jung |
3 ♠ | N | 3 | 140 | | 4.64 | 2.36 | 9-Vanstone-Gibler | 7-Schapera-Terbrueggen |
4 ♦ | E | −1 | 100 | | 3.50 | 3.50 | 10-Kereiakes-Kereiakes | 9-Diers-McCarthy |
3 ♠ | N | −1 | | 50 | 2.36 | 4.64 | 4-Singerman-Freiberg | 6-Behr-Freiberg |
3 ♠ | N | −2 | | 100 | 1.21 | 5.79 | 6-Burnam-Kanterman | 10-Markham-Markham |
3 ♣ | W | 3 | | 110 | 0.07 | 6.93 | 5-Lin-Hubka | 8-Kammer-Zimmer |
E/W will compete up to 3 ♣, but the vulnerability keeps them from bidding on.
North should double for penalty if West ventures 4 ♣. In 3 ♠, N/S lose one
trick in each suit, making three. Declarer needs to be careful when East leads
the ♥ 8--an obvious singleton on the auction--winning in the closed hand with
the ♥ A. Now, declarer plays ♠ A and another Spade. East hops with the ♠ K,
as West signals with the ♣ 3 (upside-down carding) to show a Club entry. Next
is the ♣ 7 (MUD) to the ♣ A and a low Heart back for East to ruff, but they're
ruffing declarer's Heart loser (remember trick one), so all is good.
Board 4 West Deals Both Vul |
♠ | Q J 8 3 2 | ♥ | K 7 | ♦ | A Q J 4 3 | ♣ | 10 |
|
♠ | 9 6 | ♥ | 9 5 3 2 | ♦ | 10 8 6 5 2 | ♣ | K 6 |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | K 10 7 5 | ♥ | A J 6 4 | ♦ | 9 | ♣ | 8 5 4 2 |
|
|
|
♠ | A 4 | ♥ | Q 10 8 | ♦ | K 7 | ♣ | A Q J 9 7 3 |
|
NS 5N; NS 4♠; NS 4♦; NS 4♣; NS 2♥; Par +660
West | North | East | South |
Pass | 1 ♠ | Pass | 2 ♣ |
Pass | 2 ♦ | Pass | 2 NT |
Pass | 3 NT | Pass | Pass |
Pass | | | |
Contract | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
3 NT | N | 5 | 660 | | 6.36 | 0.64 | 7-Lammers-Barron | 1-Koch-Temples |
3 NT | S | 5 | 660 | | 6.36 | 0.64 | 9-Vanstone-Gibler | 6-Behr-Freiberg |
3 NT | S | 4 | 630 | | 4.07 | 2.93 | 5-Lin-Hubka | 7-Schapera-Terbrueggen |
3 NT | S | 4 | 630 | | 4.07 | 2.93 | 10-Kereiakes-Kereiakes | 8-Kammer-Zimmer |
4 ♠ | N | 4 | 620 | | 2.36 | 4.64 | 2-Lakes-Peng | 2-Duncan-Earls |
3 NT | S | 3 | 600 | | 0.64 | 6.36 | 6-Burnam-Kanterman | 9-Diers-McCarthy |
3 NT | S | 3 | 600 | | 0.64 | 6.36 | 8-Hall-Runda | 4-Brown-Koch |
South might bid 4 NT over 3 NT, quantitative, but North will decline the
invitation. N/S take five Club tricks, four Diamond tricks, and two tricks in
the majors, making five. There's only one entry to dummy, so E/W need to be
careful not to give declarer a tempo on opening lead--not that easy. If West
finds the lead of a small Diamond, declarer will be able to collect two
major-suit tricks but no more.
Board 5 North Deals N-S Vul |
♠ | J 7 5 4 | ♥ | 9 | ♦ | 9 8 7 5 4 | ♣ | A 8 7 |
|
♠ | A 10 8 6 | ♥ | K J 5 2 | ♦ | 6 | ♣ | Q J 9 2 |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | 3 2 | ♥ | A Q 10 8 4 | ♦ | A Q | ♣ | K 6 4 3 |
|
|
|
♠ | K Q 9 | ♥ | 7 6 3 | ♦ | K J 10 3 2 | ♣ | 10 5 |
|
EW 5♥; E 4N; EW 5♣; W 2N; NS 2♦; EW 1♠; Par −450
West | North | East | South |
| Pass | 1 ♥ | Pass |
4 ♦1 | Pass | 4 ♥ | Pass |
Pass | Pass | | |
- Alert, splinter bid showing Diamond shortness and Heart support
|
Contract | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
4 ♥ | E | 4 | | 420 | 6.36 | 0.64 | 2-Lakes-Peng | 2-Duncan-Earls |
4 ♥ | E | 4 | | 420 | 6.36 | 0.64 | 7-Lammers-Barron | 1-Koch-Temples |
4 ♥ | E | 5 | | 450 | 2.36 | 4.64 | 5-Lin-Hubka | 7-Schapera-Terbrueggen |
4 ♥ | E | 5 | | 450 | 2.36 | 4.64 | 6-Burnam-Kanterman | 9-Diers-McCarthy |
4 ♥ | E | 5 | | 450 | 2.36 | 4.64 | 8-Hall-Runda | 4-Brown-Koch |
4 ♥ | E | 5 | | 450 | 2.36 | 4.64 | 9-Vanstone-Gibler | 6-Behr-Freiberg |
4 ♥ | E | 5 | | 450 | 2.36 | 4.64 | 10-Kereiakes-Kereiakes | 8-Kammer-Zimmer |
Unless you and your partner play an exotic system for raising partner's
major-suit opening, a Diamond splinter bid looks correct (limit-raise values,
4+ trump, and shortness in the suit bid). South will likely lead the ♠ K, and
E/W will lose one Spade and one Club. Hopefully declarer doesn't try the
"practice" Diamond finesse (i.e., the finesse gains no tricks if it wins and
loses a trick if it's unsuccessful). This hand is over before it begins when
declarer wins the ♠ A, pulls trump in three rounds, and knocks out the ♣ A.
Board 6 East Deals E-W Vul |
♠ | K Q 2 | ♥ | 8 4 3 | ♦ | A 9 8 5 | ♣ | Q 6 5 |
|
♠ | A J 7 6 4 3 | ♥ | 6 | ♦ | K J 10 7 2 | ♣ | 4 |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | 10 8 | ♥ | K Q J 5 2 | ♦ | 6 4 3 | ♣ | K 9 2 |
|
|
|
♠ | 9 5 | ♥ | A 10 9 7 | ♦ | Q | ♣ | A J 10 8 7 3 |
|
NS 4N; NS 4♣; NS 2♥; EW 2♦; EW 1♠; Par +430
West | North | East | South |
| | Pass | 1 ♣ |
2 NT1 | Dbl2 | 3 ♦3 | 3 ♥4 |
Pass5 | 3 NT6 | Pass | Pass |
Pass | | | |
- Alert, Unmichaels bid showing Diamonds and an unknown major
- Alert, values, interested in defending one or both of the opponent's suits
- Diamond preference
- Heart stopper for notrump
- Minimum 2-suited hand
- Let's try this, partner
|
Contract | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
4 ♠× | W | −4 | 1100 | | 6.93 | 0.07 | 5-Lin-Hubka | 7-Schapera-Terbrueggen |
3 NT | N | 3 | 400 | | 5.21 | 1.79 | 2-Lakes-Peng | 2-Duncan-Earls |
3 NT | N | 3 | 400 | | 5.21 | 1.79 | 10-Kereiakes-Kereiakes | 8-Kammer-Zimmer |
4 ♠ | W | −3 | 300 | | 3.50 | 3.50 | 9-Vanstone-Gibler | 6-Behr-Freiberg |
3 ♠ | W | −2 | 200 | | 2.36 | 4.64 | 8-Hall-Runda | 4-Brown-Koch |
3 ♣ | S | 4 | 130 | | 1.21 | 5.79 | 7-Lammers-Barron | 1-Koch-Temples |
3 ♠ | W | −1 | 100 | | 0.07 | 6.93 | 6-Burnam-Kanterman | 9-Diers-McCarthy |
Unmichaels is a nice replacement for the Unusual 2 NT convention. While the
Unusual 2 NT convention is able to show a two-suited hand with the two lowest
unbid suits, Unmichaels is able to show any two-suited hand not already covered
by the Michaels convention. If opener bids a major, a direct-seat 2 NT overcall
still shows both minor suits (not alertable). If opener bids a minor, a
direct-seat 2 NT overcall shows the other minor and an unknown major (this
version is alertable). If the advancer wants to know which major partner has,
they simply cuebid opener's minor at the three level.
In 3 NT, N/S take two Spade tricks, one Heart, one Diamond, and six Clubs when
the ♣ K turns up in the slot. West will likely lead the ♠ A on the auction,
and the hand is quickly over. If they find the ♥ 6 lead, declarer has no
reason to duck when East inserts the ♥ J (i.e., the ♥T987 between the two
hands creates a second Heart stopper).
