EVENT>Monday Night Bridge |SESSION>Monday Eve |SECTION> A N-S
------------------------,------ ------------,-------- --------------------------
DATE>October 3, 2016 |CLUB NO.>185264 | 10/04/2016 09:31
---------------------,-- ------------------- -------------,---------------------
DIR> Mike Lipp |RATING>Club Appreciation game |MOVEMENT>MITCHELL
------------,-------- ,-------------------------,--------- ---------------------
AVE> 84.0 |TOP> 7 |MP LIMITS>None/500/200 |CLUB>Monday Night Bridge
------------ --------- ------------------------- -------------------------------
PAIRS IN STRAT A=12/B=10/C=4 ,---,-----------------,-------------------------,------,---------,
-------------------------------------------------| | Overall | Section | |Final |
No Name Name |Flt|Rnk-A|Rnk-B|Rnk-C|Rnk-A|Rnk-B|Rnk-C| Score | Pct |Awards |
------------------------------------------------- --- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------- ------ ---------
1 Debbie Wiest John Altman Sr A 2 . . | 1 . . 103.50 61.61 3.10(OA)
2 Marilyn Prosise Robert Prosise A . . . | . . . 87.00 51.79
3 Patricia Burnam Darleen Young C . . . | . . . 62.00 36.90
4 Susan Stacy Vanstone Martin Gibler B . . . | . . . 78.00 46.43
5 Patrick Hoffman William Cook B . 5/6 . | 4/5 3/4 . 94.50 56.25 0.57(SA)
6 Patrick Lammers Judy Barron B . . . | . . . 76.50 45.54
7 David Elliott Carla Runda C . 5/6 2 | 4/5 3/4 1 94.50 56.25 0.96(OC)
8 Betty Torello Judith Lubow B 6 4 . | 3 2 . 95.00 56.55 1.03(SA)
9 Terri Mackey Charlie Kobida C . . . | . . 2 74.00 44.05 0.39(SC)
10 Al Venosa Janet Venosa B 3 2 . | 2 1 . 101.50 60.42 2.32(OA)
11 Richard Magnus Julian Magnus, Jr B . . . | . . . 81.00 48.21
12 Betty Murdock Erin Oblinger C . . . | . . . 60.50 36.01
Totals 1008.00
Expert Analysis provided by Bob Fisk
**PAIRS**
BOARD 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
/
1> 5- 0 5- 5- 5- 1 3 2
50 ---- ---- ---- ---- -140 50 50 50 -110 PASS -50
2> 3- 7 3- 6 0 3- 3- 1
-110 ---- ---- ---- ---- 100 -110 50 -460 -110 -110 -430
3> 1 1 5- 5- 3 5- 1 5-
510 ---- ---- ---- ---- 510 1010 1010 980 1010 510 1010
4> 6 7 3- 3- 3- 1 3- 0
-110 110 ---- ---- ---- ---- -130 -130 -130 -150 -130 -170
5> 7 5 6 3 4 2 0 1
500 110 ---- ---- ---- ---- 300 -100 100 -110 -200 -140
6> - 7 2 5 3- 6 - 3-
-600 200 ---- ---- ---- ---- -250 -110 -120 100 -600 -120
7> 6- 4- 1 4- 0 6- 2- 2-
200 100 -130 ---- ---- ---- ---- 100 -170 200 -110 -110
8> 4 4 4 0 4 7 4 1
140 140 140 ---- ---- ---- ---- -400 140 170 140 -50
9> 3 3 3 3 3 7 3 3
420 420 420 ---- ---- ---- ---- 420 420 450 420 420
10> 3- 3- 3- 3- 3- 3- 3- 3-
650 650 650 650 ---- ---- ---- ---- 650 650 650 650
11> 6 - 4- 4- 2 7 3 -
110 -100 90 90 ---- ---- ---- ---- -50 140 70 -100
12> 7 1 4- 0 4- 6 2- 2-
50 -400 -130 -460 ---- ---- ---- ---- -130 -110 -150 -150
13> 4 0 4 7 4 1 4 4
630 -100 630 660 630 ---- ---- ---- ---- 110 630 630
14> 5- 2- 5- 2- 7 2- 2- 0
110 -50 110 -50 420 ---- ---- ---- ---- -50 -50 -100
15> 5 6- 1 6- 3 3 0 3
150 180 90 180 120 ---- ---- ---- ---- 120 -200 120
16> 5 7 0 2 5 5 1 3
-50 140 -680 -620 -50 -50 ---- ---- ---- ---- -650 -100
17> 3- 3- 3- - 7 6 3- -
-420 -420 -420 -450 590 100 ---- ---- ---- ---- -420 -450
18> 2- 5 2- 6 2- 0 7 2-
-140 -100 -140 50 -140 -200 ---- ---- ---- ---- 110 -140
19> 4- 2 4- - 4- - 4- 7
100 PASS 100 -90 100 -90 100 ---- ---- ---- ---- 200
20> 3- 1 0 3- 6 3- 3- 7
PASS -100 -130 PASS 140 PASS PASS ---- ---- ---- ---- 730
21> 5 5 5 1 1 5 5 1
-170 -170 -170 -420 -420 -170 -170 ---- ---- ---- ---- -420
22> 6- 1 0 5 2 3- 6- 3-
430 -100 -150 140 -50 130 430 130 ---- ---- ---- ----
23> 2- 2- 7 0 6 5 2- 2-
-100 -100 170 -170 110 100 -100 -100 ---- ---- ---- ----
24> 2- 2- 2- 6 2- 2- 7 2-
-450 -450 -450 -400 -450 -450 -170 -450 ---- ---- ---- ----
25> 7 1- 1- 5 5 1- 5 1-
---- 200 -50 -50 140 140 -50 140 -50 ---- ---- ----
26> 3 - 2 4- 4- - 6- 6-
---- -130 -630 -620 100 100 -630 500 500 ---- ---- ----
27> 3 0 3 3 7 6 3 3
---- 110 -50 110 110 1700 130 110 110 ---- ---- ----
28> 4 7 1 4 4 6 1 1
---- ---- -170 50 -420 -170 -170 -110 -420 -420 ---- ----
29> 0 3 2 1 6 4 7 5
---- ---- -630 -120 -150 -600 100 -110 200 -100 ---- ----
30> 0 7 2- 2- 6 5 2- 2-
---- ---- -490 -50 -450 -450 -120 -420 -450 -450 ---- ----
31> 4 4 2 1 4 0 6- 6-
---- ---- ---- 620 620 200 170 620 -100 650 650 ----
32> 0 6- 2- 2- 2- 5 6- 2-
---- ---- ---- -100 400 -50 -50 -50 170 400 -50 ----
33> 2 5 2 2 5 0 7 5
---- ---- ---- -90 50 -90 -90 50 -120 150 50 ----
34> 3 3 5 3 7 - 6 -
---- ---- ---- ---- -420 -420 -170 -420 50 -450 -110 -450
35> 1 2 3 6- 0 5 6- 4
---- ---- ---- ---- -90 -50 90 200 -150 140 200 110
36> 6- 2 2 0 4 5 6- 2
---- ---- ---- ---- 110 -110 -110 -140 PASS 100 110 -110
EVENT>Monday Night Bridge |SESSION>Monday Eve |SECTION> A E-W
------------------------,------ ------------,-------- --------------------------
DATE>October 3, 2016 |CLUB NO.>185264 | 10/04/2016 09:31
---------------------,-- ------------------- -------------,---------------------
DIR> Mike Lipp |RATING>Club Appreciation game |MOVEMENT>MITCHELL
------------,-------- ,-------------------------,--------- ---------------------
AVE> 84.0 |TOP> 7 |MP LIMITS>None/500/200 |CLUB>Monday Night Bridge
------------ --------- ------------------------- -------------------------------
PAIRS IN STRAT A=12/B=9/C=7 ,---,-----------------,-------------------------,------,---------,
-------------------------------------------------| | Overall | Section | |Final |
No Name Name |Flt|Rnk-A|Rnk-B|Rnk-C|Rnk-A|Rnk-B|Rnk-C| Score | Pct |Awards |
------------------------------------------------- --- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------- ------ ---------
1 Stephen Baldwin Steve Messinger C . . 3 | 4 3 2 90.50 53.87 0.72(SA)
2 Patt Olexsey Jan Thurnau C . . 4 | . 4 3 86.50 51.49 0.54(OC)
3 Joy Singerman Pam Campbell B . . . | . . . 65.50 38.99
4 Ralph Terbrueggen Michael Dickman A . . . | . . . 76.50 45.54
5 Sharon Koster Pamela Kennedy C . . . | . . . 79.00 47.02
6 Evelyn McCarthy Joan Diers C . . . | . . . 71.00 42.26
7 Joseph Kammer Gail Zimmer B 4 3 . | 2 2 . 99.00 58.93 1.74(OA)
8 Lewis Temples Richard Koch C 1 1 1 | 1 1 1 109.00 64.88 4.13(OA)
9 Steven Simon John P LaMacchia C . . . | . . . 73.00 43.45
10 Peggy Jervis Pat Lindeman C . . . | . . . 71.00 42.26
11 Doris Kehoe Lilam Stanley A . . . | 5 . . 88.50 52.68 0.41(SA)
12 Michael Lipp Stephen Felson A 5 . . | 3 . . 98.50 58.63 1.31(OA)
Totals 1008.00
Expert Analysis provided by Bob Fisk
**PAIRS**
BOARD 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
/
1> 1- 1- 1- 6 4 7 5 1-
-50 ---- -50 ---- -50 ---- 110 ---- PASS 140 50 -50
2> 3- 1 7 3- 3- 0 6 3-
110 ---- -50 ---- 460 ---- 110 ---- 110 -100 430 110
3> 6 1- 4 1- 6 6 1- 1-
-510 -----1010 ---- -980 -----1010 ---- -510 -510 -1010 -1010
4> 3- 0 3- 6 3- 7 3- 1
130 -110 ---- 130 ---- 150 ---- 130 ---- 170 130 110
5> 4 2 3 5 7 6 1 0
100 -110 ---- -100 ---- 110 ---- 200 ---- 140 -300 -500
6> 2 0 3- 1 6- 3- 5 6-
110 -200 ---- 120 ---- -100 ---- 600 ---- 120 250 600
7> 2- 7 6 - 4- 4- - 2-
-100 170 130 ---- -200 ---- 110 ---- 110 ---- -200 -100
8> 3 3 3 0 3 6 3 7
-140 -140 -140 ---- -170 ---- -140 ---- 50 ---- -140 400
9> 4 4 4 0 4 4 4 4
-420 -420 -420 ---- -450 ---- -420 ---- -420 ---- -420 -420
10> 3- 3- 3- 3- 3- 3- 3- 3-
-650 -650 -650 -650 ---- -650 ---- -650 ---- -650 ---- -650
11> 5 2- 0 2- 4 6- 1 6-
50 -90 -140 -90 ---- -70 ---- 100 ---- -110 ---- 100
12> 2- 2- 1 7 4- 4- 0 6
130 130 110 460 ---- 150 ---- 150 ---- -50 ---- 400
13> 3 6 0 3 3 3 3 7
-630 -110 -660 -630 -630 ---- -630 ---- -630 ---- 100 ----
14> 1- 4- 4- 4- 0 7 1- 4-
-110 50 50 50 -420 ---- 100 ---- -110 ---- 50 ----
15> 6 4 - 7 4 4 2 -
-90 -120 -180 200 -120 ---- -120 ---- -150 ---- -180 ----
16> 5 6 2 4 2 2 0 7
---- 620 650 50 100 50 ---- 50 ---- -140 ---- 680
17> 6- 3- 0 6- 1 3- 3- 3-
---- 450 420 -590 450 -100 ---- 420 ---- 420 ---- 420
18> 1 0 4- 4- 7 4- 2 4-
---- -50 -110 140 140 200 ---- 140 ---- 100 ---- 140
19> 6- 2- 0 6- 2- 2- 5 2-
90 ---- -100 -200 90 -100 -100 ---- PASS ---- -100 ----
20> 3- 1 0 3- 3- 3- 6 7
PASS ---- -140 -730 PASS PASS PASS ---- 100 ---- 130 ----
21> 6 6 6 2 2 2 2 2
420 ---- 420 420 170 170 170 ---- 170 ---- 170 ----
22> 5 3- - - 6 3- 7 2
---- 50 ---- -130 -430 -430 100 -130 ---- 150 ---- -140
23> 1 2 4- 4- 4- 4- 0 7
---- -110 ---- -100 100 100 100 100 ---- -170 ---- 170
24> 4- 4- 4- 0 4- 4- 4- 1
---- 450 ---- 450 450 170 450 450 ---- 450 ---- 400
25> 2 2 5- 0 2 5- 5- 5-
-140 ---- -140 ---- 50 -200 -140 50 50 ---- 50 ----
26> 2- 2- 6- 4 - 6- - 5
-100 ---- -100 ---- 630 130 -500 630 -500 ---- 620 ----
27> 4 0 1 4 4 7 4 4
-110 -----1700 ---- -130 -110 -110 50 -110 ---- -110 ----
28> 3 3 1 3 6 0 6 6
---- 170 ---- 170 ---- 110 170 420 -50 420 ---- 420
29> 6 1 3 7 0 4 2 5
---- 600 ---- -100 ---- 110 630 -200 120 100 ---- 150
30> 4- 1 2 7 4- 0 4- 4-
---- 450 ---- 120 ---- 420 490 450 50 450 ---- 450
31> 5 6 3 7 3 - 3 -
-200 ---- -170 ---- -620 ---- 100 -620 -650 -620 -650 ----
32> 4- 4- 4- 2 7 - - 4-
50 ---- 50 ---- 50 ---- -170 100 -400 -400 50 ----
33> 5 5 2 7 5 0 2 2
90 ---- 90 ---- -50 ---- 120 90 -150 -50 -50 ----
34> 2 4 0 6- 4 1 4 6-
---- 170 ---- 420 ---- -50 ---- 450 420 110 420 450
35> 4 - 7 2 6 - 5 3
---- -90 ---- -200 ---- 150 ---- -140 90 -200 50 -110
36> 5 7 3 2 - - 5 5
---- 110 ---- 140 ---- PASS ---- -100 -110 -110 110 110
Monday Night Bridge, Monday Eve, October 3, 2016
Board 1 North Deals None Vul |
♠ | 2 | ♥ | K 9 8 | ♦ | 9 8 6 4 3 | ♣ | A Q 9 5 |
|
♠ | 10 5 3 | ♥ | Q J 10 6 4 2 | ♦ | K | ♣ | K J 7 |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | J 8 7 6 | ♥ | A 3 | ♦ | A Q J 7 5 | ♣ | 10 6 |
|
|
|
♠ | A K Q 9 4 | ♥ | 7 5 | ♦ | 10 2 | ♣ | 8 4 3 2 |
|
EW 1N; NS 1♠; EW 1♥; EW 1♦; N 1♣; Par −90
West | North | East | South |
| Pass | 1 ♦ | 1 ♠1 |
2 ♥2 | Pass | 2 NT | Pass |
Pass | Pass | | |
- Overcalls at the one level show 8-16 HCP
- Responses at the two level show 10+ HCP and 5+ card suit
|
Contract | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
3 ♥ | W | −1 | 50 | | 5.50 | 1.50 | 1-Wiest-Altman Sr | 1-Baldwin-Messinger |
4 ♥ | W | −1 | 50 | | 5.50 | 1.50 | 7-Elliott-Runda | 12-Lipp-Felson |
3 ♥ | W | −1 | 50 | | 5.50 | 1.50 | 8-Torello-Lubow | 3-Singerman-Campbell |
2 ♥ | W | −1 | 50 | | 5.50 | 1.50 | 9-Mackey-Kobida | 5-Koster-Kennedy |
Pass | | | Pass | | 3.00 | 4.00 | 11-Magnus-Magnus, Jr | 9-Simon-LaMacchia |
4 ♣ | N | −1 | | 50 | 2.00 | 5.00 | 12-Murdock-Oblinger | 11-Kehoe-Stanley |
2 ♥ | W | 2 | | 110 | 1.00 | 6.00 | 10-Venosa-Venosa | 7-Kammer-Zimmer |
3 ♥ | W | 3 | | 140 | 0.00 | 7.00 | 6-Lammers-Barron | 10-Jervis-Lindeman |
It's easy for E/W to get too high on this hand, probably because as soon as
they get past 1 NT, they're too high. Oh well, they'll have company. South will
probably rattle off ♠ AKQ and then look around for something better. If
they've been watching their partner's discards on the last two Spades, they'll
have seen something interesting . . . an uncomfortable partner. North will
probably chuck a Diamond at some point, but that gives East five Diamond
tricks. If they pitch a Club, that also costs them a trick. A Heart? Bite
your tongue. The fact is, once South led a Spade, the hand was over, although
it's hard to imagine leading anything else.
