EVENT>Tuesday Morning Pairs    |SESSION>Tuesday Morn |SECTION> A N-S
------------------------,------ ------------,-------- --------------------------
DATE>January 13, 2015   |CLUB NO.>112318    | 01/13/2015 15:35
---------------------,-- ------------------- -------------,---------------------
DIR> Helen Ogle      |RATING>Junior Fund                  |MOVEMENT>MITCHELL
------------,-------- ,-------------------------,--------- ---------------------
AVE>   84.0 |TOP>   6 |MP LIMITS>None/1500/500  |CLUB>ANDERSON BRIDGE CLUB
------------ --------- ------------------------- -------------------------------
PAIRS IN STRAT A=8/B=3/C=1                                       ,---,-----------------,-------------------------,------,---------,
-----------------------------------------------------------------|   |      Overall    |           Section       |      |Final    |
No         Name                           Name                   |Flt|Rnk-A|Rnk-B|Rnk-C|Rnk-A|Rnk-B|Rnk-C| Score | Pct  |Awards   |
----------------------------------------------------------------- --- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------- ------ ---------
 1 L208591 Jacqueline Meyers      Q589860 Michele Staats           A   .     .     .   |   .     .     .     72.46  43.13
 2 2755661  Latham                R861580 Richard Day              A   .     .     .   |   3     .     .     87.19  51.90  0.66(SA)
 3 1424319 Terry RUF              5662206 Kay Weyrick              C   .     .     .   |   .     .     .     71.39  42.49
 4 O146902 Doris Kehoe            5589711 Patrick Lammers          B   .     .     .   |   .     .     .     78.49  46.72
 5 P654839 Ray Wulf               3296008 Nancy Dever              A   .     .     .   |   .     .     .     75.63  45.02
 6 5162246 Bill Atteberry         O158161 Ray Tolston              B   1     1     .   |   1     1     .    108.55  64.61  2.63(OA)
 7 P974426 Lou Campbell           K399717 Dorothy Wierwille        A   3     .     .   |   2     .     .     93.69  55.77  1.48(OA)

                                                          Totals                                            587.40

------------------------------- --------------------- --------------------
EVENT>Tuesday Morning Pairs    |SESSION>Tuesday Morn |SECTION> A E-W
------------------------------- --------------------- --------------------
PAIRS IN STRAT A=8/B=7/C=4                                       ,---,-----------------,-------------------------,------,---------,
-----------------------------------------------------------------|   |      Overall    |           Section       |      |Final    |
No         Name                           Name                   |Flt|Rnk-A|Rnk-B|Rnk-C|Rnk-A|Rnk-B|Rnk-C| Score | Pct  |Awards   |
----------------------------------------------------------------- --- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------- ------ ---------
 1 8144710 Cynthia Schultz        8661235 Jean Allread             B   4     2     .   |   2     1     .     91.36  54.38  1.11(OA)
 2 O869963 Barbara Wagner         O377645 JOHN Jensen              A   2     .     .   |   1     .     .     94.06  55.99  1.97(OA)
 3 3865649 M Snoke                        Geo. Ahlrichs            C   5     3     1   |   3     2     1     89.55  53.30  0.95(OC)
 4 1865595 Pat Holm                       Barb Curry               C   .     .     .   |   .     .     .     76.49  45.53
 5 3626245 Jan Willenborg         7402082 MARY CULLEN              C   .     4     2   |   .     3     2     85.47  50.88  0.71(OC)
 6 3733734 Betsy Bradley          1735489 Gretchen Sherman         B   .     .     .   |   .     .     .     82.52  49.12
 7 Q523053 Jane Burpee            1865641 Micky Dasenbrock         B   .     .     .   |   .     .     .     84.25  50.15
 8         CONNIE DETTMER                 JOHN DETTMER             C   .     .     .   |   .     .     .     70.26  41.82
                                                          Totals                                            673.96

Tuesday Morning Pairs, Tuesday Morn, January 13, 2015

Board 1
North Deals
None Vul
K Q 5
Q 9 7 4 3
Q J 6
Q 4
J 9 7 2
J 10 8
A 8 5 4
9 3
N
WE
S
A 10 6 3
5 2
K 9 7 2
A 6 2
12
6    11
11
8 4
A K 6
10 3
K J 10 8 7 5