Board 7 South Deals Both Vul |
♠ | K 10 9 6 5 2 | ♥ | 8 | ♦ | Q 9 7 | ♣ | K 9 6 |
|
♠ | Q 7 | ♥ | A K 9 7 | ♦ | K 10 2 | ♣ | A Q 3 2 |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | A J 4 3 | ♥ | Q 5 4 3 | ♦ | A J 8 | ♣ | 10 5 |
|
|
|
♠ | 8 | ♥ | J 10 6 2 | ♦ | 6 5 4 3 | ♣ | J 8 7 4 |
|
W 6♥; EW 5N; E 5♥; W 4♠; E 3♠; EW 4♦; EW 4♣; Par −1430
West | North | East | South |
| | | Pass |
1 ♣ | 2 ♠1 | Dbl2 | Pass |
4 ♥3 | Pass | 4 NT4 | Pass |
5 ♦5 | Pass | 5 NT6 | Pass |
6 ♦7 | Pass | 6 ♥ | Pass |
Pass | Pass | | |
- Weak and preemptive
- Negative
- Strong showing around 17+ HCP
- RKC Blackwood for Hearts
- 0 or 3 keycards
- Confirmation of all the keycards, asking for specific Kings
- King of Diamonds, no King of Clubs
|
Contract | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
6 ♦ | W | −3 | 300 | | 6.93 | 0.07 | 3-Pollack-Pollack | 3-Burns-Jung |
4 ♥ | W | −1 | 100 | | 5.79 | 1.21 | 2-Lakes-Peng | 1-Koch-Temples |
3 NT | E | 3 | | 600 | 4.64 | 2.36 | 7-Lammers-Barron | 10-Markham-Markham |
4 ♥ | E | 4 | | 620 | 2.36 | 4.64 | 8-Hall-Runda | 2-Duncan-Earls |
4 ♥ | E | 4 | | 620 | 2.36 | 4.64 | 9-Vanstone-Gibler | 5-Dehaan-Garriott |
4 ♥ | E | 4 | | 620 | 2.36 | 4.64 | 10-Kereiakes-Kereiakes | 7-Schapera-Terbrueggen |
4 ♥ | W | 5 | | 650 | 0.07 | 6.93 | 6-Burnam-Kanterman | 8-Kammer-Zimmer |
It's a pretty good slam, but declarer is likely to go down when Hearts fail to
break 3-2. The Spade finesse is easy to get right, and North is likely to hold
both the ♦ Q and ♣ K for their vulnerable two-level preempt. If South gives
declarer a peek at their hand, then 6 ♥ is laydown.
North is going to have a heckuva time getting out of their hand on opening lead
as a Club lead removes declarer's loser in that suit, and a Diamond or Spade
lead removes declarer's guess in Diamonds. Some North players, afraid of
giving away a trick, will decide that now is the time to lead their singleton
trump....oops. West plays low from dummy and wins the ♥ K when South is forced
to cover. Now, a small Heart to dummy reveals the 4-1 split, and declarer's
Heart loser is no more. Poor North.
Board 8 West Deals None Vul |
♠ | Q 10 4 | ♥ | K Q 5 4 | ♦ | K Q 4 | ♣ | A K 10 |
|
♠ | K 9 3 2 | ♥ | 9 7 3 | ♦ | 9 6 | ♣ | J 7 5 4 |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | J 8 6 | ♥ | 8 6 2 | ♦ | J 10 8 5 2 | ♣ | 6 2 |
|
|
|
♠ | A 7 5 | ♥ | A J 10 | ♦ | A 7 3 | ♣ | Q 9 8 3 |
|
NS 6N; NS 6♥; NS 6♣; NS 5♠; NS 4♦; Par +990
West | North | East | South |
Pass | 1 ♣ | Pass | 3 NT1 |
Pass | 6 NT | Pass | Pass |
Pass | | | |
- 13 to 15 HCP and no 4-card major
|
Contract | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
6 NT | S | 6 | 990 | | 6.93 | 0.07 | 9-Vanstone-Gibler | 5-Dehaan-Garriott |
3 NT | N | 6 | 490 | | 4.64 | 2.36 | 2-Lakes-Peng | 1-Koch-Temples |
3 NT | N | 6 | 490 | | 4.64 | 2.36 | 8-Hall-Runda | 2-Duncan-Earls |
3 NT | S | 6 | 490 | | 4.64 | 2.36 | 10-Kereiakes-Kereiakes | 7-Schapera-Terbrueggen |
5 ♣ | N | 5 | 400 | | 2.36 | 4.64 | 6-Burnam-Kanterman | 8-Kammer-Zimmer |
6 NT | S | −1 | | 50 | 0.64 | 6.36 | 3-Pollack-Pollack | 3-Burns-Jung |
6 ♣ | N | −1 | | 50 | 0.64 | 6.36 | 7-Lammers-Barron | 10-Markham-Markham |
N/S take four Heart tricks, three Diamonds, two Spades, and three Clubs. If
West leads a small Spade, the hand is over quickly when declarer inserts
dummy's Queen. Even if the opening lead is something else, declarer's best
line is to lead a small Spade towards the ♠ Q.
If declarer wins trick one with the ♠ Q, then the best line to make seven is
four rounds of Hearts (West throws a small Spade) followed by three rounds of
Diamonds. On the third Diamond, West starts to squirm. If they throw a Club,
the hand is over as declarer quickly gobbles up four Club tricks and the ♠ A.
If they throw a third Spade, declarer should assume that West is trying to
protect ♣ Jxxx and finesse the ♣T at trick nine. When the ♣T holds, declarer
plays off ♣ AK, returns to their hand with the well-preserved ♠ A, and cashes
the ♣ Q for their 13th trick. Sweet.
Board 9 North Deals E-W Vul |
♠ | J 9 8 6 5 3 2 | ♥ | Q 9 | ♦ | — | ♣ | A 9 6 2 |
|
♠ | Q 4 | ♥ | 2 | ♦ | A K Q 10 5 3 | ♣ | K Q 8 4 |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | A K | ♥ | A K J 10 6 5 4 | ♦ | J 9 6 | ♣ | 5 |
|
|
|
♠ | 10 7 | ♥ | 8 7 3 | ♦ | 8 7 4 2 | ♣ | J 10 7 3 |
|
EW 6N; W 6♥; EW 6♦; E 5♥; EW 2♣; W 1♠; Par −1440
West | North | East | South |
| 3 ♠ | 4 ♥ | Pass |
5 NT1 | Pass | 6 NT | Pass |
Pass | Pass | | |
Contract | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
7 ♦× | W | −1 | 200 | | 6.93 | 0.07 | 9-Vanstone-Gibler | 5-Dehaan-Garriott |
4 ♥ | E | 5 | | 650 | 5.79 | 1.21 | 7-Lammers-Barron | 10-Markham-Markham |
4 ♥ | E | 6 | | 680 | 4.64 | 2.36 | 2-Lakes-Peng | 1-Koch-Temples |
4 ♥ | E | 7 | | 710 | 1.79 | 5.21 | 3-Pollack-Pollack | 3-Burns-Jung |
4 ♥ | E | 7 | | 710 | 1.79 | 5.21 | 6-Burnam-Kanterman | 8-Kammer-Zimmer |
4 ♥ | E | 7 | | 710 | 1.79 | 5.21 | 8-Hall-Runda | 2-Duncan-Earls |
4 ♥ | E | 7 | | 710 | 1.79 | 5.21 | 10-Kereiakes-Kereiakes | 7-Schapera-Terbrueggen |
A good use of a jump to 5 NT during an auction is Pick a Slam. Here, West
knows that they should be in slam, but has no idea which one. On this hand,
East might hold any of the following hands:
1) ♠ A7 ♥ AJT654 ♦ 2 ♣ AJ75--six Clubs is the right contract.
2) ♠ AK ♥ AKJT654 ♦ J96 ♣ 5--six notrump seems right.
3) ♠ 7 ♥ AKQJ973 ♦ J96 ♣ A3--six Hearts is cold.
4) ♠ K7 ♥ AK9873 ♦ J986 ♣ A--six Diamonds is perfect.
With ♠ AK, East has an easy 6 NT bid. If West doesn't know about the 5 NT bid,
then some might blast 6 ♦. A 5 ♦ bid would be a severe underbid, so hopefully
that doesn't happen. If you're East, and West passes 4 ♥, you have my
permission to gut them.
In 6 NT, South will likely lead the ♠T, and E/W will take 15 tricks when the
♥ Q falls. Remember to start Board 10 with E/W already having two tricks in
the bank.