Some West's will pull to 3 ♥ over 2 NT. Some E/W will play in game. This one
will be fun to watch as it crawls around the room. Expect the opposite of
"That board will be flat, partner."
Board 2 East Deals N-S Vul |
♠ | 7 5 | ♥ | 10 8 7 6 | ♦ | J 2 | ♣ | A 9 6 5 3 |
|
♠ | Q J 2 | ♥ | K Q J | ♦ | K Q 8 7 | ♣ | K J 7 |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | 8 4 3 | ♥ | A 3 2 | ♦ | A 10 6 5 4 3 | ♣ | 2 |
|
|
|
♠ | A K 10 9 6 | ♥ | 9 5 4 | ♦ | 9 | ♣ | Q 10 8 4 |
|
EW 4N; EW 3♦; NS 2♣; EW 1♥; Par −430
West | North | East | South |
| | 2 ♦1 | Pass |
3 NT2 | Pass | Pass | Pass |
- Weak-two bid showing 5-10 HCP and six Diamonds
- West can pretty much count nine tricks
|
Contract | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
5 ♦ | E | −2 | 100 | | 7.00 | 0.00 | 6-Lammers-Barron | 10-Jervis-Lindeman |
5 ♦ | E | −1 | 50 | | 6.00 | 1.00 | 8-Torello-Lubow | 3-Singerman-Campbell |
3 ♦ | W | 3 | | 110 | 3.50 | 3.50 | 1-Wiest-Altman Sr | 1-Baldwin-Messinger |
3 ♦ | E | 3 | | 110 | 3.50 | 3.50 | 7-Elliott-Runda | 12-Lipp-Felson |
3 ♦ | E | 3 | | 110 | 3.50 | 3.50 | 10-Venosa-Venosa | 7-Kammer-Zimmer |
3 ♦ | E | 3 | | 110 | 3.50 | 3.50 | 11-Magnus-Magnus, Jr | 9-Simon-LaMacchia |
3 NT | W | 4 | | 430 | 1.00 | 6.00 | 12-Murdock-Oblinger | 11-Kehoe-Stanley |
3 NT | W | 5 | | 460 | 0.00 | 7.00 | 9-Mackey-Kobida | 5-Koster-Kennedy |
North is likely to lead the ♥ 6. Declarer can count nine tricks off the top,
but this is Matchpoints and +400 is likely to be a bad score. Assuming that
they win in dummy with the ♥ A, what's trick two? Best is a Spade towards the
♠ QJ2. If this loses to North, there's no return that will hurt. In this
case, South has to hop with the ♠ K, and a Club return is best. Declarer plays
the ♣ J, and when that knocks out the ♣ A, they've gotten their tenth trick.
If anything goes sideways after the Spade at trick two, declarer can always
revert back to red-suit winners. Hopefully no E/W pairs try and play in 5 ♦.
When you have a huge minor-suit fit, try and play in 3 NT. When the fit is
suspect, play in the minor.
Board 3 South Deals E-W Vul |
♠ | A J 10 6 2 | ♥ | 8 2 | ♦ | A K Q 4 2 | ♣ | 9 |
|
♠ | 5 | ♥ | A K Q 6 5 4 3 | ♦ | 10 8 7 5 | ♣ | Q |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | 9 4 | ♥ | J 10 9 7 | ♦ | J 9 3 | ♣ | 10 6 4 3 |
|
|
|
♠ | K Q 8 7 3 | ♥ | — | ♦ | 6 | ♣ | A K J 8 7 5 2 |
|
NS 7♠; NS 6♣; NS 5♦; EW 2♥; Par +1510
West | North | East | South |
| | | 1 ♣1 |
3 ♥2 | 3 ♠3 | 4 ♥4 | 5 ♥5 |
Dbl6 | 5 ♠7 | Pass8 | 7 ♠9 |
Pass | Pass | Pass | |
- Planning on reversing into Spades
- Preemptive. Would bid 4 ♥ if not vulnerable
- Showing 5+ Spades and 10+ HCP
- I have Hearts, too! Yay me!
- Exclusion KCB, asking for keycards in Spades and showing a void in Hearts
- You can't make 5 ♥
- XX=1 or 4 keycards, Pass=0 or 3 keycards, 5 ♠=two keycards w/o ♠ Q, 5 NT=two keycards w/ ♠ Q
- Finally, someone found a green card
- Easy bid
|
Contract | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
6 ♠ | N | 7 | 1010 | | 5.50 | 1.50 | 7-Elliott-Runda | 12-Lipp-Felson |
6 ♠ | N | 7 | 1010 | | 5.50 | 1.50 | 8-Torello-Lubow | 3-Singerman-Campbell |
6 ♠ | N | 7 | 1010 | | 5.50 | 1.50 | 10-Venosa-Venosa | 7-Kammer-Zimmer |
6 ♠ | N | 7 | 1010 | | 5.50 | 1.50 | 12-Murdock-Oblinger | 11-Kehoe-Stanley |
6 ♠ | N | 6 | 980 | | 3.00 | 4.00 | 9-Mackey-Kobida | 5-Koster-Kennedy |
4 ♠ | S | 7 | 510 | | 1.00 | 6.00 | 1-Wiest-Altman Sr | 1-Baldwin-Messinger |
4 ♠ | N | 7 | 510 | | 1.00 | 6.00 | 6-Lammers-Barron | 10-Jervis-Lindeman |
4 ♠ | S | 7 | 510 | | 1.00 | 6.00 | 11-Magnus-Magnus, Jr | 9-Simon-LaMacchia |
Fun hand! Most N/S pairs should reach the easy grand, although you never
know. The ♥ J looks like a typical lead, and the hand is over quickly. While
dummy prattles on about what a nice hand they have, declarer ruffs the opening
lead in dummy, pulls two rounds of trumps, plays ♦ A and ruffs a Diamond in
dummy, ♣ AK (pitching a Heart), ♣ J (pitching the other small Diamond), claim
on good trumps and good Diamonds.
There's a million other ways to play the hand (literally, as in figuratively),
but that one seems the cleanest. Here's a ranking of final possible N/S
contracts, from happiest to saddest (for N/S):
1) 7 ♠ (+1510) 2) 7 ♥x (+1400) 3) 6 ♥x (+1100) 4) 6 ♠ (+1010)
5) 6 ♣ (+920) 6) 5 ♥x (+800) 7) 4 ♠ (+510) 8) 4 ♥x (+500) 9)
5 ♣ (+420) 10) 5 ♦ (+400) 11) 3 ♠ (+260) 12) 4 ♣ (+190) 13) 3 NT
(–150, although some E/W pair will rattle off ♥ AKQ and block the suit....heh)
Board 4 West Deals Both Vul |
♠ | A 10 5 | ♥ | A Q 9 8 7 | ♦ | Q | ♣ | Q J 4 2 |
|
♠ | Q 8 | ♥ | 10 2 | ♦ | A K 9 8 7 4 | ♣ | A K 8 |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | K 6 4 2 | ♥ | K 4 | ♦ | J 10 3 | ♣ | 9 7 6 3 |
|
|
|
♠ | J 9 7 3 | ♥ | J 6 5 3 | ♦ | 6 5 2 | ♣ | 10 5 |
|
EW 3N; EW 4♦; NS 2♥; W 3♣; E 2♣; W 1♠; Par −500: NS 4♥×−2
West | North | East | South |
1 ♦ | 1 ♥ | Dbl1 | 2 ♥ |
3 ♥2 | Dbl3 | 3 NT4 | Pass |
Pass | Pass | | |
- Negative showing four Spades
- Western Cue asking partner to bid 3 NT with a Heart stopper
- Lead a Heart
- Looks like a stopper to me!
|
Contract | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
2 ♥ | N | 2 | 110 | | 7.00 | 0.00 | 2-Prosise-Prosise | 2-Olexsey-Thurnau |
2 ♠ | E | 2 | | 110 | 6.00 | 1.00 | 1-Wiest-Altman Sr | 12-Lipp-Felson |
3 ♦ | W | 4 | | 130 | 3.50 | 3.50 | 7-Elliott-Runda | 11-Kehoe-Stanley |
2 ♦ | W | 4 | | 130 | 3.50 | 3.50 | 8-Torello-Lubow | 1-Baldwin-Messinger |
2 ♦ | W | 4 | | 130 | 3.50 | 3.50 | 9-Mackey-Kobida | 4-Terbrueggen-Dickman |
3 ♦ | W | 4 | | 130 | 3.50 | 3.50 | 11-Magnus-Magnus, Jr | 8-Temples-Koch |
3 ♦ | W | 5 | | 150 | 1.00 | 6.00 | 10-Venosa-Venosa | 6-McCarthy-Diers |
2 ♦ | W | 6 | | 170 | 0.00 | 7.00 | 12-Murdock-Oblinger | 10-Jervis-Lindeman |
South dutifully leads the ♥ 3 and declarer wins the ♥ K. What's the correct
way to play the Diamond suit? With no fast entries back to the West hand, it's
a toss up between an immediate finesse for the ♦ Q or playing for 2-2 Diamonds.
Not wanting to be "that guy" who lost to a singleton ♦ Q in the North hand,
declarer rattles off ♦ AK and collects their nine tricks. Phew.
Some N/S's will pull the trigger on 4 ♥, and will play there doubled going down
two for –500. That's better than –600, but still not a good score, since some
E/W pairs will be playing in 3 ♦ or allowing N/S to play in 3 ♥ undoubled.