NS 3; EW 2; NS 3; NS 1N; EW 2; Par +100: EW 3×−1

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 N54505.330.675-Wulf-Dever vs 8-DETTMER-DETTMER
4 N54505.330.677-Campbell-Wierwille vs 5-Willenborg-CULLEN
3 N31403.582.424-Kehoe-Lammers vs 6-Bradley-Sherman
2 S41302.423.583-RUF-Weyrick vs 4-Holm-Curry
4 N−1501.254.751-Meyers-Staats vs 1-Schultz-Allread
4 N−21000.085.926-Atteberry-Tolston vs 3-Snoke-Ahlrichs

Board 2
East Deals
N-S Vul
K 2
A Q 7 6
7 5 3
9 8 7 4
Q 7 4 3
K 2
A Q 9 6
K J 10
N
WE
S
A 9 6
J 10 8 3
10 8 2
A 6 2
9
15    9
7
J 10 8 5
9 5 4
K J 4
Q 5 3

EW 4N; W 4; EW 3; E 3; EW 4; EW 3; Par −430

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 NTW−1505.330.674-Kehoe-Lammers vs 6-Bradley-Sherman
3 NTW−1505.330.676-Atteberry-Tolston vs 3-Snoke-Ahlrichs
1 NTE1903.582.425-Wulf-Dever vs 8-DETTMER-DETTMER
2 NTW31502.423.581-Meyers-Staats vs 1-Schultz-Allread
2 NTW41801.254.753-RUF-Weyrick vs 4-Holm-Curry
3 NTW34000.085.927-Campbell-Wierwille vs 5-Willenborg-CULLEN

Board 3
South Deals
E-W Vul
A 8 2
Q 5 2
9 7 6 4 3
Q 4
7 3
A J 10 3
Q J 2
10 7 6 2
N
WE
S
K Q 9 6 4
K 8
8 5
A J 9 3
8
8    13
11
J 10 5
9 7 6 4
A K 10
K 8 5

EW 2; EW 3; EW 1N; EW 1; N 1; Par −110

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 N31105.920.086-Atteberry-Tolston vs 3-Snoke-Ahlrichs
1 NTW−11004.751.253-RUF-Weyrick vs 4-Holm-Curry
2 N−1503.582.425-Wulf-Dever vs 8-DETTMER-DETTMER
1 NTW1901.834.171-Meyers-Staats vs 1-Schultz-Allread
1 NTW1901.834.177-Campbell-Wierwille vs 5-Willenborg-CULLEN
2 E31400.085.924-Kehoe-Lammers vs 6-Bradley-Sherman

Board 4
West Deals
Both Vul
K J
Q J 7 2
A 9 5
J 10 9 5
5 4 3
K 8 5
10 8 7 4 2
6 2
N
WE
S
10 7 6
10 6 4
Q J 3
8 7 4 3
12
3    3
22
A Q 9 8 2
A 9 3
K 6
A K Q

NS 7; NS 6N; NS 6; NS 6; NS 3; Par +2140

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
6 NTN614404.171.831-Meyers-Staats vs 1-Schultz-Allread
6 NTN614404.171.835-Wulf-Dever vs 8-DETTMER-DETTMER
6 NTN614404.171.836-Atteberry-Tolston vs 3-Snoke-Ahlrichs
6 NTN614404.171.837-Campbell-Wierwille vs 5-Willenborg-CULLEN
6 S614301.254.754-Kehoe-Lammers vs 6-Bradley-Sherman
4 S66800.085.923-RUF-Weyrick vs 4-Holm-Curry

Board 5
North Deals
N-S Vul
J 10 6 5 4 3
Q
10 8 6 3
5 2
A Q 9
A 10 8 6 4
K Q 8 7 4
N
WE
S
8 7
K J 9 5 2
J 5
J 10 6 3
3
15    6
16
K 2
7 3
A K Q 9 7 4 2
A 9

EW 6; EW 5; NS 2; NS 3; Par −980

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 E64803.003.001-Meyers-Staats vs 8-DETTMER-DETTMER
4 W64803.003.002-Latham-Day vs 2-Wagner-Jensen
5 W64803.003.004-Kehoe-Lammers vs 5-Willenborg-CULLEN
4 W64803.003.005-Wulf-Dever vs 7-Burpee-Dasenbrock
5 E64803.003.006-Atteberry-Tolston vs 1-Schultz-Allread
5 E64803.003.007-Campbell-Wierwille vs 4-Holm-Curry