Board 10 East Deals Both Vul |
♠ | K 9 6 4 | ♥ | K 7 6 5 | ♦ | J 9 | ♣ | 10 5 3 |
|
♠ | Q 10 8 5 3 | ♥ | Q | ♦ | K 5 4 | ♣ | Q 9 7 4 |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | 7 2 | ♥ | A 10 4 | ♦ | Q 8 7 6 3 | ♣ | A K J |
|
|
|
♠ | A J | ♥ | J 9 8 3 2 | ♦ | A 10 2 | ♣ | 8 6 2 |
|
EW 2♠; NS 2♥; EW 3♦; EW 2♣; Par −110
West | North | East | South |
| | 1 ♦ | 1 ♥ |
1 ♠1 | 3 ♥2 | Pass | Pass |
Pass | | | |
- Showing five or more Spades
- Weak and preemptive
|
Contract | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
2 NT | E | −1 | 100 | | 6.93 | 0.07 | 8-Hall-Runda | 1-Koch-Temples |
1 NT | E | 1 | | 90 | 4.64 | 2.36 | 2-Lakes-Peng | 10-Markham-Markham |
2 ♦ | E | 2 | | 90 | 4.64 | 2.36 | 4-Singerman-Freiberg | 4-Brown-Koch |
1 NT | E | 1 | | 90 | 4.64 | 2.36 | 9-Vanstone-Gibler | 3-Burns-Jung |
2 NT | E | 2 | | 120 | 2.36 | 4.64 | 3-Pollack-Pollack | 2-Duncan-Earls |
3 NT | E | 4 | | 630 | 0.64 | 6.36 | 7-Lammers-Barron | 9-Diers-McCarthy |
3 NT | E | 4 | | 630 | 0.64 | 6.36 | 10-Kereiakes-Kereiakes | 6-Behr-Freiberg |
It's unlikely that E/W will be able to double 3 ♥, since most pairs play that
a double by East in this auction shows 3-card support for partner's suit
(support double).
N/S lose one Heart, one Diamond, and three Clubs. East may lead the ♦ 4 on the
auction, but as long as E/W collect their three Club tricks when in with the
♦ K or the ♥ A, they'll be okay.
Board 11 South Deals None Vul |
♠ | 7 3 | ♥ | A K | ♦ | 8 5 4 | ♣ | K J 10 9 8 3 |
|
♠ | J 4 | ♥ | Q 10 4 3 | ♦ | 9 6 2 | ♣ | A 7 5 4 |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | A 10 9 5 2 | ♥ | J 9 7 6 2 | ♦ | K Q | ♣ | Q |
|
|
|
♠ | K Q 8 6 | ♥ | 8 5 | ♦ | A J 10 7 3 | ♣ | 6 2 |
|
NS 3N; EW 3♥; NS 4♣; NS 3♦; Par +100: EW 4♥×−1
West | North | East | South |
| | | Pass |
Pass | 1 ♣ | 2 ♣1 | Dbl2 |
2 ♥3 | Pass4 | Pass | 2 ♠5 |
Pass | 2 NT6 | Pass | 3 NT |
Pass | Pass | Pass | |
- Michaels
- Alert, interested in defending one or both of the opponent's suits
- Heart preference
- Forcing
- Showing Spade stoppers for notrump
- Showing Heart stoppers for notrump
|
Contract | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
3 ♣ | N | 3 | 110 | | 5.79 | 1.21 | 2-Lakes-Peng | 10-Markham-Markham |
2 ♦ | S | 3 | 110 | | 5.79 | 1.21 | 4-Singerman-Freiberg | 4-Brown-Koch |
3 ♣ | N | 3 | 110 | | 5.79 | 1.21 | 7-Lammers-Barron | 9-Diers-McCarthy |
4 ♥ | W | −1 | 50 | | 3.50 | 3.50 | 8-Hall-Runda | 1-Koch-Temples |
4 ♣ | N | −1 | | 50 | 2.36 | 4.64 | 3-Pollack-Pollack | 2-Duncan-Earls |
2 ♥ | E | 2 | | 110 | 1.21 | 5.79 | 9-Vanstone-Gibler | 3-Burns-Jung |
3 ♥ | E | 3 | | 140 | 0.07 | 6.93 | 10-Kereiakes-Kereiakes | 6-Behr-Freiberg |
East might not choose to make a Michaels bid if their partner was not a passed
hand, since they hold a mid-range hand (12-15 HCP). Once partner has passed,
it's reasonable for East to assume that game is out of reach. so their bid is
fine.
When responder doubles a two-suited bid showing interest in defending the hand
and values, opener is free to pass at their next turn confident in the fact
that their partner will not pass as well.
If declarer guesses correctly in Clubs and drops the singleton ♣ Q, they'll
make 3 NT. If not, well that's too horrible to even consider. Some E/W pairs
will get to play the hand in 3 ♥ which makes easily when Hearts split 2-2,
losing only one Spade, two Hearts, and a Diamond.
Board 12 West Deals N-S Vul |
♠ | A K Q 2 | ♥ | 7 3 2 | ♦ | A 8 5 | ♣ | J 9 3 |
|
♠ | 9 8 5 | ♥ | 8 5 4 | ♦ | Q 9 7 2 | ♣ | Q 10 7 |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | 6 4 3 | ♥ | K Q J 10 | ♦ | K J 4 | ♣ | A 8 5 |
|
|
|
♠ | J 10 7 | ♥ | A 9 6 | ♦ | 10 6 3 | ♣ | K 6 4 2 |
|
NS 1N; NS 1♠; EW 1♥; EW 1♦; NS 1♣; Par +90
West | North | East | South |
Pass | 1 ♣ | 1 NT1 | Pass |
Pass | Pass | | |
- 15 to 18 HCP, but who's counting?
|
Contract | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
2 ♣ | N | 2 | 90 | | 6.93 | 0.07 | 4-Singerman-Freiberg | 4-Brown-Koch |
2 ♥ | E | −1 | 50 | | 5.21 | 1.79 | 9-Vanstone-Gibler | 3-Burns-Jung |
2 ♥ | E | −1 | 50 | | 5.21 | 1.79 | 10-Kereiakes-Kereiakes | 6-Behr-Freiberg |
1 NT | E | 1 | | 90 | 3.50 | 3.50 | 8-Hall-Runda | 1-Koch-Temples |
2 ♠ | N | −1 | | 100 | 1.21 | 5.79 | 2-Lakes-Peng | 10-Markham-Markham |
Pass | | | | 100 | 1.21 | 5.79 | 3-Pollack-Pollack | 2-Duncan-Earls |
3 ♣ | N | −1 | | 100 | 1.21 | 5.79 | 7-Lammers-Barron | 9-Diers-McCarthy |
Some Easts might choose to pass and defend N/S's 1 NT contract. That doesn't
work out very well when 1 NT rolls. If East overcalls 1 NT and goes down one,
they end up with –50 for a top or –100 for a bottom if South finds a double.
E/W pairs don't have anywhere they can run to at the two level, so that doesn't
work out any better. Most scores for N/S will range from +50 to +100.
Board 13 North Deals Both Vul |
♠ | A Q 7 2 | ♥ | 10 4 3 | ♦ | 6 5 2 | ♣ | 6 5 4 |
|
♠ | 10 6 | ♥ | K 7 6 5 | ♦ | 9 8 4 | ♣ | Q J 10 2 |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | K 5 4 | ♥ | J 9 2 | ♦ | A K 7 3 | ♣ | 8 7 3 |
|
|
|
♠ | J 9 8 3 | ♥ | A Q 8 | ♦ | Q J 10 | ♣ | A K 9 |
|
NS 2♠; NS 1N; EW 1♥; EW 1♦; EW 1♣; Par +110
West | North | East | South |
| Pass | Pass | 1 NT1 |
Pass | Pass | Pass | |
Contract | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
1 NT | S | 2 | 120 | | 6.93 | 0.07 | 3-Pollack-Pollack | 1-Koch-Temples |
1 NT | S | 1 | 90 | | 4.07 | 2.93 | 5-Lin-Hubka | 5-Dehaan-Garriott |
1 NT | S | 1 | 90 | | 4.07 | 2.93 | 8-Hall-Runda | 10-Markham-Markham |
1 NT | S | 1 | 90 | | 4.07 | 2.93 | 9-Vanstone-Gibler | 2-Duncan-Earls |
1 NT | S | 1 | 90 | | 4.07 | 2.93 | 10-Kereiakes-Kereiakes | 4-Brown-Koch |
1 NT | S | −1 | | 100 | 0.64 | 6.36 | 2-Lakes-Peng | 9-Diers-McCarthy |
2 ♠ | S | −1 | | 100 | 0.64 | 6.36 | 4-Singerman-Freiberg | 3-Burns-Jung |
West will likely choose the ♣ Q as their opening lead, and N/S will take three
Spade tricks, one Heart, one Diamond, and one Club. Hearts is a "frozen suit,"
meaning that whoever leads Hearts first loses a trick.
