EVENT>Monday Night Invitational|SESSION>Monday Eve |SECTION> A N-S
------------------------,------ ------------,-------- --------------------------
DATE>September 26, 2016 |CLUB NO.>185264 | 09/26/2016 22:44
---------------------,-- ------------------- -------------,---------------------
DIR> Mike Lipp |RATING>Club Masterpoint (80%, 80%, 80% Open)|MOVEMENT>MITCHELL
------------,-------- ,-------------------------,--------- ---------------------
AVE> 84.0 |TOP> 7 |MP LIMITS>None/500/300 |CLUB>Monday Night Bridge
------------ --------- ------------------------- -------------------------------
PAIRS IN STRAT A=9/B=6/C=3 ,---,-------------------------,------,---------,
-------------------------------------------------| | Section | |Section |
No Name Name |Flt|Rnk-A|Rnk-B|Rnk-C| Score | Pct |Awards |
------------------------------------------------- --- ----- ----- ----- ------- ------ ---------
1 Patrick Hoffman Sharon Koster B 2/3 1/2 . 94.00 55.95 0.43(A)
2 Patrick Lammers Michael Dickman A 4 . . 89.50 53.27 0.25(A)
3 Charlie Kobida Mike Burns C 2/3 1/2 1 94.00 55.95 0.43(A)
4 Debbie Wiest Carla Runda B . . . 70.50 41.96
5 Liz Lin Elmer Hubka A . . . 68.00 40.48
6 Richard Freiberg Adrianne Freiberg B . . . 80.00 47.62
7 John Ramsay Julian Magnus, Jr C . . . 86.00 51.19
8 Judy Barron Reggie Moskowitz C . . . 76.50 45.54
9 Doris Kehoe Lilam Stanley A 1 . . 97.50 58.04 0.72(A)
Totals 756.00
**PAIRS**
BOARD 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
/
1> 7 4 1- 4 4 1- 0 6
590 ---- 100 -50 100 100 -50 -110 150
2> 7 - - 3- 3- 6 3- 3-
600 ---- -300 -300 -100 -100 120 -100 -100
3> 1- 6- 4 1- 0 3 5 6-
-600 ---- 200 -90 -600 -630 -130 100 200
4> 1 6 3 0 3 6 6 3
-200 120 ---- 90 -300 90 120 120 90
5> 0 2- 2- 5- 2- 5- 2- 7
-200 -100 ---- -100 50 -100 50 -100 800
6> 4- 4- 1 1 1 4- 4- 7
-680 -680 -----1430 -1430 -1430 -680 -680 -650
7> 3- 1- 6 6 6 0 3- 1-
-140 -170 -100 ---- -100 -100 -200 -140 -170
8> 5- 5- 5- 3 5- 1- 0 1-
150 150 150 ---- -50 150 -130 -460 -130
9> 7 2- 2- 5- 2- 2- 0 5-
420 170 170 ---- 200 170 170 140 200
10> 5- 5- 3 - 7 - 3 3
-150 -150 -660 -680 ---- -130 -680 -660 -660
11> 3- 3- 1 6 1 6 1 6
50 50 -400 100 ---- -400 100 -400 100
12> 0 2- 5 5 1 2- 5 7
-450 -200 -170 -170 ---- -420 -200 -170 -140
13> 3- 0 3- 3- 3- 3- 7 3-
-620 -650 -620 -620 -620 ---- -620 -240 -620
14> 4- 4- 7 4- 1 1 1 4-
-480 -480 50 -480 -980 ---- -980 -980 -480
15> 3- - 6 6 - 3- 6 2
680 -200 1430 1430 -200 ---- 680 1430 650
16> 5 5 3 0 2 7 1 5
480 480 450 -50 230 510 ---- 200 480
17> 2 7 4- 4- 1 4- 4- 0
-510 -460 -490 -490 -990 -490 ---- -490 -1010
18> 2 4 4 6 1 4 7 0
-100 50 50 110 -110 50 ---- 130 -140
19> 2 6 4 0 2 2 7 5
-600 100 -150 -630 -600 -600 200 ---- -140
20> 7 3 0 3 3 3 6 3
200 100 -100 100 100 100 110 ---- 100
21> 1- 5 1- 1- 5 1- 5 7
50 100 50 50 100 50 100 ---- 150
22> 7 2- 6 2- - - 4- 4-
490 450 480 450 420 420 460 460 ----
23> 5 6 3 1- 1- 7 4 0
-210 -150 -600 -660 -660 100 -500 -800 ----
24> 5 3- 7 6 1- 1- 0 3-
140 130 300 150 110 110 100 130 ----
25> 4 4 1- 7 1- 0 6 4
---- 100 100 PASS 200 PASS -50 110 100
26> 1 1 5 5 5 5 1 5
---- -140 -140 100 100 100 100 -140 100
27> 3- 5- 1 3- 5- 7 1 1
---- -100 100 -110 -100 100 500 -110 -110
EVENT>Monday Night Invitational|SESSION>Monday Eve |SECTION> A E-W
------------------------,------ ------------,-------- --------------------------
DATE>September 26, 2016 |CLUB NO.>185264 | 09/26/2016 22:44
---------------------,-- ------------------- -------------,---------------------
DIR> Mike Lipp |RATING>Club Masterpoint (80%, 80%, 80% Open)|MOVEMENT>MITCHELL
------------,-------- ,-------------------------,--------- ---------------------
AVE> 84.0 |TOP> 7 |MP LIMITS>None/500/300 |CLUB>Monday Night Bridge
------------ --------- ------------------------- -------------------------------
PAIRS IN STRAT A=9/B=7/C=4 ,---,-------------------------,------,---------,
-------------------------------------------------| | Section | |Section |
No Name Name |Flt|Rnk-A|Rnk-B|Rnk-C| Score | Pct |Awards |
------------------------------------------------- --- ----- ----- ----- ------- ------ ---------
1 Robert Brown Stephen Felson A . . . 78.50 46.73
2 Joy Singerman Marlene Pierce B 3 3 . 91.50 54.46 0.36(A)
3 Kevin Henry Betty Murdock C . . . 71.00 42.26
4 Joseph Kammer Gail Zimmer B 1 1 . 100.50 59.82 0.72(A)
5 Judy Crotty Hall Patricia Burnam C . . 2 83.50 49.70 0.22(C)
6 Sara Brown Lewis Temples C . . 1 84.50 50.30 0.32(C)
7 Joan Diers Evelyn McCarthy C . . . 63.50 37.80
8 Joyce Tedrick Linda Pretz B 2 2 . 94.50 56.25 0.50(A)
9 June Cushman Martin Petersen A 4 . . 88.50 52.68 0.25(A)
Totals 756.00
**PAIRS**
BOARD 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
/
1> 0 3 5- 3 7 5- 1 3
-590 -100 ---- 50 -100 110 50 -150 -100
2> 0 3- 1 6- 3- 6- 3- 3-
-600 100 ---- -120 300 100 300 100 100
3> 5- 7 4 - 2 3 - 5-
600 630 ---- 130 -200 -100 90 -200 600
4> 4 1 1 1 4 4 7 6
-90 -120 -120 ---- -120 -90 -90 300 200
5> 4- 4- 1- 4- 4- 0 1- 7
100 100 -50 ---- 100 100 -800 -50 200
6> 6 2- 2- 2- 6 0 6 2-
1430 680 680 ---- 680 1430 650 1430 680
7> 5- 7 1 3- 5- 1 3- 1
170 200 100 140 ---- 170 100 140 100
8> 1- 5- 1- 7 5- 4 1- 1-
-150 130 -150 460 ---- 130 50 -150 -150
9> 4- 4- 4- 7 1- 1- 0 4-
-170 -170 -170 -140 ---- -200 -200 -420 -170
10> 6- 4 4 6- 4 1- 0 1-
680 660 660 680 660 ---- 150 130 150
11> 1 6 6 1 1 3- 6 3-
-100 400 400 -100 -100 ---- -50 400 -50
12> 4- 2 2 2 0 7 6 4-
200 170 170 170 140 ---- 450 420 200
13> 3- 0 3- 3- 3- 3- 7 3-
620 240 620 620 620 620 ---- 650 620
14> 0 6 2- 2- 6 2- 2- 6
-50 980 480 480 980 480 ---- 480 980
15> 1 1 1 5 6- 3- 6- 3-
-1430 -1430 -1430 -650 200 -680 ---- 200 -680
16> 6 7 2 5 2 0 2 4
-200 50 -480 -230 -480 -510 -480 ---- -450
17> 2- 2- 7 6 5 2- 0 2-
490 490 1010 990 510 490 460 ---- 490
18> 0 1 7 6 5 3 3 3
-130 -110 140 110 100 -50 -50 ---- -50
19> 7 2 5 5 5 1 0 3
630 140 600 600 600 -100 -200 150 ----
20> 4 4 4 0 4 4 1 7
-100 -100 -100 -200 -100 -100 -110 100 ----
21> 5- 0 2 5- 5- 2 2 5-
-50 -150 -100 -50 -50 -100 -100 -50 ----
22> 6- 0 6- 4- 2- 1 2- 4-
---- -420 -490 -420 -450 -460 -480 -460 -450
23> 5- 2 0 1 3 4 7 5-
---- 660 210 -100 150 500 600 800 660
24> 5- 2 5- 3- 7 0 3- 1
---- -110 -140 -110 -130 -100 -300 -130 -150
25> 0 5- 3 7 3 1 5- 3
-200 ---- PASS -100 50 -100 -110 PASS -100
26> 2 2 6 2 6 6 2 2
-100 ---- -100 140 -100 140 140 -100 -100
27> 3- 1- 3- 0 1- 6 6 6
100 ---- -100 100 -500 -100 110 110 110
Monday Night Invitational, Monday Eve, September 26, 2016
Board 1 North Deals None Vul |
♠ | K 10 5 | ♥ | — | ♦ | Q J 10 7 6 5 | ♣ | 10 9 5 2 |
|
♠ | Q 7 2 | ♥ | A K 9 8 2 | ♦ | 8 2 | ♣ | J 6 3 |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | J 3 | ♥ | 10 7 6 3 | ♦ | K 3 | ♣ | A K Q 8 7 |
|
|
|
♠ | A 9 8 6 4 | ♥ | Q J 5 4 | ♦ | A 9 4 | ♣ | 4 |
|
NS 4♠; NS 4♦; EW 2♥; Par +420
West | North | East | South |
| 2 ♦ | Pass | 2 ♠1 |
3 ♥2 | 3 ♠3 | 4 ♥4 | 4 ♠5 |
Pass | Pass | Pass | |
- Forcing
- Lead directing on the vulnerability
- Showing 3-card Spade support
- Thinks they're making
- Thinks they're sacrificing
|
Contract | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
4 ♠× | S | 4 | 590 | | 7.00 | 0.00 | 1-Hoffman-Koster | 1-Brown-Felson |
4 ♦ | N | 5 | 150 | | 6.00 | 1.00 | 9-Kehoe-Stanley | 8-Tedrick-Pretz |
4 ♣ | E | −2 | 100 | | 4.00 | 3.00 | 3-Kobida-Burns | 5-Hall-Burnam |
4 ♣ | E | −2 | 100 | | 4.00 | 3.00 | 5-Lin-Hubka | 9-Cushman-Petersen |
4 ♣ | E | −2 | 100 | | 4.00 | 3.00 | 6-Freiberg-Freiberg | 2-Singerman-Pierce |
4 ♦ | N | −1 | | 50 | 1.50 | 5.50 | 4-Wiest-Runda | 7-Diers-McCarthy |
4 ♠ | S | −1 | | 50 | 1.50 | 5.50 | 7-Ramsay-Magnus, Jr | 4-Kammer-Zimmer |
2 ♥ | W | 2 | | 110 | 0.00 | 7.00 | 8-Barron-Moskowitz | 6-Brown-Temples |
What starts out as a fairly quiet auction ends in a flurry. North's hand is
borderline for a pass initially, because it's slightly too good for a weak two
bid in Diamonds. In first seat, you should consider "What does my hand look
like as dummy in a major-suit contract?" If it looks pretty much perfect, you
should probably not preempt in a minor. Just sayin'.