Board 6
East Deals
E-W Vul
A 9 4 2
Q 6 3 2
A 10 7 4 3
K J 8 7 6
K
K 5
Q 9 6 5 2
N
WE
S
5
A 9
A Q 10 9 7 6 4 2
K J
10
12    14
4
Q 10 3
J 10 8 7 5 4
J 8 3
8

EW 5N; NS 4; EW 4; NS 1; EW 1; Par −300: NS 6×−2

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
5 S54505.920.081-Meyers-Staats vs 8-DETTMER-DETTMER
4 W−33004.751.257-Campbell-Wierwille vs 4-Holm-Curry
5 E−11003.003.005-Wulf-Dever vs 7-Burpee-Dasenbrock
5 E−11003.003.006-Atteberry-Tolston vs 1-Schultz-Allread
5 ×S−11001.254.754-Kehoe-Lammers vs 5-Willenborg-CULLEN
5 ×E57500.085.922-Latham-Day vs 2-Wagner-Jensen

Board 7
South Deals
Both Vul
K Q J
Q 9 7 5 3
J 9 3 2
9
10 9 4
K 10 2
K 8 5
7 5 4 2
N
WE
S
A 5 3 2
8 6
7 4
A K 8 6 3
9
6    11
14
8 7 6
A J 4
A Q 10 6
Q J 10

NS 3; NS 3; NS 1N; EW 2; EW 1; Par +140

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 N31405.330.671-Meyers-Staats vs 8-DETTMER-DETTMER
2 N31405.330.674-Kehoe-Lammers vs 5-Willenborg-CULLEN
2 S31103.003.006-Atteberry-Tolston vs 1-Schultz-Allread
2 S31103.003.007-Campbell-Wierwille vs 4-Holm-Curry
4 N−11000.675.332-Latham-Day vs 2-Wagner-Jensen
4 N−11000.675.335-Wulf-Dever vs 7-Burpee-Dasenbrock

Board 8
West Deals
None Vul
K Q 6
6 5 4 2
2
10 8 7 4 2
10 9 5 2
A K Q J 3
K
Q 9 6
N
WE
S
8 3
9 8 7
A J 10 8 7 5
A 3
5
15    9
11
A J 7 4
10
Q 9 6 4 3
K J 5

EW 3; EW 2N; EW 1; EW 1; NS 1; Par −140

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 W−21005.920.086-Atteberry-Tolston vs 1-Schultz-Allread
4 W−1504.171.835-Wulf-Dever vs 7-Burpee-Dasenbrock
3 W−1504.171.837-Campbell-Wierwille vs 4-Holm-Curry
3 S−21002.423.582-Latham-Day vs 2-Wagner-Jensen
3 W31400.675.331-Meyers-Staats vs 8-DETTMER-DETTMER
3 W31400.675.334-Kehoe-Lammers vs 5-Willenborg-CULLEN

Board 9
North Deals
E-W Vul
J 10 3
Q 9 8 6 5
A 6 3
9 8
A Q 9 5
A 7 3
Q J 10 9 8 7
N
WE
S
K 8 7 6 2
K 4 2
2
A 7 6 2
7
13    10
10
4
J 10
K 5 4
K Q J 10 5 4 3

EW 6; EW 4; EW 2N; EW 2; NS 1; Par −1400: NS 7×−6

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 E−11005.330.676-Atteberry-Tolston vs 8-DETTMER-DETTMER
4 E−11005.330.677-Campbell-Wierwille vs 2-Wagner-Jensen
4 W51503.003.002-Latham-Day vs 1-Schultz-Allread
4 S−31503.003.003-RUF-Weyrick vs 3-Snoke-Ahlrichs
4 E46201.254.751-Meyers-Staats vs 7-Burpee-Dasenbrock
4 E56500.085.925-Wulf-Dever vs 6-Bradley-Sherman

Board 10
East Deals
Both Vul
A 10 6 5 4
10 9 3
Q 4 3
7 4
K J 7
K 7 2
A K 9
A Q 9 2
N
WE
S
Q 3 2
J 6
J 8 6
K J 8 5 3
6
20    8
6
9 8
A Q 8 5 4
10 7 5 2
10 6