Board 14 East Deals None Vul |
♠ | A K 8 4 3 | ♥ | 2 | ♦ | 8 4 | ♣ | A J 7 6 5 |
|
♠ | 10 6 5 | ♥ | K Q J 10 | ♦ | A Q 10 6 2 | ♣ | K |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | Q 7 | ♥ | A 9 5 3 | ♦ | J 9 3 | ♣ | Q 10 8 2 |
|
|
|
♠ | J 9 2 | ♥ | 8 7 6 4 | ♦ | K 7 5 | ♣ | 9 4 3 |
|
EW 4♥; EW 4♦; EW 1N; NS 1♠; NS 1♣; Par −420
West | North | East | South |
| | Pass | Pass |
1 ♦ | 2 NT1 | Dbl2 | 3 ♦3 |
Dbl4 | 3 ♠5 | Pass6 | Pass |
4 ♥7 | Pass | Pass8 | Pass |
- Alert, Unmichaels bid showing Clubs and an unknown major
- Alert, interested in defending one or both the opponent's suits
- Cuebid asking North for their major
- Lead a Diamond
- My major is Spades
- Forcing pass with no interest in defending Spades
- I have four good Hearts if that interests you
- It does
|
Contract | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
3 ♦ | W | −1 | 50 | | 5.79 | 1.21 | 2-Lakes-Peng | 9-Diers-McCarthy |
4 ♥ | W | −1 | 50 | | 5.79 | 1.21 | 5-Lin-Hubka | 5-Dehaan-Garriott |
3 ♥ | W | −1 | 50 | | 5.79 | 1.21 | 10-Kereiakes-Kereiakes | 4-Brown-Koch |
3 ♣ | N | −3 | | 150 | 2.93 | 4.07 | 3-Pollack-Pollack | 1-Koch-Temples |
3 ♠ | N | −3 | | 150 | 2.93 | 4.07 | 4-Singerman-Freiberg | 3-Burns-Jung |
2 ♥ | W | 4 | | 170 | 1.21 | 5.79 | 8-Hall-Runda | 10-Markham-Markham |
4 ♥ | W | 4 | | 420 | 0.07 | 6.93 | 9-Vanstone-Gibler | 2-Duncan-Earls |
East's double of North's two-suited bid creates a forcing situation (i.e., E/W
will either play that hand or N/S will play the hand doubled). Once East
denies a hand that can defend a Spade control, West shows their second suit
knowing that if East doesn't have Hearts, they'll be able to raise Diamonds to
game. In this case, East has Hearts as well, and the good major-suit game is
reached.
North will lead the ♠ K (asking for count) and continue with ♠ A and another at
tricks two and three. E/W lose two Spades and a Club when the Diamond finesse
is on. It should be, since North is likely to hold only two Diamonds to their
partner's three on the auction. Declarer can afford to ruff the third Spade
high. Now a small Heart to the ♥ K at trick four and a Heart back to the ♥ A
at trick five expose the 4-1 split. Declarer should lead the ♦ 9 at trick six
and duck it when South plays small. North will have a doubleton Diamond on the
auction, and if their doubleton includes the ♦ K, then E/W are down one anyway.
When the ♦ 9 holds, South can repeat the finesse again before pulling the
remaining trump. Nicely played!
Board 15 South Deals N-S Vul |
♠ | A J 9 5 4 2 | ♥ | 3 | ♦ | K J 10 8 | ♣ | 9 5 |
|
♠ | 8 | ♥ | K J 8 | ♦ | 7 5 3 | ♣ | J 10 8 4 3 2 |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | Q | ♥ | 10 9 7 6 5 4 2 | ♦ | A 4 | ♣ | Q 7 6 |
|
|
|
♠ | K 10 7 6 3 | ♥ | A Q | ♦ | Q 9 6 2 | ♣ | A K |
|
S 6N; NS 6♠; NS 6♦; N 3N; EW 2♥; EW 1♣; Par +1100: EW 7♥×−5
West | North | East | South |
| | | 1 ♠ |
Pass | 3 ♥1 | Pass | 4 ♣2 |
Pass | 4 NT3 | Pass | 5 ♦4 |
Pass | 6 ♠5 | Pass | Pass |
Pass | | | |
- Alert, splinter bid showing Heart shortness and 4+ card Spade support
- 1st or 2nd round control in Clubs and interest in Slam
- RKC Blackwood for Spades guaranteeing control in Diamonds
- 0 or 3 keycards
- Off one keycard (guarantees the ♠ Q or extra length)
|
Contract | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
6 ♠ | S | 6 | 1430 | | 6.36 | 0.64 | 8-Hall-Runda | 10-Markham-Markham |
6 ♠ | S | 6 | 1430 | | 6.36 | 0.64 | 10-Kereiakes-Kereiakes | 4-Brown-Koch |
4 ♠ | S | 6 | 680 | | 2.36 | 4.64 | 2-Lakes-Peng | 9-Diers-McCarthy |
5 ♠ | N | 6 | 680 | | 2.36 | 4.64 | 3-Pollack-Pollack | 1-Koch-Temples |
4 ♠ | S | 6 | 680 | | 2.36 | 4.64 | 4-Singerman-Freiberg | 3-Burns-Jung |
4 ♠ | S | 6 | 680 | | 2.36 | 4.64 | 5-Lin-Hubka | 5-Dehaan-Garriott |
4 ♠ | S | 6 | 680 | | 2.36 | 4.64 | 9-Vanstone-Gibler | 2-Duncan-Earls |
A nice and clean auction results in an excellent slam! N/S lose only one
Diamond, making six. West will likely lead the ♣ J, and declarer can claim at
trick one (please).
Board 16 West Deals E-W Vul |
♠ | Q 9 5 2 | ♥ | A 10 7 6 3 2 | ♦ | Q 7 5 | ♣ | — |
|
♠ | 10 8 7 4 3 | ♥ | Q 5 4 | ♦ | 9 6 | ♣ | J 6 5 |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | J 6 | ♥ | K 9 8 | ♦ | 8 2 | ♣ | A 10 8 7 4 2 |
|
|
|
♠ | A K | ♥ | J | ♦ | A K J 10 4 3 | ♣ | K Q 9 3 |
|
NS 7♦; NS 5N; NS 5♥; NS 3♠; NS 2♣; Par +1440
West | North | East | South |
Pass | Pass1 | Pass | 2 ♣ |
Pass | 2 ♦2 | Pass | 3 ♦3 |
Pass | 4 ♦4 | Pass | 4 ♠5 |
Pass | 6 ♦6 | Pass | Pass |
Pass | | | |
- Don't preempt with 4+ cards in the other major
- Game forcing, showing an A, K, or 2Q
- Single-suited Diamond hand
- Minorwood asking for keycards in Diamonds
- 0 or 3 keycards
- Hmmmm, we may or may not be off a keycard, so let's try this
|
Contract | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
3 NT | S | 6 | 490 | | 6.93 | 0.07 | 4-Singerman-Freiberg | 2-Duncan-Earls |
4 NT | S | 5 | 460 | | 5.21 | 1.79 | 9-Vanstone-Gibler | 1-Koch-Temples |
3 NT | S | 5 | 460 | | 5.21 | 1.79 | 10-Kereiakes-Kereiakes | 3-Burns-Jung |
4 ♥ | N | 5 | 450 | | 2.93 | 4.07 | 5-Lin-Hubka | 4-Brown-Koch |
4 ♥ | N | 5 | 450 | | 2.93 | 4.07 | 6-Burnam-Kanterman | 6-Behr-Freiberg |
4 ♠ | N | −1 | | 50 | 0.64 | 6.36 | 2-Lakes-Peng | 8-Kammer-Zimmer |
4 ♥ | N | −1 | | 50 | 0.64 | 6.36 | 3-Pollack-Pollack | 10-Markham-Markham |
It's pretty easy to get to the Diamond slam, not so easy to get to the grand.
If South treats their hand as a two-suiter with both minors, it will be even
more difficult. N/S take 13 tricks against any lead, although a trump lead is
best.
On a trump lead, declarer wins in hand with the ♦ A, cashes the ♠ AK, ♥ J to
the ♥ A, ruffs a Heart high, ♦T to the ♦ Q pulling the outstanding trump in
the process, ♠ Q pitching a Club, and ruffs another Heart high. If the Hearts
don't split 3-3, declarer can ruff their second small Club and give up a Club,
making six. When Hearts split, declarer simply ruffs a Club to get to dummy
and pitches their remaining Clubs on the good Hearts.
On a Club lead, declarer might try ruffing three Clubs in dummy, hoping for the
♣ A to drop. When it doesn't, they'll try pitching their last Club on the ♠ Q,
but that won't work very well when East is able to ruff the third Spade. Oops.
On a Heart lead or Spade lead, declarer should try to set up the Hearts as
shown above.
Board 17 North Deals None Vul |
♠ | 9 6 | ♥ | Q J 9 5 3 | ♦ | Q 10 9 7 4 | ♣ | J |
|
♠ | A Q J | ♥ | 8 | ♦ | 6 2 | ♣ | K 8 6 5 4 3 2 |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | 10 8 4 | ♥ | 7 4 2 | ♦ | A K J | ♣ | Q 10 9 7 |
|
|
|
♠ | K 7 5 3 2 | ♥ | A K 10 6 | ♦ | 8 5 3 | ♣ | A |
|
EW 5♣; NS 2♥; EW 1N; S 2♦; N 1♦; Par −400
West | North | East | South |
| Pass | Pass | 1 ♠ |
3 ♣ | Dbl1 | 3 ♠2 | 4 ♥ |
5 ♣ | Pass | Pass | Pass |
- Negative
- Cuebid showing a strong Club raise
|
Contract | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
3 ♦ | N | −1 | | 50 | 6.93 | 0.07 | 10-Kereiakes-Kereiakes | 3-Burns-Jung |
4 ♥ | S | −2 | | 100 | 5.79 | 1.21 | 3-Pollack-Pollack | 10-Markham-Markham |
5 ♥ | S | −3 | | 150 | 3.50 | 3.50 | 2-Lakes-Peng | 8-Kammer-Zimmer |
4 ♣ | W | 5 | | 150 | 3.50 | 3.50 | 5-Lin-Hubka | 4-Brown-Koch |
4 ♣ | W | 5 | | 150 | 3.50 | 3.50 | 9-Vanstone-Gibler | 1-Koch-Temples |
5 ♣× | W | 5 | | 550 | 1.21 | 5.79 | 6-Burnam-Kanterman | 6-Behr-Freiberg |
4 ♣× | W | 5 | | 610 | 0.07 | 6.93 | 4-Singerman-Freiberg | 2-Duncan-Earls |
E/W should reach the nice Club game, and N/S don't have a profitable sacrifice
in 5 ♥ (down three doubled for –500). E/W lose one Heart and one Club, making
five. North will likely lead the ♥ Q. If they don't, declarer's Heart loser
may very well go away on the ♦ J, although most declarers won't risk the
Diamond hook, content simply making five.