Ugh.
Board 5 North Deals N-S Vul |
♠ | 10 8 2 | ♥ | Q | ♦ | 10 9 5 4 3 | ♣ | A 9 7 4 |
|
♠ | K Q J | ♥ | J 8 6 4 3 | ♦ | A Q 6 | ♣ | J 2 |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | 7 6 | ♥ | 10 9 7 5 2 | ♦ | J 8 2 | ♣ | Q 10 8 |
|
|
|
♠ | A 9 5 4 3 | ♥ | A K | ♦ | K 7 | ♣ | K 6 5 3 |
|
NS 2♠; EW 2♥; NS 3♣; NS 2♦; Par +100: EW 3♥×−1
West | North | East | South |
| Pass | Pass | 1 ♠ |
2 ♥ | 2 ♠ | 3 ♥ | Dbl1 |
Pass | 3 ♠2 | Pass | Pass |
Dbl3 | Pass | Pass | Pass |
- Maximal overcall double (i.e., game try)
- Nope
- I agree with North
|
Contract | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
5 ♥× | W | −3 | 500 | | 7.00 | 0.00 | 1-Wiest-Altman Sr | 12-Lipp-Felson |
4 ♥× | W | −2 | 300 | | 6.00 | 1.00 | 7-Elliott-Runda | 11-Kehoe-Stanley |
2 ♠ | S | 2 | 110 | | 5.00 | 2.00 | 2-Prosise-Prosise | 2-Olexsey-Thurnau |
4 ♥ | W | −2 | 100 | | 4.00 | 3.00 | 9-Mackey-Kobida | 4-Terbrueggen-Dickman |
3 ♠ | S | −1 | | 100 | 3.00 | 4.00 | 8-Torello-Lubow | 1-Baldwin-Messinger |
2 ♥ | W | 2 | | 110 | 2.00 | 5.00 | 10-Venosa-Venosa | 6-McCarthy-Diers |
2 ♥ | W | 3 | | 140 | 1.00 | 6.00 | 12-Murdock-Oblinger | 10-Jervis-Lindeman |
4 ♠ | S | −2 | | 200 | 0.00 | 7.00 | 11-Magnus-Magnus, Jr | 8-Temples-Koch |
Some shy Norths might pass 2 ♥, but it's losing Bridge in the long run. In
this case, it would have worked. N/S go –200 when West doubles 3 ♠. Rats.
The ♣ J is a good lead from the West hand. They aren't looking for a ruff,
simply trying to get out of their hand without giving declarer an extra trick.
N/S lose two Spades, two Diamonds, and a Club.
Board 6 East Deals E-W Vul |
♠ | 10 8 4 | ♥ | 9 8 | ♦ | 9 8 5 4 | ♣ | A Q 7 4 |
|
♠ | A 7 6 | ♥ | Q 4 3 2 | ♦ | 6 3 | ♣ | K 10 6 5 |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | K Q 3 2 | ♥ | A 10 5 | ♦ | A Q J 7 | ♣ | 9 8 |
|
|
|
♠ | J 9 5 | ♥ | K J 7 6 | ♦ | K 10 2 | ♣ | J 3 2 |
|
E 3N; EW 3♠; W 2N; EW 2♥; EW 2♦; EW 2♣; Par −600
West | North | East | South |
| | 1 NT1 | Pass |
2 ♣2 | Pass3 | 2 ♠ | Pass |
2 NT4 | Pass | 3 NT5 | Pass |
Pass | Pass | | |
- 15 to 17
- Stayman
- Don't double for a Club lead with such a weak hand and a 4-card suit
- Alert, may or may not have a 4-card major (for 4-suit transfer players)
- 16 HCP, a Ten, high cards working together. Easy acceptance.
|
Contract | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
3 NT | E | −2 | 200 | | 7.00 | 0.00 | 2-Prosise-Prosise | 2-Olexsey-Thurnau |
2 ♠ | E | −1 | 100 | | 6.00 | 1.00 | 10-Venosa-Venosa | 6-McCarthy-Diers |
2 ♠ | E | 2 | | 110 | 5.00 | 2.00 | 8-Torello-Lubow | 1-Baldwin-Messinger |
2 NT | E | 2 | | 120 | 3.50 | 3.50 | 9-Mackey-Kobida | 4-Terbrueggen-Dickman |
2 NT | E | 2 | | 120 | 3.50 | 3.50 | 12-Murdock-Oblinger | 10-Jervis-Lindeman |
3 ♥ | S | −5 | | 250 | 2.00 | 5.00 | 7-Elliott-Runda | 11-Kehoe-Stanley |
3 NT | W | 3 | | 600 | 0.50 | 6.50 | 1-Wiest-Altman Sr | 12-Lipp-Felson |
3 NT | E | 3 | | 600 | 0.50 | 6.50 | 11-Magnus-Magnus, Jr | 8-Temples-Koch |
E/W take four Spade tricks, two Heart tricks, two Diamond tricks, and one
Club. If South leads "Fourth from the longest and strongest, partner," E/W
will likely make four. Oops. A Spade lead is the safest from the South hand,
and the ♠ J looks reasonable (i.e., it doesn't cost a trick).
Board 7 South Deals Both Vul |
♠ | 10 5 4 | ♥ | K Q 10 5 2 | ♦ | Q 9 7 | ♣ | 6 3 |
|
♠ | Q 3 | ♥ | J 9 | ♦ | K 10 5 4 3 | ♣ | K Q 9 7 |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | A J 8 7 | ♥ | 8 6 | ♦ | A J 2 | ♣ | A 8 5 4 |
|
|
|
♠ | K 9 6 2 | ♥ | A 7 4 3 | ♦ | 8 6 | ♣ | J 10 2 |
|
EW 4♦; EW 4♣; EW 2N; EW 2♠; NS 1♥; Par −130
West | North | East | South |
| | | Pass |
1 ♦1 | Pass | 1 ♠ | Pass |
2 ♣ | Pass | 2 ♥2 | Pass |
3 ♦3 | Pass | 4 ♣4 | Pass |
Pass | Pass | | |
- Rule of 20 hand with an easy rebid
- Alert, fourth-suit forcing to game
- Denies three Spades, four Hearts, or a Heart stopper for notrump
- To play
|
Contract | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
3 NT | W | −2 | 200 | | 6.50 | 0.50 | 1-Wiest-Altman Sr | 11-Kehoe-Stanley |
3 NT | W | −2 | 200 | | 6.50 | 0.50 | 10-Venosa-Venosa | 5-Koster-Kennedy |
2 NT | W | −1 | 100 | | 4.50 | 2.50 | 2-Prosise-Prosise | 1-Baldwin-Messinger |
2 NT | E | −1 | 100 | | 4.50 | 2.50 | 8-Torello-Lubow | 12-Lipp-Felson |
3 ♣ | E | 3 | | 110 | 2.50 | 4.50 | 11-Magnus-Magnus, Jr | 7-Kammer-Zimmer |
3 ♦ | W | 3 | | 110 | 2.50 | 4.50 | 12-Murdock-Oblinger | 9-Simon-LaMacchia |
4 ♣ | W | 4 | | 130 | 1.00 | 6.00 | 3-Burnam-Young | 3-Singerman-Campbell |
2 ♣ | E | 6 | | 170 | 0.00 | 7.00 | 9-Mackey-Kobida | 2-Olexsey-Thurnau |
Rule of 20 is a reasonable way to decide whether to open a hand in 1st or 2nd
seat. Add your high-card points to the length in your two longest suits (11 +
5 + 4 in this case), and if you reach 20, you're good to go! West uses
Fourth-Suit Forcing to check on a Heart stopper, and then settles in 4 ♣
when none was found. Huh? Didn't East create a game force? Are Clubs worth
25 points a trick today? Do we need to pay an extra dollar for that?
It's very reasonable for partners to agree that Fourth-Suit Forcing (and 2/1
for that matter) should be played as forcing to game or to four of a minor if
there's a problem (i.e., 3 NT wouldn't make). It seems silly to have to play in
5 ♣ or 5 ♦--one trick shy of slam--when the pair have minimum values. Talk
this over with your partner.
Board 8 West Deals None Vul |
♠ | K Q 10 9 7 3 | ♥ | 6 5 | ♦ | A 2 | ♣ | K Q 9 |
|
♠ | A J 5 | ♥ | Q J 8 3 | ♦ | K J 8 | ♣ | A 7 2 |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | 6 4 | ♥ | 9 7 | ♦ | 10 9 6 5 4 3 | ♣ | J 6 4 |
|
|
|
♠ | 8 2 | ♥ | A K 10 4 2 | ♦ | Q 7 | ♣ | 10 8 5 3 |
|
S 4♠; N 3♠; S 3♥; N 2♥; S 3♣; S 1N; N 2♣; W 1♦; Par +420
West | North | East | South |
1 NT1 | Dbl2 | Pass3 | 2 ♣4 |
Pass | 2 ♠5 | Pass | Pass |
Pass | | | |
- 15 to 17
- Alert, shows a single-suited hand (DONT)
- Yes, East had Diamonds, but a one count?
- Alert, forced bid
- Alert, North is showing an opening hand with Spades
|
Contract | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
3 ♠ | N | 4 | 170 | | 7.00 | 0.00 | 10-Venosa-Venosa | 5-Koster-Kennedy |
2 ♠ | N | 3 | 140 | | 4.00 | 3.00 | 1-Wiest-Altman Sr | 11-Kehoe-Stanley |
2 ♠ | N | 3 | 140 | | 4.00 | 3.00 | 2-Prosise-Prosise | 1-Baldwin-Messinger |
2 ♠ | N | 3 | 140 | | 4.00 | 3.00 | 3-Burnam-Young | 3-Singerman-Campbell |
2 ♠ | N | 3 | 140 | | 4.00 | 3.00 | 9-Mackey-Kobida | 2-Olexsey-Thurnau |
2 ♠ | N | 3 | 140 | | 4.00 | 3.00 | 11-Magnus-Magnus, Jr | 7-Kammer-Zimmer |
2 ♠ | N | −1 | | 50 | 1.00 | 6.00 | 12-Murdock-Oblinger | 9-Simon-LaMacchia |
3 NT | W | 3 | | 400 | 0.00 | 7.00 | 8-Torello-Lubow | 12-Lipp-Felson |
If North had bid 2 ♠ directly over 1 NT, they would have been showing 6+ Spades
with less than opening values. N/S lose one Spade, one Diamond, and one Club.
Um, the results thingy says that N/S lose four tricks when North is declarer.
What gives? What gives is that declarer needs to lead three times from
dummy--one in Spades and twice in Clubs, and there are only two entries (the
♥ AK). If West was on lead, they'd need to either break Hearts (not a good
idea), lead away from the ♦ K (worse idea), or lead a black suit (still bad).
Some N/S pairs may be in game if North overcalls 3 ♠. That shows a seventh
Spade, so it's not a good idea on this hand. Opening lead will likely be the
♦T.
Board 9 North Deals E-W Vul |
♠ | A 10 | ♥ | K 10 8 6 4 | ♦ | K 9 | ♣ | K 10 5 3 |
|
♠ | 8 6 5 4 3 | ♥ | A J | ♦ | A 10 7 5 4 | ♣ | 2 |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | Q J 7 2 | ♥ | 9 7 | ♦ | J 6 3 2 | ♣ | Q J 9 |
|
|
|
♠ | K 9 | ♥ | Q 5 3 2 | ♦ | Q 8 | ♣ | A 8 7 6 4 |
|
NS 4♥; NS 4♣; NS 2N; EW 2♠; EW 2♦; Par +420
West | North | East | South |
| 1 ♥ | Pass | 3 ♣1 |
Pass | 4 ♥ | Pass | Pass |
Pass | | | |
- Alert, 4-card limit raise in Hearts
|
Contract | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
4 ♥ | N | 5 | 450 | | 7.00 | 0.00 | 10-Venosa-Venosa | 5-Koster-Kennedy |
4 ♥ | N | 4 | 420 | | 3.00 | 4.00 | 1-Wiest-Altman Sr | 11-Kehoe-Stanley |
4 ♥ | N | 4 | 420 | | 3.00 | 4.00 | 2-Prosise-Prosise | 1-Baldwin-Messinger |
4 ♠ | N | 4 | 420 | | 3.00 | 4.00 | 3-Burnam-Young | 3-Singerman-Campbell |
4 ♥ | N | 4 | 420 | | 3.00 | 4.00 | 8-Torello-Lubow | 12-Lipp-Felson |
4 ♥ | N | 4 | 420 | | 3.00 | 4.00 | 9-Mackey-Kobida | 2-Olexsey-Thurnau |
4 ♥ | N | 4 | 420 | | 3.00 | 4.00 | 11-Magnus-Magnus, Jr | 7-Kammer-Zimmer |
4 ♥ | N | 4 | 420 | | 3.00 | 4.00 | 12-Murdock-Oblinger | 9-Simon-LaMacchia |
For those who play 1 ♥-3 ♥ as invitational with 4-card support, that works
here as well. This hand will be a welcome respite after the chaos of the first
eight boards. N/S lose one Heart, one Diamond, and one Club. The ♣ Q is a
better lead than the ♠ Q, since East holds the ♣ 9. That makes it less likely
that they're giving up a trick to ♣ ATx in one hand and ♣ K9x in the other.