EW 4; EW 2N; EW 2; EW 1; NS 1; Par −130

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTW36004.751.252-Latham-Day vs 1-Schultz-Allread
3 NTW36004.751.256-Atteberry-Tolston vs 8-DETTMER-DETTMER
3 NTW36004.751.257-Campbell-Wierwille vs 2-Wagner-Jensen
3 NTW46301.254.751-Meyers-Staats vs 7-Burpee-Dasenbrock
3 NTW46301.254.753-RUF-Weyrick vs 3-Snoke-Ahlrichs
3 NTW46301.254.755-Wulf-Dever vs 6-Bradley-Sherman

Board 11
South Deals
None Vul
K 8
Q 10 5
A Q J 7 6 4
J 5
10 9 5
J 3
K 10 9 5 3
Q 7 4
N
WE
S
A Q 6 4 2
A 9 7 4
A 6 3 2
13
6    14
7
J 7 3
K 8 6 2
8 2
K 10 9 8

EW 3; W 1N; E 2; NS 1; NS 1; W 1; Par −140

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 E−21005.800.205-Wulf-Dever vs 6-Bradley-Sherman
4 E−1503.702.301-Meyers-Staats vs 7-Burpee-Dasenbrock
3 E−1503.702.307-Campbell-Wierwille vs 2-Wagner-Jensen
PassAVE-AVE+2.403.603-RUF-Weyrick vs 3-Snoke-Ahlrichs
3 E31401.604.402-Latham-Day vs 1-Schultz-Allread
4 ×N−23000.205.806-Atteberry-Tolston vs 8-DETTMER-DETTMER

Board 12
West Deals
N-S Vul
A 8 4 3
A J 10 9 6 3
9 8 3
Q J 6 5
2
Q 8 4 2
A J 7 4
N
WE
S
K 10 9
A K 9 8 7 6
7
K 10 6
9
10    13
8
7 2
Q J 10 5 4 3
K 5
Q 5 2

EW 3; EW 2; EW 3; EW 1N; Par −140

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 ×E−11005.920.082-Latham-Day vs 1-Schultz-Allread
3 E−1504.171.836-Atteberry-Tolston vs 8-DETTMER-DETTMER
2 E−1504.171.837-Campbell-Wierwille vs 2-Wagner-Jensen
2 E21101.834.171-Meyers-Staats vs 7-Burpee-Dasenbrock
2 E21101.834.173-RUF-Weyrick vs 3-Snoke-Ahlrichs
3 N−22000.085.925-Wulf-Dever vs 6-Bradley-Sherman

Board 13
North Deals
Both Vul
J 9 8 7 6
K 3
Q J
A K J 6
K Q 10 3
Q J 9 2
4 3
9 5 3
N
WE
S
5 4
10
10 9 8 6 5
Q 10 8 7 4
15
8    2
15
A 2
A 8 7 6 5 4
A K 7 2
2

NS 5; N 4N; NS 4; S 3N; NS 3; NS 3; Par +650

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 S56505.330.671-Meyers-Staats vs 6-Bradley-Sherman
5 S56505.330.674-Kehoe-Lammers vs 4-Holm-Curry
3 NTS46303.003.002-Latham-Day vs 8-DETTMER-DETTMER
3 NTN46303.003.006-Atteberry-Tolston vs 7-Burpee-Dasenbrock
3 NTN36000.675.333-RUF-Weyrick vs 2-Wagner-Jensen
3 NTN36000.675.337-Campbell-Wierwille vs 1-Schultz-Allread

Board 14
East Deals
None Vul
9 4
K Q J 10 7
K 9 7 3
A 7
Q 6
9 4
J 8 2
K Q 6 4 3 2
N
WE
S
A K 7 5 3
8 6 5 3
A 5
J 9
13
8    12
7
J 10 8 2
A 2
Q 10 6 4
10 8 5

NS 3; NS 3; EW 3; Par +100: EW 4×−1

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 N31405.920.082-Latham-Day vs 8-DETTMER-DETTMER
2 E−21004.171.833-RUF-Weyrick vs 2-Wagner-Jensen
2 E−21004.171.837-Campbell-Wierwille vs 1-Schultz-Allread
2 E−1502.423.586-Atteberry-Tolston vs 7-Burpee-Dasenbrock
4 N−1501.254.751-Meyers-Staats vs 6-Bradley-Sherman
3 W41300.085.924-Kehoe-Lammers vs 4-Holm-Curry