Board 18 East Deals N-S Vul |
♠ | Q J 2 | ♥ | K Q | ♦ | A J 9 8 5 | ♣ | A 8 7 |
|
♠ | A K 8 7 3 | ♥ | A J | ♦ | 4 3 | ♣ | J 10 9 5 |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | 5 | ♥ | 10 9 8 6 5 3 2 | ♦ | 10 7 6 | ♣ | K Q |
|
|
|
♠ | 10 9 6 4 | ♥ | 7 4 | ♦ | K Q 2 | ♣ | 6 4 3 2 |
|
EW 3♥; NS 1N; EW 1♠; NS 1♦; Par −140
West | North | East | South |
| | 3 ♥ | Pass |
Pass | Pass | | |
Contract | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
1 NT | N | 1 | 90 | | 6.93 | 0.07 | 2-Lakes-Peng | 8-Kammer-Zimmer |
4 ♥ | E | −1 | 50 | | 5.21 | 1.79 | 4-Singerman-Freiberg | 2-Duncan-Earls |
4 ♥ | E | −1 | 50 | | 5.21 | 1.79 | 5-Lin-Hubka | 4-Brown-Koch |
3 ♥ | E | 3 | | 140 | 3.50 | 3.50 | 9-Vanstone-Gibler | 1-Koch-Temples |
3 ♦ | N | −2 | | 200 | 1.79 | 5.21 | 6-Burnam-Kanterman | 6-Behr-Freiberg |
4 ♦ | N | −2 | | 200 | 1.79 | 5.21 | 10-Kereiakes-Kereiakes | 3-Burns-Jung |
1 ♠× | W | 2 | | 260 | 0.07 | 6.93 | 3-Pollack-Pollack | 10-Markham-Markham |
It's doubtful that the auction will go like this, but you never know. If
anybody takes a bid after 3 ♥, they're going to regret it. E/W lose one
Heart, two Diamonds, and a Club, making three. South is likely to lead the
♦ K.
Board 19 South Deals E-W Vul |
♠ | A 7 4 | ♥ | K J 7 | ♦ | K 6 4 | ♣ | 8 7 4 2 |
|
♠ | Q J 9 8 | ♥ | A 10 8 | ♦ | A 10 5 | ♣ | Q 9 3 |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | K 6 5 | ♥ | 6 5 4 | ♦ | Q J 9 2 | ♣ | K 10 6 |
|
|
|
♠ | 10 3 2 | ♥ | Q 9 3 2 | ♦ | 8 7 3 | ♣ | A J 5 |
|
EW 2♠; EW 1N; EW 2♦; EW 1♥; EW 1♣; Par −110
West | North | East | South |
| | | Pass |
1 ♣ | Pass | 1 ♦ | Pass |
1 NT1 | Pass | Pass | Pass |
- Alert, partner may have chosen not to show one or more 4-card majors
|
Contract | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
2 ♠ | W | −1 | 100 | | 6.93 | 0.07 | 4-Singerman-Freiberg | 1-Koch-Temples |
2 ♣ | W | 2 | | 90 | 4.64 | 2.36 | 3-Pollack-Pollack | 9-Diers-McCarthy |
1 NT | E | 1 | | 90 | 4.64 | 2.36 | 6-Burnam-Kanterman | 5-Dehaan-Garriott |
1 NT | E | 1 | | 90 | 4.64 | 2.36 | 10-Kereiakes-Kereiakes | 2-Duncan-Earls |
1 NT | W | 2 | | 120 | 1.21 | 5.79 | 2-Lakes-Peng | 6-Behr-Freiberg |
1 NT | W | 2 | | 120 | 1.21 | 5.79 | 5-Lin-Hubka | 3-Burns-Jung |
1 NT | E | 2 | | 120 | 1.21 | 5.79 | 7-Lammers-Barron | 7-Schapera-Terbrueggen |
When East bids 1 ♦ over 1 ♣, West is correct to assume their partner does not
hold a 4-card major. If it turns out they do, then they'll be showing longer
Diamonds (5+) and a game-going hand. With that in mind, West should hide their
4-card major(s) in favor of rebidding 1 NT (12-14 HCP). If this is an agreement
that E/W have, then West's 1 NT bid is alertable.
In 1 NT, E/W take three Spade tricks, one Heart, three Diamonds, and possibly
one Club, although N/S might already have established their three Heart tricks
to go with their two Aces and ♦ K by that time. Making one will be the par
result. Clubs is a frozen suit, so nobody wants to touch that one. North's
best lead is the ♥ K, but few will find it.
Board 20 West Deals Both Vul |
♠ | Q 10 5 4 | ♥ | 10 9 4 3 | ♦ | A 4 | ♣ | 8 6 2 |
|
♠ | A J 9 8 7 | ♥ | A 6 5 | ♦ | 7 6 5 2 | ♣ | 4 |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | K 6 3 2 | ♥ | Q 2 | ♦ | K 8 | ♣ | A K 9 7 5 |
|
|
|
♠ | — | ♥ | K J 8 7 | ♦ | Q J 10 9 3 | ♣ | Q J 10 3 |
|
EW 4♠; EW 2N; EW 2♣; NS 1♥; Par −620
West | North | East | South |
Pass | Pass | 1 NT1 | 2 ♦2 |
3 ♠3 | Pass | 4 ♠ | Pass |
Pass | Pass | | |
- 15 to 17
- Alert, Diamonds and a higher suit
- Game forcing showing exactly five Spades
|
Contract | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
2 ♣ | E | 2 | | 90 | 6.93 | 0.07 | 3-Pollack-Pollack | 9-Diers-McCarthy |
2 ♠ | W | 3 | | 140 | 5.79 | 1.21 | 4-Singerman-Freiberg | 1-Koch-Temples |
2 ♠ | E | 5 | | 200 | 4.64 | 2.36 | 6-Burnam-Kanterman | 5-Dehaan-Garriott |
3 ♦ | S | −3 | | 300 | 3.50 | 3.50 | 2-Lakes-Peng | 6-Behr-Freiberg |
4 ♠ | E | 4 | | 620 | 1.21 | 5.79 | 5-Lin-Hubka | 3-Burns-Jung |
4 ♠ | E | 4 | | 620 | 1.21 | 5.79 | 7-Lammers-Barron | 7-Schapera-Terbrueggen |
4 ♠ | W | 4 | | 620 | 1.21 | 5.79 | 10-Kereiakes-Kereiakes | 2-Duncan-Earls |
On the auction, East should be wary about South having shortness in Spades.
It's difficult to see how to come to 10 tricks on the auction without a
cross-ruff, so declarer should start with that in mind.
South is likely to lead the ♦ Q on opening lead, and North will probably rise
with the ♦ A. The ♥T might very well be led back at trick two, and declarer
should insert the ♥ Q, covered by South with the ♥ K and won in dummy with the
♥ A. A second Heart is led from dummy, South winning cheaply. At this point,
the stage is set for the cross-ruff. No matter what South returns, E/W will be
able to collect two Club tricks, one Diamond, one Heart, and six trump tricks
before the party ends--most likely two Club ruffs in dummy, one Heart and one
Diamond ruff in the closed hand (overruffing North). At some point, North will
collect the ♠T, but that's the third and last trick for the defense.