Board 10 East Deals Both Vul |
♠ | J 10 | ♥ | Q 6 2 | ♦ | A Q J 10 5 | ♣ | J 6 5 |
|
♠ | A K 8 6 3 2 | ♥ | 8 5 | ♦ | 7 6 4 | ♣ | 3 2 |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | Q 5 4 | ♥ | 9 4 | ♦ | 9 8 3 | ♣ | K Q 8 7 4 |
|
|
|
♠ | 9 7 | ♥ | A K J 10 7 3 | ♦ | K 2 | ♣ | A 10 9 |
|
NS 5♥; NS 5♦; NS 1N; NS 2♣; EW 1♠; Par +650
West | North | East | South |
| | Pass | 1 ♥ |
2 ♠1 | 3 ♠2 | Dbl3 | 4 ♥ |
Pass | Pass | Pass | |
- Weak jump overcall
- Cuebid showing a limit raise or better in Hearts
- Spade support
|
Contract | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
4 ♥ | S | 5 | 650 | | 3.50 | 3.50 | 1-Wiest-Altman Sr | 10-Jervis-Lindeman |
4 ♥ | S | 5 | 650 | | 3.50 | 3.50 | 2-Prosise-Prosise | 12-Lipp-Felson |
4 ♥ | S | 5 | 650 | | 3.50 | 3.50 | 3-Burnam-Young | 2-Olexsey-Thurnau |
4 ♥ | S | 5 | 650 | | 3.50 | 3.50 | 4-Vanstone-Gibler | 4-Terbrueggen-Dickman |
4 ♥ | S | 5 | 650 | | 3.50 | 3.50 | 9-Mackey-Kobida | 1-Baldwin-Messinger |
4 ♥ | S | 5 | 650 | | 3.50 | 3.50 | 10-Venosa-Venosa | 3-Singerman-Campbell |
4 ♥ | S | 5 | 650 | | 3.50 | 3.50 | 11-Magnus-Magnus, Jr | 6-McCarthy-Diers |
4 ♥ | S | 5 | 650 | | 3.50 | 3.50 | 12-Murdock-Oblinger | 8-Temples-Koch |
Another easy hand. N/S lose only two Spades. The two slow Club losers go
away on the Diamonds. It's hard to imagine West not leading the ♠ AK, but if
they lead something else, N/S are making six.
Board 11 South Deals None Vul |
♠ | 5 4 3 2 | ♥ | 9 4 3 | ♦ | A J 10 9 8 | ♣ | 3 |
|
♠ | K Q 10 9 | ♥ | K 5 | ♦ | 7 6 2 | ♣ | 8 7 6 4 |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | J 7 | ♥ | A Q 8 6 | ♦ | K Q 5 3 | ♣ | J 10 5 |
|
|
|
♠ | A 8 6 | ♥ | J 10 7 2 | ♦ | 4 | ♣ | A K Q 9 2 |
|
NS 1N; NS 1♠; NS 1♥; NS 1♦; NS 1♣; Par +90
West | North | East | South |
| | | 1 ♣ |
Pass | 1 ♠1 | Dbl2 | Rdbl3 |
1 NT4 | Pass | Pass | Pass |
- Hide the Diamonds with less than game-going values
- An opening hand with support for the unbid suits
- Alert, support redouble showing 3-card Spade support
- Seems right
|
Contract | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
2 ♠ | N | 3 | 140 | | 7.00 | 0.00 | 10-Venosa-Venosa | 3-Singerman-Campbell |
1 ♥ | S | 2 | 110 | | 6.00 | 1.00 | 1-Wiest-Altman Sr | 10-Jervis-Lindeman |
2 ♣ | S | 2 | 90 | | 4.50 | 2.50 | 3-Burnam-Young | 2-Olexsey-Thurnau |
2 ♣ | S | 2 | 90 | | 4.50 | 2.50 | 4-Vanstone-Gibler | 4-Terbrueggen-Dickman |
1 ♣ | S | 1 | 70 | | 3.00 | 4.00 | 11-Magnus-Magnus, Jr | 6-McCarthy-Diers |
2 ♣ | S | −1 | | 50 | 2.00 | 5.00 | 9-Mackey-Kobida | 1-Baldwin-Messinger |
3 ♣ | S | −2 | | 100 | 0.50 | 6.50 | 2-Prosise-Prosise | 12-Lipp-Felson |
4 ♥ | N | −2 | | 100 | 0.50 | 6.50 | 12-Murdock-Oblinger | 8-Temples-Koch |
Even if North forgets to lead partner's suit, N/S will still collect their
seven tricks. E/W take three Spade tricks and three Heart tricks once the ♠ A
is knocked out. If anybody bids any higher, they'll get doubled.
If North is truly a subscriber to leading their own suit no matter what, and
leads the ♦ J to start the hand, E/W will make 1 NT. Declarer wins in dummy,
plays Spades until South takes their Ace, and tries not to revoke during five
rounds of Clubs. Once back in, they claim with three Spade tricks, three Heart
tricks, and the ♦ K. BWAHAHAHAHAHA.
Board 12 West Deals N-S Vul |
♠ | A 8 7 | ♥ | K J 6 4 2 | ♦ | J 4 | ♣ | Q 7 2 |
|
♠ | J 10 | ♥ | A 9 | ♦ | A K 10 9 8 3 | ♣ | A J 3 |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | 6 4 | ♥ | Q 8 5 3 | ♦ | Q 7 6 2 | ♣ | K 9 8 |
|
|
|
♠ | K Q 9 5 3 2 | ♥ | 10 7 | ♦ | 5 | ♣ | 10 6 5 4 |
|
EW 4♦; NS 2♠; EW 1N; EW 1♥; EW 1♣; Par −130
West | North | East | South |
1 ♦ | 1 ♥ | 2 ♦ | 2 ♠1 |
3 ♥2 | Pass | 4 ♦3 | Pass |
Pass | Pass | | |
- A risky call, but South has something to say
- Showing a Heart stopper for notrump
- Sorry, no Spade stopper here
|
Contract | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
5 ♦ | W | −1 | 50 | | 7.00 | 0.00 | 1-Wiest-Altman Sr | 10-Jervis-Lindeman |
3 ♦ | W | 3 | | 110 | 6.00 | 1.00 | 10-Venosa-Venosa | 3-Singerman-Campbell |
3 ♦ | W | 4 | | 130 | 4.50 | 2.50 | 3-Burnam-Young | 2-Olexsey-Thurnau |
4 ♦ | W | 4 | | 130 | 4.50 | 2.50 | 9-Mackey-Kobida | 1-Baldwin-Messinger |
3 ♦ | W | 5 | | 150 | 2.50 | 4.50 | 11-Magnus-Magnus, Jr | 6-McCarthy-Diers |
1 NT | W | 3 | | 150 | 2.50 | 4.50 | 12-Murdock-Oblinger | 8-Temples-Koch |
3 NT | E | 3 | | 400 | 1.00 | 6.00 | 2-Prosise-Prosise | 12-Lipp-Felson |
3 NT | W | 5 | | 460 | 0.00 | 7.00 | 4-Vanstone-Gibler | 4-Terbrueggen-Dickman |
When two suits have been bid, Western Cue bids go away. If a cuebid is made,
it's showing a stopper for notrump, not asking for one. If South doesn't sneak
in a 2 ♠ bid during the auction, it's likely that E/W will play in 3 NT. If
North doesn't find a Spade lead (they should), 3 NT rolls.
In 4 ♦, N/S lose two Spades and a Heart. The Club finesse is a mirage, since
West's small Club can be thrown away on the ♥ Q. The ♠ A is a reasonable lead
if South gets their Spade bid in.
Board 13 North Deals Both Vul |
♠ | A Q 7 | ♥ | 9 4 | ♦ | 10 9 5 | ♣ | Q J 10 9 3 |
|
♠ | 10 8 5 | ♥ | K 8 7 6 3 | ♦ | A Q 6 2 | ♣ | 4 |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | 4 3 2 | ♥ | Q J 5 2 | ♦ | 4 3 | ♣ | 8 7 6 2 |
|
|
|
♠ | K J 9 6 | ♥ | A 10 | ♦ | K J 8 7 | ♣ | A K 5 |
|
NS 4N; NS 4♠; NS 4♣; EW 2♥; NS 3♦; Par +630
West | North | East | South |
| Pass | Pass | 1 ♦ |
1 ♥ | 2 ♣1 | 2 ♥2 | 3 NT3 |
Pass | Pass | Pass | |
- Showing 10-11 HCP and 5+ Clubs (North is a passed hand)
- 3 ♥ or 4 ♥ if not vulnerable
- Wondering if they're missing slam
|
Contract | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
3 NT | S | 5 | 660 | | 7.00 | 0.00 | 4-Vanstone-Gibler | 3-Singerman-Campbell |
3 NT | N | 4 | 630 | | 4.00 | 3.00 | 1-Wiest-Altman Sr | 9-Simon-LaMacchia |
3 NT | S | 4 | 630 | | 4.00 | 3.00 | 3-Burnam-Young | 1-Baldwin-Messinger |
3 NT | N | 4 | 630 | | 4.00 | 3.00 | 5-Hoffman-Cook | 5-Koster-Kennedy |
3 NT | S | 4 | 630 | | 4.00 | 3.00 | 11-Magnus-Magnus, Jr | 4-Terbrueggen-Dickman |
3 NT | S | 4 | 630 | | 4.00 | 3.00 | 12-Murdock-Oblinger | 7-Kammer-Zimmer |
2 ♣ | N | 3 | 110 | | 1.00 | 6.00 | 10-Venosa-Venosa | 2-Olexsey-Thurnau |
5 ♣ | N | −1 | | 100 | 0.00 | 7.00 | 2-Prosise-Prosise | 11-Kehoe-Stanley |
West will lead a small Heart, and N/S collect four Spades, one Heart, and five
Clubs, making 4 NT. 4 ♥ is a good sacrifice, but South may very well bid 4 NT
(+620 is better than +500).
Board 14 East Deals None Vul |
♠ | A 8 5 2 | ♥ | Q J 10 6 3 | ♦ | J | ♣ | J 6 3 |
|
♠ | 9 6 | ♥ | K 8 7 4 | ♦ | A 7 5 | ♣ | 10 9 8 5 |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | K 10 3 | ♥ | 9 | ♦ | Q 9 6 4 3 2 | ♣ | K Q 4 |
|
|
|
♠ | Q J 7 4 | ♥ | A 5 2 | ♦ | K 10 8 | ♣ | A 7 2 |
|
N 2N; NS 2♠; NS 2♥; S 1N; EW 2♦; NS 1♣; Par +100: EW 3♦×−1
West | North | East | South |
| | Pass1 | 1 ♣ |
Pass | 1 ♥ | 2 ♦ | Dbl2 |
Pass | 2 ♥ | Pass | Pass |
3 ♦ | Pass | Pass | Pass |
- Not a weak two opener with 8 of 10 HCP in side suits
- Alert, support double showing 3-card support
|
Contract | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
4 ♠ | S | 4 | 420 | | 7.00 | 0.00 | 5-Hoffman-Cook | 5-Koster-Kennedy |
2 ♠ | S | 2 | 110 | | 5.50 | 1.50 | 1-Wiest-Altman Sr | 9-Simon-LaMacchia |
2 ♥ | N | 2 | 110 | | 5.50 | 1.50 | 3-Burnam-Young | 1-Baldwin-Messinger |
3 ♥ | N | −1 | | 50 | 2.50 | 4.50 | 2-Prosise-Prosise | 11-Kehoe-Stanley |
3 ♠ | S | −1 | | 50 | 2.50 | 4.50 | 4-Vanstone-Gibler | 3-Singerman-Campbell |
4 ♥ | N | −1 | | 50 | 2.50 | 4.50 | 10-Venosa-Venosa | 2-Olexsey-Thurnau |
2 ♠ | N | −1 | | 50 | 2.50 | 4.50 | 11-Magnus-Magnus, Jr | 4-Terbrueggen-Dickman |
2 ♠ | S | −2 | | 100 | 0.00 | 7.00 | 12-Murdock-Oblinger | 7-Kammer-Zimmer |
N/S may double 3 ♦ or bid on to 3 ♥. Only one of those is a good decision.
E/W lose one Spade, one Heart, two Diamonds, and one Club--down one. South has
a tough lead, and may very well lead the ♠ Q.