Board 15
South Deals
N-S Vul
K 10 9 6
10 7 5 3
A
K 7 3 2
8 4 2
Q 6 2
9 8 7 6
A J 9
N
WE
S
A
K J
K J 10 3 2
10 8 6 5 4
10
7    12
11
Q J 7 5 3
A 9 8 4
Q 5 4
Q

NS 3; NS 3; EW 3; NS 1N; EW 2; Par +100: EW 4×−1

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 S46205.920.087-Campbell-Wierwille vs 1-Schultz-Allread
3 S31403.003.001-Meyers-Staats vs 6-Bradley-Sherman
3 S31403.003.003-RUF-Weyrick vs 2-Wagner-Jensen
3 S31403.003.004-Kehoe-Lammers vs 4-Holm-Curry
3 S31403.003.006-Atteberry-Tolston vs 7-Burpee-Dasenbrock
4 S−11000.085.922-Latham-Day vs 8-DETTMER-DETTMER

Board 16
West Deals
E-W Vul
A Q 9 8 6
A 9
A 10 8 6 4
2
K 3
8 6 2
K Q 7 5
J 9 5 3
N
WE
S
J 7 5 2
K Q 5
J 2
K Q 7 6
14
9    12
5
10 4
J 10 7 4 3
9 3
A 10 8 4

N 3; NS 2; S 2; NS 1N; NS 2; EW 1; Par +140

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 N44205.920.086-Atteberry-Tolston vs 7-Burpee-Dasenbrock
3 E−22004.751.254-Kehoe-Lammers vs 4-Holm-Curry
1 N31401.834.171-Meyers-Staats vs 6-Bradley-Sherman
1 N31401.834.172-Latham-Day vs 8-DETTMER-DETTMER
1 N31401.834.173-RUF-Weyrick vs 2-Wagner-Jensen
1 N31401.834.177-Campbell-Wierwille vs 1-Schultz-Allread

Board 17
North Deals
None Vul
A 10 6 4
A K 5
9 7
A 10 9 2
5 3
Q 10 8 3
K J 8
K J 5 4
N
WE
S
K J 8 2
9 7 4 2
10 6 3 2
Q
15
10    6
9
Q 9 7
J 6
A Q 5 4
8 7 6 3

S 2N; NS 2; N 1N; NS 2; EW 1; NS 1; Par +120

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 NTN21205.920.087-Campbell-Wierwille vs 8-DETTMER-DETTMER
1 NTN1904.751.253-RUF-Weyrick vs 1-Schultz-Allread
2 NTN−1502.423.581-Meyers-Staats vs 4-Holm-Curry
2 NTN−1502.423.584-Kehoe-Lammers vs 3-Snoke-Ahlrichs
2 NTN−1502.423.585-Wulf-Dever vs 5-Willenborg-CULLEN
3 NTN−31500.085.922-Latham-Day vs 7-Burpee-Dasenbrock

Board 18
East Deals
N-S Vul
A 10 9
9 6 4 2
Q 8 4
J 8 5
8 6 3
K 5 3
A K 10 6 3
Q 4
N
WE
S
Q 7 5
Q J 10 7
7 2
10 9 7 2
7
12    5
16
K J 4 2
A 8
J 9 5
A K 6 3

NS 3; NS 2N; NS 3; NS 1; NS 1; Par +140

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
1 NTS21204.751.252-Latham-Day vs 7-Burpee-Dasenbrock
1 NTS21204.751.254-Kehoe-Lammers vs 3-Snoke-Ahlrichs
1 NTS21204.751.255-Wulf-Dever vs 5-Willenborg-CULLEN
2 W−21001.834.173-RUF-Weyrick vs 1-Schultz-Allread
2 W−21001.834.177-Campbell-Wierwille vs 8-DETTMER-DETTMER
2 W−1500.085.921-Meyers-Staats vs 4-Holm-Curry

Board 19
South Deals
E-W Vul
A J 10 7 5
Q 9 8 3
9 8
10 7
Q 8 4 3 2
10 7 6
A 7 6
Q 2
N
WE
S
K 9
J 4 2
Q 5 3 2
A K 5 4
7
8    13
12
6
A K 5
K J 10 4
J 9 8 6 3