Board 21 North Deals N-S Vul |
♠ | A Q 8 7 6 3 2 | ♥ | K | ♦ | 6 | ♣ | A 7 6 5 |
|
♠ | J 10 9 4 | ♥ | J 10 9 | ♦ | 8 7 5 | ♣ | K 9 3 |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | — | ♥ | 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 | ♦ | K 9 | ♣ | J 10 8 2 |
|
|
|
♠ | K 5 | ♥ | A Q | ♦ | A Q J 10 4 3 2 | ♣ | Q 4 |
|
NS 7N; N 7♦; NS 6♠; S 6♦; NS 3♣; EW 1♥; Par +2220
West | North | East | South |
| 1 ♠ | Pass | 2 ♦ |
Pass | 2 ♠ | Pass | 3 ♠ |
Pass | 4 NT1 | Pass | 5 ♦2 |
Pass | 5 NT3 | Pass | 6 ♠4 |
Pass | Pass | Pass | |
- RKC Blackwood for Spades
- 0 or 3
- Confirmation of all the keycards, asking for specific Kings
- No side-suit Kings
|
Contract | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
6 ♠ | N | 7 | 1460 | | 6.93 | 0.07 | 3-Pollack-Pollack | 9-Diers-McCarthy |
4 ♠ | N | 6 | 680 | | 5.79 | 1.21 | 5-Lin-Hubka | 3-Burns-Jung |
4 ♠ | N | 5 | 650 | | 3.50 | 3.50 | 2-Lakes-Peng | 6-Behr-Freiberg |
4 ♠ | N | 5 | 650 | | 3.50 | 3.50 | 4-Singerman-Freiberg | 1-Koch-Temples |
4 ♠ | N | 5 | 650 | | 3.50 | 3.50 | 6-Burnam-Kanterman | 5-Dehaan-Garriott |
4 ♠ | N | 4 | 620 | | 1.21 | 5.79 | 7-Lammers-Barron | 7-Schapera-Terbrueggen |
6 ♠ | N | −1 | | 100 | 0.07 | 6.93 | 10-Kereiakes-Kereiakes | 2-Duncan-Earls |
The opening lead is likely to be the ♣ J, and declarer will be under immediate
pressure. With the slow Club loser now upgraded to a fast Club loser, declarer
needs to calculate how many entries they need to establish the Diamonds for
Club pitches. Turns out that declarer needs to risk the Diamond finesse
immediately, since they won't have enough entries to ruff Diamonds good, pull
trump, and still get back to dummy to run the Diamonds.
Once that's determined, they simply need the ♦ K to be with East. At trick
two, declarer plays a low Diamond and inserts the ♦T when East plays low.
Eureka! They're almost out of the woods. Now, the ♦ A is played, declarer
pitching a Club. When the ♦ K falls, declarer switches to ♥ A and ♥ Q,
pitching another Club before the ♦ J, pitching their last Club when West
follows suit.
Surprisingly, East doesn't ruff the third Diamond. The 4-0 trump split doesn't
batter, as declarer has all trump left. After ♠ K, ♠ A, and ♠ Q, declarer
gives West their trick and claims the remainder.
It's doubtful that any N/S pair will be in 6 NT (or 7 NT!), but you never know.
7 NT makes on a beautiful Spade-Club squeeze against West (i.e., West is unable
to keep four Spades and the ♣ K in the end position). Try it!
Board 22 East Deals E-W Vul |
♠ | 7 5 | ♥ | 6 5 4 | ♦ | 10 9 8 7 4 3 | ♣ | A 7 |
|
♠ | Q 9 | ♥ | A 10 9 | ♦ | A K J 6 | ♣ | 10 9 4 2 |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | K J 8 4 3 2 | ♥ | K 8 7 | ♦ | 2 | ♣ | K 5 3 |
|
|
|
♠ | A 10 6 | ♥ | Q J 3 2 | ♦ | Q 5 | ♣ | Q J 8 6 |
|
E 5♠; W 4♠; EW 3N; EW 2♥; EW 3♣; Par −650
West | North | East | South |
| | 2 ♠ | Pass |
4 ♠1 | Pass | Pass | Pass |
Contract | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
2 ♠ | E | 3 | | 140 | 6.93 | 0.07 | 6-Burnam-Kanterman | 4-Brown-Koch |
3 ♠ | E | 4 | | 170 | 5.79 | 1.21 | 2-Lakes-Peng | 5-Dehaan-Garriott |
1 NT | W | 4 | | 180 | 4.64 | 2.36 | 8-Hall-Runda | 8-Kammer-Zimmer |
3 ♠ | E | 5 | | 200 | 2.93 | 4.07 | 3-Pollack-Pollack | 7-Schapera-Terbrueggen |
2 ♠ | E | 5 | | 200 | 2.93 | 4.07 | 4-Singerman-Freiberg | 10-Markham-Markham |
2 ♠ | E | 6 | | 230 | 1.21 | 5.79 | 7-Lammers-Barron | 6-Behr-Freiberg |
4 ♠ | E | 5 | | 650 | 0.07 | 6.93 | 5-Lin-Hubka | 2-Duncan-Earls |
If E/W were not vulnerable, West would ask about the quality of their
partner's suit and hand (Ogust). When making a vulnerable weak-two bid, it's
presumed that opener has a good suit and a good hand. E/W lose only one Spade
and one Club, making five. When the ♦ Q falls doubleton, East can pitch their
slow Heart loser and their third Club. South will have a hard time coming up
with an opening lead, but ♠ A and another can't be wrong.
Board 23 South Deals Both Vul |
♠ | K Q 7 2 | ♥ | 9 7 5 2 | ♦ | J 10 | ♣ | 10 5 2 |
|
♠ | A 6 3 | ♥ | A J 4 | ♦ | 8 6 4 3 | ♣ | Q 9 7 |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | 10 9 8 5 | ♥ | K 8 | ♦ | A Q 9 2 | ♣ | K J 6 |
|
|
|
♠ | J 4 | ♥ | Q 10 6 3 | ♦ | K 7 5 | ♣ | A 8 4 3 |
|
EW 3N; EW 2♠; EW 3♦; EW 2♣; EW 1♥; Par −600
West | North | East | South |
| | | Pass |
Pass | Pass | 1 ♦ | Pass |
2 NT | Pass | Pass | Pass |
Contract | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
1 ♦ | E | 2 | | 90 | 6.93 | 0.07 | 6-Burnam-Kanterman | 4-Brown-Koch |
2 NT | W | 2 | | 120 | 5.79 | 1.21 | 7-Lammers-Barron | 6-Behr-Freiberg |
2 ♦ | E | 4 | | 130 | 4.64 | 2.36 | 5-Lin-Hubka | 2-Duncan-Earls |
1 NT | W | 3 | | 150 | 2.36 | 4.64 | 2-Lakes-Peng | 5-Dehaan-Garriott |
1 NT | W | 3 | | 150 | 2.36 | 4.64 | 4-Singerman-Freiberg | 10-Markham-Markham |
1 NT | W | 3 | | 150 | 2.36 | 4.64 | 8-Hall-Runda | 8-Kammer-Zimmer |
3 NT | W | 3 | | 600 | 0.07 | 6.93 | 3-Pollack-Pollack | 7-Schapera-Terbrueggen |
Most E/W pairs won't get to 3 NT, nor should they. E/W take two Club tricks,
three Diamonds, three Hearts, and one Spade, making three. North will likely
lead the ♠ 2, but if N/S persist with Spades, they'll give declarer a second
trick in that suit.
Board 24 West Deals None Vul |
♠ | K 8 2 | ♥ | J 10 7 2 | ♦ | A J 7 6 | ♣ | Q 8 |
|
♠ | A 10 7 5 | ♥ | 8 5 | ♦ | Q 5 2 | ♣ | A K 10 7 |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | J 9 6 3 | ♥ | A Q 4 | ♦ | 9 8 | ♣ | J 9 6 5 |
|
|
|
♠ | Q 4 | ♥ | K 9 6 3 | ♦ | K 10 4 3 | ♣ | 4 3 2 |
|
EW 3♠; NS 3♥; NS 3♦; EW 3♣; Par −100: NS 4♦×−1; NS 4♥×−1
West | North | East | South |
1 ♣ | Dbl1 | 1 ♠2 | 2 ♥3 |
2 ♠ | Pass | Pass | 3 ♦ |
Pass | 3 ♥ | 3 ♠ | Pass |
Pass | Pass | | |
- For takeout
- Bid at the one level if you want to
- Free bid showing around 8 HCP
|
Contract | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
2 ♥ | S | 2 | 110 | | 6.93 | 0.07 | 6-Burnam-Kanterman | 4-Brown-Koch |
2 ♠ | E | 2 | | 110 | 4.07 | 2.93 | 2-Lakes-Peng | 5-Dehaan-Garriott |
2 ♠ | E | 2 | | 110 | 4.07 | 2.93 | 4-Singerman-Freiberg | 10-Markham-Markham |
2 ♠ | E | 2 | | 110 | 4.07 | 2.93 | 5-Lin-Hubka | 2-Duncan-Earls |
2 ♠ | E | 2 | | 110 | 4.07 | 2.93 | 8-Hall-Runda | 8-Kammer-Zimmer |
2 ♠ | E | 3 | | 140 | 0.64 | 6.36 | 3-Pollack-Pollack | 7-Schapera-Terbrueggen |
2 ♠ | E | 3 | | 140 | 0.64 | 6.36 | 7-Lammers-Barron | 6-Behr-Freiberg |
Once E/W claim a Spade fit, South's hand gets better, and they're quite
confident that they have a double fit with their partner (Hearts and Diamonds).
East has the same thought, and happily bids one more. 4 ♥, down one doubled,
would be a good sacrifice for N/S, and some will take it, but they can't be
sure that 3 ♠ is making.