N/S lose one Spade, one Heart, and one Club. One Heart? Yes. Declarer can't
afford to ruff the first high Heart. Declarer should simply pitch a Club from
dummy. If West continues another high Heart, declarer can ruff, pull two
rounds of trumps ending in dummy, and lead the Queen of Diamonds. When the
King of Diamonds falls, declarer should knock out the last trump, get back in
by ruffing the 2nd Club and claim. Opening lead will be the ♥ K or ♥ A
depending on style.
Board 2 East Deals N-S Vul |
♠ | K 4 | ♥ | K 8 5 | ♦ | 10 7 5 3 | ♣ | K Q 8 7 |
|
♠ | A 5 3 | ♥ | A 10 6 3 | ♦ | K 6 | ♣ | 10 9 4 2 |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | J 10 9 7 | ♥ | 9 7 4 2 | ♦ | Q 9 8 2 | ♣ | J |
|
|
|
♠ | Q 8 6 2 | ♥ | Q J | ♦ | A J 4 | ♣ | A 6 5 3 |
|
NS 3N; NS 3♣; NS 2♦; NS 1♠; Par +600
West | North | East | South |
| | Pass | 1 ♣ |
Pass | 2 NT1 | Pass | 3 NT |
Pass | Pass | Pass | |
- 11 to 12 HCP, no 4-card major
|
Contract | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
3 NT | N | 3 | 600 | | 7.00 | 0.00 | 1-Hoffman-Koster | 1-Brown-Felson |
1 NT | N | 2 | 120 | | 6.00 | 1.00 | 7-Ramsay-Magnus, Jr | 4-Kammer-Zimmer |
3 ♣ | S | −1 | | 100 | 3.50 | 3.50 | 5-Lin-Hubka | 9-Cushman-Petersen |
3 NT | S | −1 | | 100 | 3.50 | 3.50 | 6-Freiberg-Freiberg | 2-Singerman-Pierce |
3 NT | N | −1 | | 100 | 3.50 | 3.50 | 8-Barron-Moskowitz | 6-Brown-Temples |
3 NT | N | −1 | | 100 | 3.50 | 3.50 | 9-Kehoe-Stanley | 8-Tedrick-Pretz |
3 NT | S | −3 | | 300 | 0.50 | 6.50 | 3-Kobida-Burns | 5-Hall-Burnam |
3 NT | S | −3 | | 300 | 0.50 | 6.50 | 4-Wiest-Runda | 7-Diers-McCarthy |
West will lead the ♠ J, declarer plays low from dummy, and West ducks. There
are two Spade tricks, two Heart tricks, two Diamond tricks, and three Club
tricks. It's possible to take four Club tricks, but that's a double-dummy line
(i.e., as if you looked at all four hands). The Diamond suit is a tough one to
play. Since you can afford to lose two Diamond tricks, it's probably best to
start with the ♦ A and continue with a low Diamond from both hands. You take
two Diamond tricks whenever Diamonds are 3-3 or when the ♦ K or ♦ Q is
doubleton.
Board 3 South Deals E-W Vul |
♠ | 7 3 | ♥ | Q J 6 3 | ♦ | Q 10 7 | ♣ | A 9 7 6 |
|
♠ | J 9 8 6 | ♥ | A 10 5 | ♦ | A J 6 5 3 | ♣ | 10 |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | K 5 4 | ♥ | K 4 2 | ♦ | K 8 4 | ♣ | K Q J 4 |
|
|
|
♠ | A Q 10 2 | ♥ | 9 8 7 | ♦ | 9 2 | ♣ | 8 5 3 2 |
|
W 3N; EW 3♠; E 2N; W 2♥; EW 3♦; W 2♣; E 1♥; E 1♣; Par −600
West | North | East | South |
| | | Pass |
Pass | Pass | 1 NT1 | Pass |
3 ♣2 | Pass | 3 ♦3 | Pass |
3 ♥4 | Pass | 3 NT | Pass |
Pass | Pass | | |
- 15 to 17
- Alert, Five-card Stayman
- Alert, no five-card major
- Alert, showing four Spades and three Hearts
|
Contract | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
3 NT | E | −2 | 200 | | 6.50 | 0.50 | 3-Kobida-Burns | 5-Hall-Burnam |
3 NT | E | −2 | 200 | | 6.50 | 0.50 | 9-Kehoe-Stanley | 8-Tedrick-Pretz |
3 NT | E | −1 | 100 | | 5.00 | 2.00 | 8-Barron-Moskowitz | 6-Brown-Temples |
2 ♦ | E | 2 | | 90 | 4.00 | 3.00 | 4-Wiest-Runda | 7-Diers-McCarthy |
1 ♦ | W | 4 | | 130 | 3.00 | 4.00 | 7-Ramsay-Magnus, Jr | 4-Kammer-Zimmer |
3 NT | E | 3 | | 600 | 1.50 | 5.50 | 1-Hoffman-Koster | 1-Brown-Felson |
3 NT | E | 3 | | 600 | 1.50 | 5.50 | 5-Lin-Hubka | 9-Cushman-Petersen |
3 NT | E | 4 | | 630 | 0.00 | 7.00 | 6-Freiberg-Freiberg | 2-Singerman-Pierce |
3 NT is a good contract and will be reached by the majority of the room. If
South makes the ho-hum opening lead of the ♠ 2, the contract makes easily. The
only lead that beats 3 NT (played by East) is the ♥ 9--not hard to find if you
realize that it's INSANE to lead away from ♠ AQT2!!!! Doesn't that suit look
like it wants to be lead toward? Of course it does. If South leads the ♥ 9,
N/S collect two Spades, one Heart, one Diamond, and the ♣ A. Well defended!
Board 4 West Deals Both Vul |
♠ | A 10 7 | ♥ | 9 3 | ♦ | K 8 7 3 | ♣ | 10 8 7 5 |
|
♠ | 9 8 4 3 | ♥ | 10 8 7 5 | ♦ | Q 10 9 | ♣ | Q 4 |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | J 5 | ♥ | A K 2 | ♦ | A 6 5 4 | ♣ | J 6 3 2 |
|
|
|
♠ | K Q 6 2 | ♥ | Q J 6 4 | ♦ | J 2 | ♣ | A K 9 |
|
NS 2N; NS 2♠; S 2♥; NS 2♣; N 1♥; NS 1♦; Par +120
West | North | East | South |
Pass | Pass | 1 ♦ | Dbl1 |
Pass | 1 NT2 | Pass | 2 NT3 |
Pass | Pass | Pass | |
- Although South has 15-18 HCP, a 1 NT overcall isn't as good as a takeout double with this hand
- Showing 7-10 HCP and no four-card major
- Inviting 3 NT if partner has a maximum
|
Contract | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
1 NT | S | 2 | 120 | | 6.00 | 1.00 | 2-Lammers-Dickman | 2-Singerman-Pierce |
1 NT | N | 2 | 120 | | 6.00 | 1.00 | 7-Ramsay-Magnus, Jr | 3-Henry-Murdock |
1 NT | N | 2 | 120 | | 6.00 | 1.00 | 8-Barron-Moskowitz | 5-Hall-Burnam |
1 NT | N | 1 | 90 | | 3.00 | 4.00 | 4-Wiest-Runda | 6-Brown-Temples |
2 ♣ | S | 2 | 90 | | 3.00 | 4.00 | 6-Freiberg-Freiberg | 1-Brown-Felson |
1 NT | S | 1 | 90 | | 3.00 | 4.00 | 9-Kehoe-Stanley | 7-Diers-McCarthy |
3 ♣ | N | −2 | | 200 | 1.00 | 6.00 | 1-Hoffman-Koster | 9-Cushman-Petersen |
3 ♣ | N | −3 | | 300 | 0.00 | 7.00 | 5-Lin-Hubka | 8-Tedrick-Pretz |
A 1 NT response to partner's takeout double should show 7-10 HCP, a stopper or
stoppers in the enemy suit, and no better bid. North's hand is perfect for a
minimum 1 NT response. South has extras, so they invite 3 NT, and North passes
quickly.
N/S take four Spade tricks, two Heart tricks, and two Club tricks. They might
take a Diamond trick as well if E/W lead the suit--unlikely on the auction, but
who knows? East will most likely attack the Heart suit, and the hand will be
over with in short order.
Board 5 North Deals N-S Vul |
♠ | K 7 | ♥ | A 8 5 3 | ♦ | A Q | ♣ | A Q J 10 2 |
|
♠ | A Q J 8 6 | ♥ | K Q 6 | ♦ | K 5 3 | ♣ | 8 5 |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | — | ♥ | J 9 7 4 2 | ♦ | 10 9 7 6 2 | ♣ | K 7 4 |
|
|
|
♠ | 10 9 5 4 3 2 | ♥ | 10 | ♦ | J 8 4 | ♣ | 9 6 3 |
|
NS 2♠; EW 2♥; NS 3♣; NS 1N; EW 1♦; Par +100: EW 3♥×−1
West | North | East | South |
| 2 NT | Pass | 3 ♥1 |
Pass | 3 ♠ | Pass | Pass |
Pass | | | |
Contract | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
3 ♠× | W | −4 | 800 | | 7.00 | 0.00 | 9-Kehoe-Stanley | 7-Diers-McCarthy |
3 ♥ | W | −1 | 50 | | 5.50 | 1.50 | 5-Lin-Hubka | 8-Tedrick-Pretz |
3 ♦ | E | −1 | 50 | | 5.50 | 1.50 | 7-Ramsay-Magnus, Jr | 3-Henry-Murdock |
3 ♠ | N | −1 | | 100 | 2.50 | 4.50 | 2-Lammers-Dickman | 2-Singerman-Pierce |
3 ♠ | N | −1 | | 100 | 2.50 | 4.50 | 4-Wiest-Runda | 6-Brown-Temples |
3 ♠ | N | −1 | | 100 | 2.50 | 4.50 | 6-Freiberg-Freiberg | 1-Brown-Felson |
3 ♠ | N | −1 | | 100 | 2.50 | 4.50 | 8-Barron-Moskowitz | 5-Hall-Burnam |
3 ♠ | N | −2 | | 200 | 0.00 | 7.00 | 1-Hoffman-Koster | 9-Cushman-Petersen |
West really wants to double the final contract, but they're afraid that
partner will bid something. If they want to make sure that partner interprets
their double as penalty, they should ask in a loud voice about the quality of
South's Spades. "Does your partner guarantee the ♠ A, ♠ Q, ♠ J, ♠ 8, or ♠ 6
with their transfer bid? No? Thank you." Then they should snap their double
card on the table while muttering "You're not making this contract, buster!"