N 2N; NS 2; S 1N; NS 2; NS 1; NS 1; Par +120

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTS34005.920.081-Meyers-Staats vs 4-Holm-Curry
2 NTS31504.751.252-Latham-Day vs 7-Burpee-Dasenbrock
3 S31103.582.424-Kehoe-Lammers vs 3-Snoke-Ahlrichs
2 S2901.834.175-Wulf-Dever vs 5-Willenborg-CULLEN
2 S2901.834.177-Campbell-Wierwille vs 8-DETTMER-DETTMER
3 N−1500.085.923-RUF-Weyrick vs 1-Schultz-Allread

Board 20
West Deals
Both Vul
9 7 5
10 9 4 2
Q 10 4 3 2
J
K 4 2
K J 3
7 5
A K 7 5 3
N
WE
S
Q J 8 6
7 5
K 6
Q 10 6 4 2
3
14    8
15
A 10 3
A Q 8 6
A J 9 8
9 8

E 4; EW 2; NS 2; W 3; E 1N; NS 2; Par −130

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 S31105.920.082-Latham-Day vs 7-Burpee-Dasenbrock
3 N−11004.751.251-Meyers-Staats vs 4-Holm-Curry
2 E21103.003.004-Kehoe-Lammers vs 3-Snoke-Ahlrichs
2 W31103.003.007-Campbell-Wierwille vs 8-DETTMER-DETTMER
3 W41301.254.755-Wulf-Dever vs 5-Willenborg-CULLEN
1 NTW52100.085.923-RUF-Weyrick vs 1-Schultz-Allread

Board 21
North Deals
N-S Vul
A Q 8 6 5
Q J 6 5
Q
K 8 6
J 10 9 4 2
A 10
A K
A 7 3 2
N
WE
S
7 3
K 4
8 7 6 4 3 2
Q 10 5
14
16    5
5
K
9 8 7 3 2
J 10 9 5
J 9 4

NS 3; EW 1N; EW 2; EW 1; EW 1; Par +140

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTW−31505.920.084-Kehoe-Lammers vs 2-Wagner-Jensen
2 S21104.751.252-Latham-Day vs 5-Willenborg-CULLEN
3 E−1503.003.003-RUF-Weyrick vs 8-DETTMER-DETTMER
3 E−1503.003.006-Atteberry-Tolston vs 6-Bradley-Sherman
2 E31101.254.751-Meyers-Staats vs 3-Snoke-Ahlrichs
2 NTW21200.085.925-Wulf-Dever vs 4-Holm-Curry

Board 22
East Deals
E-W Vul
A J 7 3
Q J 7
K J 7 3
Q 4
K 8 6 4
2
A Q 9 6 5 2
9 5
N
WE
S
Q 5
A K 10 6 4
J 10 8 7 6 3
14
9    10
7
10 9 2
9 8 5 3
10 8 4
A K 2

NS 1N; EW 2; N 1; EW 1; Par −90

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTE−33005.920.085-Wulf-Dever vs 4-Holm-Curry
3 W−22004.751.254-Kehoe-Lammers vs 2-Wagner-Jensen
2 S−21003.582.426-Atteberry-Tolston vs 6-Bradley-Sherman
2 E21102.423.583-RUF-Weyrick vs 8-DETTMER-DETTMER
4 E41300.675.331-Meyers-Staats vs 3-Snoke-Ahlrichs
3 E41300.675.332-Latham-Day vs 5-Willenborg-CULLEN

Board 23
South Deals
Both Vul
A 6
K 4
A J 10 9 7 4 2
K 10
K Q J 10 8
A 7
K Q 5
A J 4
N
WE
S
7 3
Q J 10 9 3 2
6
Q 6 5 3
15
20    5
0
9 5 4 2
8 6 5
8 3
9 8 7 2

W 4; W 3N; E 3; EW 2; W 3; E 2; NS 1; Par −620

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTW−44005.920.086-Atteberry-Tolston vs 6-Bradley-Sherman
3 NTW−11004.751.253-RUF-Weyrick vs 8-DETTMER-DETTMER
3 N−11003.582.422-Latham-Day vs 5-Willenborg-CULLEN
3 NTW36002.423.585-Wulf-Dever vs 4-Holm-Curry
4 W46200.675.331-Meyers-Staats vs 3-Snoke-Ahlrichs
4 W46200.675.334-Kehoe-Lammers vs 2-Wagner-Jensen

Board 24
West Deals
None Vul
A Q 10 7
A J 7 5 2
8 7
Q 5
K 4 3
3
Q 10
A J 10 9 8 7 4
N
WE
S
J 9 5 2
8 4
A 9 6 4 2
6 2
13
10    5
12
8 6
K Q 10 9 6
K J 5 3
K 3