E/W lose one Spade (declarer will take a double finesse against South), one
Heart, and two Diamonds, assuming they get the Clubs right. They should,
because South will have shown up with two points in Spades, three in Hearts,
and three in Diamonds. If they also hold the ♣ Q, North would have been
doubling with 9 HCP--highly unlikely. If South leads a Heart, then E/W will
make an overtrick. The ♣ 3 looks safest.
Board 25 North Deals E-W Vul |
♠ | A 10 6 5 3 | ♥ | J 9 7 6 | ♦ | 9 | ♣ | Q 9 2 |
|
♠ | K Q 4 | ♥ | K Q 8 4 | ♦ | K 10 8 2 | ♣ | A 8 |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | 9 7 | ♥ | A 10 5 2 | ♦ | Q 7 4 | ♣ | 10 7 5 3 |
|
|
|
♠ | J 8 2 | ♥ | 3 | ♦ | A J 6 5 3 | ♣ | K J 6 4 |
|
EW 3♥; EW 2N; NS 2♠; EW 1♦; NS 1♣; Par −100: NS 3♠×−1
West | North | East | South |
| Pass | Pass | Pass |
1 NT1 | Pass | Pass | Pass |
Contract | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
1 NT | W | −2 | 200 | | 7.00 | 0.00 | 7-Lammers-Barron | 5-Dehaan-Garriott |
2 ♠ | N | 3 | 140 | | 6.00 | 1.00 | 2-Lakes-Peng | 4-Brown-Koch |
2 ♠ | N | 2 | 110 | | 4.00 | 3.00 | 4-Singerman-Freiberg | 8-Kammer-Zimmer |
2 ♠ | N | 2 | 110 | | 4.00 | 3.00 | 6-Burnam-Kanterman | 3-Burns-Jung |
2 ♠ | S | 2 | 110 | | 4.00 | 3.00 | 9-Vanstone-Gibler | 9-Diers-McCarthy |
1 NT | W | 1 | | 90 | 1.00 | 6.00 | 3-Pollack-Pollack | 6-Behr-Freiberg |
1 NT | W | 1 | | 90 | 1.00 | 6.00 | 5-Lin-Hubka | 1-Koch-Temples |
1 NT | W | 1 | | 90 | 1.00 | 6.00 | 8-Hall-Runda | 7-Schapera-Terbrueggen |
North will lead a small Spade, South inserting the ♠ J. Declarer will likely
take this trick, since the thought of a Club switch doesn't appeal to them and
lead a small Diamond towards the ♦ Q, losing to the ♦ A. A Spade back is
likely, and declarer will pitch a small Heart and a small Club on the last two
Spades, South signaling for a Club. After winning the ♣ A, declarer should
play off the ♥ K and ♥ Q, take the marked finesse against the ♥ J, and finesse
back against the ♦ J in the South hand, making two--one Spade, four Hearts, two
Diamonds, and a Club.
Board 26 East Deals Both Vul |
♠ | K 9 6 2 | ♥ | K 10 8 | ♦ | A J 10 9 | ♣ | Q 3 |
|
♠ | J 10 8 4 | ♥ | J 4 3 | ♦ | 8 2 | ♣ | A K 10 7 |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | A 5 | ♥ | 9 6 2 | ♦ | 6 5 3 | ♣ | 9 6 5 4 2 |
|
|
|
♠ | Q 7 3 | ♥ | A Q 7 5 | ♦ | K Q 7 4 | ♣ | J 8 |
|
NS 4♥; NS 3♠; NS 4♦; NS 1N; EW 1♣; Par +620
West | North | East | South |
| | Pass | 1 ♦ |
Pass | 1 ♠ | Pass | 1 NT |
Pass | 3 NT | Pass | Pass |
Pass | | | |
Contract | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
3 NT | S | 4 | 630 | | 6.00 | 1.00 | 4-Singerman-Freiberg | 8-Kammer-Zimmer |
3 NT | S | 4 | 630 | | 6.00 | 1.00 | 5-Lin-Hubka | 1-Koch-Temples |
3 NT | S | 4 | 630 | | 6.00 | 1.00 | 9-Vanstone-Gibler | 9-Diers-McCarthy |
3 NT | S | 3 | 600 | | 4.00 | 3.00 | 6-Burnam-Kanterman | 3-Burns-Jung |
3 ♦ | S | 4 | 130 | | 3.00 | 4.00 | 3-Pollack-Pollack | 6-Behr-Freiberg |
3 NT | N | −2 | | 200 | 1.00 | 6.00 | 2-Lakes-Peng | 4-Brown-Koch |
3 NT | N | −2 | | 200 | 1.00 | 6.00 | 7-Lammers-Barron | 5-Dehaan-Garriott |
4 ♠ | N | −2 | | 200 | 1.00 | 6.00 | 8-Hall-Runda | 7-Schapera-Terbrueggen |
This one doesn't work out very well for N/S, as long as West doesn't lead the
♣ 7. Nobody would do that, would they? Well, some might, and if they do,
declarer will be very surprised when they win trick one with the ♣ J. They
won't be so surprised that they forget to cash eight quick red-suit winners,
making three. A high Club lead will beat 3 NT two tricks. A Spade lead also
beats the contract two tricks, as long as East, upon winning the ♠ A, switches
to the ♣ 2. If they don't, well, that version allows declarer to make four.
Poop.
Board 27 South Deals None Vul |
♠ | K 3 | ♥ | 10 8 6 5 4 | ♦ | A K 10 7 4 | ♣ | 8 |
|
♠ | J 7 6 2 | ♥ | 9 2 | ♦ | 9 5 | ♣ | Q J 9 6 5 |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | A 9 8 5 4 | ♥ | K Q J 7 3 | ♦ | 6 | ♣ | A 2 |
|
|
|
♠ | Q 10 | ♥ | A | ♦ | Q J 8 3 2 | ♣ | K 10 7 4 3 |
|
NS 5♦; EW 3♠; NS 2N; Par +300: EW 5♠×−2
West | North | East | South |
| | | 1 ♦ |
Pass | 1 ♥ | 1 ♠ | 2 ♣ |
3 ♠1 | 5 ♦ | Pass | Pass |
Pass | | | |
Contract | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
3 ♦× | S | 5 | 670 | | 7.00 | 0.00 | 2-Lakes-Peng | 4-Brown-Koch |
4 ♥× | E | −3 | 500 | | 6.00 | 1.00 | 9-Vanstone-Gibler | 9-Diers-McCarthy |
5 ♦ | S | 5 | 400 | | 5.00 | 2.00 | 7-Lammers-Barron | 5-Dehaan-Garriott |
4 ♦ | S | 5 | 150 | | 4.00 | 3.00 | 8-Hall-Runda | 7-Schapera-Terbrueggen |
4 ♦ | S | 4 | 130 | | 3.00 | 4.00 | 3-Pollack-Pollack | 6-Behr-Freiberg |
4 ♠ | E | −1 | 50 | | 1.50 | 5.50 | 4-Singerman-Freiberg | 8-Kammer-Zimmer |
4 ♠ | E | −1 | 50 | | 1.50 | 5.50 | 5-Lin-Hubka | 1-Koch-Temples |
3 ♠ | E | 3 | | 140 | 0.00 | 7.00 | 6-Burnam-Kanterman | 3-Burns-Jung |
North happily shows their Hearts at their first turn, but when South shows a
two-suited hand with both minors, 5 ♦ looks reasonable. N/S lose one Spade and
one Club, when declarer is able to ruff three Clubs in dummy. The ♠ 2 looks
like it will be a popular lead.
Board 28 West Deals N-S Vul |
♠ | A 9 8 | ♥ | Q 10 9 7 4 2 | ♦ | A J 5 | ♣ | A |
|
♠ | K 10 4 | ♥ | K 5 | ♦ | 9 6 2 | ♣ | Q J 9 3 2 |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | Q J 7 6 5 | ♥ | 6 3 | ♦ | K Q 8 | ♣ | 8 5 4 |
|
|
|
♠ | 3 2 | ♥ | A J 8 | ♦ | 10 7 4 3 | ♣ | K 10 7 6 |
|
NS 4♥; NS 3N; NS 3♦; EW 1♠; EW 1♣; Par +500: EW 4♠×−3
West | North | East | South |
Pass | 1 ♥ | 1 ♠ | 2 ♥ |
2 ♠ | 3 ♦1 | Pass | 4 ♥ |
Pass | Pass | Pass | |
Contract | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
4 ♥ | N | 5 | 650 | | 7.00 | 0.00 | 8-Hall-Runda | 6-Behr-Freiberg |
4 ♥ | N | 4 | 620 | | 5.00 | 2.00 | 6-Burnam-Kanterman | 2-Duncan-Earls |
4 ♥ | N | 4 | 620 | | 5.00 | 2.00 | 7-Lammers-Barron | 4-Brown-Koch |
4 ♥ | N | 4 | 620 | | 5.00 | 2.00 | 10-Kereiakes-Kereiakes | 10-Markham-Markham |
2 ♥ | N | 5 | 200 | | 3.00 | 4.00 | 9-Vanstone-Gibler | 8-Kammer-Zimmer |
3 ♥ | N | 4 | 170 | | 2.00 | 5.00 | 3-Pollack-Pollack | 5-Dehaan-Garriott |
4 ♥ | N | −1 | | 100 | 0.50 | 6.50 | 4-Singerman-Freiberg | 7-Schapera-Terbrueggen |
4 ♥ | N | −1 | | 100 | 0.50 | 6.50 | 5-Lin-Hubka | 9-Diers-McCarthy |
South has extras, so they're happy to bid on when North makes a game try. N/S
lose one Spade, one Heart, and one Diamond, declarer pitching their third
Diamond on dummy's ♣ K. The ♠ Q is a reasonable lead.