East has a tough lead against 3 ♠. Most likely they'll lead a "safe" ♦T.
Declarer wins the ♦ Q, takes the ♦ A, ♥ A, ruffs a Heart in dummy, ruffs a
diamond with the ♠ 7, another Heart ruff in dummy, ♣ A, and an attempted Heart
ruff. Alas, it's not to be as West overruffs, cashes the ♠ A, and exits with a
a Club to partner. South will win one more trump with the ♠T9 combination,
but that's it. Down one.
Board 6 East Deals E-W Vul |
♠ | A J 8 6 3 | ♥ | 9 6 3 | ♦ | 6 3 2 | ♣ | 6 5 |
|
♠ | Q 10 9 2 | ♥ | A Q 8 | ♦ | A 10 | ♣ | K 10 9 8 |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | K 7 | ♥ | K J 7 5 4 | ♦ | K | ♣ | A Q J 7 2 |
|
|
|
♠ | 5 4 | ♥ | 10 2 | ♦ | Q J 9 8 7 5 4 | ♣ | 4 3 |
|
EW 6N; EW 6♥; EW 6♣; EW 4♠; EW 1♦; Par −1440
West | North | East | South |
| | 1 ♥ | 3 ♦1 |
4 NT2 | 5 ♦3 | 5 ♥4 | Pass |
6 ♥ | Pass | Pass | Pass |
- Preemptive
- RKC Blackwood for Hearts
- Making life a bit more difficult
- Double=1 or 4, Pass=0 or 3, 1st step = 2 or 5 w/o ♥ Q, 2nd step = 2 or 5 w/ ♥ Q
|
Contract | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
4 ♥ | E | 5 | | 650 | 7.00 | 0.00 | 9-Kehoe-Stanley | 7-Diers-McCarthy |
4 ♥ | E | 6 | | 680 | 4.50 | 2.50 | 1-Hoffman-Koster | 9-Cushman-Petersen |
4 ♥ | E | 6 | | 680 | 4.50 | 2.50 | 2-Lammers-Dickman | 2-Singerman-Pierce |
4 ♥ | E | 6 | | 680 | 4.50 | 2.50 | 7-Ramsay-Magnus, Jr | 3-Henry-Murdock |
5 ♥ | E | 6 | | 680 | 4.50 | 2.50 | 8-Barron-Moskowitz | 5-Hall-Burnam |
6 ♥ | E | 6 | | 1430 | 1.00 | 6.00 | 4-Wiest-Runda | 6-Brown-Temples |
6 ♥ | E | 6 | | 1430 | 1.00 | 6.00 | 5-Lin-Hubka | 8-Tedrick-Pretz |
6 ♥ | E | 6 | | 1430 | 1.00 | 6.00 | 6-Freiberg-Freiberg | 1-Brown-Felson |
How fun! North's interfering bid over RKC Blackwood gives E/W a chance to
practice their responses. As shown above, after a RKC Blackwood "ask" and
interference in the direct seat (i.e., the seat directly to the left of the RKC
bidder), a double shows 1 or 4 keycards and a pass shows 0 or 3. The 1st step
then shows 2 or 5 w/o the Queen of trumps, etc. West signs off in 6 ♥ which
should guarantee the pair is off a keycard.
The ♦ Q will be a popular lead, and E/W lose only one Spade. Nicely bid!
Board 7 South Deals Both Vul |
♠ | K Q 10 3 | ♥ | Q 6 5 | ♦ | K 7 2 | ♣ | A 6 4 |
|
♠ | A 4 | ♥ | K 10 8 4 2 | ♦ | J 9 8 6 5 | ♣ | K |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | J 8 5 | ♥ | J 9 7 | ♦ | A Q 10 | ♣ | Q J 9 2 |
|
|
|
♠ | 9 7 6 2 | ♥ | A 3 | ♦ | 4 3 | ♣ | 10 8 7 5 3 |
|
EW 3♥; EW 3♦; EW 1N; NS 1♠; NS 1♣; Par −140
West | North | East | South |
| | | Pass |
1 ♥ | Pass1 | 1 NT2 | Pass |
2 ♦ | Dbl3 | 3 ♥4 | Pass5 |
Pass | Pass | | |
- Don't make minimum offshape takeout doubles. Yuck.
- Forcing
- Okay, maybe let's sneak into the auction now
- Showing 3-card limit raise
- Too high on the vulnerability
|
Contract | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
2 ♠ | N | −1 | | 100 | 6.00 | 1.00 | 3-Kobida-Burns | 3-Henry-Murdock |
1 ♣ | N | −1 | | 100 | 6.00 | 1.00 | 5-Lin-Hubka | 7-Diers-McCarthy |
1 ♣ | S | −1 | | 100 | 6.00 | 1.00 | 6-Freiberg-Freiberg | 9-Cushman-Petersen |
3 ♥ | W | 3 | | 140 | 3.50 | 3.50 | 1-Hoffman-Koster | 8-Tedrick-Pretz |
1 ♥ | E | 3 | | 140 | 3.50 | 3.50 | 8-Barron-Moskowitz | 4-Kammer-Zimmer |
2 ♥ | W | 4 | | 170 | 1.50 | 5.50 | 2-Lammers-Dickman | 1-Brown-Felson |
3 ♥ | W | 4 | | 170 | 1.50 | 5.50 | 9-Kehoe-Stanley | 6-Brown-Temples |
2 ♠ | N | −2 | | 200 | 0.00 | 7.00 | 7-Ramsay-Magnus, Jr | 2-Singerman-Pierce |
E/W lose two Hearts, one Spade, and one Club. If North leads the ♠ K, it
appears that E/W will gain an extra trick since there's now a pitch on the ♠ J,
but declarer has nothing in their hand that needs throwing away. I'd like to
say that this hand will be flat, but that's an almost laughable thought. Quite
a few North's will get sloppy and enter the auction early. South will then
overbid and E/W will double--or overbid themselves. Good grief.....
Board 8 West Deals None Vul |
♠ | J 10 8 5 2 | ♥ | 10 9 7 | ♦ | 6 4 | ♣ | Q J 5 |
|
♠ | K 9 7 4 | ♥ | J 8 2 | ♦ | J 7 5 2 | ♣ | 7 3 |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | A Q 3 | ♥ | A K Q 4 | ♦ | K Q 9 3 | ♣ | 8 4 |
|
|
|
♠ | 6 | ♥ | 6 5 3 | ♦ | A 10 8 | ♣ | A K 10 9 6 2 |
|
EW 4♥; EW 2♠; EW 2♦; NS 2♣; Par −420
West | North | East | South |
Pass | Pass | 2 NT1 | Dbl2 |
3 ♣3 | Dbl4 | 3 ♦5 | Pass6 |
4 ♦7 | Pass | 4 ♥ | Pass |
Pass | Pass | | |
- 20 to 21
- DONT showing a single-suited hand
- Puppet Stayman
- Hey, if your suit happens to be Clubs, I'm loving that!
- Alert, no five-card major but one or more four-card majors
- Hmmm, if these yokels end up in 3 NT, maybe we're taking six Club tricks and a Diamond
- Brilliant bid! Knowing that South's suit is Clubs, decides to show both majors
|
Contract | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
3 NT | E | −3 | 150 | | 5.50 | 1.50 | 1-Hoffman-Koster | 8-Tedrick-Pretz |
3 NT | E | −3 | 150 | | 5.50 | 1.50 | 2-Lammers-Dickman | 1-Brown-Felson |
3 NT | E | −3 | 150 | | 5.50 | 1.50 | 3-Kobida-Burns | 3-Henry-Murdock |
3 NT | E | −3 | 150 | | 5.50 | 1.50 | 6-Freiberg-Freiberg | 9-Cushman-Petersen |
3 ♣ | S | −1 | | 50 | 3.00 | 4.00 | 5-Lin-Hubka | 7-Diers-McCarthy |
4 ♦ | E | 4 | | 130 | 1.50 | 5.50 | 7-Ramsay-Magnus, Jr | 2-Singerman-Pierce |
3 ♦ | E | 4 | | 130 | 1.50 | 5.50 | 9-Kehoe-Stanley | 6-Brown-Temples |
3 NT | E | 5 | | 460 | 0.00 | 7.00 | 8-Barron-Moskowitz | 4-Kammer-Zimmer |
This hand is a sad one for Souths who play DONT over 2 NT. If they'd just keep
their mouth shut, E/W are likely to play in 3 NT, down three. Stupid DONT.
That said, unless they run up against a West with some smarts up their sleeve
(mixed metaphor...sorry), they're still going to defend 3 NT, but this time
they'll do it knowing that their partner has some Clubs as well. Ha! Take
that quiet Souths.
If West is able to find the 4 ♦ bid in the Puppet auction, showing both majors,
E/W will play in a very comfortable 4 ♥ contract, losing two Clubs and a
Diamond. If not........