NS 5; NS 2N; NS 2; NS 2; W 2; E 1; Par +450

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 S54504.171.831-Meyers-Staats vs 3-Snoke-Ahlrichs
4 N54504.171.832-Latham-Day vs 5-Willenborg-CULLEN
4 N54504.171.833-RUF-Weyrick vs 8-DETTMER-DETTMER
4 S54504.171.836-Atteberry-Tolston vs 6-Bradley-Sherman
4 S44200.675.334-Kehoe-Lammers vs 2-Wagner-Jensen
4 S44200.675.335-Wulf-Dever vs 4-Holm-Curry

Board 25
North Deals
E-W Vul
5 4
A J 7 2
10 7 5 3
Q 10 3
A 10
K Q 10 6
K 2
A J 9 7 5
N
WE
S
J 8 7 3 2
8 4
A Q J
6 4 2
7
17    8
8
K Q 9 6
9 5 3
9 8 6 4
K 8

EW 2N; EW 2; EW 3; EW 1; EW 1; Par −120

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTW−22006.000.007-Campbell-Wierwille vs 7-Burpee-Dasenbrock
3 NTE−11004.002.002-Latham-Day vs 4-Holm-Curry
3 W−11004.002.005-Wulf-Dever vs 3-Snoke-Ahlrichs
3 W−11004.002.006-Atteberry-Tolston vs 5-Willenborg-CULLEN
3 W31102.004.003-RUF-Weyrick vs 6-Bradley-Sherman
1 NTW31501.005.001-Meyers-Staats vs 2-Wagner-Jensen
3 NTW46300.006.004-Kehoe-Lammers vs 1-Schultz-Allread

Board 26
East Deals
Both Vul
Q J 8 4
A 6
K Q 8 2
10 9 8
10 7
J 8 7
7 6 5 4
K Q J 4
N
WE
S
6
K Q 10 9 5 3
A 9 3
6 5 3
12
7    9
12
A K 9 5 3 2
4 2
J 10
A 7 2

NS 4; NS 2N; EW 2; NS 2; Par +620

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 S56506.000.006-Atteberry-Tolston vs 5-Willenborg-CULLEN
4 S46203.502.501-Meyers-Staats vs 2-Wagner-Jensen
4 S46203.502.502-Latham-Day vs 4-Holm-Curry
4 S46203.502.503-RUF-Weyrick vs 6-Bradley-Sherman
4 S46203.502.505-Wulf-Dever vs 3-Snoke-Ahlrichs
3 S52000.505.504-Kehoe-Lammers vs 1-Schultz-Allread
3 S52000.505.507-Campbell-Wierwille vs 7-Burpee-Dasenbrock

Board 27
South Deals
None Vul
Q
A K 6 5 2
8 5 3
A J 7 3
A J
J 9 8 7 4
A Q J 9 4 2
N
WE
S
K 10 6 4 2
Q
K
K Q 9 5 4 2
14
13    13
0
9 8 7 5 3
10 3
10 7 6
10 8 6

EW 4N; EW 5; EW 3; EW 3; EW 3; Par −430

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 E−21005.001.002-Latham-Day vs 4-Holm-Curry
5 ×W−11005.001.003-RUF-Weyrick vs 6-Bradley-Sherman
4 E−21005.001.005-Wulf-Dever vs 3-Snoke-Ahlrichs
3 NTE44302.503.504-Kehoe-Lammers vs 1-Schultz-Allread
3 NTE44302.503.506-Atteberry-Tolston vs 5-Willenborg-CULLEN
3 NTE54600.505.501-Meyers-Staats vs 2-Wagner-Jensen
3 NTE54600.505.507-Campbell-Wierwille vs 7-Burpee-Dasenbrock

Board 28
West Deals
N-S Vul
A 7
A K 10 3 2
10 7 5 4
K 9
4 2
9 6
K Q J 8 6
A Q 7 2
N
WE
S
J 10 3
J 8 4
9 3
8 6 5 4 3
14
12    2
12
K Q 9 8 6 5
Q 7 5
A 2
J 10