Board 15 South Deals N-S Vul |
♠ | J 8 3 2 | ♥ | 10 9 3 | ♦ | 10 8 | ♣ | K Q 6 5 |
|
♠ | K Q 7 6 | ♥ | 7 5 | ♦ | Q 7 4 2 | ♣ | 10 9 4 |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | A 10 5 | ♥ | A J 8 4 | ♦ | 9 6 3 | ♣ | J 8 7 |
|
|
|
♠ | 9 4 | ♥ | K Q 6 2 | ♦ | A K J 5 | ♣ | A 3 2 |
|
NS 3♥; NS 2N; NS 2♣; NS 1♠; NS 1♦; Par +140
West | North | East | South |
| | | 1 NT1 |
Pass | Pass | Pass | |
Contract | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
1 NT | S | 4 | 180 | | 6.50 | 0.50 | 2-Prosise-Prosise | 11-Kehoe-Stanley |
1 NT | S | 4 | 180 | | 6.50 | 0.50 | 4-Vanstone-Gibler | 3-Singerman-Campbell |
1 NT | S | 3 | 150 | | 5.00 | 2.00 | 1-Wiest-Altman Sr | 9-Simon-LaMacchia |
1 NT | S | 2 | 120 | | 3.00 | 4.00 | 5-Hoffman-Cook | 5-Koster-Kennedy |
1 NT | S | 2 | 120 | | 3.00 | 4.00 | 10-Venosa-Venosa | 2-Olexsey-Thurnau |
1 NT | S | 2 | 120 | | 3.00 | 4.00 | 12-Murdock-Oblinger | 7-Kammer-Zimmer |
1 NT | S | 1 | 90 | | 1.00 | 6.00 | 3-Burnam-Young | 1-Baldwin-Messinger |
3 NT | N | −2 | | 200 | 0.00 | 7.00 | 11-Magnus-Magnus, Jr | 4-Terbrueggen-Dickman |
Short auction. West shouldn't lead a Spade honor, since they don't have ♠ KQJ
or ♠ KQTx. The ♠ 6 or the ♥ 7 look reasonable. N/S take four Club tricks, two
Diamond tricks, and two Hearts.
Board 16 West Deals E-W Vul |
♠ | A Q 8 | ♥ | 9 5 3 | ♦ | J 7 5 4 2 | ♣ | A J |
|
♠ | — | ♥ | A J 10 7 2 | ♦ | K 6 | ♣ | 10 7 5 4 3 2 |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | K 2 | ♥ | Q 8 6 | ♦ | A Q 9 8 3 | ♣ | K Q 6 |
|
|
|
♠ | J 10 9 7 6 5 4 3 | ♥ | K 4 | ♦ | 10 | ♣ | 9 8 |
|
EW 6♥; EW 4N; W 5♦; EW 5♣; E 4♦; NS 2♠; Par −800: NS 6♠×−4
West | North | East | South |
Pass1 | 1 ♦ | 1 NT | 2 ♠2 |
3 ♥3 | 3 ♠4 | 4 ♥5 | 4 ♠6 |
5 ♥7 | Pass | Pass | Pass |
- I have no idea how to bid this if I open it
- I'd like to play in 2 ♠ please
- Game forcing, showing exactly five Hearts
- We're not vulnerable and I like Spades
- I have three Hearts
- What partner said
- If you have a "shape hand," take an extra bid
|
Contract | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
3 ♠ | S | 3 | 140 | | 7.00 | 0.00 | 2-Prosise-Prosise | 10-Jervis-Lindeman |
4 ♠ | S | −1 | | 50 | 5.00 | 2.00 | 1-Wiest-Altman Sr | 8-Temples-Koch |
3 ♠ | S | −1 | | 50 | 5.00 | 2.00 | 5-Hoffman-Cook | 4-Terbrueggen-Dickman |
4 ♠ | S | −1 | | 50 | 5.00 | 2.00 | 6-Lammers-Barron | 6-McCarthy-Diers |
5 ♠ | S | −2 | | 100 | 3.00 | 4.00 | 12-Murdock-Oblinger | 5-Koster-Kennedy |
5 ♣ | W | 6 | | 620 | 2.00 | 5.00 | 4-Vanstone-Gibler | 2-Olexsey-Thurnau |
4 ♥ | W | 5 | | 650 | 1.00 | 6.00 | 11-Magnus-Magnus, Jr | 3-Singerman-Campbell |
4 ♥ | E | 6 | | 680 | 0.00 | 7.00 | 3-Burnam-Young | 12-Lipp-Felson |
It's hard to imagine an E/W pair that gets to slam on their own, but some N/S
pair might push them there by bidding 5 ♠. E/W lose one Club trick no matter
what the opening lead is. It's possible that North will try and cash the ♠ A,
but that doesn't matter as declarer simply ruffs it, plays a Diamond to dummy's
Ace, and finesses the ♥ K. With trumps gone, it's a simple matter to knock out
the ♣ A and claim.
Board 17 North Deals None Vul |
♠ | Q 8 6 5 | ♥ | 9 | ♦ | 10 9 6 2 | ♣ | A J 5 2 |
|
♠ | J | ♥ | K Q 8 5 2 | ♦ | 8 | ♣ | K Q 8 7 6 4 |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | K 4 2 | ♥ | A 7 6 3 | ♦ | A Q 5 4 | ♣ | 9 3 |
|
|
|
♠ | A 10 9 7 3 | ♥ | J 10 4 | ♦ | K J 7 3 | ♣ | 10 |
|
NS 4♠; EW 4♥; NS 3♦; EW 3♣; E 1N; Par +100: EW 5♥×−1
West | North | East | South |
| Pass | 1 ♦ | 1 ♠ |
2 ♥1 | 2 ♠ | 4 ♥ | 4 ♠ |
5 ♥ | Pass | Pass | Pass |
- Showing 5+ Hearts and 10+ HCP
|
Contract | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
4 ♠× | S | 4 | 590 | | 7.00 | 0.00 | 5-Hoffman-Cook | 4-Terbrueggen-Dickman |
3 NT | E | −2 | 100 | | 6.00 | 1.00 | 6-Lammers-Barron | 6-McCarthy-Diers |
4 ♥ | W | 4 | | 420 | 3.50 | 3.50 | 1-Wiest-Altman Sr | 8-Temples-Koch |
4 ♥ | W | 4 | | 420 | 3.50 | 3.50 | 2-Prosise-Prosise | 10-Jervis-Lindeman |
4 ♥ | E | 4 | | 420 | 3.50 | 3.50 | 3-Burnam-Young | 12-Lipp-Felson |
4 ♥ | W | 4 | | 420 | 3.50 | 3.50 | 11-Magnus-Magnus, Jr | 3-Singerman-Campbell |
4 ♥ | W | 5 | | 450 | 0.50 | 6.50 | 4-Vanstone-Gibler | 2-Olexsey-Thurnau |
4 ♥ | W | 5 | | 450 | 0.50 | 6.50 | 12-Murdock-Oblinger | 5-Koster-Kennedy |
On hands such as this one with nobody vulnerable, it sometimes seems like it's
a game of chicken with everyone bidding away, refusing to be the first one to
flinch. 5 ♥ doubled is the "Par" contract (i.e., the contract that can't be
improved by either side). Many E/W pairs will play there undoubled--some might
get to play in 4 ♥ and some N/S pairs might get to play in 4 ♠. Who knows?
The ♠ 5 will be the likely lead. South will win with the ♠ A, switch to their
singleton Club, and collect their Club ruff--down one.
Board 18 East Deals N-S Vul |
♠ | A K 10 | ♥ | 8 5 | ♦ | A 9 8 7 5 2 | ♣ | 8 3 |
|
♠ | 8 7 6 3 | ♥ | A 10 3 2 | ♦ | Q J 6 | ♣ | Q 10 |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | Q J 9 5 4 | ♥ | J 7 | ♦ | K 3 | ♣ | A 6 4 2 |
|
|
|
♠ | 2 | ♥ | K Q 9 6 4 | ♦ | 10 4 | ♣ | K J 9 7 5 |
|
E 2♠; NS 2♥; N 3♦; S 3♣; S 2♦; W 1♠; N 1♣; Par +100: E 3♠×−1
West | North | East | South |
| | 1 ♠1 | 2 ♠2 |
3 ♠3 | Pass | Pass | Pass |
- Rule of 20 hand
- Michaels showing Hearts and a minor
- To play
|
Contract | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
3 ♦ | N | 3 | 110 | | 7.00 | 0.00 | 11-Magnus-Magnus, Jr | 3-Singerman-Campbell |
3 ♠ | E | −1 | 50 | | 6.00 | 1.00 | 4-Vanstone-Gibler | 2-Olexsey-Thurnau |
4 ♦ | N | −1 | | 100 | 5.00 | 2.00 | 2-Prosise-Prosise | 10-Jervis-Lindeman |
3 ♠ | E | 3 | | 140 | 2.50 | 4.50 | 1-Wiest-Altman Sr | 8-Temples-Koch |
3 ♠ | E | 3 | | 140 | 2.50 | 4.50 | 3-Burnam-Young | 12-Lipp-Felson |
3 ♠ | E | 3 | | 140 | 2.50 | 4.50 | 5-Hoffman-Cook | 4-Terbrueggen-Dickman |
2 ♠ | E | 3 | | 140 | 2.50 | 4.50 | 12-Murdock-Oblinger | 5-Koster-Kennedy |
3 ♥ | S | −2 | | 200 | 0.00 | 7.00 | 6-Lammers-Barron | 6-McCarthy-Diers |
If West had passed or doubled, North might have bid 3 ♦. This pretty much
says "Shut up about your stupid Hearts and presumed Clubs. We're playing in
Diamonds!" If North had been interested in hearing which minor suit South
held, they would have bid 2 NT (again, only if West had passed or doubled).
Interestingly, if East doesn't open, the hand might be passed out. Norths who
live and die by the Rule of 15 (HCP + # of Spades) to determine whether or not
to open in 4th seat will surely pass (i.e., 14 is not greater or equal to 15).
Most Souths will lead the ♥ K. E/W lose one Club, one Diamond, one Heart, and
two Spades--down one.
Board 19 South Deals E-W Vul |
♠ | 9 5 4 2 | ♥ | K 9 | ♦ | K 8 7 | ♣ | Q 9 7 5 |
|
♠ | K J 8 | ♥ | A 10 8 | ♦ | J 6 3 2 | ♣ | 8 6 2 |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | A 7 3 | ♥ | 7 4 3 | ♦ | A 5 4 | ♣ | A 10 4 3 |
|
|
|
♠ | Q 10 6 | ♥ | Q J 6 5 2 | ♦ | Q 10 9 | ♣ | K J |
|
NS 1♥; EW 1♦; EW 1♣; Par +80
West | North | East | South |
| | | Pass |
Pass | Pass | 1 ♣ | 1 ♥ |
1 NT | Pass | Pass | Pass |
Contract | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
1 NT | W | −2 | 200 | | 7.00 | 0.00 | 12-Murdock-Oblinger | 4-Terbrueggen-Dickman |
2 ♦ | E | −1 | 100 | | 4.50 | 2.50 | 1-Wiest-Altman Sr | 6-McCarthy-Diers |
1 NT | W | −1 | 100 | | 4.50 | 2.50 | 3-Burnam-Young | 11-Kehoe-Stanley |
1 NT | W | −1 | 100 | | 4.50 | 2.50 | 5-Hoffman-Cook | 3-Singerman-Campbell |
1 NT | W | −1 | 100 | | 4.50 | 2.50 | 7-Elliott-Runda | 7-Kammer-Zimmer |
Pass | | | Pass | | 2.00 | 5.00 | 2-Prosise-Prosise | 9-Simon-LaMacchia |
1 NT | W | 1 | | 90 | 0.50 | 6.50 | 4-Vanstone-Gibler | 1-Baldwin-Messinger |
1 NT | E | 1 | | 90 | 0.50 | 6.50 | 6-Lammers-Barron | 5-Koster-Kennedy |
West won't enjoy playing in 1 NT, and they'll regret not allowing South to play
in 1 ♥. E/W collect three Spades, one Heart, one Diamond, and one Club--down
one for –100. The ♥ K will be the likely lead on the auction.
Board 20 West Deals Both Vul |
♠ | Q J 5 | ♥ | K Q J 7 4 | ♦ | 6 4 | ♣ | 7 4 2 |
|
♠ | 10 8 6 3 | ♥ | 6 | ♦ | A K 9 2 | ♣ | A 8 6 3 |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | K 7 | ♥ | A 9 5 2 | ♦ | Q J 7 5 3 | ♣ | 9 5 |
|
|
|
♠ | A 9 4 2 | ♥ | 10 8 3 | ♦ | 10 8 | ♣ | K Q J 10 |
|
EW 4♦; EW 1N; EW 1♠; NS 1♥; EW 1♣; Par −130
West | North | East | South |
Pass | Pass | 1 ♦ | Pass |
3 ♣1 | Pass | 3 ♦2 | Pass |
Pass | Pass | | |
- Alert, shows a limit raise for Diamonds
- Stop bidding, you!
|
Contract | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
3 ♥× | N | 3 | 730 | | 7.00 | 0.00 | 12-Murdock-Oblinger | 4-Terbrueggen-Dickman |
3 ♥ | N | 3 | 140 | | 6.00 | 1.00 | 5-Hoffman-Cook | 3-Singerman-Campbell |
Pass | | | Pass | | 3.50 | 3.50 | 1-Wiest-Altman Sr | 6-McCarthy-Diers |
Pass | | | Pass | | 3.50 | 3.50 | 4-Vanstone-Gibler | 1-Baldwin-Messinger |
Pass | | | Pass | | 3.50 | 3.50 | 6-Lammers-Barron | 5-Koster-Kennedy |
Pass | | | Pass | | 3.50 | 3.50 | 7-Elliott-Runda | 7-Kammer-Zimmer |
3 ♥ | N | −1 | | 100 | 1.00 | 6.00 | 2-Prosise-Prosise | 9-Simon-LaMacchia |
3 ♦ | W | 4 | | 130 | 0.00 | 7.00 | 3-Burnam-Young | 11-Kehoe-Stanley |
This one might get passed out, since East has a tenuous 3rd seat opener (what
to do if partner responds 1 ♠?). Those who open will be rewarded with +130 for
3 ♦ making four. The ♣ K will be the unanimous choice for the opening lead.