Board 9 North Deals E-W Vul |
♠ | J 2 | ♥ | A 10 7 5 | ♦ | A J 9 6 | ♣ | J 7 4 |
|
♠ | 10 7 6 | ♥ | 6 3 | ♦ | 5 3 2 | ♣ | 10 9 8 5 2 |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | A 9 8 5 | ♥ | J 4 | ♦ | K Q 7 | ♣ | A K 6 3 |
|
|
|
♠ | K Q 4 3 | ♥ | K Q 9 8 2 | ♦ | 10 8 4 | ♣ | Q |
|
N 4♥; S 3♥; NS 2N; NS 2♠; NS 3♦; EW 1♣; Par +420
West | North | East | South |
| Pass | 1 NT1 | 2 ♥2 |
Pass | 2 NT3 | Pass | 3 ♠4 |
Pass | 4 ♥ | Pass | Pass |
Pass | | | |
- 15 to 17
- DONT showing ♥ and ♠
- Alert, invitational hand in one or both of partner's suits
- Alert, not a minimum hand
|
Contract | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
4 ♥ | S | 4 | 420 | | 7.00 | 0.00 | 1-Hoffman-Koster | 8-Tedrick-Pretz |
4 ♣ | E | −2 | 200 | | 5.50 | 1.50 | 5-Lin-Hubka | 7-Diers-McCarthy |
1 NT | E | −2 | 200 | | 5.50 | 1.50 | 9-Kehoe-Stanley | 6-Brown-Temples |
2 ♥ | S | 4 | 170 | | 2.50 | 4.50 | 2-Lammers-Dickman | 1-Brown-Felson |
3 ♥ | S | 4 | 170 | | 2.50 | 4.50 | 3-Kobida-Burns | 3-Henry-Murdock |
3 ♥ | S | 4 | 170 | | 2.50 | 4.50 | 6-Freiberg-Freiberg | 9-Cushman-Petersen |
3 ♥ | S | 4 | 170 | | 2.50 | 4.50 | 7-Ramsay-Magnus, Jr | 2-Singerman-Pierce |
3 ♥ | S | 3 | 140 | | 0.00 | 7.00 | 8-Barron-Moskowitz | 4-Kammer-Zimmer |
N/S get a chance to practice a little known feature of DONT--a 2 NT response by
the advancer (the partner of the overcaller) showing an invitational hand or
better in support of partner's suit or suits. A 3 ♣ response to the 2 NT
inquiry shows a minimum hand with no interest in bidding on. Any other bid
shows 11+ HCP--basically an opening hand in support points. When South shows
decent values by bidding 3 ♠, North happily goes on to game.
If West finds a Diamond lead, N/S will go down one. That's unlikely, since a
Club lead looks far more attractive. On a Club lead, N/S lose one Spade, one
Club, and one Diamond on the successful endplay against East. East wins the
first trick with the ♣ K and exits with a trump (best). Declarer ruffs a Club
in the South hand, knocks out the ♠ A, pulls trump, ruffs another Club, cashes
the good Spades, and ruffs their last Spade in dummy. Now a Diamond to East's
♦ Q ends the hand. East, down to only Clubs and Diamonds, must give declarer a
ruff-sluff or play a Diamond back into North's ♦ AJ tenace. Well played!
Board 10 East Deals Both Vul |
♠ | Q 4 2 | ♥ | J 10 2 | ♦ | 10 5 4 2 | ♣ | Q 10 2 |
|
♠ | K 5 | ♥ | A K 7 | ♦ | Q 6 | ♣ | A K 7 6 5 4 |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | A 10 9 8 3 | ♥ | 6 3 | ♦ | K 9 8 3 | ♣ | J 3 |
|
|
|
♠ | J 7 6 | ♥ | Q 9 8 5 4 | ♦ | A J 7 | ♣ | 9 8 |
|
EW 5♠; EW 3N; EW 5♣; EW 4♦; EW 2♥; Par −650
West | North | East | South |
| | Pass | Pass |
2 NT1 | Pass | 3 ♥2 | Pass |
3 ♠ | Pass | 3 NT3 | Pass |
4 ♠4 | Pass | Pass | Pass |
- 20 to 21
- Transfer
- Showing exactly five Spades and game-going values
- Opts for the Spade game with their off-shape hand
|
Contract | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
3 ♣ | W | 4 | | 130 | 7.00 | 0.00 | 6-Freiberg-Freiberg | 8-Tedrick-Pretz |
2 ♣ | W | 5 | | 150 | 5.50 | 1.50 | 1-Hoffman-Koster | 7-Diers-McCarthy |
3 ♣ | W | 5 | | 150 | 5.50 | 1.50 | 2-Lammers-Dickman | 9-Cushman-Petersen |
3 NT | W | 5 | | 660 | 3.00 | 4.00 | 3-Kobida-Burns | 2-Singerman-Pierce |
3 NT | W | 5 | | 660 | 3.00 | 4.00 | 8-Barron-Moskowitz | 3-Henry-Murdock |
3 NT | W | 5 | | 660 | 3.00 | 4.00 | 9-Kehoe-Stanley | 5-Hall-Burnam |
4 ♠ | E | 6 | | 680 | 0.50 | 6.50 | 4-Wiest-Runda | 4-Kammer-Zimmer |
4 ♠ | E | 6 | | 680 | 0.50 | 6.50 | 7-Ramsay-Magnus, Jr | 1-Brown-Felson |
The only bid of note is West's final 4 ♠ call. With a balanced or
semi-balanced hand, two Spades, and soft values (Queens and Jacks), West would
surely pass 3 NT. With a nice side suit and primes (Aces and Kings), West
should choose the Spade game. 3 NT makes, but 4 ♠ making five will be good for
most of the matchpoints. E/W lose one Spade and one Diamond. The ♥ J looks
like a reasonable lead by North.
Board 11 South Deals None Vul |
♠ | J 8 3 | ♥ | 5 2 | ♦ | J 8 6 3 | ♣ | K 9 3 2 |
|
♠ | A K 9 5 | ♥ | 8 3 | ♦ | 9 7 | ♣ | A J 7 6 5 |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | Q 6 | ♥ | A Q 10 9 | ♦ | K Q 5 4 2 | ♣ | 8 4 |
|
|
|
♠ | 10 7 4 2 | ♥ | K J 7 6 4 | ♦ | A 10 | ♣ | Q 10 |
|
E 3♥; EW 2N; EW 2♠; W 2♥; EW 3♣; EW 2♦; Par −140
West | North | East | South |
| | | Pass |
1 ♣ | Pass | 1 ♦1 | 1 NT2 |
Pass | 2 ♠ | 3 ♠3 | Pass |
3 NT4 | Pass | Pass | Pass |
- With an opening hand or better, 5+ Diamonds, and a 4-card major, bid Diamonds first
- Alert, Sandwich NT showing a weak takeout double for the unbid suits
- Western Cue asking West to bid 3 NT with a Spade stopper
- Yup, that looks like a stopper
|
Contract | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
3 NT | E | −2 | 100 | | 6.00 | 1.00 | 4-Wiest-Runda | 4-Kammer-Zimmer |
3 NT | W | −2 | 100 | | 6.00 | 1.00 | 7-Ramsay-Magnus, Jr | 1-Brown-Felson |
3 NT | W | −2 | 100 | | 6.00 | 1.00 | 9-Kehoe-Stanley | 5-Hall-Burnam |
3 ♣ | W | −1 | 50 | | 3.50 | 3.50 | 1-Hoffman-Koster | 7-Diers-McCarthy |
3 NT | E | −1 | 50 | | 3.50 | 3.50 | 2-Lammers-Dickman | 9-Cushman-Petersen |
3 NT | E | 3 | | 400 | 1.00 | 6.00 | 3-Kobida-Burns | 2-Singerman-Pierce |
3 NT | E | 3 | | 400 | 1.00 | 6.00 | 6-Freiberg-Freiberg | 8-Tedrick-Pretz |
3 NT | W | 3 | | 400 | 1.00 | 6.00 | 8-Barron-Moskowitz | 3-Henry-Murdock |
3 NT will be a popular contract that has little hope of making. E/W take three
Spade tricks, two Hearts, two Diamonds, and a Club for down one. Another way
of looking at it is that N/S take a Spade, two Hearts, a Club, and a Diamond.
The best score for E/W would be to double 2 ♠ for +500 when the contract goes
down three. Not an easy double for East to make with ♠ Q6 tight.
Board 12 West Deals N-S Vul |
♠ | K 9 5 2 | ♥ | 9 8 | ♦ | 7 5 4 3 2 | ♣ | A 3 |
|
♠ | 7 6 | ♥ | A K Q 7 6 4 | ♦ | K 10 9 6 | ♣ | Q |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | A J 10 8 | ♥ | J 10 | ♦ | 8 | ♣ | J 10 9 8 7 5 |
|
|
|
♠ | Q 4 3 | ♥ | 5 3 2 | ♦ | A Q J | ♣ | K 6 4 2 |
|
EW 4♥; EW 2N; EW 2♠; EW 2♣; EW 1♦; Par −420
West | North | East | South |
1 ♥ | Pass | 1 ♠ | Pass |
3 ♥1 | Pass | 4 ♥ | Pass |
Pass | Pass | | |
- Showing 6+ Hearts and a 5-loser hand
|
Contract | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
2 ♥ | W | 3 | | 140 | 7.00 | 0.00 | 9-Kehoe-Stanley | 5-Hall-Burnam |
2 ♥ | W | 4 | | 170 | 5.00 | 2.00 | 3-Kobida-Burns | 2-Singerman-Pierce |
2 ♥ | W | 4 | | 170 | 5.00 | 2.00 | 4-Wiest-Runda | 4-Kammer-Zimmer |
2 ♥ | W | 4 | | 170 | 5.00 | 2.00 | 8-Barron-Moskowitz | 3-Henry-Murdock |
2 ♥ | W | 5 | | 200 | 2.50 | 4.50 | 2-Lammers-Dickman | 9-Cushman-Petersen |
2 ♥ | W | 5 | | 200 | 2.50 | 4.50 | 7-Ramsay-Magnus, Jr | 1-Brown-Felson |
4 ♥ | W | 4 | | 420 | 1.00 | 6.00 | 6-Freiberg-Freiberg | 8-Tedrick-Pretz |
4 ♥ | W | 5 | | 450 | 0.00 | 7.00 | 1-Hoffman-Koster | 7-Diers-McCarthy |
E/W lose one Spade, one Diamond, and one Club. The best lead from North is a
trump. East wins, and realizing that there's no hope of ruffing Diamonds in
dummy, leads the ♣ Q. North has to win with their doubleton ♣ A, but now
declarer knows that the ruffing finesse for the ♣ K is working. If North plays
back a second trump, declarer can win in dummy and leads Clubs until South
covers, making five (the Spade loser goes away). North needs to play a Spade
immediately after winning the ♣ A, or the Spade trick will vanish.