NS 6N; NS 6; NS 6; NS 2; Par +1440

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 N66803.502.501-Meyers-Staats vs 2-Wagner-Jensen
4 N66803.502.502-Latham-Day vs 4-Holm-Curry
4 N66803.502.503-RUF-Weyrick vs 6-Bradley-Sherman
4 N66803.502.504-Kehoe-Lammers vs 1-Schultz-Allread
4 N66803.502.506-Atteberry-Tolston vs 5-Willenborg-CULLEN
4 N66803.502.507-Campbell-Wierwille vs 7-Burpee-Dasenbrock
3 S62300.006.005-Wulf-Dever vs 3-Snoke-Ahlrichs

Board 29
North Deals
Both Vul
10 3
Q J 8 7 4 3
Q 8
Q 7 3
A K 6
9 5 2
K J 6 4 2
9 4
N
WE
S
2
K 10 6
10 9 5 3
K J 8 6 2
7
11    7
15
Q J 9 8 7 5 4
A
A 7
A 10 5

NS 2; EW 3; EW 3; NS 1; Par −110

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 S46205.330.672-Latham-Day vs 3-Snoke-Ahlrichs
4 S46205.330.674-Kehoe-Lammers vs 7-Burpee-Dasenbrock
3 S41703.582.426-Atteberry-Tolston vs 4-Holm-Curry
3 S31401.834.173-RUF-Weyrick vs 5-Willenborg-CULLEN
2 N31401.834.175-Wulf-Dever vs 2-Wagner-Jensen
4 W−11000.085.927-Campbell-Wierwille vs 6-Bradley-Sherman

Board 30
East Deals
None Vul
K Q 7 4
A J
Q 10 7 6 5
6 3
J 9 5 2
10 9 4
8 2
Q 8 5 4
N
WE
S
10 6
K 5 3 2
A K J 9
10 7 2
12
3    11
14
A 8 3
Q 8 7 6
4 3
A K J 9

NS 3; NS 2N; NS 2; NS 3; NS 2; Par +140

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTS34004.751.254-Kehoe-Lammers vs 7-Burpee-Dasenbrock
3 NTN34004.751.256-Atteberry-Tolston vs 4-Holm-Curry
3 NTS34004.751.257-Campbell-Wierwille vs 6-Bradley-Sherman
3 NTS−1501.834.172-Latham-Day vs 3-Snoke-Ahlrichs
3 NTS−1501.834.173-RUF-Weyrick vs 5-Willenborg-CULLEN
3 NT×S−11000.085.925-Wulf-Dever vs 2-Wagner-Jensen

Board 31
South Deals
N-S Vul
J 7 5 4
K Q 9 6
K J 9
K 9
A 10 6 2
5
A Q 8 5 4
Q 8 4
N
WE
S
K 9
A J 7 2
3 2
J 10 7 6 3
13
12    9
6
Q 8 3
10 8 4 3
10 7 6
A 5 2

W 2N; EW 3; E 1N; EW 2; EW 1; NS 1; Par −120

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTW−21005.920.086-Atteberry-Tolston vs 4-Holm-Curry
1 S1804.751.255-Wulf-Dever vs 2-Wagner-Jensen
2 NTS−11003.582.427-Campbell-Wierwille vs 6-Bradley-Sherman
2 W31102.423.584-Kehoe-Lammers vs 7-Burpee-Dasenbrock
2 NTE21200.675.332-Latham-Day vs 3-Snoke-Ahlrichs
1 NTE21200.675.333-RUF-Weyrick vs 5-Willenborg-CULLEN

Board 32
West Deals
E-W Vul
A J 10 2
9 6
K J 10 4 3
9 7
K 5
A J 4 3 2
A
A 8 5 4 2
N
WE
S
9 8
K 10 8 5
Q 9 8 2
Q J 6
9
16    8
7
Q 7 6 4 3
Q 7
7 6 5
K 10 3

EW 4; W 3N; EW 4; E 2N; NS 1; Par −500: NS 4×−3

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 W41705.330.673-RUF-Weyrick vs 5-Willenborg-CULLEN
3 W41705.330.677-Campbell-Wierwille vs 6-Bradley-Sherman
4 W46202.423.582-Latham-Day vs 3-Snoke-Ahlrichs
4 W46202.423.585-Wulf-Dever vs 2-Wagner-Jensen
4 W46202.423.586-Atteberry-Tolston vs 4-Holm-Curry
4 W66800.085.924-Kehoe-Lammers vs 7-Burpee-Dasenbrock