E/W lose one Club and two Spades, as long as declarer remembers to ruff two
Hearts and pitch the third one on the good ♠T. Those that get lazy during the
hand will make three. Another choice is simply to cross-ruff the entire hand,
but N/S will lead trump when they're back in, so that option is out.
Board 21 North Deals N-S Vul |
♠ | 3 | ♥ | 7 6 5 3 | ♦ | 9 8 5 4 3 | ♣ | 10 6 4 |
|
♠ | A K J 9 4 | ♥ | A K 9 2 | ♦ | K | ♣ | Q J 3 |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | Q 10 8 7 | ♥ | J 10 4 | ♦ | Q 10 | ♣ | 9 7 5 2 |
|
|
|
♠ | 6 5 2 | ♥ | Q 8 | ♦ | A J 7 6 2 | ♣ | A K 8 |
|
EW 4N; EW 4♠; EW 4♥; NS 2♦; EW 2♣; Par −430
West | North | East | South |
| Pass | Pass | 1 ♦ |
Dbl1 | 3 ♦2 | Pass | Pass |
4 ♦3 | Pass | 4 ♠ | Pass |
Pass | Pass | | |
- Planning to cuebid Diamonds at next turn to show huge hand
- Preemptive jump raise
- Bid a major partner
|
Contract | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
3 ♠ | W | 4 | | 170 | 5.00 | 2.00 | 1-Wiest-Altman Sr | 6-McCarthy-Diers |
1 ♠ | W | 4 | | 170 | 5.00 | 2.00 | 2-Prosise-Prosise | 9-Simon-LaMacchia |
3 ♠ | W | 4 | | 170 | 5.00 | 2.00 | 3-Burnam-Young | 11-Kehoe-Stanley |
3 ♠ | E | 4 | | 170 | 5.00 | 2.00 | 6-Lammers-Barron | 5-Koster-Kennedy |
3 ♠ | W | 4 | | 170 | 5.00 | 2.00 | 7-Elliott-Runda | 7-Kammer-Zimmer |
4 ♠ | E | 4 | | 420 | 1.00 | 6.00 | 4-Vanstone-Gibler | 1-Baldwin-Messinger |
4 ♠ | E | 4 | | 420 | 1.00 | 6.00 | 5-Hoffman-Cook | 3-Singerman-Campbell |
4 ♠ | W | 4 | | 420 | 1.00 | 6.00 | 12-Murdock-Oblinger | 4-Terbrueggen-Dickman |
A takeout double followed by a cuebid of opener's suit shows a hand that would
have opened 2 NT, 2 ♣, or made a game-forcing jump shift--a rock crusher in
other words. 4 ♦ is a sensible rebid by West, and East has an easy 4 ♠ call.
E/W lose one Diamond and two Clubs. South will likely cash out with ♣ AK and
♦ A on the first three tricks.
Board 22 East Deals E-W Vul |
♠ | 9 8 2 | ♥ | K 3 2 | ♦ | Q 10 7 | ♣ | A K 3 2 |
|
♠ | 10 5 | ♥ | 8 7 6 5 | ♦ | K J 5 4 2 | ♣ | J 5 |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | A K J 6 4 3 | ♥ | 10 4 | ♦ | 6 3 | ♣ | 10 8 4 |
|
|
|
♠ | Q 7 | ♥ | A Q J 9 | ♦ | A 9 8 | ♣ | Q 9 7 6 |
|
NS 3♥; NS 3♣; NS 1N; NS 2♦; EW 1♠; Par +140
West | North | East | South |
| | 2 ♠ | Dbl |
Pass | 3 NT1 | Pass | 4 ♣2 |
Pass | Pass | Pass | |
- Alert, values to play in 3 NT but with no Spade stopper
- Me neither
|
Contract | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
3 NT | S | 4 | 430 | | 6.50 | 0.50 | 1-Wiest-Altman Sr | 5-Koster-Kennedy |
3 NT | S | 4 | 430 | | 6.50 | 0.50 | 7-Elliott-Runda | 6-McCarthy-Diers |
3 ♥ | S | 3 | 140 | | 5.00 | 2.00 | 4-Vanstone-Gibler | 12-Lipp-Felson |
4 ♣ | N | 4 | 130 | | 3.50 | 3.50 | 6-Lammers-Barron | 4-Terbrueggen-Dickman |
3 ♣ | N | 4 | 130 | | 3.50 | 3.50 | 8-Torello-Lubow | 8-Temples-Koch |
4 ♣ | N | −1 | | 50 | 2.00 | 5.00 | 5-Hoffman-Cook | 2-Olexsey-Thurnau |
3 NT | S | −2 | | 100 | 1.00 | 6.00 | 2-Prosise-Prosise | 7-Kammer-Zimmer |
4 ♥ | N | −3 | | 150 | 0.00 | 7.00 | 3-Burnam-Young | 10-Jervis-Lindeman |
N/S pairs that don't play Lebensohl will struggle with this hand. Those that
do play Lebensohl will also struggle, but for different reasons. With
Lebensohl, advancer has two ways to bid 3 NT after a weak-two bid and a takeout
double--either directly (denying a stopper in opener's suit) or by employing a
2 NT relay to 3 ♣ and then bidding 3 NT (showing a stopper) at their next turn.
Once N/S bypass 3 NT, it's time to park, and South chooses 4 ♣ since North has
denied holding 4 ♥ on the auction (i.e., they didn't bid Hearts and they didn't
employ Stayman).
N/S lose two Spades, a Diamond, and a trump uppercut. What's an uppercut?
After East wins the ♠ AK, they need to continue with the ♠ J. If South ruffs
small, West wins the trick with the ♣ J. If South ruffs with the ♣ Q, West
simply discards and E/W sit back and wait for their natural trump trick.
Nicely defended!
Board 23 South Deals Both Vul |
♠ | A | ♥ | J 7 4 2 | ♦ | 10 9 7 5 4 | ♣ | K 10 2 |
|
♠ | Q 10 5 2 | ♥ | K 10 3 | ♦ | 6 2 | ♣ | Q 8 5 4 |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | 8 7 6 4 | ♥ | Q 6 | ♦ | A Q 8 | ♣ | A J 7 6 |
|
|
|
♠ | K J 9 3 | ♥ | A 9 8 5 | ♦ | K J 3 | ♣ | 9 3 |
|
NS 2♥; EW 1N; NS 2♦; EW 1♠; EW 1♣; Par +110
West | North | East | South |
| | | 1 ♦ |
Pass | 1 ♥ | Dbl1 | 2 ♥2 |
Pass | Pass | Pass | |
- Showing an opening hand and support for the unbid suits
- Guaranteeing 4-card Heart support (i.e., did not make a support double)
|
Contract | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
2 ♥ | N | 4 | 170 | | 7.00 | 0.00 | 3-Burnam-Young | 10-Jervis-Lindeman |
2 ♥ | N | 2 | 110 | | 6.00 | 1.00 | 5-Hoffman-Cook | 2-Olexsey-Thurnau |
3 ♠ | E | −1 | 100 | | 5.00 | 2.00 | 6-Lammers-Barron | 4-Terbrueggen-Dickman |
2 ♥ | N | −1 | | 100 | 2.50 | 4.50 | 1-Wiest-Altman Sr | 5-Koster-Kennedy |
3 ♥ | N | −1 | | 100 | 2.50 | 4.50 | 2-Prosise-Prosise | 7-Kammer-Zimmer |
3 ♦ | S | −1 | | 100 | 2.50 | 4.50 | 7-Elliott-Runda | 6-McCarthy-Diers |
3 ♥ | N | −1 | | 100 | 2.50 | 4.50 | 8-Torello-Lubow | 8-Temples-Koch |
3 ♠ | E | 4 | | 170 | 0.00 | 7.00 | 4-Vanstone-Gibler | 12-Lipp-Felson |
West would happily compete to 2 ♠ if not vulnerable, but the stakes are too
high. If East doesn't have the values to double again, then letting N/S play
in a partial has to be right. N/S lose two Hearts, one Diamond, and two Clubs.
The ♠ 7 looks like a popular lead (2nd high from crap).
Board 24 West Deals None Vul |
♠ | 8 6 3 | ♥ | A 9 6 4 | ♦ | 10 8 5 | ♣ | 10 7 5 |
|
♠ | A 10 7 5 | ♥ | 7 5 | ♦ | K 7 6 | ♣ | K Q J 4 |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | J | ♥ | K Q J 10 8 3 | ♦ | Q 4 2 | ♣ | A 3 2 |
|
|
|
♠ | K Q 9 4 2 | ♥ | 2 | ♦ | A J 9 3 | ♣ | 9 8 6 |
|
E 5♥; E 4N; W 4♥; W 3N; EW 3♣; EW 2♦; E 1♠; Par −450
West | North | East | South |
1 ♣ | Pass | 1 ♥ | 1 ♠ |
1 NT | Pass | 4 ♥ | Pass |
Pass | Pass | | |
Contract | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
2 ♥ | E | 4 | | 170 | 7.00 | 0.00 | 7-Elliott-Runda | 6-McCarthy-Diers |
3 NT | W | 3 | | 400 | 6.00 | 1.00 | 4-Vanstone-Gibler | 12-Lipp-Felson |
4 ♥ | E | 5 | | 450 | 2.50 | 4.50 | 1-Wiest-Altman Sr | 5-Koster-Kennedy |
4 ♥ | E | 5 | | 450 | 2.50 | 4.50 | 2-Prosise-Prosise | 7-Kammer-Zimmer |
4 ♥ | E | 5 | | 450 | 2.50 | 4.50 | 3-Burnam-Young | 10-Jervis-Lindeman |
4 ♥ | E | 5 | | 450 | 2.50 | 4.50 | 5-Hoffman-Cook | 2-Olexsey-Thurnau |
4 ♥ | E | 5 | | 450 | 2.50 | 4.50 | 6-Lammers-Barron | 4-Terbrueggen-Dickman |
4 ♥ | E | 5 | | 450 | 2.50 | 4.50 | 8-Torello-Lubow | 8-Temples-Koch |
Straightforward auction. South will likely lead the ♠ K, and the hand is over
in short order. Declarer wins the ♠ A, and knocks out the ♥ A. North should
win the third round of Hearts so they can see their partner's discard. South
will signal frantically for a Diamond, and North will oblige. E/W lose one
Heart and one Diamond, making five.
Board 25 North Deals E-W Vul |
♠ | J 10 9 | ♥ | Q 9 7 6 4 2 | ♦ | K Q | ♣ | 5 4 |
|
♠ | 8 5 2 | ♥ | 8 | ♦ | A 10 8 7 4 2 | ♣ | K J 10 |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | 4 3 | ♥ | K J | ♦ | 9 6 5 | ♣ | A Q 8 7 6 3 |
|
|
|
♠ | A K Q 7 6 | ♥ | A 10 5 3 | ♦ | J 3 | ♣ | 9 2 |
|
NS 3♠; NS 3♥; EW 3♦; EW 3♣; EW 1N; Par +140
West | North | East | South |
| 2 ♥ | Pass | 2 NT1 |
Pass | 3 ♣2 | Pass | 3 ♥3 |
Pass | Pass | Pass | |
- Ogust, asking for the quality of partner's suit/hand
- Alert, bad hand, bad suit
- Regrettably
|
Contract | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
3 ♥ | N | 5 | 200 | | 7.00 | 0.00 | 2-Prosise-Prosise | 6-McCarthy-Diers |
3 ♥ | N | 3 | 140 | | 5.00 | 2.00 | 5-Hoffman-Cook | 1-Baldwin-Messinger |
2 ♠ | S | 3 | 140 | | 5.00 | 2.00 | 6-Lammers-Barron | 3-Singerman-Campbell |
3 ♥ | N | 3 | 140 | | 5.00 | 2.00 | 8-Torello-Lubow | 7-Kammer-Zimmer |
4 ♥ | N | −1 | | 50 | 1.50 | 5.50 | 3-Burnam-Young | 8-Temples-Koch |
4 ♥ | N | −1 | | 50 | 1.50 | 5.50 | 4-Vanstone-Gibler | 11-Kehoe-Stanley |
4 ♥ | N | −1 | | 50 | 1.50 | 5.50 | 7-Elliott-Runda | 5-Koster-Kennedy |
4 ♠ | N | −1 | | 50 | 1.50 | 5.50 | 9-Mackey-Kobida | 9-Simon-LaMacchia |
In a Swiss Team event (or KO), South should bid 4 ♥ immediately rather than
ask about North's hand at all. Slam is unlikely, and the payoff for a game is
too great to not at least give it a go. N/S lose one Heart, one Diamond, and
two Clubs. The ♣ J isn't an unreasonable lead.