Board 13 North Deals Both Vul |
♠ | 7 | ♥ | A 10 4 3 2 | ♦ | J 10 5 4 3 | ♣ | J 2 |
|
♠ | A J 10 9 3 | ♥ | Q 9 | ♦ | A 7 | ♣ | K 9 6 5 |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | K 8 5 | ♥ | J 8 7 6 | ♦ | Q | ♣ | A Q 8 7 4 |
|
|
|
♠ | Q 6 4 2 | ♥ | K 5 | ♦ | K 9 8 6 2 | ♣ | 10 3 |
|
EW 5N; EW 5♠; EW 5♣; NS 3♦; Par −660
West | North | East | South |
| Pass | 1 ♣ | Pass |
1 ♠ | Pass1 | 2 ♠2 | Pass |
2 NT3 | Pass | 3 ♣4 | Pass |
4 ♠ | Pass | Pass | Pass |
- Not quite enough to come in to the auction vulnerable
- Best bid to raise Spades with 3-card support and an outside singleton
- Alert, Wold 2 NT, asking more about partner's raise
- Alert, artificial showing a minimum hand with 3-card support
|
Contract | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
1 NT | E | 6 | | 240 | 7.00 | 0.00 | 8-Barron-Moskowitz | 2-Singerman-Pierce |
4 ♠ | W | 4 | | 620 | 3.50 | 3.50 | 1-Hoffman-Koster | 6-Brown-Temples |
4 ♠ | W | 4 | | 620 | 3.50 | 3.50 | 3-Kobida-Burns | 1-Brown-Felson |
4 ♠ | W | 4 | | 620 | 3.50 | 3.50 | 4-Wiest-Runda | 3-Henry-Murdock |
4 ♠ | W | 4 | | 620 | 3.50 | 3.50 | 5-Lin-Hubka | 5-Hall-Burnam |
4 ♠ | W | 4 | | 620 | 3.50 | 3.50 | 7-Ramsay-Magnus, Jr | 9-Cushman-Petersen |
4 ♠ | W | 4 | | 620 | 3.50 | 3.50 | 9-Kehoe-Stanley | 4-Kammer-Zimmer |
4 ♠ | W | 5 | | 650 | 0.00 | 7.00 | 2-Lammers-Dickman | 8-Tedrick-Pretz |
West's 2 NT bid is a slam try--they know they'll always be in at least game
after East's raise, but might consider slam if East has a nice hand with 4-card
support. E/W lose two Hearts. If North doesn't find a Heart lead, E/W make
six. +680 will be the likely E/W score on this board.
Board 14 East Deals None Vul |
♠ | J 9 5 4 3 | ♥ | 9 4 | ♦ | Q 6 | ♣ | 10 9 4 3 |
|
♠ | Q 10 7 6 | ♥ | K | ♦ | 10 9 8 5 4 3 | ♣ | Q 8 |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | A K 8 2 | ♥ | A Q J 8 7 6 2 | ♦ | A | ♣ | A |
|
|
|
♠ | — | ♥ | 10 5 3 | ♦ | K J 7 2 | ♣ | K J 7 6 5 2 |
|
EW 7N; EW 6♥; EW 5♠; EW 3♦; NS 2♣; Par −1520
West | North | East | South |
| | 2 ♣ | Pass |
2 ♦1 | Pass | 2 ♥ | Pass |
2 ♠ | Pass | 3 ♠2 | Pass |
4 ♥3 | Pass | 4 NT4 | Pass |
5 ♦5 | Pass | 5 ♥6 | Pass |
6 ♥7 | Pass | 7 NT8 | Pass |
Pass | Pass | | |
- Game forcing, showing an A, K, or 2Q.
- Agreeing on Spades
- Control bid showing first or second round control of Hearts
- RKC Blackwood for Spades
- Showing zero keycards
- Do you have the Queen of Spades?
- Yes, and I have the King of Hearts
- To play
|
Contract | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
6 ♥ | E | −1 | 50 | | 7.00 | 0.00 | 3-Kobida-Burns | 1-Brown-Felson |
4 ♥ | E | 6 | | 480 | 4.50 | 2.50 | 1-Hoffman-Koster | 6-Brown-Temples |
4 ♥ | E | 6 | | 480 | 4.50 | 2.50 | 2-Lammers-Dickman | 8-Tedrick-Pretz |
4 ♥ | E | 6 | | 480 | 4.50 | 2.50 | 4-Wiest-Runda | 3-Henry-Murdock |
4 ♥ | E | 6 | | 480 | 4.50 | 2.50 | 9-Kehoe-Stanley | 4-Kammer-Zimmer |
6 ♥ | E | 6 | | 980 | 1.00 | 6.00 | 5-Lin-Hubka | 5-Hall-Burnam |
6 ♥ | E | 6 | | 980 | 1.00 | 6.00 | 7-Ramsay-Magnus, Jr | 9-Cushman-Petersen |
6 ♠ | W | 6 | | 980 | 1.00 | 6.00 | 8-Barron-Moskowitz | 2-Singerman-Pierce |
Some E/W pairs will decide to play in 7 ♠ (or 6 ♠ for those who can't count to
13). There's absolutely no reason to do that when you can (hopefully) see 13
tricks. What's the only thing that can ruin 7 NT? A 5-0 Spade split? Well,
that might put a damper on 7 ♠ as well. If South has five Spades, the contract
is doomed, but E/W can still take four Spade tricks if North has five Spades by
playing the ♠ Q first. When South shows out, it's trivial to pick up ♠ J9 in
the North hand. The lead won't be a Heart, but if it is, the contract is going
to fail. There's no way that declarer is going to take a Spade finesse at
trick two unless they have the hand record in advance. Call the director if
that happens--or sit farther away from the table if you're North.
Board 15 South Deals N-S Vul |
♠ | 10 9 8 4 2 | ♥ | A K 5 4 | ♦ | A 10 5 | ♣ | 9 |
|
♠ | Q 6 3 | ♥ | 10 9 2 | ♦ | 9 8 4 | ♣ | J 5 4 2 |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | 5 | ♥ | J 8 7 6 | ♦ | K Q 7 3 | ♣ | 10 8 7 3 |
|
|
|
♠ | A K J 7 | ♥ | Q 3 | ♦ | J 6 2 | ♣ | A K Q 6 |
|
NS 6♠; NS 5N; N 5♥; S 4♥; NS 4♦; NS 4♣; Par +1430
West | North | East | South |
| | | 2 NT1 |
Pass | 3 ♣2 | Pass | 3 ♦3 |
Pass | 4 ♦4 | Pass | 4 ♠5 |
Pass | 4 NT6 | Pass | 5 ♦7 |
Pass | 5 ♥8 | Pass | 5 ♠9 |
Pass | 6 ♠10 | Pass | Pass |
Pass | | | |
- 20 to 21
- Puppet Stayman, asking for a 4- or 5-card major
- Alert, no 5-card major but one or more 4-card majors
- Artificial, showing two 4-card majors
- Showing four Spades
- RKC Blackwood for Spades
- 0 or 3 keycards
- Do you have the Queen of trump?
- Nope, sorry
- Let's play here
|
Contract | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
6 ♠ | S | 6 | 1430 | | 6.00 | 1.00 | 3-Kobida-Burns | 1-Brown-Felson |
6 ♠ | S | 6 | 1430 | | 6.00 | 1.00 | 4-Wiest-Runda | 3-Henry-Murdock |
6 ♠ | S | 6 | 1430 | | 6.00 | 1.00 | 8-Barron-Moskowitz | 2-Singerman-Pierce |
4 ♠ | S | 6 | 680 | | 3.50 | 3.50 | 1-Hoffman-Koster | 6-Brown-Temples |
4 ♠ | N | 6 | 680 | | 3.50 | 3.50 | 7-Ramsay-Magnus, Jr | 9-Cushman-Petersen |
4 ♠ | N | 5 | 650 | | 2.00 | 5.00 | 9-Kehoe-Stanley | 4-Kammer-Zimmer |
6 NT | S | −2 | | 200 | 0.50 | 6.50 | 2-Lammers-Dickman | 8-Tedrick-Pretz |
5 NT | S | −2 | | 200 | 0.50 | 6.50 | 5-Lin-Hubka | 5-Hall-Burnam |
For those of you who play 2 NT-3 NT as showing five Spades and four Hearts, be
careful about using that gadget on this hand. North's hand is a bit too good
to play in 3 NT if South passes your Flip-Flop Flannery bid. An interesting
solution is to bid 3 ♣, Puppet Stayman, treating your hand as if it's 4-4 in
the majors. When a major-suit fit is found, you can then use 4 NT, RKC
Blackwood, to continue.
N/S lose only the ♠ Q, making six. Nicely bid!
Board 16 West Deals E-W Vul |
♠ | Q 10 9 4 3 | ♥ | A 8 5 3 2 | ♦ | 3 2 | ♣ | 8 |
|
♠ | 6 2 | ♥ | K 4 | ♦ | 10 7 | ♣ | A J 9 7 5 3 2 |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | J 8 5 | ♥ | J | ♦ | K 8 6 4 | ♣ | K Q 10 6 4 |
|
|
|
♠ | A K 7 | ♥ | Q 10 9 7 6 | ♦ | A Q J 9 5 | ♣ | — |
|
NS 7♥; NS 6♠; NS 6♦; EW 2♣; Par +1510
West | North | East | South |
3 ♣ | Pass | 5 ♣1 | 6 ♣2 |
Dbl3 | 6 ♥4 | Pass | Pass |
Pass | | | |
- Correct bid even if vulnerable--where are the Hearts?
- Sexy bid. Partner can't get this wrong
- Methinks you aren't making 6 ♣!
- Obvious
|
Contract | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
4 ♥ | S | 7 | 510 | | 7.00 | 0.00 | 6-Freiberg-Freiberg | 6-Brown-Temples |
4 ♠ | N | 6 | 480 | | 5.00 | 2.00 | 1-Hoffman-Koster | 5-Hall-Burnam |
4 ♥ | S | 6 | 480 | | 5.00 | 2.00 | 2-Lammers-Dickman | 7-Diers-McCarthy |
5 ♥ | S | 6 | 480 | | 5.00 | 2.00 | 9-Kehoe-Stanley | 3-Henry-Murdock |
4 ♥ | N | 5 | 450 | | 3.00 | 4.00 | 3-Kobida-Burns | 9-Cushman-Petersen |
3 ♠ | N | 6 | 230 | | 2.00 | 5.00 | 5-Lin-Hubka | 4-Kammer-Zimmer |
4 ♣ | W | −2 | 200 | | 1.00 | 6.00 | 8-Barron-Moskowitz | 1-Brown-Felson |
3 ♦ | S | −1 | | 50 | 0.00 | 7.00 | 4-Wiest-Runda | 2-Singerman-Pierce |
South doesn't want to double 5 ♣, since slam in a non-Club suit has to be
making, so they invent a bid with 6 ♣. 7 ♥ is a bad contract needing to find
the ♥ K and the ♦ K onside to make. 6 ♥ is essentially laydown. If you're
playing N/S and you aren't in slam, you should blame your partner--it can't be
you, can it?
Board 17 North Deals None Vul |
♠ | J 10 4 | ♥ | J 9 5 | ♦ | Q J 5 3 2 | ♣ | 4 2 |
|
♠ | A K Q 5 | ♥ | A K Q | ♦ | A K 7 | ♣ | A Q 5 |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | 7 6 2 | ♥ | 10 8 7 4 3 | ♦ | 9 | ♣ | J 10 8 3 |
|
|
|
♠ | 9 8 3 | ♥ | 6 2 | ♦ | 10 8 6 4 | ♣ | K 9 7 6 |
|
EW 7♠; EW 7♥; EW 6♣; EW 5N; EW 3♦; Par −1510
West | North | East | South |
| Pass | Pass | Pass |
2 ♣1 | Pass | 2 ♥2 | Pass |
5 NT3 | Pass | 6 ♥4 | Pass |
Pass | Pass | | |
- Good lord!