Board 29 North Deals Both Vul |
♠ | J 4 | ♥ | K J 8 2 | ♦ | A K Q 10 8 5 | ♣ | 8 |
|
♠ | A Q 10 9 8 5 | ♥ | A | ♦ | 9 6 4 | ♣ | 9 4 3 |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | 7 2 | ♥ | 10 9 7 4 3 | ♦ | J 3 2 | ♣ | 7 5 2 |
|
|
|
♠ | K 6 3 | ♥ | Q 6 5 | ♦ | 7 | ♣ | A K Q J 10 6 |
|
S 5N; N 4N; S 4♥; S 5♦; S 5♣; N 3♥; N 4♣; N 3♦; NS 1♠; Par +660
West | North | East | South |
| 1 ♦ | Pass | 2 ♣ |
2 ♠ | 3 ♥ | Pass | 3 NT |
Pass | Pass | Pass | |
Contract | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
3 NT | S | 7 | 720 | | 6.00 | 1.00 | 5-Lin-Hubka | 9-Diers-McCarthy |
3 NT | S | 7 | 720 | | 6.00 | 1.00 | 7-Lammers-Barron | 4-Brown-Koch |
3 NT | S | 7 | 720 | | 6.00 | 1.00 | 10-Kereiakes-Kereiakes | 10-Markham-Markham |
5 ♣ | S | 6 | 620 | | 4.00 | 3.00 | 9-Vanstone-Gibler | 8-Kammer-Zimmer |
4 ♣ | S | 5 | 150 | | 3.00 | 4.00 | 8-Hall-Runda | 6-Behr-Freiberg |
3 ♦ | N | 3 | 110 | | 2.00 | 5.00 | 6-Burnam-Kanterman | 2-Duncan-Earls |
4 ♦ | N | −2 | | 200 | 1.00 | 6.00 | 4-Singerman-Freiberg | 7-Schapera-Terbrueggen |
5 ♦ | N | −3 | | 300 | 0.00 | 7.00 | 3-Pollack-Pollack | 5-Dehaan-Garriott |
The final contract is a good one, but N/S might easily get too high. N/S take
12 tricks if West doesn't cash out at trick one. It's doubtful that they'll do
that against 3 NT. Against 6 NT? Well, that's a different story. Expect all
N/S pairs that aren't in slam to take 12 tricks and all that are in slam to
finish with 11. Odd.
Board 30 East Deals None Vul |
♠ | Q 10 | ♥ | Q 10 7 3 2 | ♦ | 9 3 | ♣ | K Q 8 3 |
|
♠ | K 8 5 4 2 | ♥ | A 5 4 | ♦ | A Q 10 | ♣ | 10 5 |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | 9 7 3 | ♥ | K J 9 | ♦ | J 7 2 | ♣ | 9 7 4 2 |
|
|
|
♠ | A J 6 | ♥ | 8 6 | ♦ | K 8 6 5 4 | ♣ | A J 6 |
|
EW 3♠; EW 1N; NS 1♥; NS 1♦; NS 1♣; Par −140
West | North | East | South |
| | Pass | 1 ♦ |
1 ♠ | 2 ♥ | 2 ♠ | 2 NT |
3 ♠ | Pass | Pass | Pass |
Contract | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
2 ♦ | S | 3 | 110 | | 7.00 | 0.00 | 3-Pollack-Pollack | 5-Dehaan-Garriott |
2 ♣ | S | 2 | 90 | | 6.00 | 1.00 | 7-Lammers-Barron | 4-Brown-Koch |
2 ♥ | N | −1 | | 50 | 4.50 | 2.50 | 9-Vanstone-Gibler | 8-Kammer-Zimmer |
1 NT | S | −1 | | 50 | 4.50 | 2.50 | 10-Kereiakes-Kereiakes | 10-Markham-Markham |
2 ♥ | N | −2 | | 100 | 2.50 | 4.50 | 4-Singerman-Freiberg | 7-Schapera-Terbrueggen |
3 NT | S | −2 | | 100 | 2.50 | 4.50 | 8-Hall-Runda | 6-Behr-Freiberg |
1 NT | S | −3 | | 150 | 1.00 | 6.00 | 6-Burnam-Kanterman | 2-Duncan-Earls |
4 ♥ | N | −4 | | 200 | 0.00 | 7.00 | 5-Lin-Hubka | 9-Diers-McCarthy |
When nobody's vulnerable, everybody seems to be in the bidding. West likes
their Diamond honors on the auction and bids one more time than they should--in
theory.
E/W lose two Spades and two Clubs, making three. The ♣ K would be a good
opening lead, except for that pesky 1 ♦ opener by South which will result in a
Diamond lead. It doesn't much matter as nine tricks will be the limit.
West | North | East | South |
| | | 1 ♥ |
4 ♣1 | Pass | 5 ♣ | Pass |
Pass | Pass | | |
- Alert, showing 6+ Clubs, exactly four Spades, and game-going values
|
A really good agreement to have with partner is to play that a 4-level
overcall in a minor suit after a major-suit opening shows 6+ cards in the
minor, exactly four cards in the other major, and game-going values (i.e.,
needing partner to have a trick and a fit to make game). West's hand is
absolutely perfect for this bid!
E/W lose one trick in each red suit, making five. North will lead the ♥ 7.
West | North | East | South |
Pass | Pass | 1 NT1 | Pass2 |
2 ♣3 | Pass | 2 ♦4 | Dbl5 |
2 ♥6 | 3 ♦7 | Pass | Pass |
Pass | | | |
- 15 to 17
- What else?
- Stayman, looking to park in Hearts if partner has no 4-card major
- No 4-card major
- I like Diamonds. A lot.
- Parking in Hearts
- I like Diamonds too. Please don't hate me for my raise.
|
If N/S play that a double of a strong 1 NT opener is for penalty, then E/W will
be playing the hand in 2 ♥, making, or worse--doubled and making. If they
pass, like they should, it's possible that they'll get to 3 ♦ or 4 ♦ on the
auction shown. That would be better.
In 3 ♦, N/S lose two Clubs and a Club ruff. If E/W get their Club ruff, then
they won't get their Spade trick. The opening lead is likely to be the ♣ 4,
and West ruffs the third Club with the ♦ J. The ♥ 9 is next, South winning in
their hand. Now a high Diamond, West showing out, the good Club, pitching a
Spade from North, ♠ A and a small Spade, ruffed in dummy, and the marked
finesse against the ♦ Q, making four.
West | North | East | South |
| Pass | 1 ♠1 | 2 ♦ |
3 NT | Pass | Pass | Pass |
West has nine quick tricks in notrump, and once South makes a two-level
overcall showing an opening hand, thoughts of slam go away. North is likely to
lead the ♦ Q, and the hand is over. It's a bit sad that East's hand
contributes zero tricks. Nice opener, partner.
West | North | East | South |
| | Pass1 | Pass |
1 ♥ | 1 ♠ | 3 ♥2 | 3 ♠ |
4 ♥ | Pass | Pass | Pass |
- Don't preempt with a 4-card major on the side
- Weak and preemptive
|
Some N/S pairs will pull the trigger on 4 ♠, down one doubled for –200. That
should get them a nice score, but since some of the other N/S pairs get to play
in 3 ♠, they shouldn't expect a top. E/W lose one Spade, one Heart, and one
Diamond when it turns out that South's Diamond ruff costs them their natural
trump trick. Rats. The ♣ K looks like the best lead.
West | North | East | South |
| | | Pass |
1 ♦ | 1 ♥ | 1 ♠1 | 4 ♥2 |
4 ♠ | Pass | Pass | Pass |
- Showing 5+ Spades
- Weak and preemptive, showing 5+ Hearts
|
The bidding may very well continue past 4 ♠, but North is unlikely to bid
again with such good Spades, and South has already preempted. E/W lose one
Heart and one Spade. The Club slam is not a good one needing the ♦ K to be
onside (unlikely on the auction). South will lead a small Heart on opening
lead.
West | North | East | South |
Pass | 1 ♣ | Dbl1 | Pass |
1 ♥ | Pass | 2 ♥2 | Pass |
Pass | Pass | | |
- For takeout, planning on correcting 1 ♠ to 1 NT
- Showing 16-18 HCP
|
A 1 NT overcall by East at their first turn wouldn't be wrong. In 2 ♥, E/W
lose one Club, one Spade, and three Diamonds. North will have a hard time
finding a good opening lead. They're probably best off shutting their eyes and
grabbing a random card, totally befuddling their partner ("Huh, I wonder what
the ♣ 7 means.")