Board 26 East Deals Both Vul |
♠ | 4 2 | ♥ | 10 3 | ♦ | K 9 3 2 | ♣ | 10 8 7 6 3 |
|
♠ | A 10 | ♥ | K 6 5 | ♦ | A Q 10 | ♣ | A K Q 5 4 |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | K J 9 8 5 3 | ♥ | Q 9 4 | ♦ | 8 5 | ♣ | J 9 |
|
|
|
♠ | Q 7 6 | ♥ | A J 8 7 2 | ♦ | J 7 6 4 | ♣ | 2 |
|
W 6N; E 5N; EW 5♠; EW 4♣; EW 2♥; E 1♦; Par −1440
West | North | East | South |
| | Pass1 | Pass |
2 ♣ | Pass | 2 ♦2 | Pass |
2 NT3 | Pass | 3 ♥4 | Dbl5 |
Pass6 | Pass | 4 ♠7 | Pass |
Pass | Pass | | |
- Not quite a vulnerable weak-two bid
- Game forcing showing an A, K, or QQ
- 22 to 24
- Planning to transfer at the three level and then raise to show a mild slam try
- Partner, lead a Heart
- Pass denying a 3rd Spade
- East could retransfer by redoubling or bidding 4 ♥, but they want South on lead
|
Contract | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
5 ♥ | E | −5 | 500 | | 6.50 | 0.50 | 8-Torello-Lubow | 7-Kammer-Zimmer |
5 ♦ | E | −5 | 500 | | 6.50 | 0.50 | 9-Mackey-Kobida | 9-Simon-LaMacchia |
6 NT | W | −1 | 100 | | 4.50 | 2.50 | 5-Hoffman-Cook | 1-Baldwin-Messinger |
6 ♠ | E | −1 | 100 | | 4.50 | 2.50 | 6-Lammers-Barron | 3-Singerman-Campbell |
3 ♣ | W | 4 | | 130 | 3.00 | 4.00 | 2-Prosise-Prosise | 6-McCarthy-Diers |
4 ♠ | W | 4 | | 620 | 2.00 | 5.00 | 4-Vanstone-Gibler | 11-Kehoe-Stanley |
3 NT | W | 4 | | 630 | 0.50 | 6.50 | 3-Burnam-Young | 8-Temples-Koch |
3 NT | W | 4 | | 630 | 0.50 | 6.50 | 7-Elliott-Runda | 5-Koster-Kennedy |
West would probably like to bid 4 NT on this auction to play, but it would be
RKC Blackwood for Spades. Alas. Not sure how to get E/W to be in
notrump--possibly on a 3 NT response after 3 ♥-X, but that's far fetched. South
has to find a Diamond lead to hold E/W to five--not an easy lead to find. More
likely South will lead the ♥ A or the ♣ 2.
Board 27 South Deals None Vul |
♠ | Q | ♥ | 9 8 | ♦ | A K 10 7 | ♣ | A K J 10 9 4 |
|
♠ | A J 10 3 | ♥ | A K Q | ♦ | Q 4 | ♣ | 8 6 5 2 |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | 8 7 | ♥ | 10 7 6 3 2 | ♦ | J 5 3 2 | ♣ | 7 3 |
|
|
|
♠ | K 9 6 5 4 2 | ♥ | J 5 4 | ♦ | 9 8 6 | ♣ | Q |
|
NS 3N; NS 2♠; NS 3♦; NS 3♣; EW 1♥; Par +400
West | North | East | South |
| | | 2 ♠ |
2 NT1 | Dbl2 | 3 ♦3 | Pass |
3 ♥ | Dbl4 | Pass | Pass |
Pass | | | |
- 15 to 19
- For penalty
- Transfer
- Bidding 4 ♣ seems wrong
|
Contract | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
5 NT× | W | −7 | 1700 | | 7.00 | 0.00 | 6-Lammers-Barron | 3-Singerman-Campbell |
3 ♣ | N | 4 | 130 | | 6.00 | 1.00 | 7-Elliott-Runda | 5-Koster-Kennedy |
3 ♣ | N | 3 | 110 | | 3.00 | 4.00 | 2-Prosise-Prosise | 6-McCarthy-Diers |
2 ♣ | S | 3 | 110 | | 3.00 | 4.00 | 4-Vanstone-Gibler | 11-Kehoe-Stanley |
3 ♣ | N | 3 | 110 | | 3.00 | 4.00 | 5-Hoffman-Cook | 1-Baldwin-Messinger |
3 ♣ | S | 3 | 110 | | 3.00 | 4.00 | 8-Torello-Lubow | 7-Kammer-Zimmer |
3 ♣ | N | 3 | 110 | | 3.00 | 4.00 | 9-Mackey-Kobida | 9-Simon-LaMacchia |
4 ♣ | N | −1 | | 50 | 0.00 | 7.00 | 3-Burnam-Young | 8-Temples-Koch |
N/S should easily be able to collect two Club tricks, two Diamond tricks, a
Spade trick, and a trump trick in the wash when Declarer has to ruff too many
Clubs--down two for –300, quite a bit better than 4 ♣ down one. If South
doesn't open 2 ♠ for some reason, N/S will likely play in 3 ♣.
Board 28 West Deals N-S Vul |
♠ | K 5 4 | ♥ | A 5 3 | ♦ | 8 5 4 | ♣ | K 8 7 4 |
|
♠ | A 7 3 2 | ♥ | 10 8 6 | ♦ | 10 6 3 | ♣ | A 6 5 |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | Q J 10 6 | ♥ | J 4 | ♦ | A K Q J 7 | ♣ | Q 2 |
|
|
|
♠ | 9 8 | ♥ | K Q 9 7 2 | ♦ | 9 2 | ♣ | J 10 9 3 |
|
EW 3♠; NS 2♥; EW 3♦; EW 1N; NS 2♣; Par −140
West | North | East | South |
Pass | Pass | 1 ♦ | Pass |
1 ♠ | Pass | 2 ♠1 | Pass |
Pass | Pass | | |
- East's hand is not nearly strong enough to bid 3 ♠
|
Contract | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
4 ♠ | W | −1 | 50 | | 7.00 | 0.00 | 4-Vanstone-Gibler | 9-Simon-LaMacchia |
2 ♦ | E | 3 | | 110 | 6.00 | 1.00 | 8-Torello-Lubow | 6-McCarthy-Diers |
3 ♠ | W | 4 | | 170 | 4.00 | 3.00 | 3-Burnam-Young | 7-Kammer-Zimmer |
2 ♠ | W | 4 | | 170 | 4.00 | 3.00 | 6-Lammers-Barron | 2-Olexsey-Thurnau |
3 ♠ | E | 4 | | 170 | 4.00 | 3.00 | 7-Elliott-Runda | 4-Terbrueggen-Dickman |
4 ♠ | W | 4 | | 420 | 1.00 | 6.00 | 5-Hoffman-Cook | 12-Lipp-Felson |
4 ♠ | E | 4 | | 420 | 1.00 | 6.00 | 9-Mackey-Kobida | 8-Temples-Koch |
4 ♠ | W | 4 | | 420 | 1.00 | 6.00 | 10-Venosa-Venosa | 10-Jervis-Lindeman |
E/W lose one Spade, two Hearts, and a Club. North may lead a Diamond out of
sheer desperation. It doesn't matter, since none of the losers are going away.
Board 29 North Deals Both Vul |
♠ | J | ♥ | 10 8 7 4 | ♦ | 6 2 | ♣ | K 10 9 7 5 3 |
|
♠ | K 9 5 | ♥ | J 9 5 | ♦ | K Q 9 5 | ♣ | A Q J |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | Q 10 8 2 | ♥ | A 6 3 | ♦ | A 7 3 | ♣ | 8 6 2 |
|
|
|
♠ | A 7 6 4 3 | ♥ | K Q 2 | ♦ | J 10 8 4 | ♣ | 4 |
|
EW 4N; EW 3♠; EW 2♦; EW 1♥; NS 1♣; Par −630
West | North | East | South |
| Pass | Pass | 1 ♠1 |
1 NT2 | Pass | 3 NT | Pass |
Pass | Pass | | |
- Minimum 3rd seat opener
- 15 to 18
|
Contract | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
3 NT | W | −2 | 200 | | 7.00 | 0.00 | 9-Mackey-Kobida | 8-Temples-Koch |
3 NT | W | −1 | 100 | | 6.00 | 1.00 | 7-Elliott-Runda | 4-Terbrueggen-Dickman |
3 ♣ | N | −1 | | 100 | 5.00 | 2.00 | 10-Venosa-Venosa | 10-Jervis-Lindeman |
3 ♦ | E | 3 | | 110 | 4.00 | 3.00 | 8-Torello-Lubow | 6-McCarthy-Diers |
2 NT | W | 2 | | 120 | 3.00 | 4.00 | 4-Vanstone-Gibler | 9-Simon-LaMacchia |
1 NT | W | 3 | | 150 | 2.00 | 5.00 | 5-Hoffman-Cook | 12-Lipp-Felson |
3 NT | W | 3 | | 600 | 1.00 | 6.00 | 6-Lammers-Barron | 2-Olexsey-Thurnau |
3 NT | W | 4 | | 630 | 0.00 | 7.00 | 3-Burnam-Young | 7-Kammer-Zimmer |
East has an easy raise to game. The ♠ J will be a typical opening lead, and
declarer is thrilled (they would have liked a Heart lead a bit less). E/W take
three Spade tricks, three or four Diamond tricks, two Clubs, and one or two
Hearts--making four. The ambiguity in the red suits stems from South's
difficulty finding pitches on three rounds of Clubs.
Board 30 East Deals None Vul |
♠ | Q 10 5 | ♥ | 10 | ♦ | J 10 9 8 7 6 2 | ♣ | 7 4 |
|
♠ | 9 8 4 | ♥ | A K 3 | ♦ | A Q 4 3 | ♣ | K Q J |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | 6 3 | ♥ | Q J 8 7 5 | ♦ | 5 | ♣ | A 10 8 6 5 |
|
|
|
♠ | A K J 7 2 | ♥ | 9 6 4 2 | ♦ | K | ♣ | 9 3 2 |
|
EW 5♥; EW 5♣; EW 2N; NS 2♦; NS 1♠; Par −450
West | North | East | South |
| | Pass | 1 ♠ |
Dbl1 | 2 ♠2 | 3 ♥ | Pass |
4 ♥ | Pass | Pass | Pass |
- Big hands start with doubles
- Alert, showing three Spades and 0-6 HCP (BROMAD)
|
Contract | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
3 ♦ | N | −1 | | 50 | 7.00 | 0.00 | 4-Vanstone-Gibler | 9-Simon-LaMacchia |
2 NT | W | 2 | | 120 | 6.00 | 1.00 | 7-Elliott-Runda | 4-Terbrueggen-Dickman |
4 ♥ | E | 4 | | 420 | 5.00 | 2.00 | 8-Torello-Lubow | 6-McCarthy-Diers |
4 ♥ | E | 5 | | 450 | 2.50 | 4.50 | 5-Hoffman-Cook | 12-Lipp-Felson |
4 ♥ | E | 5 | | 450 | 2.50 | 4.50 | 6-Lammers-Barron | 2-Olexsey-Thurnau |
4 ♥ | E | 5 | | 450 | 2.50 | 4.50 | 9-Mackey-Kobida | 8-Temples-Koch |
4 ♥ | E | 5 | | 450 | 2.50 | 4.50 | 10-Venosa-Venosa | 10-Jervis-Lindeman |
3 NT | W | 6 | | 490 | 0.00 | 7.00 | 3-Burnam-Young | 7-Kammer-Zimmer |
East is delighted to enter the bidding at the three level with that gorgeous
hand, and West has an even easier raise to game. E/W lose two Spade
tricks--making five. South will lead ♠ AK on the go, and the hand will be
over.
Board 31 South Deals N-S Vul |
♠ | A 9 5 3 | ♥ | 10 5 2 | ♦ | A 7 6 2 | ♣ | J 7 |
|
♠ | Q 10 | ♥ | J 3 | ♦ | Q 10 8 3 | ♣ | K 10 9 6 5 |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | J 8 7 | ♥ | 9 7 4 | ♦ | K 9 5 | ♣ | Q 4 3 2 |
|
|
|
♠ | K 6 4 2 | ♥ | A K Q 8 6 | ♦ | J 4 | ♣ | A 8 |
|
NS 5♠; NS 4♥; NS 3N; NS 1♦; Par +650
West | North | East | South |
| | | 1 ♥1 |
Pass | 1 ♠2 | Pass | 3 ♠3 |
Pass | 4 ♠ | Pass | Pass |
Pass | | | |
- Planning on reversing into Spades
- It can't hurt to show a 4-card Spade suit before supporting Hearts
- Same size hand as one that would have reversed
|
Contract | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
4 ♠ | N | 5 | 650 | | 6.50 | 0.50 | 10-Venosa-Venosa | 9-Simon-LaMacchia |
4 ♠ | N | 5 | 650 | | 6.50 | 0.50 | 11-Magnus-Magnus, Jr | 11-Kehoe-Stanley |
4 ♥ | S | 4 | 620 | | 4.00 | 3.00 | 4-Vanstone-Gibler | 8-Temples-Koch |
4 ♥ | S | 4 | 620 | | 4.00 | 3.00 | 5-Hoffman-Cook | 10-Jervis-Lindeman |
4 ♥ | S | 4 | 620 | | 4.00 | 3.00 | 8-Torello-Lubow | 5-Koster-Kennedy |
3 ♠ | S | 5 | 200 | | 2.00 | 5.00 | 6-Lammers-Barron | 1-Baldwin-Messinger |
3 ♥ | S | 4 | 170 | | 1.00 | 6.00 | 7-Elliott-Runda | 3-Singerman-Campbell |
4 ♥ | S | −1 | | 100 | 0.00 | 7.00 | 9-Mackey-Kobida | 7-Kammer-Zimmer |
N/S lose one Spade and one Diamond. Let's assume the lead of the ♣T.