- Alert, no A, K, or 2Q
- 30+ HCP
- To play (please don't say transfer, please don't say transfer, ...)
|
Contract | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
3 NT | W | 5 | | 460 | 7.00 | 0.00 | 2-Lammers-Dickman | 7-Diers-McCarthy |
3 NT | W | 6 | | 490 | 4.50 | 2.50 | 3-Kobida-Burns | 9-Cushman-Petersen |
3 NT | W | 6 | | 490 | 4.50 | 2.50 | 4-Wiest-Runda | 2-Singerman-Pierce |
3 NT | W | 6 | | 490 | 4.50 | 2.50 | 6-Freiberg-Freiberg | 6-Brown-Temples |
3 NT | W | 6 | | 490 | 4.50 | 2.50 | 8-Barron-Moskowitz | 1-Brown-Felson |
4 ♥ | W | 7 | | 510 | 2.00 | 5.00 | 1-Hoffman-Koster | 5-Hall-Burnam |
6 NT | W | 6 | | 990 | 1.00 | 6.00 | 5-Lin-Hubka | 4-Kammer-Zimmer |
6 ♥ | E | 7 | | 1010 | 0.00 | 7.00 | 9-Kehoe-Stanley | 3-Henry-Murdock |
Bidding theory doesn't really address how to bid 31 HCP hands. Some might
play Kokish relay (lecture coming soon....stay tuned), but that doesn't help
here when partner bids 2 ♥--a double negative showing limited values. 5 NT
seems like plenty, and East has an easy 6 ♥ correction. It's a really good
idea to talk with your partners about whether you still play transfers over
higher notrump bids in auctions such as this one. I recommend that you do.
Not much to the play with 7 ♥ making on the successful Club finesse(s).
Board 18 East Deals N-S Vul |
♠ | J 3 | ♥ | A Q 6 5 3 | ♦ | A K 9 5 | ♣ | 10 6 |
|
♠ | Q 10 8 2 | ♥ | 9 7 4 2 | ♦ | 8 4 | ♣ | A 9 7 |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | A K 7 4 | ♥ | K 10 8 | ♦ | 10 7 | ♣ | Q J 3 2 |
|
|
|
♠ | 9 6 5 | ♥ | J | ♦ | Q J 6 3 2 | ♣ | K 8 5 4 |
|
EW 2♠; NS 3♦; EW 1N; EW 1♣; Par +100: EW 3♠×−1
West | North | East | South |
| | 1 ♣ | Pass |
1 ♥ | Pass | 1 ♠ | Pass |
2 ♠ | Dbl1 | Pass | 3 ♦ |
Pass | Pass | 3 ♠ | Pass |
Pass | Pass | | |
- North didn't pick up their hand to play in 2 ♠
|
Contract | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
3 ♦ | N | 4 | 130 | | 7.00 | 0.00 | 8-Barron-Moskowitz | 1-Brown-Felson |
3 ♦ | S | 3 | 110 | | 6.00 | 1.00 | 4-Wiest-Runda | 2-Singerman-Pierce |
2 ♠ | E | −1 | 50 | | 4.00 | 3.00 | 2-Lammers-Dickman | 7-Diers-McCarthy |
2 ♠ | E | −1 | 50 | | 4.00 | 3.00 | 3-Kobida-Burns | 9-Cushman-Petersen |
2 ♥ | W | −1 | 50 | | 4.00 | 3.00 | 6-Freiberg-Freiberg | 6-Brown-Temples |
3 NT | N | −1 | | 100 | 2.00 | 5.00 | 1-Hoffman-Koster | 5-Hall-Burnam |
2 ♠ | E | 2 | | 110 | 1.00 | 6.00 | 5-Lin-Hubka | 4-Kammer-Zimmer |
2 ♠ | W | 3 | | 140 | 0.00 | 7.00 | 9-Kehoe-Stanley | 3-Henry-Murdock |
Talk over with your partner about how you'd play an immediate 2 ♥ bid by North
on this auction after West's 1 ♥ bid. I like to play it as natural, showing
nice Hearts and an opening hand. Why should West's 1 ♥ response take away my
natural bid? Can't they hold ♥ 5432? Sure they can! I also like to play that
a 2 ♣ bid by North in this same position is also natural. If you agree to play
this with your partner, don't forget to alert either bid.
E/W are happy to sacrifice in 3 ♠ on the vulnerability. It doesn't really
matter whether N/S double the final contract or not--it's still not going to
score well (+100 is not as good as +110....you can grab a calculator and check
that if you don't believe me). South will lead their singleton ♥ J, and N/S
collect two Diamonds, the ♥ A, and two Heart ruffs, down one.
Board 19 South Deals E-W Vul |
♠ | 9 7 4 | ♥ | K 9 | ♦ | A K Q 10 8 2 | ♣ | 5 4 |
|
♠ | A Q J 6 | ♥ | 8 7 | ♦ | J 7 6 5 4 | ♣ | K 2 |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | K 5 | ♥ | A 10 6 4 3 | ♦ | 3 | ♣ | A Q 10 7 6 |
|
|
|
♠ | 10 8 3 2 | ♥ | Q J 5 2 | ♦ | 9 | ♣ | J 9 8 3 |
|
EW 3♠; EW 3♥; EW 2N; EW 3♣; W 2♦; E 1♦; Par −140
West | North | East | South |
| | | Pass |
Pass | 1 ♦ | 1 ♥1 | Pass |
2 NT2 | Pass | 3 ♦3 | Pass |
3 ♠4 | Pass | Pass5 | Pass |
- Not right for Unusual 2 NT being mid-range (12-15 HCP)
- Showing 11 HCP and a Diamond stopper
- Check one more time on the quality of that stopper
- Not very good, but I do have four nice Spades
- Let's try that
|
Contract | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
4 ♥ | E | −2 | 200 | | 7.00 | 0.00 | 7-Ramsay-Magnus, Jr | 7-Diers-McCarthy |
3 ♥ | E | −1 | 100 | | 6.00 | 1.00 | 2-Lammers-Dickman | 6-Brown-Temples |
3 ♥ | E | 3 | | 140 | 5.00 | 2.00 | 9-Kehoe-Stanley | 2-Singerman-Pierce |
4 ♦ | N | −3 | | 150 | 4.00 | 3.00 | 3-Kobida-Burns | 8-Tedrick-Pretz |
3 NT | W | 3 | | 600 | 2.00 | 5.00 | 1-Hoffman-Koster | 4-Kammer-Zimmer |
3 NT | W | 3 | | 600 | 2.00 | 5.00 | 5-Lin-Hubka | 3-Henry-Murdock |
3 NT | W | 3 | | 600 | 2.00 | 5.00 | 6-Freiberg-Freiberg | 5-Hall-Burnam |
3 NT | W | 4 | | 630 | 0.00 | 7.00 | 4-Wiest-Runda | 1-Brown-Felson |
An Unusual 2 NT bid by East would show either a preemptive hand (5-11 HCP) or a
strong hand (16+ HCP or similar playing strength). East is in between those
bids, so they temporize with an overcall of 1 ♥. West shows an "almost opener"
with 2 NT, East asks them to recheck their Diamonds stopper, and West flinches.
3 ♠ will get all the matchpoints, although a 3 ♥ contract would also work on a
similar auction. E/W take four Spade tricks, one Heart trick, and four Club
tricks. North will most likely lead Diamonds. Wouldn't you?
Board 20 West Deals Both Vul |
♠ | A J 9 6 | ♥ | Q 10 8 6 3 | ♦ | 6 | ♣ | 10 4 3 |
|
♠ | K 7 4 2 | ♥ | J 2 | ♦ | K J 10 | ♣ | A K Q 7 |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | 10 8 | ♥ | A 7 5 4 | ♦ | 9 5 3 2 | ♣ | 9 8 5 |
|
|
|
♠ | Q 5 3 | ♥ | K 9 | ♦ | A Q 8 7 4 | ♣ | J 6 2 |
|
S 2N; S 2♠; NS 2♥; N 1N; N 1♠; NS 1♣; Par +120
West | North | East | South |
1 NT1 | Pass | Pass | Dbl2 |
Pass | Pass | Pass | |
Contract | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
1 NT | W | −2 | 200 | | 7.00 | 0.00 | 1-Hoffman-Koster | 4-Kammer-Zimmer |
2 ♥ | N | 2 | 110 | | 6.00 | 1.00 | 7-Ramsay-Magnus, Jr | 7-Diers-McCarthy |
3 NT | W | −1 | 100 | | 3.00 | 4.00 | 2-Lammers-Dickman | 6-Brown-Temples |
1 NT | W | −1 | 100 | | 3.00 | 4.00 | 4-Wiest-Runda | 1-Brown-Felson |
1 NT | W | −1 | 100 | | 3.00 | 4.00 | 5-Lin-Hubka | 3-Henry-Murdock |
1 NT | W | −1 | 100 | | 3.00 | 4.00 | 6-Freiberg-Freiberg | 5-Hall-Burnam |
1 NT | W | −1 | 100 | | 3.00 | 4.00 | 9-Kehoe-Stanley | 2-Singerman-Pierce |
2 ♥ | N | −1 | | 100 | 0.00 | 7.00 | 3-Kobida-Burns | 8-Tedrick-Pretz |
While DONT is a reasonable thing to play in the direct seat over a strong 1 NT
opening, it doesn't work as well in the balancing seat. Ideally, you'd like to
play a balancing double of 1 NT as "penalty oriented" showing around 11-14 HCP.
Partner can either pass the double or try and land in a suit contract with a
hand that doesn't look right to defend 1 NT.
N/S collect +500 on this hand after North leads a small Heart. E/W are limited
to four Club tricks and the ♥ A.
Board 21 North Deals N-S Vul |
♠ | 8 5 3 | ♥ | A J 10 | ♦ | K Q 10 3 | ♣ | 9 8 6 |
|
♠ | A K 4 | ♥ | K 9 8 4 | ♦ | A 5 | ♣ | J 10 7 2 |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | 9 7 2 | ♥ | 7 5 3 | ♦ | 9 8 6 4 2 | ♣ | A Q |
|
|
|
♠ | Q J 10 6 | ♥ | Q 6 2 | ♦ | J 7 | ♣ | K 5 4 3 |
|
NS 1N; NS 1♠; EW 1♥; NS 1♦; NS 1♣; Par +90
West | North | East | South |
| Pass | Pass | Pass |
1 NT1 | Pass | Pass | Pass |
Contract | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
3 NT | W | −3 | 150 | | 7.00 | 0.00 | 9-Kehoe-Stanley | 2-Singerman-Pierce |
3 NT | W | −2 | 100 | | 5.00 | 2.00 | 2-Lammers-Dickman | 6-Brown-Temples |
3 ♥ | W | −2 | 100 | | 5.00 | 2.00 | 5-Lin-Hubka | 3-Henry-Murdock |
3 ♣ | E | −2 | 100 | | 5.00 | 2.00 | 7-Ramsay-Magnus, Jr | 7-Diers-McCarthy |
1 NT | W | −1 | 50 | | 1.50 | 5.50 | 1-Hoffman-Koster | 4-Kammer-Zimmer |
1 NT | W | −1 | 50 | | 1.50 | 5.50 | 3-Kobida-Burns | 8-Tedrick-Pretz |
1 NT | W | −1 | 50 | | 1.50 | 5.50 | 4-Wiest-Runda | 1-Brown-Felson |
1 NT | W | −1 | 50 | | 1.50 | 5.50 | 6-Freiberg-Freiberg | 5-Hall-Burnam |
Not much to this one. With proper defense, N/S should easily beat 1 NT one
trick. E/W take two Spade tricks, one Diamond trick, and three Club tricks.
The ♠ 8 looks like a good lead on the auction--no majors have been bid, and
neither of North's red suits look like they want to be lead away from.
Board 22 East Deals E-W Vul |
♠ | K | ♥ | K 10 6 4 3 | ♦ | A K Q 4 | ♣ | A 10 2 |
|
♠ | 7 6 4 3 | ♥ | 9 5 | ♦ | J 10 3 2 | ♣ | 8 7 5 |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | J 10 8 | ♥ | A 8 7 | ♦ | 7 5 | ♣ | K Q 9 4 3 |
|
|
|
♠ | A Q 9 5 2 | ♥ | Q J 2 | ♦ | 9 8 6 | ♣ | J 6 |
|
NS 5N; NS 5♥; NS 4♠; NS 5♦; NS 2♣; Par +460
West | North | East | South |
| | Pass | Pass |
Pass | 1 ♥ | 2 ♣1 | 2 ♠2 |
Pass | 3 NT3 | Pass | Pass4 |
Pass | | | |
- Showing a hand very close to a full opener
- Showing 10-11 HCP and 5+ Spades
- 2 NT would not be forcing, so North bids game
- Without the ♣ J, South may very well correct to 4 ♥, but it's matchpoints so 3 NT seems right
|
Contract | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
3 NT | N | 6 | 490 | | 7.00 | 0.00 | 1-Hoffman-Koster | 3-Henry-Murdock |
5 ♥ | N | 6 | 480 | | 6.00 | 1.00 | 3-Kobida-Burns | 7-Diers-McCarthy |
3 NT | N | 5 | 460 | | 4.50 | 2.50 | 7-Ramsay-Magnus, Jr | 6-Brown-Temples |
3 NT | N | 5 | 460 | | 4.50 | 2.50 | 8-Barron-Moskowitz | 8-Tedrick-Pretz |
4 ♥ | N | 5 | 450 | | 2.50 | 4.50 | 2-Lammers-Dickman | 5-Hall-Burnam |
4 ♥ | N | 5 | 450 | | 2.50 | 4.50 | 4-Wiest-Runda | 9-Cushman-Petersen |
4 ♥ | N | 4 | 420 | | 0.50 | 6.50 | 5-Lin-Hubka | 2-Singerman-Pierce |
4 ♥ | N | 4 | 420 | | 0.50 | 6.50 | 6-Freiberg-Freiberg | 4-Kammer-Zimmer |
N/S collect four Heart tricks, three Diamonds tricks, two Spade tricks, and
two Club tricks after a Club lead. If East leads something besides the ♣ K,
N/S will easily make six.
Board 23 South Deals Both Vul |
♠ | A J 10 9 7 3 2 | ♥ | 8 6 | ♦ | Q 6 | ♣ | K 6 |
|
♠ | K Q 6 5 | ♥ | A Q 2 | ♦ | A K 8 | ♣ | A 8 7 |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | 4 | ♥ | J 10 | ♦ | 7 5 4 2 | ♣ | J 10 9 5 4 2 |
|
|
|
♠ | 8 | ♥ | K 9 7 5 4 3 | ♦ | J 10 9 3 | ♣ | Q 3 |
|
W 5N; E 4N; EW 4♣; EW 3♦; S 1♠; NS 1♥; Par −660
West | North | East | South |
| | | Pass1 |
2 ♣ | Pass | 2 ♥2 | Pass |
2 NT3 | Pass | 3 NT4 | Pass |
Pass | Pass | | |
- Fine for a non-vulnerable weak two bid, but not vulnerable
- Alert, no A, K, or 2Q
- 22-24 HCP
- Easily worth a raise to game
|
Contract | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
5 ♣ | W | −1 | 100 | | 7.00 | 0.00 | 6-Freiberg-Freiberg | 4-Kammer-Zimmer |
3 ♣ | W | 5 | | 150 | 6.00 | 1.00 | 2-Lammers-Dickman | 5-Hall-Burnam |
2 NT | W | 5 | | 210 | 5.00 | 2.00 | 1-Hoffman-Koster | 3-Henry-Murdock |
3 ♠× | N | −2 | | 500 | 4.00 | 3.00 | 7-Ramsay-Magnus, Jr | 6-Brown-Temples |
3 NT | W | 3 | | 600 | 3.00 | 4.00 | 3-Kobida-Burns | 7-Diers-McCarthy |
3 NT | W | 5 | | 660 | 1.50 | 5.50 | 4-Wiest-Runda | 9-Cushman-Petersen |
3 NT | W | 5 | | 660 | 1.50 | 5.50 | 5-Lin-Hubka | 2-Singerman-Pierce |
3 ♠× | N | −3 | | 800 | 0.00 | 7.00 | 8-Barron-Moskowitz | 8-Tedrick-Pretz |
With two or more stoppers in the side suits, West has plenty of time to set up
and enjoy dummy's Clubs. E/W take five Club tricks, two Diamonds, three
Hearts, and a Spade. North will probably lead the ♠ J (interior honor
sequence) to West's ♠ K. Declarer wins and plays ♣ A and another Club. A nice
play by North would be to throw the ♣ K under the ♣ A hoping to get partner in
the lead for a Spade through. Unfortunately, South doesn't have a second
Spade. Oh well, it was a nice thought.
Board 24 West Deals None Vul |
♠ | 10 8 6 5 | ♥ | J 8 | ♦ | K Q 9 8 | ♣ | 7 4 2 |
|
♠ | Q J | ♥ | Q 7 5 3 | ♦ | A J 4 3 | ♣ | A 10 9 |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | 7 4 3 | ♥ | K 10 9 6 4 | ♦ | 10 5 2 | ♣ | 8 6 |
|
|
|
♠ | A K 9 2 | ♥ | A 2 | ♦ | 7 6 | ♣ | K Q J 5 3 |
|
NS 4♠; NS 4♣; NS 1N; EW 1♥; NS 1♦; Par +420
West | North | East | South |
1 ♦ | Pass | Pass | Dbl |
Pass | 1 ♠ | Pass | 2 ♦1 |
Pass | 2 NT2 | Pass | 3 ♠3 |
Pass | Pass | Pass | |
- A double followed by a cuebid shows a hand approximately worth a 2 NT opener
- North shows the Diamond stopper(s) for notrump
- South shows delayed Spade support
|
Contract | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
4 ♥× | E | −2 | 300 | | 7.00 | 0.00 | 3-Kobida-Burns | 7-Diers-McCarthy |
3 ♣ | S | 5 | 150 | | 6.00 | 1.00 | 4-Wiest-Runda | 9-Cushman-Petersen |
3 ♠ | N | 3 | 140 | | 5.00 | 2.00 | 1-Hoffman-Koster | 3-Henry-Murdock |
2 ♣ | S | 4 | 130 | | 3.50 | 3.50 | 2-Lammers-Dickman | 5-Hall-Burnam |
2 ♣ | S | 4 | 130 | | 3.50 | 3.50 | 8-Barron-Moskowitz | 8-Tedrick-Pretz |
2 ♣ | S | 3 | 110 | | 1.50 | 5.50 | 5-Lin-Hubka | 2-Singerman-Pierce |
2 ♠ | N | 2 | 110 | | 1.50 | 5.50 | 6-Freiberg-Freiberg | 4-Kammer-Zimmer |
3 ♥ | E | −2 | 100 | | 0.00 | 7.00 | 7-Ramsay-Magnus, Jr | 6-Brown-Temples |
South borrows a King when making a balancing double, so for the rest of the
hand they'll bid as if they hold 20 HCP. North subtracts the same King and
bids like they have a two HCP. North doesn't have much reason to think 4 ♠
will make, so they pass South's 3 ♠ invitation.
Of course, the hand is magic, and N/S lose no Spades, one Heart, one Diamond,
and one Club. +170 will not be a bad score, but the N/S pairs who overbid will
get rewarded....this time. East will most likely lead the ♦ 2 on the auction.
Board 25 North Deals E-W Vul |
♠ | A Q J 5 4 | ♥ | K 8 3 | ♦ | 9 | ♣ | 8 4 3 2 |
|
♠ | 7 6 3 2 | ♥ | A J 9 2 | ♦ | J 10 3 | ♣ | A 5 |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | K 9 | ♥ | Q 10 7 5 | ♦ | A 6 4 2 | ♣ | J 9 7 |
|
|
|
♠ | 10 8 | ♥ | 6 4 | ♦ | K Q 8 7 5 | ♣ | K Q 10 6 |
|
NS 2♠; EW 2♥; NS 3♣; NS 1N; NS 1♦; Par +110
West | North | East | South |
| Pass | Pass | 1 ♦ |
Pass | 1 ♠ | Pass | 2 ♣ |
Pass | 2 ♠ | Pass | Pass |
Pass | | | |
Contract | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
3 ♥ | W | −2 | 200 | | 7.00 | 0.00 | 5-Lin-Hubka | 1-Brown-Felson |
2 ♠ | N | 2 | 110 | | 6.00 | 1.00 | 8-Barron-Moskowitz | 7-Diers-McCarthy |
1 NT | E | −1 | 100 | | 4.00 | 3.00 | 2-Lammers-Dickman | 4-Kammer-Zimmer |
1 NT | E | −1 | 100 | | 4.00 | 3.00 | 3-Kobida-Burns | 6-Brown-Temples |
2 ♥ | W | −1 | 100 | | 4.00 | 3.00 | 9-Kehoe-Stanley | 9-Cushman-Petersen |
Pass | | | Pass | | 1.50 | 5.50 | 4-Wiest-Runda | 8-Tedrick-Pretz |
Pass | | | Pass | | 1.50 | 5.50 | 6-Freiberg-Freiberg | 3-Henry-Murdock |
2 ♦ | S | −1 | | 50 | 0.00 | 7.00 | 7-Ramsay-Magnus, Jr | 5-Hall-Burnam |
South has a minimum 3rd seat opener, and it's hard not to open 1 ♦ with an
easy 2 ♣ rebid. Some North's might raise South's Clubs at their second turn,
which results in the same +110. East will most likely lead the ♥ 5 on the
auction. N/S lose one Spade, one Heart, one Diamond, one Club, and a Club
ruff. West wins the ♥ A and plays ♣ A and another Club. When East gets in
with the ♠ K, they cash the ♦ A and give partner a Club ruff.