Declarer wins with the ♣ A, pulls two rounds of trump leaving the ♠ J in the
East hand. Now declarer plays off their Hearts and hopes that the player with
the long trump also has at least three Hearts. This seems to be their lucky
day, and dummy's ♣ J goes away on the fourth Heart as East ruffs. Nicely
played!
Board 32 West Deals E-W Vul |
♠ | A 8 | ♥ | A 7 3 2 | ♦ | K 3 2 | ♣ | A 10 4 2 |
|
♠ | K 10 7 5 3 | ♥ | 4 | ♦ | A 10 9 | ♣ | 9 8 5 3 |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | Q 9 4 | ♥ | 10 9 6 5 | ♦ | Q J 8 6 | ♣ | K 6 |
|
|
|
♠ | J 6 2 | ♥ | K Q J 8 | ♦ | 7 5 4 | ♣ | Q J 7 |
|
NS 3♥; EW 2♠; NS 1N; NS 2♣; W 1♦; Par +140
West | North | East | South |
Pass | 1 NT1 | Pass | 3 ♣2 |
Pass | 3 ♦3 | Pass | 3 ♠4 |
Dbl5 | Pass | 4 ♥ | Pass |
Pass | Pass | | |
- 15 to 17
- Alert, asking for a 5-card major
- Alert, no 5-card major
- Alert, showing three Spades and four Hearts
- Partner, please lead a Spade
|
Contract | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
3 NT | N | 3 | 400 | | 6.50 | 0.50 | 5-Hoffman-Cook | 10-Jervis-Lindeman |
3 NT | N | 3 | 400 | | 6.50 | 0.50 | 10-Venosa-Venosa | 9-Simon-LaMacchia |
3 ♥ | N | 4 | 170 | | 5.00 | 2.00 | 9-Mackey-Kobida | 7-Kammer-Zimmer |
4 ♥ | N | −1 | | 50 | 2.50 | 4.50 | 6-Lammers-Barron | 1-Baldwin-Messinger |
4 ♥ | N | −1 | | 50 | 2.50 | 4.50 | 7-Elliott-Runda | 3-Singerman-Campbell |
4 ♥ | N | −1 | | 50 | 2.50 | 4.50 | 8-Torello-Lubow | 5-Koster-Kennedy |
3 ♥ | N | −1 | | 50 | 2.50 | 4.50 | 11-Magnus-Magnus, Jr | 11-Kehoe-Stanley |
4 ♥ | N | −2 | | 100 | 0.00 | 7.00 | 4-Vanstone-Gibler | 8-Temples-Koch |
Not a bad contract at all, but unfortunately it doesn't make. N/S lose one
Spade, one Club, and two Diamonds. If East leads the ♠ 4, West needs to play
the ♠T, not the ♠ K.
Note: It's often a bad idea to try and find a 4-4 major-suit fit with a flat
hand. South, with such a nice Heart suit and weakness in Spades is probably
right to try and locate a Heart fit.
Board 33 North Deals None Vul |
♠ | A 10 9 3 | ♥ | Q J | ♦ | 10 9 7 6 | ♣ | K 5 2 |
|
♠ | 8 7 5 | ♥ | K 10 7 3 | ♦ | 8 3 2 | ♣ | A 10 6 |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | K J 6 | ♥ | A 6 4 | ♦ | K Q J 4 | ♣ | J 8 4 |
|
|
|
♠ | Q 4 2 | ♥ | 9 8 5 2 | ♦ | A 5 | ♣ | Q 9 7 3 |
|
EW 2N; EW 2♥; EW 1♠; EW 1♦; E 1♣; Par −120
West | North | East | South |
| Pass | 1 NT1 | Pass |
Pass | Pass | | |
Contract | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
4 ♥ | W | −3 | 150 | | 7.00 | 0.00 | 10-Venosa-Venosa | 9-Simon-LaMacchia |
2 NT | E | −1 | 50 | | 5.00 | 2.00 | 5-Hoffman-Cook | 10-Jervis-Lindeman |
1 NT | E | −1 | 50 | | 5.00 | 2.00 | 8-Torello-Lubow | 5-Koster-Kennedy |
1 NT | E | −1 | 50 | | 5.00 | 2.00 | 11-Magnus-Magnus, Jr | 11-Kehoe-Stanley |
1 NT | E | 1 | | 90 | 2.00 | 5.00 | 4-Vanstone-Gibler | 8-Temples-Koch |
1 NT | E | 1 | | 90 | 2.00 | 5.00 | 6-Lammers-Barron | 1-Baldwin-Messinger |
1 NT | E | 1 | | 90 | 2.00 | 5.00 | 7-Elliott-Runda | 3-Singerman-Campbell |
1 NT | E | 2 | | 120 | 0.00 | 7.00 | 9-Mackey-Kobida | 7-Kammer-Zimmer |
E/W will easily take three Heart tricks, one Spade, two Diamonds, and a Club.
The other trick will come "in the wash" as they say. Both North and South will
have difficulty with pitches, and one of them is likely to get end played in
Clubs. Clubs is a "frozen suit" (i.e., a suit where it costs a trick to be the
first side to lead it). South should refuse to make their opening lead, as
none of the suits looks appealing. The ♠ 2 doesn't hurt, as North can win with
the ♠ A and lead back the ♠T.
Board 34 East Deals N-S Vul |
♠ | K 9 | ♥ | J 10 4 3 | ♦ | K Q 8 | ♣ | Q 8 4 3 |
|
♠ | 7 6 5 4 | ♥ | K 2 | ♦ | A 3 | ♣ | K 10 9 7 6 |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | A Q 10 2 | ♥ | A Q 9 7 5 | ♦ | 10 7 4 | ♣ | 5 |
|
|
|
♠ | J 8 3 | ♥ | 8 6 | ♦ | J 9 6 5 2 | ♣ | A J 2 |
|
EW 4♠; EW 3♥; EW 1N; EW 2♣; EW 1♦; Par −420
West | North | East | South |
| | 1 ♥ | Pass |
1 ♠ | Pass | 2 ♠ | Pass |
2 NT1 | Pass | 3 ♥2 | Pass |
3 ♠ | Pass | Pass | Pass |
- Alert, asking for more information about partner's raise
- Alert, artificial with four Spades and minimum values
|
Contract | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
4 ♥ | E | −1 | 50 | | 7.00 | 0.00 | 9-Mackey-Kobida | 6-McCarthy-Diers |
2 ♥ | E | 2 | | 110 | 6.00 | 1.00 | 11-Magnus-Magnus, Jr | 10-Jervis-Lindeman |
3 ♠ | E | 4 | | 170 | 5.00 | 2.00 | 7-Elliott-Runda | 2-Olexsey-Thurnau |
4 ♠ | E | 4 | | 420 | 3.00 | 4.00 | 5-Hoffman-Cook | 9-Simon-LaMacchia |
4 ♠ | W | 4 | | 420 | 3.00 | 4.00 | 6-Lammers-Barron | 11-Kehoe-Stanley |
4 ♠ | W | 4 | | 420 | 3.00 | 4.00 | 8-Torello-Lubow | 4-Terbrueggen-Dickman |
4 ♠ | E | 5 | | 450 | 0.50 | 6.50 | 10-Venosa-Venosa | 8-Temples-Koch |
4 ♠ | W | 5 | | 450 | 0.50 | 6.50 | 12-Murdock-Oblinger | 12-Lipp-Felson |
Some E/W pairs will be in 4 ♠, but it's a horrible contract (around 15%). The
♦ K will be the likely lead. Declarer should win the first trick and play a
Spade to the ♠ Q followed by the ♥ K, ♥ A, and a low Heart towards the closed
hand. It does South no good to ruff, so they discard. A Spade now back to the
♠ A drops the ♠ K, and the ♥ Q provides a parking place for West's small
Diamond. South has to ruff, and now there's no way to keep declarer from
ruffing a Diamond in hand. E/W lose one Heart, one Club, and a Diamond at the
end, making four.
Board 35 South Deals E-W Vul |
♠ | A 9 | ♥ | A 9 4 | ♦ | K Q 5 | ♣ | J 10 6 4 2 |
|
♠ | K 7 | ♥ | Q 7 6 | ♦ | 10 9 6 | ♣ | 9 8 7 5 3 |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | Q J 8 6 | ♥ | K 8 5 3 | ♦ | A J 8 4 | ♣ | A |
|
|
|
♠ | 10 5 4 3 2 | ♥ | J 10 2 | ♦ | 7 3 2 | ♣ | K Q |
|
W 1N; EW 2♦; N 1♠; EW 1♥; NS 1♣; Par −90
West | North | East | South |
| | | Pass |
Pass | 1 ♣ | Dbl | 1 ♠ |
Pass | 1 NT | Pass | Pass |
Pass | | | |
Contract | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
3 ♥ | W | −2 | 200 | | 6.50 | 0.50 | 8-Torello-Lubow | 4-Terbrueggen-Dickman |
2 NT | E | −2 | 200 | | 6.50 | 0.50 | 11-Magnus-Magnus, Jr | 10-Jervis-Lindeman |
1 ♣× | N | 1 | 140 | | 5.00 | 2.00 | 10-Venosa-Venosa | 8-Temples-Koch |
2 ♠ | N | 2 | 110 | | 4.00 | 3.00 | 12-Murdock-Oblinger | 12-Lipp-Felson |
2 ♣ | N | 2 | 90 | | 3.00 | 4.00 | 7-Elliott-Runda | 2-Olexsey-Thurnau |
2 ♠ | N | −1 | | 50 | 2.00 | 5.00 | 6-Lammers-Barron | 11-Kehoe-Stanley |
2 ♦ | E | 2 | | 90 | 1.00 | 6.00 | 5-Hoffman-Cook | 9-Simon-LaMacchia |
2 ♠ | S | −3 | | 150 | 0.00 | 7.00 | 9-Mackey-Kobida | 6-McCarthy-Diers |
N/S will have trouble staying out of 1 NT if South takes a bid following East's
takeout double. South should bid, but should try not to rebid 2 ♠ since East
is highly likely to have four of them. N/S take three Club tricks, one Diamond
trick, one Heart trick, and one Spade--down one.
Board 36 West Deals Both Vul |
♠ | K 10 | ♥ | A 4 | ♦ | A 3 2 | ♣ | 8 6 5 4 3 2 |
|
♠ | A Q 4 2 | ♥ | K J 7 | ♦ | 9 8 6 5 | ♣ | Q 10 |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | J 9 6 5 3 | ♥ | 8 5 3 2 | ♦ | K 10 4 | ♣ | K |
|
|
|
♠ | 8 7 | ♥ | Q 10 9 6 | ♦ | Q J 7 | ♣ | A J 9 7 |
|
NS 2N; EW 2♠; NS 3♣; Par +120
West | North | East | South |
1 ♦ | Pass | 1 ♠ | 1 NT1 |
2 ♠ | 3 ♣ | Pass | Pass |
Pass | | | |
- Alert, Sandwich NT, a weak takeout double showing the unbid suits
|
Contract | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
3 ♣ | N | 3 | 110 | | 6.50 | 0.50 | 5-Hoffman-Cook | 9-Simon-LaMacchia |
2 ♣ | N | 3 | 110 | | 6.50 | 0.50 | 11-Magnus-Magnus, Jr | 10-Jervis-Lindeman |
3 ♠ | E | −1 | 100 | | 5.00 | 2.00 | 10-Venosa-Venosa | 8-Temples-Koch |
Pass | | | Pass | | 4.00 | 3.00 | 9-Mackey-Kobida | 6-McCarthy-Diers |
2 ♠ | E | 2 | | 110 | 2.00 | 5.00 | 6-Lammers-Barron | 11-Kehoe-Stanley |
2 ♠ | E | 2 | | 110 | 2.00 | 5.00 | 7-Elliott-Runda | 2-Olexsey-Thurnau |
2 ♠ | E | 2 | | 110 | 2.00 | 5.00 | 12-Murdock-Oblinger | 12-Lipp-Felson |
3 ♠ | E | 3 | | 140 | 0.00 | 7.00 | 8-Torello-Lubow | 4-Terbrueggen-Dickman |
Not much to this one. N/S lose one Spade, one Heart, one Diamond, and one
Club--making three. The ♠ 5 looks like a normal lead.