Board 26 East Deals Both Vul |
♠ | J 8 6 4 | ♥ | 8 5 2 | ♦ | A J 2 | ♣ | 5 4 3 |
|
♠ | A K 5 3 2 | ♥ | K Q 10 6 | ♦ | 10 4 | ♣ | J 8 |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | Q 10 9 | ♥ | A 9 4 | ♦ | K 8 7 6 | ♣ | Q 9 7 |
|
|
|
♠ | 7 | ♥ | J 7 3 | ♦ | Q 9 5 3 | ♣ | A K 10 6 2 |
|
EW 4N; EW 4♠; EW 4♥; EW 1♦; NS 1♣; Par −630
West | North | East | South |
| | Pass | Pass |
1 ♠ | Pass | 2 ♣1 | Dbl2 |
4 ♠3 | Pass | Pass | Pass |
- Alert, Drury showing a 3- or 4-card limit raise in Spades
- Partner, please lead a Club
- 6-loser hand with no interest in slam
|
Contract | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
4 ♠ | W | −1 | 100 | | 5.00 | 2.00 | 4-Wiest-Runda | 8-Tedrick-Pretz |
4 ♠ | W | −1 | 100 | | 5.00 | 2.00 | 5-Lin-Hubka | 1-Brown-Felson |
4 ♠ | E | −1 | 100 | | 5.00 | 2.00 | 6-Freiberg-Freiberg | 3-Henry-Murdock |
4 ♠ | W | −1 | 100 | | 5.00 | 2.00 | 7-Ramsay-Magnus, Jr | 5-Hall-Burnam |
4 ♠ | W | −1 | 100 | | 5.00 | 2.00 | 9-Kehoe-Stanley | 9-Cushman-Petersen |
3 ♠ | W | 3 | | 140 | 1.00 | 6.00 | 2-Lammers-Dickman | 4-Kammer-Zimmer |
2 ♠ | W | 3 | | 140 | 1.00 | 6.00 | 3-Kobida-Burns | 6-Brown-Temples |
3 ♠ | W | 3 | | 140 | 1.00 | 6.00 | 8-Barron-Moskowitz | 7-Diers-McCarthy |
E/W lose one Diamond and two Clubs. North should lead the ♣ 4 (MUD). For
those who look at the West hand and see a minimum hand, try and picture a 10 or
11 HCP hand opposite with 3-card Spade support and limited values in Clubs
(Remember South's double?). It's hard to create a hand that doesn't have some
play in 4 ♠.
Board 27 South Deals None Vul |
♠ | A J 4 3 | ♥ | Q 7 2 | ♦ | 10 9 8 6 4 | ♣ | Q |
|
♠ | K 8 6 2 | ♥ | A 10 9 8 5 4 | ♦ | 5 | ♣ | J 2 |
| |
|
|
| ♠ | Q 9 7 5 | ♥ | K J | ♦ | K J 3 | ♣ | K 10 6 4 |
|
|
|
♠ | 10 | ♥ | 6 3 | ♦ | A Q 7 2 | ♣ | A 9 8 7 5 3 |
|
NS 4♦; EW 2♠; E 1N; EW 1♥; NS 1♣; Par +130
West | North | East | South |
| | | 1 ♣ |
1 ♥ | Dbl1 | Rdbl2 | Pass |
2 ♥ | Dbl3 | Rdbl4 | 3 ♦5 |
Pass | Pass | Pass | |
- Negative
- Rosenkrantz Redouble showing high honor doubleton in Hearts
- Do something intelligent for once, partner
- I like my hand and think this contract is making
- I wish I hadn't opened, but here's my second suit if that helps
|
Contract | Score | Matchpoints | Pair | Pair |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W |
4 ♠× | E | −3 | 500 | | 7.00 | 0.00 | 7-Ramsay-Magnus, Jr | 5-Hall-Burnam |
4 ♠ | E | −2 | 100 | | 5.50 | 1.50 | 3-Kobida-Burns | 6-Brown-Temples |
3 ♥ | W | −2 | 100 | | 5.50 | 1.50 | 6-Freiberg-Freiberg | 3-Henry-Murdock |
3 ♣ | S | −2 | | 100 | 3.50 | 3.50 | 2-Lammers-Dickman | 4-Kammer-Zimmer |
3 ♣ | S | −2 | | 100 | 3.50 | 3.50 | 5-Lin-Hubka | 1-Brown-Felson |
2 ♠ | E | 2 | | 110 | 1.00 | 6.00 | 4-Wiest-Runda | 8-Tedrick-Pretz |
2 ♥ | W | 2 | | 110 | 1.00 | 6.00 | 8-Barron-Moskowitz | 7-Diers-McCarthy |
2 ♠ | E | 2 | | 110 | 1.00 | 6.00 | 9-Kehoe-Stanley | 9-Cushman-Petersen |
West can't make a weak jump overcall at their first turn, since they have four
Spades. East has as many points as they'll ever hold on this auction. South
stretched for their first bid, but they feel obligated (as they should) to bid
3 ♦ which ends the auction. Declarer has to be very careful to wrap up nine
tricks, and a crossruff looks like their best chance. N/S take one Spade
trick, one Club trick, and seven ruffs. Nicely played!
West | North | East | South |
1 ♦ | Pass | 1 ♥ | Dbl1 |
Pass | 1 ♠ | 2 ♥ | Pass |
Pass | Pass | | |
- Full opener in support of the unbid suits
|
If South doesn't enter the auction, E/W will probably play in 3 ♥ after
1 ♦-1 ♥-2 ♣-3 ♥, but South has their double. E/W lose two Hearts and a Spade
on uninspired defense. The only way to hold E/W to three is to lead a Club.
When back in with a high Heart, South continues Clubs. When back in with the
second high Heart, South has to lead the ♦ K to prematurely kill dummy's entry.
There's no way now for E/W to enjoy dummy's good Clubs, since North still has
a trump. Awesome defense!
West | North | East | South |
| 1 ♣ | 1 ♦ | 2 ♦1 |
Pass | 3 ♦2 | Pass | 4 ♣3 |
Pass | Pass | Pass | |
- Limit raise or better in Clubs
- Do you have a Diamond stopper to help in a notrump contract?
- Nope
|
N/S fish for a 3 NT contract and come up empty. ♦ KQ tight is not a very good
stopper, whereas ♦ KQx would be fine (i.e., declarer can hold up an extra round
if necessary). It turns out that Diamonds aren't the danger suit--Spades are.
N/S lose one Spade, one Heart, and one Diamond.
West | North | East | South |
| | 1 ♦ | Pass |
1 ♥ | Pass | 2 ♣ | Pass |
2 ♥ | Dbl1 | Pass | 2 NT |
Pass | Pass | Pass | |
- North feels like the auction is about to end, so they pre-balance
|
South has no better bid after North's delayed takeout double than 2 NT. N/S
take four Spade tricks (it shouldn't be hard to place the ♠ Q in East's hand),
one Heart, one Diamond, and two Clubs. If South chooses to pass the double,
N/S will collect +300. Not an easy pass on the vulnerability.
West | North | East | South |
| | | 1 ♥ |
1 ♠ | 2 ♥ | 2 ♠ | 3 ♥ |
3 ♠ | Dbl1 | Pass | Pass |
Pass | | | |
North, unwilling to bid on, happily doubles E/W's Spade contract. E/W lose
two Diamonds, one Heart, and two Spades when West gets "tapped" in Hearts
(i.e., has to ruff one to many times to maintain trump control).
West | North | East | South |
1 ♠ | Pass | Pass | 1 NT1 |
Pass | Pass | Pass | |
South's 1 NT in the "pass out" or balancing seat shows 11 to 14 HCP. Nobody
has anything else to say, so the auction ends there. West doesn't open 1 NT
because of their weak doubleton in Hearts. N/S take three Spade tricks, two
Heart tricks, one Diamond, and one Club.
West | North | East | South |
| Pass | Pass | 2 ♣ |
Pass | 2 ♦1 | Pass | 2 NT2 |
Pass | 3 ♣3 | Pass | 3 ♦4 |
Pass | 3 NT5 | Pass | Pass |
Pass | | | |
- Game forcing showing an A, K, or 2Q
- 22-24 HCP
- Puppet Stayman, asking for a 4- or 5-card major
- No 5-card major, but one or more 4-card majors
- No reason to play in Club unless interested in a slam
|
6 ♣ would not be a good slam, so N/S are content to play in notrump. N/S take
two Spades, one Heart, two Diamonds, and six Club tricks. If West leads a
small Heart, N/S make six. Best lead is probably the ♦ Q.
West | North | East | South |
| | 1 ♣ | 1 ♥ |
2 ♦ | Pass1 | 3 ♦ | Pass |
Pass | Pass | | |
- The right shape for a Snapdragon Double, but a bit low on points
|
West feels like they've shown their hand with their first bid, so they let it
go in 3 ♦. E/W lose one Heart, one Diamond, and one Club. North will lead the
♥T.
West | North | East | South |
| | | Pass |
2 ♦ | Dbl | Pass | 3 ♥1 |
Pass | 4 ♥ | Pass | Pass |
Pass | | | |
- Showing 10-11 HCP and 5+ Hearts
|
N/S lose two Diamonds. Another way to look at it is that N/S take five Heart
tricks, one Spade trick, and five Club tricks--making 5 ♥. West will lead the
♦ K, East will overtake with the ♦ A, return a Diamonds, but when East can't
overruff dummy's ♥ 7, the hand is over.
West | North | East | South |
1 ♦ | Pass | 1 ♥ | Pass |
2 NT | Pass | 3 ♦1 | Pass |
3 ♠2 | Pass | 4 ♠ | Pass |
Pass | Pass | | |
- Checkback, asking about East's major suits
- Showing four Spades--does not deny three Hearts
|
East, while holding very few HCP, has a strong hand on the auction. Remember,
West opened 1 ♦ which improved East's hand. East checks for a major-suit fit
and happily bids game. E/W lose two Spades and a Heart. North will lead the
♦ Q, and declarer has to carefully win it in dummy with the ♦ K before cashing
the ♠ A, playing off the ♣ AK (pitching Diamonds), and exiting with a second
Spade. South has no more Spades for a ruff, and the hand is over.